ERRAND OF MERCY

 

How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate.

Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have “outlived their usefulness”.

Sometimes around the advent of its “Golden Age”, the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.

In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.

The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.

The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.

Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30  years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.

Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.

I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and “having outlived her usefulness”.

Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.

She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:”Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much…” I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.

In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference  for the better.

The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.

That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.

The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as “useless” and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies)  destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that “Enemy of the Church”. It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of “an Extremist Organization”. I was successful in helping that individual as well.

I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.

I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those “award winners” basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.

That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said.  I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a “LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE” by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.

Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.

This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

——

The voice of the victim of a Class VIII speaks louder than just words.

Somehow the voice of the victim has been ignored by PR artists promoting  the abuser.

Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the L

Pierre Ethier has NOT trained Trey Lotz and has NOT provided Ls materials to Trey Lotz! Pierre has NO connection with Trey!

Written by Site Admin ( The author is not Pierre Ethier)

Below is a summary of concerns raised by Karen De La Carriere in regard to the lack of proper auditor training for delivery of the Ls in the independent field. IFA / APIS did not provide me with a response and did not address their certification scheme shortcomings in the light of the issues raised below. I want to thank Karen for raising the concerns below and to thank her for taking the safety of the PCs at heart. It requires an impressive amount of dedication in studies and perfection of your own techniques to master the proper delivery of the Ls. It is even more impressive the amount of care  about the well being of the PC  that motivated auditors like Karen to master their tech.

The current situation is that untrained auditors deliver  while PR-ing their business practice with “success stories” and no case gain. On the background are their failed cases spiritually broken, hopeless and desperate. There were instances of   corrupt practices sabotaging the PC ‘s spiritual case. Those practices led to botched Ls and/or extended the delivery time cycle for practitioner’s financial profit to four or even ten times beyond the normal Ls delivery cycle. It is unethical for a trainee to use the PC as a “cash cow” while charging excessive hourly rates. For example the average standardly delivered L12 should take not more than 25 hours delivered in a week.  L11 should be delivered in a week and L10 takes 2-3 weeks.  This is based on case average statistics of over 5000 cases. A warning sign of improper processing of L12 would be if you have received it  in over 4 months period in 130 hours. The Ls are very powerful processing and are designed by LRH to be delivered on an intensive daily schedule in order to produce a successful case gain. The pricing for the Ls is recommended to be based on a flat fee for the whole completed cycle.  It is definitely NOT recommended to get one session a week and if your auditor can not accommodate you in his schedule or shortchange you with  advice  that is against your best interest, this should be a warning sign. One session a week or less on  the Ls is a violation of C/S Series #1. How trustworthy is a testimonial from an individual who is trying to promote their own business with violations of the basic auditing rules that LRH established himself. LRH has designed L11 and L12 to be delivered in about a week and L10 to be delivered in about 3 weeks.

An example of abuse comes to my mind , when a PC was forced to bare the cost of living out of town for 4 months and “completed” L12 in 130 hours paying to a junior class auditor more than what he would of paid in the Church of Scientology for a Class XII auditing.  Normally  this cycle should of taken less than  a week and in 95% of the cases takes less than 2 intensives.

I strongly believe that auditors who really care about their PCs will undergo the proper training, including internships, studies and drills as described by Karen. The independent field needs to adhere to higher standards to KSW.

December 21, 2011

Karen De La Carriere: ….[name omitted ] ….. “never had any Ls training. He certainly did not have the very complex and unique training of Class X, XI and Class XII. There is an enormous study of LRH CSed folders and special testsn to understand why LRH CSed that way. ” ….[name omitted ] ….” never came anywhere near this section of the training.”

Karen De La Carriere : “ The Ls are like a Ferrari. Most people can drive one up to 100mph but the minute you get into 150 mph, when things so wrong, they go terribly wrong. The Ls are high performance spiritual work that require expert handling by qualified Ls auditors. This requires interneships and not done by reading ‘hat write ups”.”

Karen De La Carriere : “When something goes wrong …either in a high performance vehicle or intense spiritual work ~~ the results can be catastrophic if one does not know how to recover from trouble. Lisa Mcpherson, 3 weeks after L-11 (see the image on the web of her proudly displaying her L-11 Cert and smiling) went Type III, taking off her clothes and walking naked on Fort harrison Avenue. This is an example of how badly it can backfire.”

Karen De La Carriere : “What we are discussing is an expanded range, that which can boost you so high spiritually and take you into the lofty heights of heaven can also backfire in the other direction and send you into hell.”

Karen De La Carriere: “ I will never participate in any action that does not guarantee the safety and well being of pcs. Only knowing, training and understanding the length an breadth of the procedures and their remedies can give the results LRH intended for these rundowns.”

Karen De La Carriere : “One example of how Interneships are so vital is that the AUDITING STYLE of Ls auditing is different. You have to un-do all the TRs 1-4 you have ever learned all your life and learn “TR L10 style” It is designed to impact the case differe…ntly. This needs to be drilled and drilled and drilled on video and one has to watch one’ own videos day after day, month after month til one has perfected one’s performance and til it is second nature. There is nothing in the field in current set ups that can even come near approximating Ls training. Each interneship takes MONTHS of 40 hour to 60 hours in the chair of flawless VWD sessions for graduation to be approved. But the pc is the beneficiary and is now in safe hands. The safety and guaranteed stability of the pc is the primary importance here. To hell with any other consideration than the PC and the PC’s benefit.”

The Sad Fate of Lisa McPherson

EVIL AND GREED are the motivations for public attacks on Pierre

Below I have included fresh harassment posts forwarding the CoS enemy lines based on exchanges by Aida Thomas and Trey Lotz, Both targeted to instigate attacks on Pierre by omissions.  I wish them both well! I also wish that both Aida and Trey move on with their life. They both admit in public to have been keeping track on what Pierre is doing while telling fabrications and claiming the  opposite in front of weak minded people they both manipulate to do their dirty work and bidding of viscous attacks. One example about targeted harassment is that right after publishing this note Pierre received threats by email.

Another example is that Trey Lotz below posted comments that  clearly indicate that Trey keeps track on Pierre and who Pierre has trained on the Ls as well as on Pierre’s personal activities. How is this any of Trey’s business and why Trey keeps spreading rumors about Pierre ? Simple answer is that this is Trey’s covert way to instigate attacks on Pierre and fraudulently to portray himself as the “good guy”. This is Scientology fairgame 101. Do not be mistaken about the real intentions as to why those rumors are put on public lines in places where Pierre can not respond! People need to see through it!

I have always hoped that both ( Trey and Aida) can do much better than purposefully forward the church enemy lines. I am also hoping they both  move onto greener pastures! Aida Thomas somehow feels entitled to receive a copy of Pierre’s personal notes about the Ls despite her gross out ethics and consistent attacks spreading fabrications and insults about Pierre, his family and his child. She also sent a foul language KR full of profanities and insults to Pierre wife’s non-Scientology work. Somehow after years of harassing my family, Aida still feels entitled to parasitically use Pierre’s work for her own profit.   When confronted about her own out ethics and how creepy this is , Aida keeps using brainwashed “friends” of hers to dead agent the truth. Aida’s consistent attacks on Pierre are excused with her telling that either “this was so long ago” and deceiving people portraying herself as a victim when she in actual fact is the aggressor posting insults on Pierre on ongoing basis  in various public forums. One fresh example below from February 20 , 2015. Aida’s modus operandi or or so called operational routine is to use her ” friends” or fraudulent puppet accounts to press buttons and generate hostilities on a targeted individual ( in this case Pierre). If you dare to respond to Aida, she will keep smearing and dragging your name into the mud back channel so you can’t even respond.

Trey Lotz on his site operated by spreading the ” convenient” truths and using his brainwashed PCs to viciously attack a targeted individual. Trey Lotz on his site keeps insisting to have been trained by Pierre omitting the fact that he started training and flunked. If one was a doctor and flunked on his exams , hospitals would not allow him to do surgeries. In the FreeZone however anything goes. This including Treys self promoting himself using Pierre’s name with this type of deception and deliberate omissions. One omission of Trey’s was that he was delivering the Ls without the supervision of a C/S . This is very important as some of the fixes are in the C/S materials. Trey also omits that he started training on L11 which he chronically delivered in duration of 4 months when one week is the standard and besides all technical issues he was charging more than what one would normally pay if the Ls was delivered in the Church. For the unsuspected victims let me tell you some truths: that Trey Lotz’s integrity is rather money and greed motivated as he omits to mention that he also made and agreement with Pierre to charge flat fee for the L which is 1/10 ( one tenth ) of the COS price instead of bleeding the PCs for money during his training. Trey has also taken the liberty to spread suggestive enemy lines on Pierre.

As Trey Lotz says below that Pierre has spend a lot of time compiling the materials on the Ls , then how come Trey Lotz threw under the carpet his integrity and his agreements with Pierre and feels justified to use parasitically Pierre’s personal notes for business purpose and to make profit? I view Trey Lotz as a parasite! The very same way Trey Lotz parasitically was using Pierre for free C/S-ing his numerous session and was parasitically using Pierre’s name to market his business by misleading his PCs that they were C/Sed by Pierre when they were not C/Sed at all after Trey’s refusal to correct his tech . Where was Trey’s integrity to pay a fair exchange for Pierre’s time and expenses instead of taking unfair advantage of Pierre who worked like a slave for 20 years at the Church? Trey’s own words claiming that he has a knowledge as to who is Pierre training on the Ls. This is a very interesting statement! Why would Trey Lotz track who is Pierre training and what is Trey’s obsession with Pierre’s personal affairs?

In order to silence some truths Trey Lotz PCs have viciously attacked and fairgamed Pierre  and his family. I am talking this not just spreading mere insults on the internet but legal threats on Pierre and his family, extortion , stalking and criminal harassment in partnership with the CoS ! This is to prove my point about the product of Trey Lotz – his PCs are not spiritually fulfilled stable and serene completing  L11 with Trey , but instead plotting to cause evil to family of 3 people with attempting to profit by taking the home of a disabled child and leaving 3 people homeless on the street. This is Trey’s UGLY and EVIL product!

After many years in silence I decided that from now on I will PUBLISH the information about all manipulations , attacks and constant insults!

Wall of Shame
Fairgame 1o1

Trey Lotz  busy with forwarding Church of Scientology enemy lines, fabrications to create conflicts and upsets. Below you will see how  Trey) third party Pierre behind his back.

This following is a response by Pierre Ethier which was originally published in 2012:

Do you distribute copyrighted materials?

Absolutely not, despite of rumors and innuendos from Trey Lotz and his associates.

What about delivery of the Ls in the Free Field?

Rumors and innuendos from Trey Lotz, Perry Sheppard and their associates, using Pierre’s name as a reference and fraudulently claiming that Pierre has trained them to deliver the Ls are untrue. 

The Ls are designed to be delivered by Flag trained Class XIIs. There is a huge difference between a Flag trained auditor and a field auditor. Below is a Quote by Karen De La Carierre , Class XII C/S: 

“I soon discovered that a “Field Class VIII” did not mean a Flag Class VIII. And so I re-did all my internships and then trained up to Class XII…”

Rumors that Pierre has trained Trey Lotz to deliver the Ls are also untrue.  Pierre did attempt to train Trey Lotz on L11 , Trey committed gross auditing errors , refused correction and never sent a video for evaluation, yet made many unreasonable demands. Trey Lotz never attested nor completed Ls training with Pierre. Trey Lotz is a field auditor, never worked in an advanced organization and has mostly experience auditing the Lower Bridge . It is a well known fact that as a field auditor Trey was forbidden per Church Policy to audit any Upper Level Rundowns and OT Levels. He lacked the discipline  and the training to audit under the supervision of a C/S and lacked experience  to address the complexity of the Upper Bridge . There is vital information for the Ls in the C/S materials and for an auditor with no experience in the Upper Bridge to deliver the Ls without a C/S is reckless. In addition many of the  references related to the Ls are in the Class X , Class XI and Class XII materials and Trey is only Class VIII. When Trey Lotz promotes 40 000 hours on the chair , this means that his experience is overwhelmingly  in the Lower Bridge, which is not as complex as the Upper Bridge. L11 was designed by LRH to be delivered in a week , however Trey Lotz was chronically delivering it on numerous occasions in a duration of 4 months. This information is also broadly documented on the internet in various public releases by Trey’s PCs. Additional out tech was present in Trey’s delivery andPierre wish NO association with Trey Lotz.

A number of Trey Lotz PCs have viciously attacked Pierre and his family on Trey’s behalf , this including attacking Pierre’s child due to his disability or making  other vicious and cruel threats. The very same Trey’s PCs also carried out vast smear campaigns about Pierre and claimed to have  made fraudulent reports to the Church and various government agencies . A PC of Trey claims to have partnered with the Church in attacking Pierre to uphold Trey’s financial interests , claimed to have paid $30 000 to investigate Pierre in order to ruin his auditing practice and take Pierre’s home with intention of unfairly profiting and putting his disabled child homeless. The very same Trey’s PC published on the internet Pierre’s bank account and other clearly private information like phone numbers. Her  invitation  to harass Pierre. This was an organized effort of associates of Trey Lotz in a partnership with the Church to silence and dead agent Pierre in order prevent him from spiritual progress. This evil plot eventually fired back on the conspirators.   Such a behavior is practically shameless and  it is sad to see such  EVIL outcome has been produced by a practitioner out ofGREED! EVIL is a poor product! We hope that one day the above people will realize that seeking to destroy people of good will (like Pierre) is NOT the road to spiritual enlightenment. This also applies to their enablers and associates. In all cases these PCs were prized and socially rewarded  by Trey Lotz despite of their EVIL  behavior seeking to destroy a person of good will. Good people who had voiced private concerns directly to Trey Lotz , had been also threatened and harassed by the very same PCs.

 Trey Lotz NEVER made any advanced payments to Pierre to book or schedule his time and to cover Pierre’s time and expenses with a fair exchange . Rumors and innuendos from Trey Lotz and his associates in that regard are also untrue.  Pierre who spent 20 years in the Sea Org at almost no pay , had covered out of his own pocket many advanced and initial expenses , as well as ongoing expenses related Trey, who had spent his time as a field auditor at the rate of  around $160 000/ year. (based on Trey’s own reports to IRS  for tax exemption 2004 ,2009 , other– not paying taxes for paid services is an operation set up to function like the Church- merely mentioning the facts here! Also  based on Trey Lotz own boosting to have delivered 4000 hours of Ls auditing which amounts to 2500 hours in the last two years or $250 000 per year just from the Ls where around $100 000/year seem to have been unreported to IRS) In one year period alone Pierre provided to Trey in excess of 300 hours unpaid services. Despite that fact Trey went ahead with to spread rumors about Pierre and had the arrogance to insist that Pierre have to serve his practice as a slave ( at NO PAY!).

Pierre Ethier also had NO knowledge and has NO association with the intimidating “agreement” used by Trey Lotz on his Preclears , where Preclears seem to have been asked to contract themselves out of legal rights. ( Link to the document as published by Trey’s PCs) . Pierre Ethier does NOT approve practices based on intimidation and disprove this supressive document that could potentially prevent a Preclear from spiritual gains.  .

Below is a quote by LRH that explains that the Upper Bridge should not be misused. This applies for the Ls , OT Levels , Flag Only Rundowns, NOTs and other Upper Bridge actions.

“The lower levels of Scientology are quite innocent. Only the upper grades could be harmful if misused and these are only placed in the hands of experts” L. Ron Hubbard in “ Is Scientology Dangerous”

.

What about the role of the Case Supervisor ( C/S) in upper level rundowns?

Field auditors affiliated with the Corporate Church of Scientology deliver auditing up to Clear and typically have NO EXPERIENCE in delivering upper levels. Field auditors refer their PC to the Orgs for 15% FSM commission which they receive for services purchased by the PC from the Church. A field auditor usually comes out in the free field with no experience auditing beyond Clear and lacks the discipline to audit under C/S..

Flag only rundowns (which Pierre studied and delivered – e.g. Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive ) address variety of handlings like money and spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other. The Ls , Flag Only Rundowns [Delivered at Flag Only] , NOTs [Delivered only in Advanced Organizations / Sea Orgs] , Power and Superpower require advanced auditor skills and trained C/S. The above rundowns should not be delivered without the supervision of a trained C/S. C/S training is required as some of the handlings are in the C/S materials. The authentic Flag Only Rundowns materials have not been released in the Free Field

The C/S series came out in 1970-es. Any claims that one has been trained as a C/S before that are untrue! “Dishonesty cuts persons reach” and fraudulent claims are only motivated by GREED. One must be pretty desperate to lie and deliberately mislead about their training and attests.

Short response to Marty Rathbun and Mark Rinder or are you both (Rathbun and Rinder) calling David Mayo a liar?- written by Catherine Ethier (Re: OT VIII and above)

Good morning Gentleman,

I am not going to engage myself with personal insults and profanities as you do. Your own past deeds speak for themselves. I also mean no disrespect! What I want to address is your offensive language showing poor taste and the personal attacks in the exert below. We also wish NO part of your rude exchanges!

I also want to make a side mention about the quality of the influencing crowd spreading rumors  and “opinions”  about Pierre on your blogs – one is a “FreeZoner” who Mark Rathbun is often praising on his blog as a close friend and who funnels money to him. The very same individual has made a considerable attempt to take the roof over the head of my disabled teenage child and attempted an intimidation extortion scheme in order to profit by trying to get my family homeless. This out of GREED. Speaks volumes! 

One lesson for everyone else: ” Carefully choose your people and your sources!”

Below is an audio tape by David Mayo who talks about LRH developing the OT levels above OT VIII. This with Maoy’s words directly addresses your (Rathbun’s and Rinder’s) claims. David Mayo worked close to LRH and saw the upper levels, so I would say that Maoy’s words are first hand knowledge. You both inclusive ( Rinder and Rathbun) were  NEVER close to LRH , so whatever you say would be at best “a hear say” . True enough you were both close to David Miscavige. In addition it seems that you both (Rinder and Rathbun) do not believe that you can evolve to treat others  with respect and kindness, so to engage in civilized dialogue without insults, I do not see the reason why are you are looking for the advanced levels, perhaps they are NOT for you.  Perhaps you want to call David Mayo a lair for saying that he saw OT IX and above  and you have directly labeled as “self importance”  the fact that Pierre has chosen to believe David Mayo’s first hand knowledge instead of your “hear say “rumors. Below is an audio record of  David Mayo’s own words:“LRH continue researching the levels above that and eventually completed through what’s called OT XI” What do you have to say about that ? There must be a real good reason why one (referring to Rathbun and Rinder) is willfully “blind” to the obvious and unwilling to engage in civilized conversation but instead resorts in one sided personal attacks! I was led to believe that real OTs are skillful in communication in which you both ( Rathbun and Rinder) had proven  disappointing deficiency by expressing juvenile labels and engaging in undeserved personal attacks. Apparently the constructive communication ability is seriously lacking. ( My 2 cents! written By Catherine Ethier)

David Mayo says 3:15 – “LRH continue researching the levels above that and eventually completed through what’s called OT XI”

“David Mayo was the senior spiritual technical person who L. Ron Hubbard initially entrusted to oversee the whole Scientology spiritual practice legacy in 1982, when the aging Hubbard realized he didn’t have many years left. Mayo’s title was the Senior Case Supervisor International. Mayo fell from grace just months after the April 1982 20 page despatch from Hubbard where Hubbard detailed to Mayo what Hubbard wanted. This talk discusses that 20 page despatch and other relavant events. This talk is one of several dozen talks recorded of David Mayo speaking in 1983 or 1984 at the center in Santa Barbara where David’s group of ex official Scientologists were based. Mayo’s Scientology splinter group probably formed the largest and most skilled schism group of ex official Scientologists in the history of the Scientology movement, and from these tapes of Mayo’s group’s informal weekly graduation ceremonies, it can be heard that his schism group’s offered services were almost the same services official Scientology delivers, with just different names. Mayo’s group operated within a milder atmosphere, minus the harsher atmosphere of official Scientology. Mayo’s Santa Barbara group was hit with suits and infiltration by official Scientologists and the Mayo group fell apart within a few years. But while it was operating, Mayo’s group constituded the largest schism group in the Scientology movement’s 60 or so years of history so far.
– Chuck Beatty, ex Scientology (Sea Org) staffer 1975-2003“

Other sources about the upper OT Levels you can find here:

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/ot-viii-and-beyond/

 In response foul language at

“Curiosus | January 19, 2013 at 10:49 am | Reply

According to Pierre Ethier, Hubbard actually developed OT 9 to 15 aboard the Apollo. Class XII auditors have been shown these materials. The Ls are fragments of these levels.

Could another class XII confirm?
martyrathbun09 ( Marty Rathbun) | January 19, 2013 at 1:29 pm | Reply

Bull.
mrinder ( Mark Rinder) | January 19, 2013 at 3:26 pm | Reply

Pierre seems to have a self-importance button about having a hidden data line. Being a “Class XII” doesnt make you an authority any more than being an “OT VIII” does, or for that matter a Patron Meritorious with knobs on.

Its been 27 years since LRH’s passing. IF there really were OT levels beyond OT VIII they would have been released by now…. You can only “go on hoping” for so long before you have to conclude that whatever stories you may have heard just are not true.

There are people who post on this blog (RussW and DanK) who worked in RTRC — the technical compilation unit responsible for taking all the notes and ideas that LRH had and turning them into issued format. They have a much higher likelihood of knowing about the supposed “further OT levels” than Pierre or anyone else.

Sooner or later you just have to confront reality. They don’t exist. It’s an empirical FACT. Rumor, stories, hearsay, hidden data, wishful thinking — none of them create reality. And the reality is, there are no OT levels above OT VIII. If they did exist, Miscavige would have issued them LONG before now to keep sucking the bucks out of the biggest cash cows….

Of course, you can pretend they DO exist and are just hidden from view somewhere, waiting for the appropriate time for release. But confronting the physical universe reality — they do not exist. Nobody can show them to you. They are like the Abominable Snowman. Some people will just keep believing it exists, I guess forever. And there isn’t really much you can do about it as it’s pretty hard to prove something DOESNT exist because it COULD be somewhere out of sight. But if nobody sees it for 25 years or 50 years or 100 years — it’s a pretty safe bet that it doesnt exist.

Wake up and smell the coffee…”

——

Quote: “Sometime people around you won’t understand your journey. They do not need to. It is not for them!”

Perhaps the OT journey is not for you!

WARNING

Pierre Ethier has NOT trained Trey Lotz and has NOT provided Ls materials to Trey Lotz! Pierre has NO connection with Trey!

Note from admin

Pierre Ethier does not endorse any groups , associations and independent auditors. Pierre Ethier DOES NOT endorse the delivery of the Ls by other auditors or trainees. Please be warned that there were multiple instances when auditors have been fraudulently claiming that Pierre Ethier is C/S-ing their practice and on few occasions have been fraudulently charging the PC under a false pretence.

Pierre Ethier DOES NOT endorse the delivery of the Ls by other auditors or trainees, this specifically apply to TREY LOTZ whom Pierre Ethier never actually trained on L12 nor L10 after too many flubs,and insisting on auditing pcs that were clearly not setup, (ignoring FLUNKS and explicit interdiction from Pierre as the C/S), in addition to Trey refusal to correct on L11 and on chronically missing witholds on his pcs. Trey Lotz has NOT completed & attested training and is NOT certified by Pierre Ethier to deliver the Ls . According to Trey Lotz he informed his public that Pierre is not C/Sing for him. Karen de La Carriere has confirmed that she has never C/Sed for Trey Lotz nor trained him on the Ls. She has not provided him any Ls materials either.

Pierre Ethier does not engage in the distribution of copyrighted materials, despite of roomers and innuendos from Trey Lotz and his associates.

Related link.

——-

Field auditors affiliated with the Corporate Church of Scientology deliver auditing up to Clear and typically have NO EXPERIENCE in delivering upper levels .Field auditors refer their PC to the Orgs for 15% FSM commission which they receive for services purchased by the PC from the Church. A field auditor usually comes out in the free field with no experience auditing beyond Clear and lacks the discipline to audit under C/S..

Flag only rundowns (which Pierre studied and delivered – e.g. Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive ) address variety of handlings like money and spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other. The Ls , Flag Only Rundowns [Delivered at Flag Only] , NOTs [Delivered only in Advanced Organizations / Sea Orgs] , Power and Superpower require advanced auditor skills and trained C/S. The above rundowns should not be delivered without the supervision of a trained C/S. C/S training is required as some of the handlings are in the C/S materials. The authentic Flag Only Rundowns materials have not been released in the Free Field.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do you still audit?

Pierre Ethier  is supporting an exclusive and limited circle of public, who maintain ethical standards and are dedicated to standard tech and spiritual advancement. Pierre does not support other practices and discourage mixing practices. Pierre accepts new public only after a case assessment.

Pierre makes any recommendations and discuss further arrangements only after a thorough case assessment with the one who have shown to be truly dedicated to spiritual advancement . 

Can you share the list of the trained Class XIIs?

Below is the list of the trained Class XII.  There are fraudulent claims by people who have not been trained or have not attested.  The names of the auditors personally trained by LRH are well documented in the Apollo Crew List and other documents. The original 8 Class XIIs that were trained by LRH are listed in the following link:

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/list-of-the-original-8-lrh-trained-class-xii-s/

The list of all Class XIIs that were ever made was compiled in 1998:

http://community.freezone-tech.info/pierre-ethier/pierre-ethier/complete-list-of-all-class-xii-auditors-ever-made/

Do you travel to provide onsite auditing?

Pierre Ethier no longer travels, his time currently is predominantly dedicated to research. His travels are related only to completion of ongoing cycles.

Can you recommend auditors in my area?

It has proven that in order to recommend an auditor Pierre has to consistently oversee his/hers practice , training and ethical standards. On other hand for every Preclear there are case specific requirements that have to be addressed. Some auditors who are good auditing the lower bridge , might lack training on the upper bridge. For the above reasons any recommendations can be done only after a thorough assessment of the  auditor and additional case assessment of the Preclear , along with consistent Case Supervision.

I am in a need of repair due to bad auditing. Any recommendations?

Often this kind of situation is related to some sort of ethics situation. On one hand the poor choice of auditor shows  low perceptions. It was your responsibility to choose wisely and verify your auditor’s claims and credentials versus actual objective outcomes of his practice. (Reference: Dishonesty cuts persons reach HCO Bulletin 1 May 1985 “Honesty and Case Gain”:

 https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/dishonesty-cuts-persons-reach/) .

You will have to deal with your personal ethics in order improve your ability to make wise decisions. On other hand auditors that mislead or defraud about  their credentials are out ethics. One example is the delivery of the Ls. Most of the fixes for the Ls are in the C/S materials. This is why the role of the C/S is vital and auditor needs advanced training that has been typically provided at Flag.

I was getting auditing in the Church. I am considering auditing in the Free field. Would I be able to get my folders?

This is a question that you should be directing to the Church.

Do you respond anonymous correspondence?

No. Anonymous exchange is an indication of some sort of ethics situation. Perhaps you should consider resolving it first.

Do you provide assistance with requests for refunds from the Church of Scientology?

No. 

Do you distribute copyrighted materials?

Absolutely not, despite of rumors and innuendos from Trey Lotz and his associates.

What about delivery of the Ls in the Free Field?

The Ls are designed to be delivered by Flag trained Class XIIs. There is a huge difference between a Flag trained auditor and a field auditor. Below is a Quote by Karen De La Carierre , Class XII C/S: 

“I soon discovered that a “Field Class VIII” did not mean a Flag Class VIII. And so I re-did all my internships and then trained up to Class XII…”

Rumors that Pierre has trained Trey Lotz to deliver the Ls are also untrue.  Pierre did attempt to train Trey Lotz on L11 , Trey committed gross auditing errors , refused correction and never sent a video for evaluation, yet made many unreasonable demands. Trey Lotz never attested nor completed Ls training with Pierre. Trey Lotz is a field auditor, never worked in an advanced organization and has mostly experience auditing the Lower Bridge . It is a well known fact that as a field auditor Trey was forbidden per Church Policy to audit any Upper Level Rundowns and OT Levels. He lacked the discipline  and the training to audit under the supervision of a C/S and lacked experience  to address the complexity of the Upper Bridge . There is vital information for the Ls in the C/S materials and for an auditor with no experience in the Upper Bridge to deliver the Ls without a C/S is reckless. In addition many of the  references related to the Ls are in the Class X , Class XI and Class XII materials and Trey is only Class VIII. When Trey Lotz promotes 40 000 hours on the chair , this means that his experience is overwhelmingly  in the Lower Bridge, which is not as complex as the Upper Bridge. L11 was designed by LRH to be delivered in a week , however Trey Lotz was chronically delivering it on numerous occasions in a duration of 4 months. This information is also broadly documented on the internet in various public releases by Trey’s PCs. Additional out tech was present in Trey’s delivery and Pierre wish NO association with Trey Lotz.

A number of Trey Lotz PCs have viciously attacked Pierre and his family on Trey’s behalf , this including attacking Pierre’s child due to his disability or making  other vicious and cruel threats. The very same Trey’s PCs also carried out vast smear campaigns about Pierre and claimed to have  made fraudulent reports to the Church and various government agencies . A PC of Trey claims to have partnered with the Church in attacking Pierre to uphold Trey’s financial interests , claimed to have paid $30 000 to investigate Pierre in order to ruin his auditing practice and take Pierre’s home with intention of unfairly profiting and putting his disabled child homeless, published on the internet Pierre’s bank account and private phone numbers with an invitation  to harass Pierre. This was an organized effort of associates of Trey Lotz in a partnership with the Church to silence and dead agent Pierre in order prevent him from auditing. This evil plot eventually fired back on them.   Such a behavior is practically shameless and  it is sad to see such  EVIL outcome has been produced by a practitioner out of GREED. EVIL is a poor product! We hope that one day the above people will realize that seeking to destroy people of good will (like Pierre) is NOT the road to spiritual enlightenment. This also applies to their enablers and associates. In all cases these PCs were prized and socially rewarded  by Trey Lotz despite of their EVIL  behavior seeking to destroy a person of good will. Good people who had voiced private concerns directly to Trey Lotz , had been also threatened by the very same PCs.

 Trey Lotz NEVER made any advanced payments to Pierre to book or schedule his time and to cover Pierre’s time and expenses with a fair exchange . Rumors and innuendos from Trey Lotz and his associates in that regard are also untrue.  Pierre who spent 20 years in the Sea Org at almost no pay , had covered out of his own pocket many advanced and initial expenses , as well as ongoing expenses related Trey, who had spent his time as a field auditor at the rate of  around $160 000/ year. (based on Trey’s own reports to IRS  for tax exemption 2004 ,2001 – this is exactly like the Church- merely mentioning the facts here! Also  based on Trey Lotz own boosting to have delivered 4000 hours of Ls auditing which amounts to 2500 hours in the last two years or $250 000 per year just from the Ls where around $100 000/year seem to have been unreported to IRS) In one year period alone Pierre provided to Trey in excess of 300 hours unpaid services. 

Below is a quote by LRH that explains that the Upper Bridge should not be misused. This applies for the Ls , OT Levels , Flag Only Rundowns, NOTs and other Upper Bridge actions.

“The lower levels of Scientology are quite innocent. Only the upper grades could be harmful if misused and these are only placed in the hands of experts” L. Ron Hubbard in “ Is Scientology Dangerous”

.

———-

Related:

 https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/warning/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/flag-trained-auditors/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/flag-only-rundowns-mastered-by-flag-auditors-only/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/why-interships-are-so-vital-for-the-auditor-delivering-the-ls/

All information contained, written and/or supplied shall be deemed to be without prejudice and is intended only for general education use.

Click here for a summary of concerns about delivery of the Ls in the FreeZone/ Independent field by Karen De La Carriere

Other related articles:

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/vital-information-about-the-ls-rundowns/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/programs/why-interships-are-so-vital-for-the-auditor-delivering-the-ls/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/articles/the-sad-fate-of-lisa-mcpherson/

Overpriced Church Services in the Church promo:

1994 Church of Scientology price list for services

RTC publication found on google search:

2002 Church of Scientology price list for the Ls

Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the Ls

Below is a summary of concerns raised by Karen De La Carriere in regard to the lack of proper auditor training for delivery of the Ls in the independent field. I want to thank Karen for raising this concern and taking the safety of the PCs at heart.

I strongly believe that auditors who really care about their PCs will undergo the proper training, including internships, studies and drills as described by Karen. The independent field needs to adhere to higher standards.

December 21, 2011

Karen De La Carriere: ….[name omitted ] ….. “never had any Ls training. He certainly did not have the very complex and unique training of Class X, XI and Class XII. There is an enormous study of LRH CSed folders and special testsn to understand why LRH CSed that way. ” ….[name omitted ] ….” never came anywhere near this section of the training.”

Karen De La Carriere : “ The Ls are like a Ferrari. Most people can drive one up to 100mph but the minute you get into 150 mph, when things so wrong, they go terribly wrong. The Ls are high performance spiritual work that require expert handling by qualified Ls auditors. This requires interneships and not done by reading ‘hat write ups”.”

Karen De La Carriere : “When something goes wrong …either in a high performance vehicle or intense spiritual work ~~ the results can be catastrophic if one does not know how to recover from trouble. Lisa Mcpherson, 3 weeks after L-11 (see the image on the web o…f her proudly displaying her L-11 Cert and smiling) went Type III, taking off her clothes and walking naked on Fort harrison Avenue. This is an example of how badly it can backfire.”

Karen De La Carriere : “What we are discussing is an expanded range, that which can boost you so high spiritually and take you into the lofty heights of heaven can also backfire in the other direction and send you into hell.”

Karen De La Carriere: “ I will never participate in any action that does not guarantee the safety and well being of pcs. Only knowing, training and understanding the length an breadth of the procedures and their remedies can give the results LRH intended for these rundowns.”

Karen De La Carriere : “One example of how Interneships are so vital is that the AUDITING STYLE of Ls auditing is different. You have to un-do all the TRs 1-4 you have ever learned all your life and learn “TR L10 style” It is designed to impact the case differe…ntly. This needs to be drilled and drilled and drilled on video and one has to watch one’ own videos day after day, month after month til one has perfected one’s performance and til it is second nature. There is nothing in the field in current set ups that can even come near approximating Ls training. Each interneship takes MONTHS of 40 hour to 60 hours in the chair of flawless VWD sessions for graduation to be approved. But the pc is the beneficiary and is now in safe hands. The safety and guaranteed stability of the pc is the primary importance here. To hell with any other consideration than the PC and the PC’s benefit.”

The Sad Fate of Lisa McPherson

 

Lisa McPherson

If the full Lisa McPherson story can teach us something, it is not so much what can happen if someone applies a Technology harmfully, but rather what happens when a group of otherwise well-meaning people becomes the adverse effect of a self-appointed Elite whose goal has solely become to maintain their Power through Terror.

SYNOPSIS

I have limited my study of the McPherson case to first hand reports, namely from Interviews and Hearings conducted by the Florida State Attorneys, subpoenaed records and “daily watch reports” that are publicly available. I have read them in their entirety.

The most crucial piece of evidence (Lisa’s Pc’s folders) is lacking due to having been reportedly “lost”. If Lisa’s folders had indeed been lost in what turns out to be one of the most high profile case in the entire Church History, RTC would have ordered a literal army of Sea Org members and even public to work around the clock for an entire week, if needed. Such a loss would have never been accepted if RTC had been at the unwilling end of it. Therefore the fact that Lisa’s folder loss was anything but deliberate and calculated is by far the most plausible explanation.
While I have not been involved with that case nor possess any first hand knowledge of what took place on her last day, my thorough knowledge of Scientology Technology and Procedures and great familiarity with that type of case condition (which I have been called dozens of times to handle personally as one of the very few experienced Introspection Rundown Specialists on the planet), allows me to make a surprising number of conclusions with the data that is available. Further I know all technical personnel involved very well.

THE “WHO” (according to RTC)

Only a Class XII is fully capable of grasping the irony of Web sites dedicated to Lisa McPherson showing her holding her L-11 Certificate signed by Peter Buttery and by David Gellie.

In Scientologese, the Who is the Individual or individuals found to be responsible for any situation adversely affecting the Church.

The unfortunate individuals found to be the who by RTC were both Class XIIs, who C/Sed and audited Lisa through her “L-11 completion” , a mere 3 weeks before her Psychotic Break, They were promptly ordered “PERMANENTLY OFF Tech Lines” by RTC. They are currently working, the former as a janitor, the later as a Bus Driver and are explicitly forbidden to be transferred out of their menial jobs unless so ordered by RTC. “They may never hold a Technical Post again”

It is said that in a confidential Memo a Senior Management individual stated: “They caused Lisa McPherson to die, so they deserve the same fate as Auditors.” So they are considered “dead” as Auditors and as long as they pledge allegiance to the Mother Church they will be forbidden to ever audit again. Their long tracks of several decades of dedicated service and Technical accomplishments, some of it directly under LRH, was according to RTC, the only thing that prevent their savage expulsion, prosecution or an imaginative way to degrade and humiliate them further THE “HOW”

The irony of Lisa holding her L11 Certificate, all smiling is that L11 was originally designed to resolve and prevent the very condition she soon after fell in, This can only be fully appreciated by someone who has done the Class XI course.

Shortly after completing L11, Lisa was put on a lengthy O/W write up that went on for weeks, and without getting any corrective sessions in spite of her bad indicators increasing.
O/W write-ups are a routinely short term action to be done as part of a condition handling. One spends hours writing O/W Write-ups, not days or weeks.
Making someone spend weeks on it, is merely an invitation for the pc to chew on bank and to Introvert, as the individual is continually made to look inwards at his guilt feelings without any direction or guidance. Severe Introversion and feelings of guilt is very evident in her write up.
It used to be routine to send a person to the examiner after each O/W write-up, to ensure they feel good. This apparently is no longer being done at Flag. Apparently the deep guilt someone or introversion someone may feel after a mishandled or overrun O/W write is no longer a concern in COS any longer, but on the contrary, expected to occur.
Unfortunately such offbeat Ethics Handlings (which are actually not part of Scientology technology, contrarily to the teachings of RTC who claim otherwise) have become common place in the current COS. These are not the product of LRH tech, but are solely RTC own brand of Tech alteration, based on the case Manifestations of its promoters and their frantic desire to maintain their power.. (It is a technical fact that people will instinctively seek to program others for the very action that they themselves need).
The Current Bridge as currently promoted by RTC has degenerated in nothing else than a Huge and Monstrous Grade 2 (Overt and Withold Technology) where Dianetics, Clear and OT levels has become mere interruptions and side-trips on the overall program.

TECHNICAL DATA

According to Scientology Technology, an illness (covered in the Assist Bulletins) or even a psychotic Break (covered in the Introspection Rundown Bulletin are both preceded by a “predisposition” and a “precipitation”.
A predisposition is defined as a susceptibility or propensity for something. It is what makes the mind liable or likely to be affected by some particular thing. Being tired, living in an invalidative environment, recent flagrant auditing errors, are examples of predisposition By precipitation is meant the occurrence of an incident where what was being predisposed now comes to fruition.

In the case of an illness it is generally the incident that brings about the infection. In the case of a psychotic break, it is the moment of introversion where the person actually looses control.
One sees this type of phenomenon in the expression: “The straw that broke the camel back”.
Adding straws, one after the other is the predisposition. The actual straw that breaks the camel’s back is the precipitation.
In the case of Lisa McPherson, it looks like a virtual certainty for all available data that L-11 was the predisposition. L11 is designed to resolve and even prevent the very condition in which she sank! In addition there are a number of originations that are telltale signs of specific unflat L11 steps . During the early days of her “non-sequitur talk”: she was in actual fact talking directly out of restimulated and unflat L11 steps. This is an expected phenomenon. It is possible for the well trained individual to sieve through the apparent babble of natter, screams or “non-sequitur talk” to track down the root cause of the condition.
It is actually the first step done by an auditor in the introspection rundown. By making the “correct indication”, it is entirely possible, as I have done it dozens of times, to miraculously turn off the insane babble and restore, at least temporarily and slightly sanity to the individual.
The offbeat O/W Write up was the precipitation. This is completely obvious from a number of her comments and actions.
In the actual psychotic Break Episode, she says he needs help. She should have been red tagged right then and there, as she obviously had immediate BPC on her current action (O/W write ups and most likely others as well) By going through her pc folders and recent reports and write up, an indication should have been made to her. This should have been made within hours of the Psychotic Break, not days later. This was never done.

A BOTCHED L-11 RUNDOWN

If a trained Class XII examines some of her “early non-sense” he can actually see that it actually makes perfect sense and give vital clue as to what is wrong, even though she didn’t know it.

1. On the 18th (the psychotic Break episode), she says she needs help
2. Once in isolation she says the following things (meaningless babble to the average person, but extremely meaningful a Class XI auditor in the light of the fact she only recently did L-11)

“I created time 3 billion years ago and now I am dramatizing it since than.”
This is a Clear indication of a specific unflat L-11 step meant to handle the key dramatization on the whole track in a case.
“I am LRH and I didn’t confront it because I didn’t confront that power.”
This is an identity or valence problem, a typical sign of a list error on L-11 as some lists will give exact valences. There is an unblown Valence/Identity.
Her statement: “I can’t confront force. I am dramatizing it.”
More signs of Unflat L-11 which is meant to handle the key aberration on a case.
“I was 1.1. What my chronic tone level is.”
This is a Clear sign of introversion, and guilt, which became quite apparent on her O/W Write up.
“I disseminated my mother, but she didn’t get handled. As I didn’t confront force.”

Either a wrong item from L-11 or from Ethics or she is PTS to her Mother. (in which case she should have handled it
BEFORE L-11)
” I need my auditor…”
“Needing auditing is the typical manifestation of auditing error, most specifically out-lists which cause the most
case deterioration on a case.
I need to confront my mom.
PTS to her Mother (among other things).
Next report : “You have to follow the light as Light is life”.
This is a textbook Whole Track Implant description.
A Key implant on the case is one of the key steps of L-11. This is yet another indicator that her L11 was botched.

THE REAL REASON (THE “WHY”)

Sadly, RTC policy toward the prevention of disaffection and dissent has been to instill a regime of Terror.

This was originally done through assignment to the RPF and expulsion from the Church.

As time went on, cruel and long lasting cruel and humiliating punishment became the norm.

People who work at the Flag land Base and have joined the Sea Org, have typically donated all their assets to the Church and are already working in excess of 60 hours a week for little or no pay. In cases of “Down statistics” and emergencies” hours grow even longer and what little benefit one would get even becomes smaller. Deprivation of Food, sleep, and privacy, cancellation of right to meet one’s spouse or underage children are among the first penalties enforced to all group members..

Already hardened by these harsh conditions, the RPF has slowly become, through the years, in many aspects, an actual improvement over the average condition a Sea Org member, to the point that a the threat of an RPF assignment is no longer carry the weight that it once did.

RTC answer has been to remove from the group of unfortunates who work for them in a state more akin to slavery than ever prison would offer the only asset they still possess: their Dignity and their Integrity.

Dignity is removed by broad publication of unilateral findings against an individual. Whereas Scientology Policy dictates a sort of Justice Hearing or Court called a Committee of Evidence, those are very seldom done. Justice being served by pronouncing people based on evidence the individual has not be allowed to confront or dispute. In other words the Accuser, Judge, Jury and Executioner is one and the same individual or group of individuals. In RTC vision of “Justice” the Accusation, Judgement and Sentencing are now performed as a single step and in most cases no appeal is possible.

There seems to be no limit to RTC’s imagination in creating new forms of Torments calculated to degrade and debase the individual receiving their brand of Justice.

New posts with degraded titles get created and the people are assigned to it. People are forced to make public confessions eerily reminiscent of the Stalinist Purges, Marriage are ordered broken, children in actual fact become wards of Church and are raised in a manner entirely consistent with Germany’s infamous “Hitler’s Youths. of the 1930s”

Therefore the prime motivation of most staff, though none would dare admitting it, in an organization where merely having such thoughts is a punishable act, is to “AVOID DRAWING RTC’s NOTICE”.

This eerie duplication of George Orwell’ “Thought Police” comes as a result of RTC’s obsession with implementing the “False Purpose Rundown Technology” at every level and its widespread and frequent use.

A SOCIETY COMPOSED OF MINDLESS ROBOTS

The False Purpose Rundown seeks not only confessions of any “reprehensible acts”, but will demand the admission of any and all negative or critical thoughts about the Church Leadership and Policies. The idea is to nip any such disagreements in the bud, by inferring that any disagreement with the current Leadership or Policies is an Overt and that it can only exist in the presence of unrevealed “crimes” against the Church. For that purpose the word crime has been redefined in Scientology to no longer mean such things as Murder and Rape, but rather “omissions” and “failures to take all the necessary actions” that would have been required to prevent any downfall or “lowering of statistics” within the Church. The fact that in most cases, the downfalls and down statistics could only have been prevented by someone with the psychic abilities to foretell the Future as in “20/20 Hindsight” is of no concern to RTC.
To the experienced staff member the only way to salvage oneself is by “Not disagreeing” with anything and to not even form within his mind even the shadow of a Doubt.
The end result is “utter robotism”. Creative thought has become so suppressed and even “Dangerous” that individuals no longer dare making them.. LRH amply describes the characteristics of Robotism in the Expanded Dianetics Materials and a Number of other Bulletins.
People suffering from Robotism and Slaves share a lot in common. Both will avoid taking responsibility and can no longer think clearly. they can no longer confront the environment that surrounds them and they instinctively tend to ignore or “forget” their prior knowledge. They will disregard any moral choices or “common sense” but rather adhere to “safe” if unprodictive protocols. They have isolated themselves from the painful and terrifying environment by allowing circuitry to take over.
By understanding the above, one can now clearly undeerstand the actions of people who were either trained in some way in the medical field, or should have known that they should be “doing something” more.

WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE

The first thing that should have been done when the C/S and Snr C/S heard of Lisa’s psychotic reaction, would have been to do an “Folder Error Summary” of her applicable recent auditing. This would have taken at most a few hours.

Then an auditor with the correct training Level and experienced with the Introspection Rundown and L-11 should have made the right indication to Lisa McPherson, wether she could be put on the meter or not, until some type of relief took place.

When I left the in 1992, I was the only auditor fully trained in both Rundowns. It is quite likely with all auditors having been put shortly after, onto “Golden age of Tech training”, that by the time Lisa needed it, there was still no auditor qualified to do both Rundowns.

A small note in a one of the report, actually indicates the true viewpoint of all people involved. It should have been to care for the person in front of them, to truly help her.
Unfortunately the note said that that the purpose of “Watching” Lisa was to take care (or prevent) a Flap. This is the sordid true purpose that Sea Org have degenerated to.

Staff no longer wishes to Help people of make them free as their prime Purpose. Preventing flaps (Flaps are a virtual guarantee that RTC would descend on those it pronounced guilty with all the expected savagery of a sharpened guillotine) are now considered the paramount desire of Staff members.
Individuals exhibiting the symptoms described above are clearly PTS themselves.

PTS individuals make mistakes. It seems to have never dawned on RTC that by creating the dangerous environment they have, that previously flubless auditors have now lost their skills and would make major blunders in Lisa McPherson’s case.

The invention of the “Golden Age of Tech” is just another unusual solution to handle auditors who flub due to their exposure to a dangerous (suppressive) environment. De-PTSing them would have been the answer, but it would also mean loosing control.

The most easily controlled people are PTS. Robotism is merely a manifestation of PTSness.

This is no coincidence that countless battered spouses will neither complain nor leave their partner. They are utterly PTS and hence utterly controlled.

Robots are the perfect example of something that is utterly controlled.

Therefore, RTC share a far greater responsibility than David Gellie and Peter Buttery in causing Lisa’s condition. David and Peter’s error was primarily to become PTS and ignoring it. (RTC made that handling impossible).

THE OFF-BEAT TECHNOLOGY OF WATCHING

In Lisa McPherson case, a number of inept watchers are being brought one after the other into her room. Many show very little ARC for Lisa (it takes truly exceptional TRs to show genuine affinity to a person in that condition- something one cannot expect from anybody but a veteran auditor.
These watchers became a major source of disruption for Lisa. She became increasingly violent with them, and it is obvious in some reports that some of them felt animosity toward her. Of interest is that the only person with whom Lisa never became violent was the only one who showed great ARC. Paradoxically, it was the youngest and less experienced of all watchers, a 17 year old girl called Heather.
Unfortunately the concept of 8C has become perverted over the years. 8c simply means smooth and effective control.
Dianetics 55 clearly demonstrates that 8C can only really exist in the presence of ARC.
In fact it is a key component of the Two Key interacting Triangles in Scientology ARC (Affinity, Reality, Communication) and KRC (Knowledge, Responsibility, Control).
Unfortunately in the Sea Org , 8C has become all too often synonym with coerced or manipulative control, which a perversion of the term. There continual reports of doing 8C on Lisa which in this context simply means to force her to do something.
According to an early report, Lisa had trouble swallowing. As time went on, she would either refuse or reject any food.
The answer of the watchers were to force feed her (not with a syringe but with the crude medieval method of shoving it into her mouth.
A PTS Type III individual sees suppressives everywhere. How can a person in that condition react, when faced with people who attempt some sort of violence (force feeding, prevented from leaving or from pacing). The watchers soon became, as far as Lisa was concerned,active Suppressives in the present time environment. On that standpoint alone, one could not expect anything, but severe deterioration to take place.
AS far as Lisa case was concerned, New “Present Time Suppressives” had been added to her environment. and it became that much more unsafe.
LRH states that the ultimate result of Suppression is Death. Therefore from the point the coercive environment in which Lisa lived became firmly established, her fate was sealed.
It does not require a PhD in Medicine to conclude that a person who has trouble swallowing has either some disease or infection or at the very least requires immediate Medical attention. Wouldn’t any normal, or even uneducated parent seeing their child in that state, not seek instant medical attention? Even any Dog lover would have rushed his pet to the Vet if he had exhibited Lisa’s symptoms.
In addition to the disruption caused by low ARC people and a continual change of watchers (each watcher inevitably sees the watch as a penalty as she must endure significant hardship without any compensation).
Typically watchers are assigned to people who are doing lower condition and therefore are already in some form of “Robotic state” Obviously a person who holds an unrealistically long watch (16 hours will start to show impatience, lack of alertness),

This can only result in harming the person being watched.

Sleeping in the company of the psychotic is yet another form of disruption. Since one is completely vulnerable when he sleeps, the person who is deeply PTS will perceive anyone, especially a stranger as threat and a reason to remain awake. Making watchers sleep with a person in a psychotic is a complete Violation of all LRH materials on the Subject of PTS and Psychotics.

The watchers have the false data, that as long as they do not verbally talk to the person, other forms of communication is OK. This is invented Technology and is contrary to all LRH data on Psychotics.

This is based on a misunderstanding of the original bulletins that deal with the subject.
One keeps absolute silence around a person in the middle of a psychotic break episode. This is the actual incident where the psychotic break manifest itself. This is not the whole duration of the isolation period! The reason for the silence is that on a normal person the incident is a lock, but on the psychotic this incident is actually an engram and anything uttered will become part of its content and a command to be later dramatized.
In the book “The Creation of Human Ability”there is an utterly silent process. One get a pc to comply with a non verbal command.
This process is seldom run, as it is not part of any standard Rundown or grade, though I have run it on a number of people, including Flag public.
A typical manifestation occurring during the process is the person becoming upset by the auditor utter lack of verbal communication. This eventually blows off, as the process is brought to its rightful conclusion (EP).
This clearly illustrates the fact that any individual in a prolonged condition where is being denied verbal communication can find the episode to be rather unsettling.

Technically, one could argue that the “process of No Verbal Communication” is an actual New case action or process undertaken on a case which needs to complete incomplete cycles, not start new ones.
How would YOU feel, if a group of people would forcibly bring you into a poorly lighted room and would maintain utter silence in your presence, answering any verbal queries through sign language with their insincere smiles. You would most probably think that they feel you have gone mad and that you are being treated like a complete loon.

Indeed this type of actions have been used around the world to unsettle people or even make them feel crazy when they were sane, For the one who has already lost his Mind, one may put the person beyond the reach of any type of help.

If I would expect anything to occur in the presence of these factors (disruptive or indifferent watchers, artificial silence, denial of freedom of movement, it is simply the restimulation of incidents on the tracks about being confined or incarcerated (or in other words: being tapped) There many such incidents on the track. Being trapped is not only one of the key buttons of the bank, but a prolonged enforced confinement could even develop into out-Int phenomenon or restimulation The only person who keeps bringing up suggestion to do something different is Heather, a 17 year old girl. This is ignored.

EPILOGUE

The regime of terror instilled by RTC ruthless reinterpretation of Scientology Tech and Policy has created an organization of robots and automatons.
The only thing RTC has truly achieved is in recent years in gaining blind loyalty from a horde of unthinking individuals.
Even a Medically trained Doctor (Laura Arrunada) took no action on the numerous and flagrant physical ailments symptoms when they seemed completely obvious to the eye of an untrained teenager (Heather).

Most of the other “watchers” appear more concerned about their own problems and only see Lisa as a ” DEV-T (unwanted) particle”. When one realizes the impossible hours, work and demands put on those people for little or no compensation, one can actually understand their behavior, even if one doesn’t condone it.
It is not the misapplication of Scientology that killed Lisa, but rather the blatant refusal to utilize any one of many elements that forms the vast array of available technology by people who have been trained to no longer form self-determined thoughts.
Except for one person, Heather, everyone involved was more interested in pleasing RTC by “preventing a Flap” than helping the person who was begging for help in front of their very eyes.

Pierre Ethier

Class XII

 

 

Related article: Vendetta

• Black Dianetics and/or reverse processing is often done on the person in an effort to cave him/her in. Black Dianetics is used in the free field by auditors who apply processes sourced by the Church to cave in others or to produce fanatic followers. Typically those auditors never been trained to provide the specific level , lack major data from the rundowns. Their unsuspected subjects rave in euphoria but then constantly get stuck on irrelevant issues, enterbualate and get upset easily. Those kind of people become restimulated, simply unstable and easily manipulated. This is how one produce EVIL, promote EVIL and talk mostly about EVIL doing.
• When an individual continues to vocalize or write about disagreements with Black PR treatment or anything else about evil practices he/she is being subjected to, a partnership of allies will publish mean-spirited propaganda about that individual. That propaganda inevitably contains the fruits of the personal and private communication and the private life of the targeted individual directed into a smear campaign. Seldom is it done with chapter-and-verse, literal detail which could make the opressor legally accountable. Instead, it is done through a sophisticated and complex propaganda methodology. It requires the development of a dark and evil mindset to create this sort of propaganda.
•  Ralph Hilton had published an open letter as a part of a Black PR campaign to spread the enemy line around the web. Now over a five years later a crowd of stooges related to the Church are glorifying  Hilton’s full admission of having personal attitude problems , re-stimulation and acting out of EVIL. Ralph Hilton wrote: “I attacked you in return – yes it was evil purposes in restimulation and I know that I woke them up to do it.” It is very wrong to do others in. It is wrong to orchestrate attacks out of your own evil. It is even more wrong to freely advertise your evil intentions like it is something that makes you stand out with promoting your evil and appealing to manipulate the crowd of haters to join you in doing evil to others. Evil remains evil , no matter what shape and form it takes. There is no excuse for evil doing! Be aware that very sadly evil propagates to your associates and allies.

It is time to say ” Enough is Enough” of your evil!

We do not want your evil in our lives!

The Church of Scientology snooping for Tech. Reviews (Humor)

The Church of Scientology is apparently a fan of Pierre’s Technical Reviews. We have documented a recent visit from the Church groupies below:

Date: 13.07.2013

Time: 23:39:46 ( Moscow time zone)

IP: 198.77.155.102

United States

California

Los Angeles

URL visited: https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/articles/availab…

Related articles:

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/humor/

https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/humor-the-bulgarian-umbrella-for-my-juvenile-stalker/

Contributions to the site welcome

I just wanted to drop you a note and thank you for such a great website. It is truly an oasis in the madness of the Independent field for me. I hope you are doing well. I do look forward to seeing you one day soon. Flourish and prosper, my friend. You are appreciated and admired for the work you do by those of us who want real LRH Tech, not less. That said, I am working on a little idea to contribute to your site. I’ll send that idea along to you to look at. Meanwhile, lots of love and best wishes.

(signed)

Research Project

Pierre Ethier has invested large amount of resources in acquiring original audio recordings from the early years of Diantetics and Scientology (1951) , most of the materials were never published before. This large acquisition came into existence due to Pierre’s ambitious efforts to invest time and personal resources in Dianetics and Scientology Research. Also a number of fellows contributed gifts-in-kind to this research project.

We may need volunteer  help with transcribing the audio files and perform comparative analysis. I must note that all materials are acquired by legal sources.

Un-compromised personal ethics standard is a condition to participate in this project. If you want to contribute personal time and effort to this project please contact us via the  form below. Please note you will be contacted on as needed basis. Thank you for your kindness and your contributions.

More on Dianetics and Scientology Research Project

Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

We have acquired materials from several hitherto undiscovered cache. This is an acquisition of very rare, most of them one of a kind and the only copies of  unpublished technical and historical materials from the dawn of Dianetics & Scientology. The Independent field of Scientology goes back to 1951.

The official publications of the Church of Scientology give very little information about the early 1950’s. The history of Dianetics possibly begins in the 1920s. In April 1950, Hubbard and several others established the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation in Elizabeth, New Jersey to coordinate work related for the forthcoming publication of Dianetics. Hubbard wrote Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health at that time.

The success of selling Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health brought in a flood of money, which Hubbard used to establish Dianetics foundations in six major American cities.

In the early days of Scientology, Hubbard expressed a debt to other thinkers for developing Dianetics. For example, there are a number of references to Freud and Breuer in his 1950 lectures. Hubbard also initially credited U.S. Navy doctor Commander Thompson. The books Science of Survival (1951) and Scientology 8-8008 (1952) both contain acknowledgment lists. However, on 7 February 1965 Hubbard published the Policy Letter “Keeping Scientology Working“, where he said: “Our technology has not been discovered by a group. True, if the group had not supported me in many ways I could not have discovered it either.”

During 1950 demand grew for auditing facilities. Branches of the Foundation were established in Los Angeles, New York, Washington, Chicago and Honolulu. The main auditor training centres were in New Jersey and Los Angeles. Graduates of the four week course were certified as professional auditors.

In parallel with this, ‘grass-roots’ groups emerged who began training themselves and co-auditing. Some publicised their activities in the papers, some wrote to booksellers or the Foundation to make contact with others in their area interested in Dianetics. Extensive written communication took place between the groups and with the Foundation. This correspondence discussed case histories, new ideas on therapy and practice, and ideas on development of the movement. Groups started to produce their own newsletters and the Foundation produced its own journal. This included articles by Hubbard and other Foundation staff plus details of courses and books available,

There was no attempt however by the Foundation to control or structure the field groups. Auditors trained by the Foundation were left to apply their new skill how and where they wished. Some joined or led local groups, others set up as solo-practitioners.

By the autumn of 1950, financial problems had developed, and by November 1950, the six Foundations had spent around one million dollars and were more than $200,000 in debt. Disagreements emerged over the direction of the Dianetic Foundation’s work, and relations between the board members became strained, with several leaving, even to support causes critical of Dianetics. One example was Harvey Jackins, founder of Re-evaluation Counselling.

In January 1951, the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners instituted proceedings against the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation in Elizabeth for teaching medicine without a licence. The Foundation closed its doors, causing the proceedings to be vacated, but its creditors began to demand settlement of its outstanding debts. Don Purcell, a millionaire Dianeticist from Wichita, Kansas, offered a brief respite from bankruptcy, but the Foundation’s finances failed again in 1952.

Because of a sale of assets resulting from the bankruptcy, Hubbard no longer owned the rights to the name “Dianetics”,but its philosophical framework still provided the seed for Scientology to grow. Scientologists refer to the book Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health as “Book One.”

More information about Dianetics early years:

 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/townsend/5.htm

———

As you all know for many years Pierre Ethier has given free advice, interpretation and references on various standard tech. matters for the personal benefits and advancement of countless Scientologists. On many occasions Pierre had provided free C/Sing and free Programming. Thus donating his time , effort and expertise solely to help others advance.

Pierre has been compiling a Scientology Research library purchasing many rare materials in order to preserve the tech. and to use the materials for research and as a practical reference for standard processing. This project has been heavily sabotaged in the the past, however it came to produce extraordinary good results despite the counter intention and many road blocks. Now the fruits of the hard work have become evident.

Recently we have been approached by benefactors who offered some help for this project. I am happy to see that despite of the many who just want to consume resources without fair exchange, there are some kind people who  actually want to contribute and further help for the development of the Scientology Research Library by sending gifts-in-kind donating materials and monetary resources. I am happy to see that true kindness and care for others is still out there.

Thank you for your gifts-in-kind and your contributions.

True kindness is still out there.

What makes great people are the simple acts of kindness.

Have rare, historical or significant books or materials? Why not make them available for research and beyond?

Pierre Ethier welcomes gifts of materials and monetary donations for research materials from individuals or groups. All materials must be legally obtained without exception. Please contact us if you kindly want to contribute rare, historical books or other materials that you want to make available for technology research for enhancing and preserving standard tech applications. Where possible we will attempt to add the materials into our Research Library based on criteria that apply to the selection of our library materials. It is understood that gifts are freely given without conditions attached

All donations will be considered as Donations of Gifts-In-Kind. You also can make voluntary donation via PayPal.

 

Related articles

• Forthcoming Articles (pierreethierclassxii.wordpress.com)
• Diantetics and Scientology Research Project (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Scientology (underthegnome.wordpress.com)
• What Is Scientology? (livescience.com)
• Scientology has infiltrated Iranian academia (jigdood.wordpress.com)
• Exclusive: Pictured close-up for the first time, Scientology’s secret ‘alien space cathedral’ and landing pad in New Mexico desert ‘for return of followers after Armageddon on Earth’ (talesfromthelou.wordpress.com)
• Scientology postpones Flag Building dedication (bizjournals.com)
• Racist, Anti-Jew Louis Farrakhan embraces fundamentally white religion — whats not to like about cult-like absolute loyalty, using lie detector-like devices to investigate members, and employ a cadre of security officers to monitor and dominate me (onecitizenspeaking.com)
• Scientology without it’s basics (spyrosillusionist.wordpress.com)
• Scientology: From Engrams to Axioms (jeskesm.wordpress.com)

THE CRIMINAL MIND

L. Ron Hubbard in Los Angeles, California. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“THE CRIMINAL MIND

Definition: A criminal is one who is motivated by evil intentions and who has committed so many harmful overt acts that he considers such activities ordinary.

There is a datum of value in detecting overts and withholds in criminal individuals:

THE CRIMINAL ACCUSES OTHERS OF THINGS WHICH HE HIMSELF IS DOING.”

“INDIVIDUALS WITH CRIMINAL MINDS TEND TO BAND TOGETHER SINCE THE PRESENCE OF OTHER CRIMINALS ABOUT THEM TENDS TO PROVE THEIR OWN DISTORTED IDEAS OF MAN IN GENERAL.

It is not true that where any person accuses another of a crime the accuser is always guilty of the crime or that type of crime. But it is true that when a criminal is doing the accusing it is more than probable that the criminal is disclosing his own type of crime”

 

 

L. Ron Hubbard
(HCO Bulletin September 15, 1981 “THE CRIMINAL MIND” “)

Dishonesty cuts person’s reach

L. Ron Hubbard in Los Angeles, California. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

” Dishonest people have withholds, and withholds stack up mass and bring about stupidity. They cut the person’s reach and his ability to perceive. They hold in place the masses that imprison and pin the being at the level of Homo sapiens— and a miserable Homo sapiens, at that! Who is such a person really fooling?

Thus, one can bar his own way up the Bridge by dishonesty.

I always feel a bit sad when I see somebody doing himself in this way. It is so pointless.

One sees this in those who, for whatever irrational reason, cling knowingly to withholds and wind up critical, nattery and generating hostility. If one finds himself feeling hounded or persecuted, he should ask himself what his condition is on the first dynamic instead of going around persuading others to do him in.

How precious, after all, are one’s dishonesties, withholds and falsities in the face of the real freedom there is to be gained?

One CAN be honest. He will find it a happier, more comfortable existence when he is.

And more important—he’ll find the route to stable case gain is now open to him.

HONESTY OPENS THE DOOR TO CASE GAIN.

That is the route to sanity. It is the route up the Bridge to OT and real freedom. With honesty, one can make it and make it all the way! “

L. Ron Hubbard
(HCO Bulletin 1 May 1985 “Honesty and Case Gain”)

——–

This is an example of someone “condemned into his own hell” ( LRH quote)  by his auditor , who does not understand that there no case gain for people who are audited over withholds:

“The stick of ethics. Lol! Were I be trying to do L’s at Flag I’d have been routed straight away to ethics and O/W write ups, sec checks, and intense pressure for “indulgences” that would have had Martin Luther spinning in his grave. And I would have walked, no run.  And I’m not including anything here about being an “SP” FZer”

Diantetics and Scientology Research Project

Pierre Ethier has spent many years in Dianetics and Scientology Research dedicated to documenting the technology research for supporting the standard tech application processing and preserving the Scientology Spiritual Technology in its powerful original. His efforts include sustaining of a full line of research materials on Dianetics and Applied Scientology in their unaltered original, including many undocumented contributions.

Currently our Research Library includes Full Runs of all major Scientology Publications as they were originally mailed:

Publications and magazines:

• Dianetic auditor bulletins ,
• Professional auditor bulletins “PABS” ,
•  Journal of Scientology ,
• Certainty ,
• Ability “Washington” ,
• Auditor ,
• Advance,
•  Source ,
• Celebrity and many others.

Other non-sectioned publications:

• The Aberree
• Dianotes
• Dianews
• ARC Light
• CADA Journals and Bulletins
• Free Spirit
• Bristol Dianetic Review and many others

Full First Editions of books and booklets from the 1950-es, both by L.Ron Hubbard and other Dianeticists and scientologist. (the list is very long).

Large quantity of original Reels to Reels from the 1950-es by both L. Ron Hubbard and his followers and dissenters, and scores of published original materials.

Have rare, historical or significant books or materials? Why not make them available for research and beyond?

Pierre Ethier welcomes gifts of materials and monetary donations for research materials from individuals or groups. All materials must be legally obtained without exception. Please contact us if you kindly want to contribute rare, historical books or other materials that you want to make available for technology research for enhancing and preserving standard tech applications. Where possible we will attempt to add the materials into our Research Library based on criteria that apply to the selection of our library materials. It is understood that gifts are freely given without conditions attached.

All donations will be considered as Donations of Gifts-In-Kind. You also can make voluntary donation via PayPal.

It is understood that gifts are freely given without conditions attached.

As you all know for many years Pierre Ethier has given free advice, interpretation and references on various standard tech. matters for the personal benefits and advancement of countless Scientologists. On many occasions Pierre had provided free C/Sing and free Programming. Thus donating his time , effort and expertise solely to help others advance.

Pierre has been compiling a Scientology Research library purchasing many rare materials in order to preserve the tech. and to use the materials for research and as a practical reference for standard processing. This project has been heavily sabotaged in the the past, however it came to produce extraordinary good results despite the counter intention and many road blocks. Now the fruits of the hard work have become evident.

Recently we have been approached by benefactors who offered some help for this project. I am happy to see that despite of the many who just want to consume resources without fair exchange, there are some kind people who  actually want to contribute and further help for the development of the Scientology Research Library by sending gifts-in-kind donating materials and monetary resources. I am happy to see that true kindness and care for others is still out there.

Thank you for your gifts-in-kind and your contributions.

True kindness is still out there.

What makes great people are the simple acts of kindness.

Related articles

• Fad and Fallacies in the Name of the Ot Levels in Scientolog (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Exclusive: Pictured close-up for the first time, Scientology’s secret ‘alien space cathedral’ and landing pad in New Mexico desert ‘for return of followers after Armageddon on Earth’ (talesfromthelou.wordpress.com)
• Happy Thanksgiving Canada (pierreethierclassxii.wordpress.com)
• Racism and Bigotry On Glosslip Radio (mulberryofficialwebsite.wordpress.com)
• Tom Cruise annoyed at trolling by Jessica White; CC Int staffers advise HIV+ person to avoid taking antiretroviral drugs (scientologycelebrity.wordpress.com)
• Will Smith’s Alleged Scientology School Closes Doors Due To Parent’s Outrage? (thebuzzcincy.com)
• Scientology case has judges debating the meaning of religion (guardian.co.uk)

FAD AND FALLACIES IN THE NAME OF THE OT LEVELS IN SCIENTOLOGY

FAD AND FALLACIES IN THE NAME OF THE OT LEVELS IN SCIENTOLOGY

The OT Levels were developed by L.Ron Hubbard after 1966, the year he first delivered the Clearing Course.

OT I through VII were released one by one between 1966 and 1971.

On June 30, 1973 L. Ron Hubbard wrote SCIENTOLOGY, CURRENT STATE OF THE SUBJECT AND MATERIALS, a bulletin where he states: “OT levels as they exist in Advanced Orgs were completed by 68.There are perhaps 15 levels above OT VII fully developed but existing only in unissued note form…”

Many people appear to have never duplicated the meaning of the phrase “UNISSUED NOTE FORM” and expect to find full Bulletins and completed write-up and compilations.

In 1969, L.Ron Hubbard issued a confidential bulletin, which is the only bulletin bearing OT VIII in the title or the distribution.

In late 1978 NOTs was released amid much fanfare and promoted by L.Ron Hubbard as the missing piece of tech necessary to prepare a case for OT VIII.

In 1981 an official Church Directive announced the naming of the OT Drug Rundown as NEW OT IV, Audited NOTs as NEW OT V, Solo NOTs course as NEW OT VI and SOLO NOTs auditing as NEW OT VII. Contrarily to FREEZONE conspiracy theories and disinformation spread by ignorant people that had no information, the Original OT LEVELS WERE NOT CANCELLED at that time. Quite on the contrary the same Executive Directive and a subsequent clarification explicitly stated that the original Levels were to be called “ORIGINAL OT…” rather than “OLD OT …” to avoid technical degrades and that they were not cancelled, but rather to be done after NOTs was completed. In 1984 at Flag, foreign students that could not enroll on the SOLO NOTS because it was not translated in their language were still doing the original OT Levels OT IV-VII. I was even called once to do a review on original OT V and VI. The year was late 1983.

Another false datum dreamed about SOLO NOTS is that “Suppressives have split NOTS and SOLO NOTs into two separate levels. The idea that SOLO NOTS is an entirely different level and to be delivered at FLAG ONLY (as the only place with the resources to deliver it standardly) comes from L. Ron Hubbard himself. Those who complain that their case is suffering from being unable to do SOLO NOTS are simply in need to have their case repaired on the level(s) they were run on, not get into a new level while still being some restimulation.

Confidential issues released in 1982 for SOLO C/Ses and AO Review auditors only clarified, based on LRH recommendation and technology that the ORIGINAL OT IV – VI, levels which primarily deal with clean exteriorization and ability to operate outside a body, were best done after NOTs, because the phenomena that NOTs address can often act as an impediment to getting the full gains possible on those original OT Levels. There is even a confidential Solo C/S ONLY bulletin about the original OT VI that list phenomena subsequently fully described in the NOTs materials, as the major obstacle to getting the OT abilities and stability promised on that level.

It is astonishing to see the number of false data being spread by people who never trained in AO Reviews (NOTs is NOT the same level as AO Reviews and there are over 100 pages of original OT III-VII materials that are not in the courses given to the students nor on the NOTS course, but only in the SOLO C/S and AO Review auditor courses. Most people spreading false data are merely spreading their own speculations based on ignorance.

Contrarily to Freezone hype and propaganda the ORIGINAL OT VII has been continuously delivered at Flag and the AOs by graduates of the AO Review auditor courses to pre-OTs on OT III and who had just completed the level whenever it was adjudicated necessary by the Solo C/S. As an example, between 1982 and 1992 (the year I left Flag) ,I delivered over 25 ORIGINAL OT VII AUDITED RUNDOWNS.(Original OT VII consist of an audited Rundown audited by an AO Review Auditor followed by a Solo step).

Just over a year ago, when I sought to correct the hype being spread by a “popular auditor” and “Freezone Authority” who was boasting about being the first to have audited that rundown since 1982, by politely pointing that I had audited over 30 of those Rundowns between 1982 and 2010, I was instantly attacked by his fanatical followers who still view as a fiend anyone hinting that their idol may be mistaken in any of his utterances.

I have even found out that the same auditor is using a bootleg version of the original OT VII. The version that auditor use is one created by the Church of Eductivism, a Scientology splinter group from the 1970s led by Jack Horner who has been branded multiple times by L.Ron Hubbard as a fiend and master of deception. On that version of OT VII, most processes were not written by L. Ron Hubbard and the approach taken to the level is radically different than the one written by L. Ron Hubbard.

It does not prevent his fanatical followers to proclaim on every roof that they view him as the pillar of standard tech in the Independent field (beside the fact that I have written 3 retrains on him for serous tech alteration and I am still awaiting compliance). Another “FREEZONE AUTHORITY” doing the same thing has built their practice on the hype of having once been trained by L. Ron Hubbard, even though they currently prefer to sell other practices ranging from UFO and Alien Channelling to Shamanism, while still pretending it is Scientology. Sadly they do it because they need the income from the clients they lure in and because those practices require little to no skill to deliver compared to expert C/Sing. The sad truth is that the auditor in question has become incredible rusty on the subject of standard tech is deeply afraid to be found out and therefore pretends to still be a master at it.

FOR THE RECORD: THE VERY FIRST ACTION OF THE ORIGINAL OT VII IS AN ASSESSMENT.

If the Original OT VII you received is not like that, then you most probably received EDUCTIVISM, not Scientology, whatever you auditor thought or may have told you.

THE OT LEVELS BEYOND OT VIII

Contrarily to the multiple statements that were made by the propaganda machine of Marty Rathbun and by his worshippers: The Original OT LEVELS above OT VIII were both created and audited by L. Ron Hubbard and do exist but, as AS STATED MULTIPLE TIMES: “only in unissued note form” These notes typically range from simple LRH session worksheets to hastily handwritten notes similar to “old cuffs” published in the 1950s.

 The truth is that Marty Rathbun was not on tech lines or overseeing them until the late 1990s. If he had been trained on the Ls rundowns, he would know that within exist three mentions by L.Ron Hubbard in the L-10 materials (two in his handwriting, one in a typed bulletin) that L-10 is based on his research and discoveries made on OT VIII to XV. L. Ron Hubbard has never been known to make deliberately false statements in tech materials. Further, I have conversed with several of the people that were responsible for the safekeeping, testing and compilation of the technology during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Each of those individuals independently stated the same thing: they had seen the folder containing the research notes on OT VIII-XV and beyond or some of its content and they confirmed the existence of those Levels. Marty Rathbun has never had conversation with those individuals and in fact they would not even give him the time of day, based on Marty’s track of supporting OSA attacks on tech defectors for well over a decade and his confessed history of physical abuse of people under his command, not to speak that he was for a number of years the right arm of a degenerate and tech basher/squirrel named David Miscavige.

I have spent hundreds of hours reconstructing those levels and have offered them to ethical individual who were technically ready for it. The results were everything that was hoped for.

Sadly a number of fanatic bashers have decided that Marty Rathbun is as infallible on technical matters just like the Pope is on matters of Catholic faith. My technical assessment of Marty Rathbun falls very short of the hypnotic faith some of his followers have in him.

One of my most virulent attackers was someone who never bothered to communicate or email me before he launched an attack by putting words in my mouth and accusing me of making statements I never had made.

The same individual professes to have abandoned belief in Scientology in favor of Buddhism, while having no problem charging large C/Sing fees for OT III, a level he apparently no longer believe in. Further, he uses the excuse of being a “Swinger” to justify his repeated attempts at getting his female public and trainees in bed with him.

Here is someone who is nowhere near ready for the next OT Levels, therefore should not have to concern himself about the availability of such.

Pierre Ethier

Class XII Auditor and C/S

Copyright © 2013 by Pierre Ethier Publications

 

 

Related articles

• Success on OTVII (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• About The Grinch & Ash who tried to steal our Christmas two years in a row (pierreethierclassxii.wordpress.com)
• Success Story (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Is Scientology the Science of Evil? (exposingsquirrel.wordpress.com)
• PC was glowing after session (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Wins on L 11 Expanded (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• About this blog (pierreethier.wordpress.com)

Debbie Cook’s email

Cher(ère) ami(e)

Je vous envoie cet email en tant qu’ami et camarade scientologue. Nous entrons dans une nouvelle année, et j’espère que 2012 sera une année de grande dissémination et d’avancée réelle sur le Pont pour tous les scientologues.

Bien que je ne sois pas dans la Sea Org à l’instant présent, j’ai servi dans la Sea Org, pendant 29 ans à Flag. J’ai passé 17 années à la tête de Flag en tant que capitaine de FSO. Je suis auditeur et C/S entraîné en Tech, et en Admin j’ai fait les cours OEC, FEBC et DSEC.

Je suis entièrement dédiée à la technologie de Dianétique et de Scientologie et à l’œuvre de LRH. J’ai vu des résultats plus spectaculaires et miraculeux les uns que les autres avec l’application des technologies de LRH, et je sais avec certitude qu’il faut se battre pour la garder pure et non altérée.

Mon mari et moi sommes en bon standing et nous ne sommes pas liés à quelqu’un qui ne l’est pas. Nous avons toujours refusé de parler aux médias, même s’ils nous ont beaucoup sollicité.

Mais j’ai de très sérieuses préoccupations quant aux outpoints de KSW que je vois imprégner la religion de Scientologie.

J’ai le plus grand respect pour les milliers de scientologues dévoués et les membres de la Sea Org. Ensemble, nous avons traversé les pires difficultés que l’on puisse imaginer et cependant nous avons réussi à avoir un impact réel sur l’environnement. Je suis fière de ce que nous avons réalisé et je sais que vous l’êtes aussi. Cependant c’est une lapalissade de dire que ce nouvel âge de « levée de fonds continuelle » vient considérablement noircir le tableau.

LRH dit dans l’HCO PL du 9 janvier 51, Un Essai sur le Management, “Ne mettez pas de rideaux entre l’organisation et le public sur quoique ce soit.” – LRH

Je m’appuie sur cette lettre de règlement, pour vous informer de certaines situations sur lesquelles nous avons besoin de faire quelque chose au sein de notre religion, au sein de notre groupe.

Les actions non couvertes dans une lettre de règlement de LRH, ou qui violent directement une lettre de règlement de LRH et de la technologie comprennent:

• Les activités extrêmes de sur-regging et de levées de fonds qui sont maintenant la priorité de presque toutes les orgs Sea Org et orgs classe V ainsi que de tous les “OT Comités” ne sont couvertes dans aucune lettre de règlement de LRH.

• Les Travailleurs acharnés membres de la Sea Org et le personnel dévoué des orgs du monde entier ne choisissent pas de faire ces actions. Pas plus que les OTs. Je suis sûr qu’ils seraient bien plus heureux s’ils pouvaient simplement faire de la dissémination directe de la Scientologie comme ils l’ont fait pendant tant d’années. Mais la vérité est que les ordres viennent des échelons les plus élevés, au sein de la structure de la Scientologie et clairement il y a beaucoup de pression pour atteindre les objectifs qui sont fixés.

• L’ IAS: L’IAS a été créé à l’insu de LRH en 1984 par Marc Yager et David Miscavige.

Cette création était supposée être fondée sur des lettres de règlement de LRH concernant le membership et le HASI (Hubbard Association of Scientologists, International).

Cependant l’IAS ne correspond en rien au système de membership décrit par LRH qui ne comprend que deux memberships (HCO PL du 22 Mars 1965 ” Current Promotion and Org Program Summary, Membership Rundown” et qui affirme:

“Il ya deux memberships …” – LRH

LRH les cite: il y a le membership international ANNUEL et estime son coût à 10 livres sterling ou 30 $ US. Il cite également un abonnement à vie qui coûte 75 $ US. Il n’y a pas d’autres memberships ou statuts approuvés ou connus pour LRH.

• Par ailleurs, les fonds de membership sont censés aller directement dans les caisses de l’org, là où la carte de membre est prise, et l’argent doit être utilisé pour la dissémination par cette org, dans cette zone. Ceci est couvert dans la lettre de règlement HCOPL du 1er sept 1965R Règlements sur les adhésions.


 ‘ Tout l’argent va dans le livre de compte HCO de la zone où l’adhésion est signée et ne compte pas dans le revenu brut (G.I.) de l’organisation, pour la semaine. L’argent des adhésions va à la dissémination.’ – LRH.

• Actuellement l’argent des adhésions est détenu en tant que réserve à Int et la somme a largement dépassé le milliard de dollars.

Seule une infime partie a été dépensée, en violation de la lettre de règlement susmentionnée.

Et sur ces sommes monumentales seule une partie des intérêts générés est utilisée pour financer des projets.

En fait, beaucoup des activités que vous voyez lors d’événements IAS ne sont pas en réalité financées par l’IAS, mais plutôt par les scientologues impliqués.

• Réfléchissez-y maintenant, combien d’annonces diffusant la Scientologie, la Dianétique ou des programmes affiliés de Scn avez-vous vu à la télé? Entendu à la radio? Vu dans les journaux? Je n’en ai pas vu un seul, à San Antonio, au Texas où je vis depuis 4 ans. San Antonio est la 7ème ville des États-Unis. Et vous, combien en avez-vous vu?

Donner plus d’argent que le montant des deux memberships mentionnés ci-dessus viole la lettre de règlement de LRH.

L’article “Ce qu’achètent vos donations” (The Auditor, le journal mensuel de la scientologie n° 51, 1970) explique clairement la façon dont l’église utilise vos donations pour les services de Dianétique et de Scientologie.

• La prochaine fois que l’on vous demande de faire un don pour autre chose qu’un service, réalisez que cela relève de la levée de fonds et exigez de voir quelque chose écrit par  L. Ron Hubbard qui montre que c’est ce qu’il attend de vous en tant que scientologue.

Nouveaux bâtiments des Orgs:

• De la même façon, LRH n’a jamais ordonné l’acquisition d’immeubles opulents ou des rénovations chic ou des meubles coûteux pour chaque org.

En fait, si vous lisez l’HCO PL du 12 Mars 75 Issue II «L’Org Idéale», qui a donné son nom à ce programme immobilier, vous verrez que dans sa description d’une Org Idéale, LRH n’a jamais demandé des bâtiments à 20 millions de dollars, ou même fait référence au chic ou au luxe des locaux des orgs.

Au lieu de cela, une Org Idéale était une Org qui délivrait des services et faisait monter les gens sur le Pont – quelque chose  qui ne fait pas partie de ce programme d’ ‘Org Idéale’.

LRH dit dans la PL qu’une Org Idéale: “devrait être propre et suffisamment attractive pour ne pas repousser son public” – LRH. C’est tout ce qu’il dit sur l’état de l’immeuble.

• En raison de cette altération de la lettre de règlement sur l’Org Idéale, la majorité des OTs, désormais appelés “ambassadeurs OT”,  passent le plus clair de leur temps dans ces activités de levée de fonds incluant «bingo», ‘dîners de pirate’,  et de nombreuses autres activités tournant uniquement autour de la levée de fonds pour récolter les multi-millions de dollars nécessaires pour financer leurs “Orgs Idéales”.

Ceci explique pourquoi, les publics de chaque org sont désormais invités à faire des dons à leur «Org Idéale» locale plutôt que de payer leurs propres services ou leur propre pont.


 LRH dit dans l’HCO PL PL Org Ethics and Tech:

“DébarrasseZ vous de tout ce qui vous détourne de la Scientologie dans votre org, débarrassez-vous des ‘distractions’, Baby-sitting, billets de tombola et autres absurdités. “


 • Pourtant, ces distractions prolifèrent car elles sont utilisées pour les levées de fonds pour satisfaire les quotas énormes exigés pour financer l’”Org Idéale”.

«Si l’org s’effondre … ne vous engagez pas dans des levées de fonds» ou « ventes de cartes postales» ni n’empruntez de l’argent.  Il suffit de faire plus de revenus avec la Scientologie.

C’est un signe de très mauvais management que de chercher des solutions extraordinaires pour le financement en dehors de la Scientologie. Cela a toujours échoué. “

«Pour les orgs comme pour les PCs, ‘Résolvez-le avec la Scientologie».

“Chaque fois que j’ai moi-même cherché à résoudre des problèmes financiers ou personnels par d’autres moyens que la Scientologie, j’ai échoué. Donc, je peux vous dire par expérience que la solvabilité des orgs réside dans plus de Scientologie, pas dans des peignes brevetés ou des barbecues pour lever des fonds.”
 HCO PL 24 Février 1964, Issue II, Org Programmation, (OEC Vol. 7, p. 930)

Le point est que les Scientologues et les OTs ont besoin d’entraîner, auditer et de disséminer de nouveaux publics – non pas de se regger les uns les autres ou d’organiser des levées de fonds internes.

Out Tech:

• Au cours des dernières années, nous avons vu des centaines et des centaines de personnes valider leur état de  Clair par le CCRD développé par LRH, à qui on annonce maintenant qu’ils ne sont pas Clairs.

Cela incluait des centaines d’OTs qui ont ensuite été mis sur NED comme «maniement». LRH interdit clairement de parcourir toute Dianétique sur les OTs dans l’HCOB « Dianétique Interdite sur les OTs».

Ceci est out Tech.

COB RTC (COB = Chairman of Board : David Miscavige) a personnellement confectionné ce “maniement” technique qui a été appliqué sur des milliers d’OTs.

Mais ce n’était pas basé sur un HCOB de LRH, mais plutôt basé sur un C/S unique de LRH, sur un PreOT qui n’avait pas atteint l’état de Clair, mais avait été néanmoins mis sur OT III et n’y arrivait pas du tout.

LRH a donné des instructions pour un maniement en solo que le PreOT a dû faire pour atteindre lui-même l’état de Clair.

Ce C/S de LRH pris hors contexte a ensuite été utilisé pour mettre en œuvre un maniement technique qui était en violation directe d’un HCOB de LRH.

• Ceci ainsi que d’autres “maniements techniques” appliqués sur les auditeurs de Solo NOTs au niveau mondial leur a occasionné de grands frais et des difficultés, car ils devaient faire ces maniements pour continuer sur le niveau.

• Puis il y a les “grades rapides à Flag” qu’aucune autre org ne délivre.

Comment se peut-il que Flag ait pu délivrer les grades différemment du reste du monde dans les 3 dernières années ?

Quel que soit le problème, le fait est que d’avoir des «Grades rapides” à Flag crée une ligne de données cachées et c’est un Haut Crime et cela fait l’objet d’une lettre de règlement entière appelée «TECH dégrade» que LRH a placé au début de chaque cours de Scientologie.

• Plus récemment, la mode semble être que presque tout le monde a besoin de «refaire son Purif et de faire un long programme d’objectifs”, dont de nombreux auditeurs solo NOTs en plein milieu du niveau.

• Il n’ya rien de mal à faire des objectifs, mais c’est une violation claire de l’HCOB  ”MÉLANGE  DES RUNDOWNS ET DES RÉPARATIONS” qu’une personne au milieu d’un rundown ou d’un niveau d’OT en soit retirée et placée sur un programme d’objectifs.

De plus les auditeurs solo NOTs doivent également recevoir leurs procédés objectifs par un auditeur classe IX, au prix des intensives de NOTs, car ils ne sont pas autorisés à la co-audition.

Flag a ainsi fait plusieurs millions de dollars grâce à ces maniements out-tech ci-dessus énumérés parce que:

Les OTs au milieu de solo NOTs sont obligés de recevoir ces actions out-tech pour être en mesure de revenir et de rester sur le niveau et le compléter. Sans oublier les effets spirituels de l’out-tech que cela a sur chaque OT.

• J’ai été moi-même sujette à ces maniements out-tech, y compris un long FPRD au milieu de solo NOTs. Cela m’a couté à bien des égards, notamment au niveau physique car j’ai développé une maladie que je dois encore combattre aujourd’hui. J’ai donc une certaine réalité des dégâts que cela a causé.

Structure de commandement de LRH

• LRH nous a laissé avec une structure de commandement complexe et équilibrée, avec nos orgs dirigées par le Bureau international de l’ED.

Ce bureau a été jugé si important que LRH a créé un groupe de management spécial appelé le Comité Watch Dog (Comité de surveillance), dont le seul but était de veiller à ce que ce bureau et les autres entités de management nécessaires existent et continuent d’exister.

La LRH ED 339R parle de cela abondamment en tant qu’outil de protection de notre Eglise.

Mais ces personnes sont portées disparues.

Et pas quelques unes seulement.

Effectivement il y a quelques années, il n’y avait pas de membres du bureau de ED Int sur poste, ainsi qu’aucun tops execs dans toute la structure de Management International.

    Vous vous êtes peut être également demandé … où est Heber, le président de l’Église?

    Qu’en est-il de Ray Mitthoff, Senior C/S International, celui à qui LRH a personnellement donné les niveaux d’OT supérieurs?

    Et de  Norman Starkey, LRH Trustee?

    Qu’est-il arrivé à Guillaume – Directeur Exécutif International?

    Et Marc Yager, le président du WDC (Watch Dog Committee)?

    Qu’est-il arrivé aux autres dirigeants du Management International que vous avez vu lors des événements au fil des ans?

La vérité…

C’est que j’ai passé des semaines à travailler dans le bâtiment vide du Management International.

Vide car tout le monde avait été retiré de poste.

Au niveau supérieur de la hiérarchie, j’ai été briefé en détail par David Miscavige, qui m’a expliqué à quel point ils étaient tous mauvais et avaient tous commis des choses très très déshonorantes.

Cela semblait «expliquer» le fait que l’intégralité du Watch Dog Committee n’existait plus.

L’intégralité de l’Executive Strata, qui se composait de ED international et 11 autres top dirigeants internationaux, chacun en charge d’un domaine particulier, n’existait plus.

Le Commodore Messenger Org international n’existait plus.

Toutes ces structures de commandement clés de la Scientologie Internationale, mises en place par LRH, avaient été enlevées.

• Il y avait des centaines et des centaines de lettres restées sans réponse et des demandes d’aide du personnel des orgs, adressées à ces 11 tops executif  de l’Exec strata (dans la  LRH ED 339R, LRH explique que chaque membre du personnel pouvait écrire à ces tops cadres pour demander de l’aide.)

• Mais si vous enlevez tout le monde de poste il n’y aura personne pour répondre et aider les staff, pour obtenir des évaluations et des programmes pour l’expansion de la scientologie.

• Eh bien, après ça, j’ai réussi à rencontrer et passer des moments de qualité avec Heber, Ray Mithoff, Norman Starkey, Guillaume, ainsi que l’intégralité du Management international de l’époque. Ils étaient tous hors poste et faisaient de très longs et très durs programmes d’éthique.

• Ces programmes ont duré des années et ont eu pour seul résultat qu’ils sont toujours hors poste. On ne peut nier que ces top dirigeants ont tous progressivement disparu du paysage scientologique. Vous ne les voyez plus dans les grands événements ou au voyage inaugural sur le navire.

• David Miscavige est maintenant devenu le «leader» de la religion de Scientologie.

• Pourtant, ce que LRH avait laissé derrière lui était une énorme structure pour manager correctement tous les aspects de la religion de Scientologie.

• Il a mis sur pied toute une structure organisée complète et brillante, pas un individu unique.

• Il n’a jamais été censé y avoir un «leader» autre que LRH lui-même en tant que créateur de buts pour notre groupe.

• Il y a là un gros problème et même si vous n’avez pas fait partie du Management International, vous devriez être capable de voir que du sur-regging et de fréquents changements technologiques ne sont pas OK et vous avez la responsabilité de faire quelque chose pour faire en sorte que la Scientologie continue à fonctionner (KSW).

• Vous devriez être capable de trouver et de lire les références sur les memberships dans le volume 6 des OEC. Trouvez et lisez la HCO PL intitulée «L’Org Idéale» (Data Series 40).

• Trouvez et lisez les références sur les bâtiments des orgs, y compris HCO PL du 24 août 65 II, la propreté des locaux et le personnel, améliorer notre image. Ainsi que l’HCO PL du 17 Juin 69, L’Image de l’Org.

Si vous ne voulez pas faire de vagues, ou risquer de vous voir retiré du niveau d’audition ou vous voir refuser l’inégibilité aux niveaux d’OT, alors il y a des choses simples que vous pouvez faire:

D’abord et avant tout :

• Arrêtez de soutenir les actions qui sont off Policy (allant à l’encontre des lettres de règlement).

• Cessez de donner de l’argent pour autre chose que vos propres services et votre montée sur le Pont.

• Il vous suffit simplement d’exiger de voir une référence de LRH qui stipule que vous êtes tenu de faire de telles donations.

Personne ne sera capable de vous montrer une référence car il n’y en a pas.

• Arrêtez de soutenir toute activité de levée de fonds dans votre zone.

LRH dit ce qu’il attend d’un scientologue :

— C’est ce qu’il attend de vous. En fait il l’a écrit dans l’HCOB du 10 Juin 1960 Issue I, KSW Serie 33, Ce que nous attendons d’un scientologue. Lisez et appliquez le.

• L’autre chose que vous pouvez faire est d’envoyer ce mail à un maximum de personnes que vous le pouvez, même si vous le faites sous couvert d’anonymat.

• S’il vous plaît gardez ce courriel entre nous, les scientologues. Les médias n’ont pas leur place dans ce domaine.

Peut être vous demandez vous pourquoi je n’ai pas écrit de KR.

La réponse est : je l’ai fait. Mais il n’y a plus personne à qui envoyer ce KR.

• Mais vous pouvez et devez rédiger des rapports et rapportez ce qui est out et off-policy, aux dirigeants locaux et aux membres de la Sea Org.

Nous sommes un groupe fort et puissant et nous pouvons effectuer un changement. Nous avons affronté de nombreuses tempêtes. Je suis désolé d’être celle qui vous l’annonce, mais une nouvelle tempête est sur nous. Ses vagues sont déjà dans les médias et le monde qui nous entoure.

La vérité est que, en tant que Scientologue, vous êtes plus capable, plus perspicace et avez une plus grande intégrité. La Scientologie est censée vous faire «penser par vous-même» et vous amener à ne jamais compromettre votre propre intégrité. Et il ne fait aucun doute que LRH tient chaque Scientologue responsable pour faire que la Scientologie continue à fonctionner (KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING).

Je ne cherche pas à faire autre chose que de remédier à toutes les choses off Policy qui se produisent. Mon mari et moi avons une grande partie de notre famille et beaucoup beaucoup de bons amis qui sont Scientologues.

Je n’ai pas grand intérêt à fournir la corde pour me faire pendre. Cependant, je sais aussi que j’ai consacré toute ma vie d’adulte à soutenir LRH et l’application des technologies de LRH. Si jamais je devais regarder LRH dans les yeux, à moins de faire quelque chose maintenant, je ne pourrais pas lui dire que je fais tout mon possible pour faire que la Scientologie continue à fonctionner (KSW).

Nous avons tous à y gagner. Il n’est simplement pas possible de lire les références de LRH et ne pas voir les altérations et les violations qui se produisent journellement.

Vous avez une obligation très simple envers LRH. Ne pas participer à quoi que ce soit hors règlement, et faire savoir aux autres qu’ils ne le doivent pas non plus.

Si chaque personne qui lit ce mail n’avait rien fait d’autre que d’arrêter les actions qui sont hors règlement, nous aurions déjà changé de cap.

Si toute cette énergie était canalisée dans l’audition, l’entraînement et la dissémination du nouveau public, nous serions en train de gagner la partie.

Et c’est ce que je vous souhaite à vous et à nous tous, à l’aube de cette nouvelle année.

ARC,

Debbie Cook

Credits for translation: http://debbiecookletter.wordpress.com/french/

Related articles

• La colère de Mireille – Bitter Better Bee (slideshare.net)
• Is LRH the Antichrist? Was Jesus a Marcabian spy? (scientologycelebrity.wordpress.com)
• Superpower (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Get In Wizz – Le Camping – Founder’s Party : Adopt a CTO (slideshare.net)
• PC was glowing after session (pierreethier.wordpress.com)
• Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the Ls. (exposingsquirrel.wordpress.com)
• Leah Remini has left the building (and so will Elisabeth Moss if they keep bullying her) (scientologycelebrity.wordpress.com)
• Horror scenario: what if Scientology wins? (barefacedmessiah.wordpress.com)
• Actus de bordeaux par michel ohayon (slideshare.net)
• Hub Meeting BCN pre-call [ENG-SPA-FRA-ITA] (snuproject.wordpress.com)

About Evil

no comments

Ls Rundowns – Vital Information

There is a lot of false data on the Ls and their delivery in the “Independent” field. This comes exclusively from untrained and unqualified auditors doing these rundowns using altered, forged and/or stolen materials, in addition to the fact they have over 50% missing. I tried to train a few people to deliver those rundowns, and tried, only for a short while to supervise their auditing. I divorced myself from each of those people, as soon as I realized they had betrayed my trust by mis-auditing those rundowns, refusing to do standard setups, getting repeated FLUNKS and being adamant they made no errors and refusing correction. There are 6 pending retrain orders among those people (all involving goofs at lower levels) that are still not complied with, because they each admitted, it would be detrimental to their income. Each of them provided me with criminal exchange.

I later found out that each of them had been guilty of false auditor reports. I have not been C/Sing any auditors on the Ls for many  years now. However, according to their dissatisfied pcs who keep coming forward, many claims were made that I was C/Sing their case when I wasn’t.

No need to name names as there are no exceptions as it applies to the Ls. My message to those individuals is: Shame on you, for spending much time promoting yourself on the Internet, while you ignore vital retrain orders and keep making the same mistakes. You need some ethics help first, per LRH, retraining or studying over personal unhandled out-ethics will result in no change and making the same flubs. Fortunately there are many Independents who state they offer Ethics Handlings.

The Ls rundowns based on thousands of cases seen by myself and those I have audited and information by Flag LRH trained Class XII C/Ses:

1- should be audited INTENSELY, meaning one session day at the very minimum, unless the pc is on a persistent F/N and undesirous of more auditing for the day. Auditing Ls at one session a week is a GROSS Violation of C/S Series 1 and the bulletins that explain the philosophy of those rundowns and what they seek to achieve. I have report of an auditor exactly doing that, apparently taking 6 months to a year on an L, meaning LIFE itself was the main process being run on the case, not the Ls. Seemingly those people are now happy. The question is for how long, as the C/S series clearly state that out-tech on a pc, even when the person may be rave about their attest, may be short lived or unstable, sometimes not. In each case, who can truly tell what wins the person receiving the out-tech auditing actually missed???

I have declined repeatedly to audit people on the Ls when it was impossible to deliver them intensively (meaning at least once, preferably more) those Ls either because of my schedule or the pcs. Unfortunately, less scrupulous individuals, are apparently still taking people hard earned money for that kind of delivery I repeatedly told them was wrong and out-tech. One of the auditors is a millionaire. I am not. I am not rich but I have been told that I have a heart of gold and my ultimate satisfaction it that I have helped people and did my best.

2- A plausible duration for L-11, where the pc had been honestly and fully set-up and done an in tech fashion is from a low 4 hours to a Maximum of 40 hours. Anyone run less than that (and sometimes even more) is QUICKIED. Anyone run over 40 hours was either NOT SET-UP, unnecessary optional rundowns (or those designed for another case and not the pc) were run, or there is significant OUT-TECH. By far the most likely is NOT SET-UP. If the PC is not properly set up, the PC will run then the PC will run endlessly.

Setups for the Ls are explicitly described in HCOB “Auditing and C/Sing Flag Only rundowns and a restricted checklist. The HCOB just mentioned has  NOT  been read by anyone delivering the Ls in the free field, because it is part of the Ls C/S materials only.

I have heard reports of people being run 100 hours or even 200 hours on L-11. Sometimes it comes from the pc himself, or from his/her published success story.

We have heard auditors charged for L-11  between $20,000 and $40,000 and taking in excess of 100 to 200 hours. WoW!!!  This is more than the Church charges. These poor saps have either literally money to burn or do so little research that they happily pay the Ferrari list price when buying a Geo or a Volkswagen. There were actual reports from PCs paying for a single L in excess of  $300 000. I am shocked by the arrogance of those “gold diggers”.  As to myself I have often attended the needs of dying and abandoned Scientologists at my own expense and spent countless hours assisting people.

3- A plausible duration for L-12, where the pc had been honestly and fully set-up and done an in tech fashion is from a low 10 hours to a Maximum of 50 hours. The same comments as I wrote for L-11 apply. Apparently there are people who have spent 100-200 hours on L-12, paying more than the Church own exorbitant prices. I heard of a person getting L-12 in one hour by an auditor… meaning 90% of the rundown could not have possibly been run.

4- L-10 is different than other Ls. It is a long rundown. It covers all dynamics and areas of life. A standardly run L-10 has a minimum of 2500 questions, with many others for handling items that come up. 25 hours is made of 1500 minutes. Spending only one minute per question means the auditor is zipping the rundown at supersonic speed and failing to restimulate the pc. This means the auditor has at his hands the full power of a 747 Jumbo jet and is satisfied with doing local pizza delivery and never getting off the ground.

L-10 duration can vary widely. On a non-clear, Dianetics R3r is run as part of the rundown. This can lengthen the rundown.

An badly trained auditor will often overrun handlings, since he does not have the skill to properly spot them. Instead of validating the EP of an Item when it occurs, he will run many additional (unnecessary) questions, extending unnecessary the rundown (and filling his pocket in the bargain). This can cause the earlier blown item to come back, resulting in instability or unaddressed aberration. It took months of Internships, videos and cramming accessing LRH C/Sed L-10 session to learn how to audit L-10 flublessly. Per C/S 52 and LRH conferences on the Flag Internship and on auditing the Ls, this is the only way an auditor can learn how to audit L-10 properly. Anything else is QUICKIE training and will result in Quickie L-10. This is what LRH says and my experience has shown him to be correct on that point.

Apparently some people don’t mind getting botched Ls (or out-tech/squirrel auditing). Rotten food may taste great, if you have never eaten anything but unflavoured liquid protein and vitamins, but don’t be surprised you get infected with E choli or worse…

Karen de la Carriere trained by LRH, multiple winner of the auditor of the year award at Flag and an authentic Flag Class XII C/S, has made several statements about the training and skills necessary to learns the Ls.

I agree with each of them 100%. Specifically she said:

“There is nothing in the field in current set ups that can even come near approximating Ls training. Each internship takes MONTHS of 40 hour to 60 hours in the chair of flawless VWD sessions for graduation to be approved. But the pc is the beneficiary and is now in safe hands. The safety and guaranteed stability of the pc is the primary importance here. To hell with any other consideration than the PC and the PC’s benefit.” Karen

I could not have said it better myself.

Written by Pierre Ethier

Related posts:

 WARNING

Why interships are so vital for the auditor delivering the Ls. 

Found with google search:

1994 Church of Scientology price list for services

RTC publication found on google search:

2002 Church of Scientology price list for the Ls

Karen Black

A Solo NOTS Completion audited by Pierre Ethier in the 80-es

Karen Black  is an American actress, screenwriter, singer, and songwriter. She is noted for appearing in such films as Easy Rider,Five Easy Pieces, The Great Gatsby, Rhinoceros, The Day of the Locust, Nashville, Airport 1975, and Alfred Hitchcock‘s final film, Family Plot. Over the course of her career, she won two Golden Globe Awards (out of three nominations), and an Academy Award nomination in 1970 for Best Supporting Actress, among numerous other honors. Karen Black was a child prodigy, reading past the high school level by fourth grade.

——-

Karen Black is fighting cancer

Please donate for her treatment: http://www.gofundme.com/2b7alc

Message from her husband:

“Some of you may remember my wife, Karen Black.  She contributed tremendous work as an actress in movies of the seventies and eighties. If you’ve ever enjoyed her work, now is your chance to reach back to Karen – because Karen needs your help.

Karen has waging a battle for over two years with cancer.  She has not talked about this publicly because she was hoping it would be cured and she could call herself a cancer survivor.

Karen was diagnosed with ampullary cancer in November of 2010. She immediately had the “Whipple,” one of the most serious operations that is performed at the Mayo clinic were she had it done– a third of her pancreas was removed.  This was followed by extensive chemo and radiation back home at UCLA in the Spring and Summer of 2011.  After suffering through nausea, fainting and losing over thirty pounds, she was finally declared NED – No Evidence of Disease in July.

But by December 2011 a small tumor developed and another surgery was in order, which left her completely bed-ridden.  Her cancer seemed conquered though.  By spring 2012 she was doing a lot better and could walk around and was almost normal.

But in June 2012, the cancer came back – and it started spreading – one near her lungs and one in her lower back.

We started trying different things – through hit and miss we found some alternative treatments that seem to help, and she went to Cedar Sinai in Los Angeles and had two operations in January and February to freeze the tumor in her lower back that by then had grown to be four pounds.   Even though the operation was a success, Karen was completely debilitated – even now she can hardly move around and is mostly bed-bound.

The cancer is minimized, but we know from past experience that it won’t be long before it comes back.  Her oncologist in Los Angeles has recommended that she do chemo therapy, but the problem is that she is skin and bones – before starting on this journey she weighed 156 pounds, she now weighs 96 pounds.  That’s a third of her body weight!  Part of the problem is that missing a pancreas she doesn’t digest food, and also chemo makes it very difficult to eat.

Karen has been confronting the fact that she would die soon if she didn’t do something.

BUT THERE IS HOPE.  Karen’s family physician of many years called us two weeks ago and told us of success she has had with several of her patients doing a treatment in Europe as part of a clinical study there.  I cannot go into more details now, but I promise I will in the future as we get involved.  I will say that this is a medically supervised program and it targets Karen’s kind of cancer.  In fact, we personally know two of the patients that have had remarkable recoveries from cancer there.  So we know it works, and right now it is her best and only shot.

But we have to move fast, Karen needs to go in the next few weeks, otherwise she might be to weak to go at all.

Karen will be there for two months.

So here is the big question; why would someone like Karen need money?

Yes, she was an actress in movies, but most of the high-paying work dwindled out many years ago.  She has a modest pension and medical insurance (thank goodness), but as anyone knows who has fought cancer, that is not enough.  In the last two years we have used up all of our savings keeping Karen alive – traveling – treatments, getting people to help her.  We have nothing left.  And the European treatment is not covered by insurance.

Your contribution will cover travel, living and treatment expenses for two months and will give Karen a chance.  Please help anyway you can, we humbly accept it.

Thank you.

Stephen Eckelberry”

Church of Scientology Erasing Founder’s Son

Good and Evil

Coming soon “The Baobabs of  Tomorrow”

GOOD AND EVIL

The Church of Scientology actions to suppress the Independent Field and Dissenters are actually making them stronger

L. Ron Hubbard repeatedly stated: Create God and you have to create the Devil.

As usual the Church of Scientology gets its wrong and does anything that seems to make sense in reverse. Since that organization now dedicate itself almost exclusively into creating EVIL, through it callous and depraved acts, it logically follows that it is willy-nilly incenting the creation of GOOD through that ever increasing number of people of good will who oppose their pernicious agenda.

A quote frequently attributed to Edmund Burke (though there is no evidence he ever stated it)  is: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing”.

Along with the Code of Honour rules that “Your self-determinism and your honour are more important than your immediate life” and “Your integrity to yourself is more important than your body”  this summarizes my personal philosophy in life and why threats that “I’d loose my Eternity” have always been entirely ineffectual on me. If you sell out your Integrity then, you have lost everything and there is no Eternity to be had. The big secret is that one cannot loose his Eternity except through his abandonment of his own Integrity. All threats to make one loose it are empty threats. Through the action of an Oppressor like the Church of Scientology actions against anyone who refuse to comply or who departs on his own determinism, one may suffer inconvenience, material discomfort. But when all is said and done, those who suffered through the fanatical actions of an organization or individuals bent on revenge and Evil will have moved up several notches on the Spiritual Scale and come that much closer toward true Enlightenment.

Those tormented souls acting on behalf of the Church (or on their own) to oppress people of Good Will pay very dearly by sliding toward an inexorable dwindling spiral of Spiritual degeneration, turmoil and unhappiness.

I happen to agree with L. Ron Hubbard, when he says, in complete agreement with the Laws of Karma that those who perpetuate Evil and refuse to self-examine to ensure they continue to act in accordance with Morality, Ethical Behaviour and Decency will get very much worse than just their deserved comeuppance.

When someone has become freed from the fetters imposed by Life, material considerations, the body and the environment, and has moved on beyond what we call as “Life”, one typically becomes faced with the most inexorable judge of all (oneself|)and sometime get a punishment so severe that few people can perhaps conceive of it.

Traditionally the concept of Hell was created to describe the most unpleasant possible of fates, but that concept was full misconceptions and sought to describe entirely Spiritual Phenomena with things that are only meaningful in the material universe.

L.Ron Hubbard described the ultimate punishment could be was “to become an Animated Cluster: i.e. a single Being completely glued within a large group of degraded/ Insane beings intent on dramatizing the most perverse and destructive acts and continuously and violently at war with itself “.  Or try to imagine becoming a Bacteria capable feeling pain and threats to survival while being incessantly attacked by antibodies.Or as a weak inmate in a room full of highly unfriendly and aggressive Hannibal Lecters.

Evil has a way to torment the righteous and the Ethical. One may even loose the battle, but as long as one has not sold out his Integrity he will remain undefeated.

If Man is basically good, then anyone attacking people of Good Will or perpetrating Evil on them is admitting having already succumbed and admitted defeat face to those dark areas within his case he dares not face.

Evil is therefore the product of cowardice and the vast majority of people doing Evil acts are indeed cowards: they hide their identity while committing their crime. They use pseudonyms on the Internet, always very afraid of being exposed and confronting the fact that what they call their soul is nothing more than a little clinker.

Both the Evil intended individual and the Criminal share the following : Inability to conceive that another thinks differently or is motivated by different Aims than their own.

Life is full of Choices: it is very easy to engage in unethical behavior prompted by ignorance, bigotry or a desire for revenge or greed. The temporary rewards can seem to be great,but sooner or later it will be PAYBACK  TIME. and the penalties will completely obliterate the  amount of comfort or pleasure one had because of not thinking through the fact that there are always eventual consequences for one’s acts.

On the other hand, the one who said no to unethical behavior or invitations to Hate,  may have to go through some rough patches, but the rewards will be far beyond the realm of material or physical gratification.

They say that: “To err is Human. To forgive, divine”.

I, for one, would rather emulate, the divine, even though it may require a greater effort, than do like too many and act the easy (and potentially evil way) “because it is Human”.

This is why I seldom respond to even the most outlandish acts of defamations made by a few bigots who somehow think that spouting lies about myself will end up helping them. They seem to be unable to grasp the fact that only the relatively few individuals with a like bigot frame of Mind agree with them.

The truth is that my many true friends will continue to have faith in me and what I say no matter what lie or drivel is spread about me. False friends and Enemies, will never have faith in me, no matter what I state or would prove.

If enough people would say NO to abuse and Evil, it would greatly diminish its impact in the World. After all, those behind Evil tend to be lazy and cowards. They will therefore follow the path of lesser resistance and eventually when enough doors get closed in their face, seek to oppress those still willing to sell out their integrity.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

 

PRISCILLA PRESLEY

Pierre Ethier audited Prescilla Presley

PRISCILLA  PRESLEY

American actress and businesswoman Priscilla Presley, the ex-wife of cultural icon Elvis Presley and mother of singer-songwriter Lisa Marie Presley, was born on May 24, 1945. She starred in three Naked Gun movies with Leslie Nielsen, and played the character Jenna Wade on the television series Dallas. Presley founded Elvis Presley Enterprises and helped to turn Graceland into a multimillion-dollar tourist attraction.

Eight years after they met, Priscilla and Elvis were married in Las Vegas, Nevada. Their daughter, Lisa Marie, was born the following year, in 1968. Although their marriage didn’t last (they divorced in 1973), Elvis and Priscilla remained friends, and raised Lisa Marie together, until his death in 1977.

Film Credits

2011 2011 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys (in person), 2010 The ONE Show (in person), 2008 The Insider (in person), 2008 Jimmy Kimmel Live! (in person), 2008 Dancing with the Stars (in person), 2008 Access Hollywood (in person), 2007-2010 Larry King Live (in person), 2007 Elvis: Viva Las Vegas (in person), 2007 Dinner: Impossible (in person), 2006-2010 Entertainment Tonight (in person), 2006 This Morning (in person), 2006 The 50 Greatest Comedy Films (in person), 2006 Canada A.M. (in person), 2006 Breakfast (in person), 2005-2008 The Oprah Winfrey Show (in person), 2005 The Tony Danza Show (in person), 2005 Rove Live (in person), 2005 Late Show with David Letterman (in person), 2005 Friday Night with Jonathan Ross (in person), 2005 Elvis by the Presleys (in person), 2004 Between the Lines (in person), 2002-2005 Biography (in person), 2002 After They Were Famous (in person), 2002 After Dallas (in person), 2000 Hayley Wagner, Star (Performer), 1999 The Rosie O’Donnell Show (in person), 1999 Spin City (Performer), 1998 Finding Graceland (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Performer), 1997 Touched by an Angel (Performer), 1997 Elvis: His Life and Times (in person), 1997 Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (Performer), 1996 Melrose Place (Performer), 1995 Wetten, dass.. (in person), 1994 Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult (Performer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (Producer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (in person), 1993 Tales from the Crypt (Performer), 1993 Rock the Vote (in person), 1992 The 9th Annual American Cinema Awards (in person), 1991 Wogan (in person), 1991 The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (Performer), 1990 The Adventures of Ford Fairlane (Performer), 1990 The 1990 Annual ShoWest Awards (in person), 1990 Live! With Kelly and Michael (in person), 1990 Elvis (Producer), 1989 The 3rd Annual American Comedy Awards (in person), 1988 The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (Performer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Producer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Writer), 1985 The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (in person), 1985 Night of 100 Stars II (in person), 1984 Elvis Presley’s Graceland (in person), 1984 Elvis 85 (in person), 1983-1988 Dallas (Performer), 1983 The Fall Guy (Performer), 1983 Love Is Forever (Performer), 1981 The 7th Annual People’s Choice Awards (in person), 1980 Those Amazing Animals (in person), 1980 The John Davidson Show (in person), 1978-2008 Good Morning America (in person)

SCIENTOLOGY: A PASSION FOR GENOCIDE

The Church of Scientology promotes Hatred, Discrimination and vilification of anyone who has the guts to expose it to the light of Truth.

All I have done so far is to communicate publicly for them to knock off their Evil ways and to cooperate in ethical and honest ways to promote the spiritual Freedom of individuals. All my communications addressed to the Church and its agents and puppets so far, have fallen on deaf ears.

It is costing them their shirt: Church membership has dwindled by 60% in the past 10 years alone. Their Magazines (Auditor, Advance,Source, Freewinds) betray the true numbers. One has merely to compare the statistics of completions and the names to discover some disturbing facts:

1- The Number of Completions to Major Levels and Rundowns is on a continuous decline, which contradict the generalities and soaring graphs with no scale nor reference points published at events. The events themselves are largely boycotted by its public, which has prompted Senior Management to hire busloads of Extras (non scientologists generic actors) to give the illusion of attendance. Virtually every photo of a crowd at events is photoshopped to multiply its size. It has become so gross that in some cases even a casual observer can discover it on his own.

Doctored promo: Headless man appears 3 times, once with no head, ghostly woman also 3 times and once without a head, the people top right corner and far right are actually proportionately smaller, like hobbits, and the female with the red top is there twice

2- The organizations are almost entirely deserted.  Except for a few large organizations, most Class IV Org around the world have less than a dozen staff. Some of the same organizations had upward of 100 staff in the late 1970s.

3- When David Miscavige high-jacked Scientology resources to defend himself in a copy of Freedom Magazine 2 years ago, the following points could be observed. For each mention of L. Ron Hubbard, David Miscavige name was mentioned three times. Nowhere was there a mention of the TRUE statistics of Scientology; CLEARS AND OTs (because these statistics are dreadfully low and on a steady decline).The only statistics mentioned were the number of square feet and value of Real Estate Property under the Church control. It clearly shows that the Church is primarily interested in the acquisition of wealth.Nowhere does Spiritual Freedom come in the equation any more.

It has been well documented that acquisition of Real Estate property is meant to be distraction for the few remaining faithfuls, to hide the horrible truth that the Church of Scientology is on a toboggan ride toward the bottom.

4- The number of defectors from the Church of Scientology now surpasses its membership  Over 30,000 people have been declared suppressives since RTC came into being in 1982. This is twice as many active Scientologists in good standing within the Church worldwide.

Doctored promo: The woman at the bottom left of the blue circle is standing next to an 8 foot tall black man is there twice

In Scientology every statistic of its Management is now false to protect against the Church worst fear: the discovery of truth by its members: that its leadership is corrupted to the core (David Miscavige denying food and rest to his juniors, but extorting the Sea Org underpaid staff to buy him a $100,000 motorcycle and finance a life of luxury while some Sea Org staff live in conditions more appalling than those found in the poorest countries on Earth). This is why the Church has abandoned LRH ideas of making each org  “saint Hill size” and has “ideal orgs” instead. Saint Hill size is based in numbers. Ideal org is based on opinion and fudginga few meaningless stats. All one has to do is look at the pictures of those ideal orgs in action: they are quiet like morgues and the course rooms are empty.

Stress and invalidation of preclears and Pre-OTs has grown exponentially over the years. Life expectancy for an Upper Level Scientologist on Church lines is now below 57 years.

The Ls are about to become an extinct technology at Flag.Last year the FSO lost two Class XII C/S to cancer (A Kartuzinsky and Richard Reiss). There are only 9 Class XII remaining at Flag and most of them are already Senior Citizens . The Ls are now being mistaught and run differently than the way L Ron Hubaard taught it to the original Class XIIs. They are now run “Miscavige style” and their failure ratio is now 50%. (prior to my departing in 1992, any Class XII with less than 95% success ratio was removed from auditing and sent on a retrain)

The Church actually amuse me whenever they promote the most aberrant fabrications about me or others that they are unable to blackmail because the only one dirty with crimes is the Church itself.The Church typically recruits renegades with a long history of betrayal and people who are according to their own records insane and unfit for services. I have studied enough pc folders of those GO or OSA puppets cases in the past to know it. The Church hires in lieu of journalists, people so aberrated and crazy that the only uniform they should wear is a straight-jacket.

I recognize the recent frenzy of attacks by OSA and the Church for what it is: the death throws of a wild Beast that has been mortally wounded by the black PR that has backfired upon themselves from decades of lies, deceptions and unethical acts and a list of defectors twice as long as its current membership.

One would think that those running the Church would grown a brain or have a sudden attack of sanity and try to reform the Church, but everything including quality of Services seems to be getting worse every year.

One of the lies promoted by the Church is that I keep desperately searching for PCs to audit. Thanks to the great stupidity and incompetence of OSA and the zombies that now abound on Church staff, I am literally besieged by inquiries from traumatized and disgruntled public of the Church. I just cannot find the time to look for new public. I even had to hire a secretary just to address the load.

Their pc complaints are multiple: Gross Auditor code violations: evaluation, Invalidation, squirrel procedures not written in any HCOB but ordered by the failed auditor who now runs the Church (David Micavige was expelled from his Class IV internship at  Saint Hill in the 1970s for gross Auditor code violations and reports of physically assaulting the pc in the session). Registrars and executives pillaging the accounts of public to get book sales and earn a 15% commission. Denigration of the state of Clear,etc.

The numbers are multiplying  Thanks to the Publcity from the Church of Scientology itself. Who believes them? The Ku Klux Klan, the Neo Nazis and the Taliban have now more credibility that the Church of Scientology has remaining.

I certainly would not go out of my way to defend myself against the raving and insane fabrications of lunatics and mass murderers such as Charles Manson,Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden.In fact I would view personal attacks and parroting of the insane fabrication by these or their stooges,dupes or fans as a form of compliment, meaning that I must be doing something right to get such a degree of attention.

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. described bigotry in the following quotation: “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.”

My Life philosophy can be resumed in the following sentence:

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

Anyone who thinks that the Church of Scientology has not become an EVIL organization has either become mentally lobotomized or seeks to purposefully promote Evil because of the advantages he or she thinks it will afford him/her.

I have departed the Church of Scientology because by 1992,under its leadership it violated the core principles taught in the fundamentals of its philosophy of helping people and seeking to live with the truth.

I developed disagreement in the view that L. Ron Hubbard had reached a permanent state of Infallibility and could never err. (something by definition reserved only for Deity).

I developed disagreement in the fanatical application of the Scientology procedures,observing that I had a near 100% success rate and those under tight control of the Church had a success below 70% by the time I left and that this ratio has continue to go down since.

I decided that it was wrong for the Church to hide its corrupt activities and to keep on telling tell gross lies to its membership for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of Money controlled by its elite.

Therefore attempt to silence me (Church, Freezone,Independents) simply means that:

1- Those attacking me are deeply afraid. Criticism is defined by L. Ron Hubbard as the desire to Harm with a covert admission that one is incapable of actually doing so. Therefore after too many failures to harm someone of goodwill, the mind becomes psychotic and starts to dream the most frantic and absurd fabrications and soon starts to hallucinate believing in their own lies.

2- Those who propagate Hatred believe they have the right to violate the Human Rights of others if it threaten in their eyes the triumph of their ideology. (This is in itself  the definition of Extremism)

Anyone who departs from the Church by dissenting or embracing different beliefs and religious views than those taught by its current leadership is uniformly treated in the following manner

1. Classification:  People are divided into “us and them”. The Church (or fanatical opponent group like Freezone factions) views itself as the good guys no matter how Evilly they act and feel that attacks anyone who try to show them howto reform Evil.

2. Symbolization “When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups…”

3.Dehumanization “One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases.” (squirrels) or ridiculing any handicap, old age etc.

4.Organization Attacks are always organized. Special groups or Specialists execute the pernicious agenda seeking to destroy the targeted individuals/group

5. Polarization “Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda…”

6. Preparation “Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity…” My disagreements with the Church are philosophical and religious in nature.

7.Extermination “It is ‘extermination’ because the perpetrators feel the target is a liability to the greater group or Dynamic and is viewed with deep Hatred. Ostracism, boycott and Isolation are merely the first stages before violence becomes justified in the eyes of the perpetrators because their victims are not truly human.”

8. Denial:The perpetrators… deny that they committed any crimes…” OSA (and its agents) and the Freezone are frequently accomplished liars.

9. Discrimination: Because of its dissenting views and the enactment of the previous steps, both the Church and its offshoots (Freezone/Independents) promote the FAIR GAME LAW and the spreading of calumnies and vilification toward dissenters.

10.Persecution:systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs or affiliations or lack thereof.

The Above 10 steps are known as the 10 Stages of Genocide.

It describes very precisely the tactics of the Church toward religious dissension.

Anyone who still promotes the ideals of the Church of Scientology in maligning its religious dissenters and/or who promotes Hatred toward those it dislikes or have physical disabilities,or belong to the “wrong ethnic group” should be labelled for what he or she is:  A GENOCIDE ADVOCATE.

Pierre Ethier

(c) 2013

“The Bulgarian Umbrella“ for my juvenile stalker (Humor)

Thank you for the recognition ! I am fully flattered . WoW. My juvenile stalker labeled me  as`The Brains“and here  how a tale got born. My stalker is ” Pinky” . At least I got a brain. This reminds me the song from The Pinky and The Brain about the two mice who every night are trying to take over the world : `…. One is a genius and the other is insane`…  Now we have the new version of the tune about the genius and the insane. Two Catherine’s are” trying”  to take over ……….hmmm The Internet……….or  The FreeZone ?

Madonna is not the only one having a stalker. I have one as well !

Our version of The Brains

Below are few emails recently received:

 I want to thank you for all the info on your blog. It really has gotten me closer to confronting my own dynamics and wanting to go OT. I am going to continue reading your blog and frankly feel safe doing so knowing you have done so much and have a lot of experience with the tech. I have a ton of questions. I would be honored if you would be a terminal for me in my quest for the truth. I have been a Scientologist since the late 60s.

 My Best,

Signed

——

 I have followed your blog over the past year, having been affiliated with the church. It has been helpful and enlightening in many ways. I am a successful executive in Europe. I also work in the US and South America from time to time. I advanced in my auditing, and couple of years ago I desisted in my auditing as I had clear differences with the church. I underwent endless ethics sessions trying to fix the matter, saw many things in session, and yet, the situation did not change, reason for which I decided to go on with my life as the Way to Happiness preaches, rather than being forced to be something that I feel I should not. However, this radical disconnection from source is difficult as my spiritual goals remain stagnant for the time being. I am hesitating whether or not to go back to auditing in the church. I thank you for your efforts to heighten the values of this spiritual path. It has been soothing and helpful in understanding many points of confusion.

 Thank you,

Signed

——–

[Introduction]…..I became aware of Scientology in the 90-es and had life-changing win right away. Since then it has been over two decades of unsuccessful trying to achieve any progress or win despite my efforts, involvement and resources spent. In the last couple of years, as I could see within Scientology organizations I visited for help increasing outpoints which were in direct conflict with my purposes to achieve positive changes to my life. I felt indoctrinated and started to look for alternatives and data to explain what I saw in the Church. That is how I found your videos and your blog and that is how I decided to contact you. I don’t want to waste your time by writing long stories about my experience nor I would expect any technical opinions based on e-mail communication. To be perfectly honest, I don’t know really, what to do, it seems, after all I did and tried, I would need some expert handling that I believe I can get in the Church. Would it be possible to get some help and guidance from you?

Yours Sincerely

Signed

——–

A few years back, I hit a point where I was in need of some answers and became willing to communicate with anyone or anything to come up with some answers. I’ve found plenty of answer. I never knew how deep the rabbit hole went.

I’ve enjoyed your Web site, I enjoy your blog.

Best,
Signed
CL VIII

——–

….Thank you for the link to Pierre`s blog !!!  I see weeks worth of reading and enlightenment and catching up .. After all these years. …..I am very encouraged after decades of hopelessness.  And I look forward to seeing Pierre again. It is so comforting to know that there is hope again for spiritual progress … and by such a friend and high caliber auditor as you Pierre!!!

Signed

Who else is reading us? Below a copy of our logs :

AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES

AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES

2

TECHNICAL VOLUMES 13 AND 14

 

A number years ago, an enterprising individual took it upon himself to compile the entirety of the Upper Level materials (mainly confidential ones) that were available to him.

Those two volumes were prepared in PDF format and made to look just like the original Technical Volumes issued in 1976

Immediately, the bulk of the Independent field took the compilation as complete, entirely authentic and accurate, three things it simply was not. It seems that acknowledging the fact that some materials were incomplete would have run afoul of a number or practitioners vested interests, especially financial ones. As a result, a number of auditors have been running boot-leg rundowns or rundowns that are attributed to LRH but are in fact the entire creation of Independent auditors of questionable competence.

I have denounced the inaccuracies within those two volumes, to little avail in the past.

Here is an exact summary based on facts by someone who has had access to the entirety of the materials covered in  those volumes:

VOLUME 13

POWER

Whereas all materials but one issue is complete and authentic, the materials are not complete. The way the materials are presented has led a number of auditors to assume very incorrectly that any Class IV, including those who have not even interned would be competent enough to audit those processes. This is definitely not the case. It requires the highest skill to run those processes competently. Particularly notable in their omission, are the materials that explain the actual auditing style and why running Power processing on Clears is destructive to their case and why it is suppressive to do so.

R6EW

The checksheet is missing, but 80% of required materials are present, all of them bona fide. Missing are 5 C/S only or confidential HCOBs that are crucial for proper guidance on the level.

CLEARING COURSE

The entirety of the Clearing Course written materials is presented minus the checksheet.

Missing are all of the Clearing Course Films.  Also three HCOBs that are only found on the SOLO C/S course (and the AO Review Auditor course) that deal with the state of Clear and are crucial in determining the mechanics of Clearing and on what type of auditing it is possible (or impossible) to achieve Clearing. Failure to apply those principles has led to numerous false attests to the state of Clear from pcs on lower levels in the In dependent field, where the Auditor-C/S was simply not qualified to make the adjudication.  The self-appointed Freezone PR has been fanatically active falsely validating those attestations, and chastised me for “speaking against Upstats” even after I showed him evidence that those “Upstats” were in fact very much Downstats and in lower conditions as far as the Tech is concerned. I hope that those who read my comment decide to enlist competent help before blindly attesting people to Clear with no independent test and without someone who is fully trained to validate Clear. A particular organization that specializes in false Clear attest at lower levels decided to direct people on OT II to run the Clearing Course Materials at the same time, “because the pc is very much interested in running those” If those who perpetuate that out-tech had only bothered to train properly they would have realized that the reason for such interest was that the fact that these individuals had never archived the state of Clear in the first place!

Some ignorant individuals have renamed their own copies of the 1958 Clearing Congress Films held in Washington DC as “Clearing Course Films”

For the record: there are 6 Clearing Course films (5 technical briefings, one demo session)

The Bank and its pattern (1964)

The Materials of the R6 Bank (1965)

Composition of the Bank (1966)

The Technical Materials (1966)
General Information (1966)
Auditing Demonstration  (1966)

VOLUME 14

OT I

Complete and authentic materials of all past and present version of OT I

 

OT II

Complete and authentic materials. One page from the platens is omitted, most likely the result of an error. The text version of Volume 14 has the missing page.

OT III

Complete and authentic materials as far as the student OT III course pack goes.

5 OT III C/S and Remedy/Review HCOBs are missing. These HCOBs are crucial for programming certain types of remedy. Only auditors who have audited OT III reviews at an AO or Flag or trained on the Solo C/S course are likely to have ever read those bulletins.

ORIGINAL OT IV-VII

Each of those levels is in some way altered from the version written by LRH.

The original materials of these levels were entirely written in LRH hand. The materials presented in Volume 14 are typed materials.

OT IV has some crucial Processes/Drills omitted from it. The C/S instruction on C/Sing the level are entirely missing. The first step of OT IV is an audited rundown audited by a Class VIII. Misguided Freezone C/Ses with the Quickie impulse are known to instruct people to do that step Solo, even though it is clearly a Review Action and has a secret purpose not revealed to the pc but known by the C/S.

OT VII is entirely different than the version written by LRH. It turns out to be the “EDUCTIVISM” version. Eductivism was Jack Horner (pronounced squirrel by LRH and persecuted for it) own take and version of Scientology in the 1960s and 1970s. Jack Horner believed in the vital importance of running Creative Processing. LRH ordered Creative Processing abandoned during the 1950s, after observing that it tended to beef up the bank in a number of cases.

Anyone reading that version of OT VII will instantly notice that it contains many Creative processing processes and therefore an immediate giveaway that it cannot be authentic.

The true version of OT VII start with an assessment before any process is run.

And last but not least, the End Phenomenon of OT VII is not mentioned, making one wonders if all those who trumpet completing people on OT VII are truly giving their pcs what they had been promised ,if neither they nor the pc truly know the EP.

NEW OT V: NOTS

Mainly Complete. Authentic materials. A few of the NOTs series are missing.

There are a total of 55 NOTs series Bulletins plus a number of additions and attachments.

NOTE: NOTs 53 is missing. It was a useful bulletin called ERRORS ON NOTs, which gave useful and realistic examples on how NOTs cases could be debugged. Because it was written by David Mayo, in 1982 all copies were ordered to be pulled out of packs and anywhere else and turned over to RTC. Everyone having access to that bulletin was sec-checked to ensure no copy had survived.

NOTS 56 is a forgery. I am told that a “FREEZONE AUTHORITY” had certified it as authentic.

All one has to do is use to google to discover it was a parody written by Keith Henson.

NEW OT VI: SOLO NOTS

No checksheet exist.  most of the Solo NOTS only materials are missing. For a full rundown on what the full Solo NOTs materials consist of, please read my essay on the Synopsis of Solo NOTs

ORIGINAL OT VIII

The lone HCOB in that section is authentic. It is the only HCOB ever issued that has OT VIII in either the title or the distribution.

Paradoxically that HCOB has never been part of OT VIII as delivered on the Freewinds or by the Church.

NEW OT VIII

This is one of the three versions of OT VIII released by the Church. It was released after the fiasco of the first version of OT VIII on the Maiden Voyage. Out of 300 people who did that version of OT VIII, more than 40 had dropped dead within 3 months. This was a tightly kept secret. Since i was working in the OT VIII Eligibility HGC at the time, I became privy to all sort of information on the matter.

In late 1988, the following Tech terminals were secretly RPFed:

Ray Mithoff, actual author of the Freewinds OT VIII with some assistance from LRH handwritten notes. As is the case with all Scientology compilations since 1985, David Miscavige had absolute veto power over it and approved its release.

The entire Freewind (FSSO) OT VIII delivery team except for one course Supervisor, the OT VIII review Auditor and the Tech page. It specifically included Margaret Supak (Senior C/S FSSO) and the late Laura Wolfe (OT VIII C/S)

At the FSO the following two C/Ses were RPFed for having an unusually high proportion of the dead among people they had C/sed: Ruthe Humprey and Dan McNicholl.

A number of year ago, Ariane Jackson, a former friend and pc of mine became livid when she discovered how abused and ripped off her ex-husband had been by the Church and had literally died of a broken Heart with Scientology.  (His diary has been published on the Internet under the title: Diary of a Dying Scientologist).She decided to punish the Church by telling all  she knew about OT VIII on the Internet.

I immediately emailed Ariane and we had a series of pleasant communications. The next day she wrote me, informing me that there were 8 lawyers representing the Church in her living room. Ariane was never heard of again. It requires no great ability to speculate what happened next: the two million dollars in loans arranged by the Church that her ex-husband had made to dead-beats, being reimbursed to her and their child, plus hush money and a gag order..

L10

Grossly inaccurate and incomplete materials.

It includes the Class X course checksheet. For some reason all of the auditors who claim to deliver L-10 in the independent field make nothing of the fact that there are 24 theory bulletins on the Checksheet that are not available in any form nor even an abridged summary. Those bulletins explains the procedures, the auditing style and general prerequisites and core theory of the rundown.

Most of the process sheets in that section are as Warren McShane had testified in court “unartful and severely incomplete reconstructions”.

I have repeatedly stated that one of the missing bulletins states that you can seriously deteriorate a case or even kill him by misrunning L-10. This has been always glossed over by those who have a financial interest in delivering rundowns they are not qualified for, since most of these pseudo-auditors instantly wash their hands of any overt product they make, much like a cheap mechanic who refuse to honor any warranty on his repairs as long as the car has been driven out of his lot.

L11

This pathetic reconstruction fails to explain the theory behind the rundown nor how it is achieved. Some of the steps are even given in the wrong sequence.

L12

Very poor reconstruction with none of the theory behind L12 explained in any way. Several of the techniques used on L-12 are only described in an LRH briefing. Neither the tape, nor a transcript, or even notes or summary of it are known to exist outside of the Church

Anyone who delivers that rundown under those conditions is deeply out-ethics and can have only financial motives for delivering a rundown that can easily deteriorate a case (and in some celebrated cases in the Independent field) make them act like ranting lunatics.

NEW VITALITY RUNDOWN

Quickiest of the quickies is the only way to describe this laughable write-up by Russ Meadows who was declared Suppressive in 1976 under orders by LRH. The 1976 HCOB “Auditing reports, Falsifying of” summarize Russ’s career. His write up omits almost everything of importance, starting with the fact that the New Vitality Rundown is a Dianetics Rundown. This has led a Squirrel in the US Midwest to market that “LRH Rundown” while he delivers processes of his own manufacture instead. Having failed to produce the expected result of a Valence shift, the pseudo-auditor then runs NOTs commands and procedures on lower level pcs. When I privately chastised the auditor for both Fraud (selling an out-tech Rundown of his own manufacture while claiming it is LRH) and squirreling (auditing NOTs procedures on lower level cases), his reaction was extremely violent. He wrote a Suppressive Person Declare on me and distributed it to his “Friends”. He then added the heinous fabrication that I wished his wife dead. I did not even know he was married and to this day I do not even know the name of that woman nor anything about her. I never wish people dead. It is against my basic philosophy. I want criminals to stop being out-ethics and I wish liars to stop lying because according to my fundamental belief, anyone can redeem himself. Only someone cruel wish to see people dead.

 

BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN

These bulletins are authentic. They were released in 1978 but soon after were withdrawn stating that their use was restricted to SuperPower only.

 

SUPERPOWER

The version of SuperPower is a pure work of fantasy from the Freezone.

The correct SuperPower Rundown as originally conceived by LRH consist of the following 12 steps:

C/S 53 (as included in the Tech Volumes)

Ethics repair list (the original list issued in 1978 is NOT the same as the one in Volume 14.The Ethics Repair List in Volume 14 was written by a person with a long history of out 2D and alcoholism)

Personal revival rundown (not released /known in the Independent field)

Consequences rundown  (not released/known in the Independent field)

Bright think rundown (as described above)

Study green form (in the New Tech Volumes)

False data rundown parts I and II  (not released/known in the Independent field)

Cause rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

Power of choice rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

 Perception rundown  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

 Learning drills  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

Physical universe drills  (not released nor known in the Independent field)

The original purpose of SuperPower was to resolve all the ills that make staff members poor workers or ineffective.

ANALYSIS OF THE BOGUS SUPERPOWER STEPS

 

1- A ludicrous statement is made about there being a “condition of No Condition” Obviously the one who designed that step failed to word Clear the word Condition, which means state of being. One cannot avoid being in some form of state of being, even postulating oneself in the lowest possible levels of unconsciousness or non-existence causes someone to still be in some type of state of being or condition.  It is followed by the command to “Find a Viewpoint”. If the author of that process had understood the axioms well, he would have written “Assume a Viewpoint” instead.

2- The next step directs the person to violate all known references on exterior and ending sessions, plus those on persistent F/N. It then introduces the false datum that one can audit over a big win and over a persistent F/N. The author appears to never have read the definition of a persistent F/N: it persists, therefore by definition you could no longer get reads without having killed it first, yet the authors insinuate that only a Floating TA cause an F/N to be truly persistent.

3-This is followed by a Creative Processing Process. Owing to their having been abandoned by LRH long ago, it is proof by itself that the process cannot be genuine.

4- A seriously altered version of the Ethics Repair list with a number of important questions omitted.

5- The next step is another Creative Processing Action

6- The last set of process shows its author confusion on flows, some of the commands have Flow one reversed with Flow 2 or have flow 3 omitted.

The last Creative Processes in this rundown are a form of Validation Processing. Long experience with that kind of process has shown that they have built in instability within them and that the key-outs created by that type of process not only do not last long, but frequently result in an eventual very strong key-in days or months later. At least one case in the Independent field that had been doing well before the rundown was started committed suicide shortly after completing it.

Therefore consider as out-ethics any auditor still running this rundown once they have been appraised of the data above.

Obviously those whose overts are restimulated by my analysis above will probably attack me.

It is my hope that others, which form the majority, will benefit greatly from my statements and be able to make better and effective progress toward improvement and a better state of well-being.

Pierre Ethier

The Little Prince by Exupery

Source: link

…….Indeed, as I learned, there were on the planet where the little prince lived– as on all planets– good plants and bad plants. In consequence, there were good seeds from good plants, and bad seeds from bad plants. But seeds are invisible. They sleep deep in the heart of the earth’s darkness, until some one among them is seized with the desire to awaken. Then this little seed will stretch itself and begin– timidly at first– to push a charming little sprig inoffensively upward toward the sun. If it is only a sprout of radish or the sprig of a rose-bush, one would let it grow wherever it might wish. But when it is a bad plant, one must destroy it as soon as possible, the very first instant that one recognizes it.

Now there were some terrible seeds on the planet that was the home of the little prince; and these were the seeds of the baobab. The soil of that planet was infested with them. A baobab is something you will never, never be able to get rid of if you attend to it too late. It spreads over the entire planet. It bores clear through it with its roots. And if the planet is too small, and the baobabs are too many, they split it in pieces. . .

“It is a question of discipline,” the little prince said to me later on. “When you’ve finished your own toilet in the morning, then it is time to attend to the toilet of your planet, just so, with the greatest care. You must see to it that you pull up regularly all the baobabs, at the very first moment when they can be distinguished from the rosebushes which they resemble so closely in their earliest youth. It is very tedious work,” the little prince added, “but very easy.”

And one day he said to me: “You ought to make a beautiful drawing, so that the children where you live can see exactly how all this is. That would be very useful to them if they were to travel some day. Sometimes,” he added, “there is no harm in putting off a piece of work until another day. But when it is a matter of baobabs, that always means a catastrophe. I knew a planet that was inhabited by a lazy man. He neglected three little bushes. . . ”

So, as the little prince described it to me, I have made a drawing of that planet. I do not much like to take the tone of a moralist. But the danger of the baobabs is so little understood, and such considerable risks would be run by anyone who might get lost on an asteroid, that for once I am breaking through my reserve. “Children,” I say plainly, “watch out for the baobabs!” My friends, like myself, have been skirting this danger for a long time, without ever knowing it; and so it is for them that I have worked so hard over this drawing. The lesson which I pass on by this means is worth all the trouble it has cost me.

Perhaps you will ask me, “Why is there no other drawing in this book as magnificent and impressive as this drawing of the baobabs?”

The reply is simple. I have tried. But with the others I have not been successful. When I made the drawing of the baobabs I was carried beyond myself by the inspiring force of urgent necessity.

Related links:
https://pierreethier.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/the-baobabs-of-tomorrow/

Black Propaganda

“Anyone engaging in black propaganda is either using a wrong way to right a wrong or confessing he can’t make it in open competition”

Hubbard, L. Ron, Hubbard Communication Office Policy Letter 11 May 1971 “Black PR“

The Baobabs of Tomorrow

Coming soon

A Russian song about the reincarnation describes those poor souls that have not behaved themselves honorably this lifetime and will be reborn as baobabs to spend next lifetime of 1000 years as a pitiful tree. Your deeds today shape your tomorrow.

The reincarnation song
Russian title: Pesenka o pereselenii dush

Some may believe in Jesus, some in Mohammed or whatever,
Some don't believe in anything, just to spite them all.
There is a good belief in India, and it is rather clever:
That when we kick the bucket we don't pass away for all.
To rise to heaven you may strive:
You'll have a dream when born again,
But if you've lived a piggy's life,
A piggy you'll remain.
If people look askance at you, take all reproaches easy,
Don't worry, you'll be born again a man with a mordant tongue,
And if you've seen the death of a foe, there's every reason
To think that after death you will be born a keen-eyed man.
So keep on living, and have fun,
Be happy and don't bother,
Maybe, your soul will settle down
In some big boss's body.
If you are engaged in sweeping streets, you'll be an engineer,
And maybe slowly grow into a minister in time.
But if you're dull and stupid, you'll be born a baobab-tree an'
Will remain one for a thousand years or more, until you die.
It's bad to live a parrot's life,
Or be a snake-like demon,
Hadn't one better live a life
Of just a decent human?
Well, who is who and who was who, to this there is no answer,
Geneticists are off their nuts o'er chromosomes and genes.
Perhaps that shabby looking cat at one time was a rascal,
And this good natured person was a friendly dog, it seems.
I jump for joy, just like a kid,
And I avoid all hindrance,
A very good belief indeed
Has been thought up by Indians!

Кто верит в Магомета кто в Аллаха кто в Иисуса
Кто ни во что не верит
Даже в черта назло всем
Хорошую религию придумали индусы
Что мы отдав концы не умираем насовсем
Стремилась ввысь душа твоя
Родишься вновь с мечтою
Но если жил ты как свинья
Останешься свиньею
Пусть косо смотрят на тебя привыкни к укоризне
Досадно что ж родишься вновь на колкости горазд
Но если видел смерть врага еще при этой жизни
В другой тебе дарован будет верный зоркий глаз
Живи себе нормальненько
Есть повод веселиться
Ведь может быть в начальника
Душа твоя вселится
Такие ситуации простор воображенью
Был гордым и почтенным а родился дураком
А если мало радует такое положение
Скажи еще спасибо что не сделался скотом
Уж лучше сразу в дело чем
Копить свои обиды
Ведь если будешь мелочен
Докатишься до гниды
Пускай живешь ты дворником
Родишься вновь прорабом
А после из прораба до министра дорастешь
Но если туп как дерево родишься баобабом
И будешь баобабом тыщу лет пока помрешь
Досадно попугаем жить
Гадюкой с длинным веком
Не лучше ли при жизни быть
Приличным человеком
Так кто есть кто так кто кем был
Мы никогда не знаем
С ума сошли генетики от ген и хромосом
Быть может тот облезлый кот был раньше негодяем
А этот милый человек был раньше добрым псом
Я от восторга прыгаю
Я обхожу искусы
Удобную религию
Придумали индусы

Partial list of public audited

The following is a partial list of PCs Pierre have audited  that was officially published by the Church of Scientology. It is not in any way exhaustive and consists of roughly 3500 people out of about 5000. Anyone on this list (or not) is welcome to contact Pierre. With virtually no exception, he enjoyed auditing each of those people. Pierre provided counseling as a volunteer minister for 20 years at no pay. Dalai Lama  says , quote: “Those who, through  their personal suffering,  truly want to end completely  all the suffering of others  are persons of supreme capacity. ” Pierre is one of those people of supreme capacity.

 Pierre is going over the list and recalling the gains and life changing improvements he saw in those people provided him with hours of happy memories: “My ultimate desire is for each of these people to reach happiness and spiritual Freedom, whether they achieve it in the Church of Scientology or in another. A lot of those names have not been on Flag completion list for a very long time. Each and everyone should be told that

“NO CHURCH HOLDS A MONOPOLY ON SPIRITUAL FREEDOM OR THE STATES OF BEINGNESS PROMISED BY L. RON HUBBARD”.

Anyone can move forward from whatever point they have been stopped, betrayed or given arbitrary actions that were not designed to help them.” Pierre says

Note: We have received the following special request by  John Brownlee to include his name in the incomplete list of PC-s I have audited and I am gladly revising the list: “I never saw my name on your list of people you had audited so I didn’t make the connection until fairly recently. I am recalling now that you DID audit me once at Flag back in 1980. But thank you. This is belated, I know, but you helped me a lot in those few short hours-if it was even one hour all told. And it made a difference”

Related links:

• OT VIII & beyond
• Pierre Ethier – Class XII
  • About Pierre
  • Brief Summary of my Career as a Class XII
  • Class XII Wedding
  • Class XIIs
  • Early Involvement in Scientology
  • Early Years This Lifetime
  • IFA Kha Khan Status
  • My Last Days in the Sea Org
  • My Meeting with LRH
  • Scientology Paradox
  • We are against family disconnection

Alberto Abate, Mario Abbiati, Stefania Abbiati, Tom Abrams, Delia Acheson, Doug Acheson, Hans-Ruedi Ackle, Suzette Ackle, Angela Acosta, Mary Acosta, Ramon Acosta, Robin Adair, GianFranco Adami, Bob Adams, Gene Adams, June Adams, Mary Adams, Chris Adler, Fernando Adler, Lloyd Adler, Lottie Adler, David Agami, Elias Agami, Roberto Agami, Theresa Agami, Vicky Agami, Viviane Agami, Frank Aggio, Eliana Aguilar, Patricia Aguilar, Elaine Aguirre, Peter Aguirre, Juan Aguirrebeitia, Robert Ahoua, Margaret Ainsworth, Aldo Airoldi, Debra Aitken, Lena Akesson, Linda Aldrete, Angela Alemania, Alex Alemis, Cathy Alessandrini, Maurizio Alessi, Peter Alevizos, Lee Alexander, Minty Alexander, Peter Alexander, Rick Alexander, Dixon Allen, Gabrielle Allen, Jane Allen, Terry Allen, Lynda Allender, Patricia Almeida, Robert Almqvist, Richard Almstead, Stephen Alpert, Felix Altorfer, Heidi Altorfer, Marianna Altorfer, Diana Alvarado, Enrique Alvarado, Lucio Alverez, Maria-Fernanda Amaya, Konrad Ambach, Amanda Ambrose, Roland Ambuhl, Carol Anahu, Clare Anahu, Bob Anderson, Candy Anderson, Carol Anderson, Cindy Anderson, Doug Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rick Anderson, Sherry Anderson, Roland Andersson, Joe Andruscavage, Greg Angus, Pamela Angus, Dee Ann Rule, Lisa Ann Malmquist, Mary Ann Durham, Jo Anne Beachy, Jo Anne Christensen, Dodley Anson, Elizabeth Anstrin, Peter Anstrin, Luis Antoni Perez, Tiziano Antonini, Peter Antonio, Philip Antonio, Luis Antonios Vasquez, Stefano Antonucci, Luciano Apperti, Mariano Apperti, Mauro Apperti, Juan Arambula, Edurne Aranguren, Michel Archambault, Carlos Arena, Cherie Arend, Tony Arend, Ruth Arguelles, Miguel Arguello, Alejandro Aristi, Michael Armentrout, Janice Armstrong, Raoul Arnal, Gerry Arnett, Ramon Arnold, Vicky Arnold, Rafael Arredo, Philippe Arsac, John Arvanitakis, Tomas Arvidsson, Peter Asberg, Sandro Asnaghi, Harout Assadourian, Bob Asselin, Robert Asselin, Doug Atcheson, Douglas Atcheson, Bruce Atkinson, Peter Atkinson, Bertha Aubert Llorens, Armando Aubert, Bertha Aubert, Helen Audrey Stewart, Pierre Auget, Peter August, Carol Austin, David Austin, Jeff Avrin, Karen Aylor, Rebecca Azares, Inma Azpitarte, Irma Azpitarte, George Baca, Mariella Baccari, Adelio Bacchi, Ornella Bacchi, Frederick Badger, Edwin Baer, Susan Baez, Gianfranco Baggio, Robert Bagnall, Paul Baikie, Roland Baikley, Brigitte Bailke, Wolfgang Baitz, Joanne Baker, John Brownlee, Sally Baker, Yiva Balazs, Mike Ball, Mike Ballard, Otis Ballard, Frederick Balmaele, Fulvio Balmelli, Edgar Bammatter, Fulvio Bandera, Giovanni Bandieri, Giuseppe Bandierini, Henvelle Bandroin, Ken Banfield, Britta Bang, Alison Banks, David Banks, Hanna Baram, Michael Baram, Paul Barbaro, Steve Barbera, Alain Barbier, Jean-Luc Barbier, Antonella Barbieri, Giorgio Barbieri, Sandra Barbieri, carlos Barcena, Vivian Bardavid, Gavin Bargate, Dee Barker, Mary Barne Mann, Debra Barnes, Cathy Barnett, Gabriela Baroni, Michael Barram, Kay Barres, Chuck Barron, Elizabeth Barron, Olivia Barron, Bob Bartell, Donna Barton, Geoffrey Barton, Pamela Barton, Ray Barton, Win Barton, Steve Basin, Chere Bauman, Molly Baxter, Randy Baxter, Liz Bayback, Robin Beaman, Sarah Bean, Joan Beats, Shane Beats, Anne Beatty, Karin Beatty, Richard Beatty, Karen Beaty, Joanne Beaubien, Phil Beaubien, Jocelyne Beauregard Jocelyne Beauregard, Pierre Beauregard, Pierre Beauregards, Donna Beaven, Carlos Becerra, Gabi Beck, Peter Beck, Emily Becker, Stephanie Becquet, Susanne Beeh, Suzanne Beeh, Carol Beeny, carol Beeny, Hannelore Behdig, Ray Behm, Jean Beigantz, Robert Beilhart, Robert Bein, Susana Bejarano, Enzo Beletti, Enzo Belletti, John Bellmaine, Vanessa Bellmaine, Gale Belsel, John Belue, Javier Benet, Martha Benilles, Gracia Bennish, Gisele Benoit, Rolly Berdna, Jacqueline Bergantz, Bobbie Berger, David Berger, Yogi Berger, Linda Bergman, Mitzi Bergman, Albie Berk, Anthony Berka, candy Berman, Ray Bernard, Sergio Bernardini, Roberto Bernazzoli, Eva Berryman, John Berryman, Sylvie Berson, Marino Bertoli, Luigi Bertoni, Sylvie Bertrand, Alain Berube, Franco Beschi, Sharon Besio, Steve Besio, Jean Besre, Richard Best, Leni Betes, Sue Bettinger, Florence Bezazian, Paul Bezazian, Hennie Bezuidenhout, Fabbian Biagio, Loredana Biancolini, Cathy Bible, Monica Biddle, Gaby Bilodeau, Dario Binda, Donato Biondi, Rick Birkenshaw, Donatella Birolo, Laurie Bittner, Karen Black, Michael Black, Stephanie Black, Tina Black, Doris Blair, Eva Blake, Corinne Blanc, Yves Blanc, Sandrine Blanchet, Alain Blanchette, Tony Blanco, Charles Blankenship, Ellie Blankenship, Lise Blankertz, Angelika Blaskovich, Carol Blaut, Jay Blaut, Alexander Blechinger, Dean Blehert, Pamela Blehert, Henry Blumenthal, Frank Blumer, Dieter Blumler, Lorentz Blumler, Paolo Boarato, Dan Boardsen, Silvano Bobadilla, Remo Boden, Arlene Boeger, William Boeger, Serd Boehm, Ginny Boehme, Patrice Boesinger, Donald Bohn, Donna Bohn, Pierre Bolduc, Ellie Bolger, Maureen Bolisczak, Michael Bollen, Michel Bollen, Michael Bolln, Giorgi Bonardi, Giorgio Bonardi, Sonia Bonfiglioli, Simone Bongiovanni, Caroline Bonifas, Rosa Bonisoli, Donald Bonn, Massimo Bonoldi, Paolo Boratao, Christa Bordewieck, Gianluca Bordoni, Jorg Borgmann, Al Born, Kai Bornemann, Susanne Bornemann, Carl Borowski, Carlos Borrero, Giuseppe Borsarini, Jane Bosan, Christian Bosiger, Patrice Bosiger, Patrice Bosinger, Jane Boson, Glen Bostrom, Wendy Bostrom, Nick Bot, Carol Bottle, Claude Boublil, Julian Bouchard, Calisre-Marie Boujon, Francois Boulbil, Francoise Boulbil, Hank Bourland, Denise Boutin, Richard Bovey, Bill Bowen, David Bowers, Janet Bowes, Theo Box, Stephen Boyko, Steven Boyko, Alejandro Bozzone, Bernard Brackenshaw, Ulrich Bracunig, George Bradley, Gregory Bradley, Hugh Bradley, Jeff Bradley, Jeff Bradshaw, Lisa Bragato, Lucia Bragg, Ted Braggin, Antonio Braggion, Antinio Braggione, Antonio Braggione, Brigitte Brandle, Christian Brandle, Karl Braun Steiner, Morgans Bredsdorf, Gabi Brendel, Peter Brendel, Giovanna Brenicci, Pino Brenicci, Annette Brennan, Rob Brennan, Sandra Brennan, Naomi Bresaham, Dee-Dee Bressert, Jim Brewer, Carleen Bridgetown, David Brier, Maureen Brigatti, Rita Bright, Anne Briscoe, Naomi Brisnehan, Bill Broderick, Christa Broderick, Ed Broderick, Cammie Brodie, Patrick Broeker, Louis-Michel Brolles, Madeline Broman, Harry Bronsoiler, Lilis Bronsoiler, Gaetan Brouilette, Christine Brovcenko, Cathy Brown, Charles Brown, Judy Brown, Hans Brugemann, Gro Brugermann, Greg Brumley, Marie-Therese Brunet, Alain Brunette, Larry Bruning, Ruth Brunner, Ed Bryan, Daniel Bryenton, Giacomo Bucchi, Heimo Bucerius, Anna Buch-Hansen, Doris Buchel, Annabel Bueno, Beth Bueno, Sue Bueno, Kathy Bulawa, Hamish Bulger, Lorraine Bulger, Martine Bullot, Claudio Burchi, Irene Burgener, Ray Burgess, Don Burgett, Donald Burgett, Jane Burgett, Arnell Burghorn, Florence Burghorn, Jim Burghorn, Shannon Burke, Lynn Burkhart, Monika Burkli, Roberto Burlone, James Burnham, Jeffrey Burr Johnson, Nancy Burton, Jim Bush, Rex Bush, Ray Butera, Laura Butki, Debbie Butler, William Butler, Tony Butzlaff, Jarrett Buys, Peter Buzzelli, Karen Bydlo, Dan Byl, Peter Byrne, Char Byrnes, Jessica Byrnes, Larry Byrnes, Lawrence Byrnes, Alejandro Cabrera, Elvis Cabrera, Idea Cabrera, Patrizio Cabrini, Elena Cabrino, Lisa Cabrino, Warren Caggiano, Cinzia Cagnoni, Alessia Cairoli, Giorgio Cairoli, Juliette Calame, Sergio Calcinai, Ida Calder, Antionetta Calderon, Guillermo Calderon, Letitia Calderon, Maria-Antonieta Calderon, Sarah Calderon, Barbara Caldwell, Elaine Caldwell, Eric Caldwell, Giovanni Calicchio, Giuseppe Calicchio, Haracio Caligiuri, Fausto Callegarini, Rosette Calliauw, George Calpin, Lisetta Calzolari, Lisette Callarata, Lee Cambigue (Mr), Lee Cambique (Mrs), Nancy Cameron, Antonio Cammarata, Gaetano Cammarata, Salvatore Cammarata, Mark Campbell, Baby Campos, Dolores Campos, Jose-Luis Campos, Susana Campos, Frank Camuso, Gilbert Canali, Paolo Canali, Bruno Cantalupi, Gianni Canuti, Hector Cardenas, Barbara Cardona, Juan Cardona, Maria-Terese Cardona, Chuck Carel, Pat Carel, Pat Carey, Ruth Carey, Jerry Caril, Dixie Carlisle, Hank Carlson, Marti Carlson, Mike Carlson,
Scott Carmichael, Ida Carrera, Gina Carrerra, Joanne Carrier, Steve Carrier, Julie Carrol, Gail Carroll, Noel Carroll, Ann Carter, Marylin Carvin, Vickie Case, Doug Casey, Carlos Casillas, Juan Casillas, Claudia Caspary, Raymond Cassano, Sheryle Cassano, Alfonso Castaneira, Jorge Castaneira, Lisa Castellani, Jacinto Castellano, Virgilio Castellano, Carlos Casteneira, Virginia Casteneira, Antonella Castignoli, Carlos Castillo, Lucinda Castillo, Rosana Castillo, Eugenio Castillo,, Betty Castleman, Elizabeth Castleman, Ken Castleman, Rosita Castro, Massimo Cavadenti, Stephanie Cayouette, Nadia Cedro, Julian Cerati, Denise Ceresnak, Berenice Cervantes, Jean Chacon, John Chadder, Mary Chadder, Andrew Chalmers, Alan Chamberlain, Allen Chamberlin, Don Chamberlin, James Chamberlin, John Chambers, Rebecca Chambers, Luis Chamorro, Julie Champness, Mick Champness, Michael, Chandler, Tom Chandler, Karin Chapman, Peter Charbonneau, Jean Charbonnier, Jeanie Charles, John Charlesworth, Louise Charnonneau, Mike Chatelain, Julio Chavez, Martha Chavez, Jeff Chee, Brigitte Chelin, Hellen Chen, Nancy Chepey, Murie Cheshire, Alain Chevrot, Henriette Chevrot, Felipe Child, Filipe Child, Maria-Teresa Child, Roberto Child, Rosario Child, Pam Chipman, Pamela Chipman, Corine Chiquet, Francoise Chiquet, Gerard Chiquet, Josette Chiquet, Luisa Chiricho, Jay Chitteroe, Mireille Chouraki, Lorna Chrichton, Monica Christen, Carl Christensen, James Christensen, Jamie Christensen, Joanne Christensen, Kurt Christensen, Mie Christensen, Malcolm Christiansen, Gillian Christie-Cullen, Gerd Christoffel, Gerry Chromoy, Jeanie Chromoy, Michael Church, Mauro Cinquepalmi, David Cintron, Bruce Cladwell, Bruce Clark, Evelyne Clark, Fran Clark, Jane Clark, Jeanne Clark, Jenny Clark, Michael Clark, Mike Clark, Shirley Clark, Garrison Clarke, Peter Clarke, Jean Claude Smadja, Karl Clausen, Nancy Clay, Peter Clay, Robert Clay, Tom Clay, Emily Clayton, John Clegg, Charles Clements, Dale Clerk, Maria Clovet Bridget Cobb, Maxine Cocain, Giuliano Cocchetti, Guigliana Cocchetti, Jan Cockerill, Judith Code, Keith Code, Joaquim Coelho, Art Colaianni, Lucy Cole, Ross Cole, Allen Collins, Jim Collins, Regina Collins, Sally Colloden, Franco Comi, Carlo Comincini, Maria-Luisa Como, Kathy Conable, kathy Conable, Maria Conceicao, Kathy Condon, Maggie Condon, Margaret Condon, Robert Condon, Ron Condron, Robert Conn, June Connelly, Lynn Connor, Bernd Conradi, Elke Conradi, fabian Conti, Richard Cook, Giancarla Coppi, Ernest Corbett, Gaye Corbett, Arlette Corbi, Paolo Corbi, Jose Cordero, Andre Cordet, Maria Cordova, Shirley Coriveau, Rebecca Cormier, Skip Cormier, Daphne Cornelius, Vernon Cornelius, Ewald Cornelsen, Marc Coromina Hector Cortes, Patty Cortes, Noemi Cortinovis, Luisa Cossini, Giuliano Cossu, Robasto Costanzo, Jennifer Costello, Denis Cote, Ghislan Cote, Paul Cote, Marie-Louise Courvoisier, Marianne Couvoisier, Helen Covary Fritsch, Michael Covin, Maria Covini, John Cowden, Brian Coyle, Bryan Coyle, Ed Cramb, Larry Cramer, Susan Crausaz, Bill Crawford, Ginger Crawler, Michele Crescetino, Bruno Crestino, Adelio Crippa, mario Crippa, Miriam Crippa, Ralph Criscione, Rick Crites, Ron Crites, Gabrielle Crittendon, Barry Critzer, Beppe Crivella, Malcolm Croft, Jim Crosser, Bill Crossley, Roddie Crouch, Emil Crough Allan Crouse, Lisa Crundall, Peter Crundall, Virgilio Cruzado, Gerardo Cucciniello, Mariana Cuenca, Gwen Culbert, Chris Cullen, Sally Culloden, Patrick Cultiera, Peter Cunningham, Elizabeth Currier, Glenn Currier, Jaye Curry, Mike Curry, David Curtis, Patricia Curtis, Yolande Curty, Matteo D’Agnelli, Louis Da Re, Susan Da Re, Alicia Dabbah, Lucy Dabbah, Salomon Dabbah, Bob Dahlquist, Robert Dahlquist, Jacinthe Daigle, Barbara Dakin, Sonja Dal Borgo, Luciano Daldosso, Raoul Dallaire, Antonella Dallari, kathy Dalziel, Karin Damian, Marisa Damiani, Marcos Dana, Cindy Dangberg, Gunther Dangela, Dana Danhoff, Nazmy Daniel, Dick Danilobb, Peter Daniloff, Alycia Danilovich, Harold Danko, Roberto Danne, Francesco DaPasquale, Silvia Dare Susan Daugherty, Jose-Luis Davila, Cathy Davis, Chris Davis, Kennny Davis, Les Davis, Leslie Davis, Lonnie Davis, Nancy Davis, Naomi Davis, Paul Davis, Vicki Davis, Peggy Day Westerman, Brian Day, Doreen Day, Andree De Thiersant, Beatriz De Aguilar, Bernard De La Cour, Celia De Mello, Gisele De Benoit, Hennie De Ridder, Henri De Bruyn, Iria De La Vaccarra, Javier De Aguinaga, Jill De Hochepied, Jim De Grosa, Justa De Villiers, Maria De Landez Ferreira, Marie De Thiersant, Peter De La Cour, Pierre De Thiersant, Tom De Grandpre, Ursula De Leon, Galee Dean, Gaylee Dean, Richard Dean, Alicia Debbah, Henri DeBryun, Thiery DeChaunac, Madeleine DeFreitas, John Dekiewitt, Antonio Del Francia, Bernard Delacour, Jacqueline Delafraye, Odile Delafraye, Patrick Delafraye, Pierre Delance, Jean-Pierre Deleze, Antonio Della Giovanna, Marc Delomez, Odile Delomez, Giovanna Delzanno, Henry DeMarco, Jutta Demeler, Dan Deming, Jane Deming, Thomas Demogines, Paul Denev, Peter Denev, Camille Denholme, Eugenia DeNieto, Francesco DePasquale, Bertrand DePetigny, Marie-Therese DePetigny, Carole DeRoo, Charles Deschambury, Daniel Descombaz, Andree DeThiersant, Andre Dettieri, Justa DeVilliers, Pino Devitini, Candace Devoe, Chuck Devoe, Eloy Dewey, Albert Dewisme, David DeZelle, Anna Di Lorenzo, Anna Di Meo, Antonio Di Gioia Bob Di Diego, Antonio Diaz, Barbara Diaz, Pat Didear, Rosemary Didear, Carlo DiFrancesco, Sergio DiFrancesco, Antonio DiGoia, Tina Dillard, Julia Dimmock, Dana Dineen, Anita Dingler, Raul Dingler, Thomas DiPaola, Loren Dirks, Claes Ditleusen, Else-Marie Ditleusen, Claes Ditlevsen, Bruno Divitini, Dan DiVito, Janet Dixon, Dusan Djukich, Michael Dlack, Bruce Dobin, Forrest Dockery, Eddie Dodd, Linda Doering, Willy Doestschman, Sass Doetschmann, Willy Doetschmann, David Dolan, Mary Dolan, Paul Dolan, Mike Dolbaczuk, Karin Don Braber, Graham Donavan, Angelo Donghia, Christa Donker, Graham Donovan, Cecile Donze, Therese Donze, Karen Doobi, Mercedes Dorelia, Anna Dorigo, Elen Dorset, Ellen Dorsett, Eugenio Dos-Santos, Denyse Doudan, Alan Douglas, Jim Douglas, Joan Douglas, Richard Douglas, Robert Drake, Chris Dresser, Robin Drimmer, Ronnie Drimmer, Mitchell Drobbin, Jeff Drumm, Veronique DuBellay, Horst Dubiel, Dennis Dubin, Stan Dubin, Martin Dubow, Bob Duggan, Tom Duggan, Bob Duggin, Helene Dugmore, Georgette Dumas, Scott Duncan, Joe Duncanson, Joseph Duncanson, Lindy Duncanson, Ann Dunev, Camille Dunholme, Jean-Jacques Dunki, James Dunn, Brigitte Duquesne, Francoise Durand, Dave Durnan, Jurgen Durnberger, Peter Durnil, Corrie Dutko, Brenda Dyer, Trevor Eade, Dick Eastin, John Eastment, Edna Eaton, Lolita Echavarria, Fred Eckfeld, Lilliane Eckharter, Margaret Eckold, Tina Eckstein, Anders Eckwell, Eve Eden, Donna Edison, Steve Edison, Ellen Edmondson, Eloise Edmonson, Louise Edmunson, Luis Eduardo Cuello, Carlton Edwards, Deborah Edwards, Harold Edwards, Darlene Eggen, Dean Eggen, Jerry Ehrlich, Debbie Ehst, Ilse Eich, Alexander Einkhour, Jay Eisenbach, Else-Brith Ekstrom, Roland Ekstrom, Maria Elana Nunez, Maria Elena Martini, Amy Elliot, Hugh Elliot, Kay Elsner, Catherine Emard, Philip Embick, Susan Embick, Pat Emery, Tucker Emmett, Susan Emory, Shahab Emran, Shahab Emrani, David Ender, Edi Ender, Sabine Ender, Christine Engler, Thomas Engler, Walter Erb, Lothar Erdtmann, Nena Erdtmann, Ramses Erdtmann, Gert Eriksson, Gunilla Eriksson, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Espinoza, Christopher Estey, Tina Estey, Carol Estrada, Julio Estrada, Beverley Ettinger, Wendy Ettricks, Gus Evans, Noel Evans, Suzanne Evans, Virginia Fair, Andre Fakir, Tony Falcaro, Steve Falcy, Caroline Falone, David Farca Lorna Farca, Raquel Farca, Franco Farina, Jana Farr, Valerie Fasnakis, Floriana Fassi, Gianfranco Fassi, Marina Favilla, Marino Fazi, Marisa Fazi, Stephen Fedele, Dennis Feeney, Eloisa Feeney, Axel Fehling, Liv Fehn, Maria-Luisa Feirrara, Leon Feldbrill, Maria Feldman, Sikica Feldman, Caroline Felons, John Fenton, Enrico Fermi, Slvador Fernanderz, Salvador Fernandez Herrero, Juan Fernandez, Salvator Fernandez, Jose Ferrano, Juan Ferrara, Vivian Ferrara, Bruno Ferrari, Mario Ferrari, Rosar
ia Ferrario, Robert Ferrarro, Lourdes Ferreira, Maria Ferreira, Alberto Ferrerro, Linda Ferry, Lynn Ferry, Richard Ferry, Steven Ferry, Cindy Feshbach, Kathy Feshbach, Lynn Feshbach, Matthew Feshbach, Sheryle Festa, Ron Fiandaca, James Fiducia, Margrit Fierz, Angel Figueroa, Fred Filios, Robin Filios, Giusy Filippini, Renata Filippini, Betty Filisky, robert Filisky, Beatrice Findlay, David Findlay, Lena Findlay, Bill Findley, Bob Fine, Elena Fine, Mike Fine, Robert Fine, Mary Finley, Hans-Peter Fischer, Dianne Fisher, Joan Fisher, Leslie Fisher, Gary Fishman, Patrice Fishman, Jonny Fjall, Jim Flahive, Bob Flanagan, Dave Fleershoff, Debby Flemming, John Flemming, Mary Float, Irma Flores, Walter Flosser, Willi Flosser, Luigi Fogazzi, Leslie Foglesong, John Foglio, Ed Fomby, Astrid Fontana, Gerald Foos, Bob Forrest, Nancy Forrest, David Forsman, Suzanne Fortin, Fabio Fortunat, Sarina Foster, Christian Fouche, Rex Fowler, Jonathan Fox, Marsha Fox, Russell Fox, Marie France Carpentier, Albert Franceschetti, Clara Franceschetti, Maria Franceschinelli, Alessandra Franchi, Maria Franchini, Carlo Francisco, Fabrizio Francomano, Veronica Francomano, vincente Francomano, Jim Frankel, Massimo Franzoni, Neil Fraser, Susana Frederick, Judy Freedman, Rosy Freihoff, Bertha Frias, Roxanne Friend, Hanne Fries, Fabio Frigerio, Thomas Frigge, Harry Frisch, Nancy Frisch, Helen Fritsch, Arda Froese, Diane Froese, Linda Frommer, Greg Frost, Claude Froute, Mary Fry, Rafael Fuentes, Valerie Fuetris, Hamida Fuiatti, Debra Fuller, Terry Fuller, Wayne Fuller, Graziano Fumari, Dudo Func, Richard Furbish, Geoff Fushi, Geoffrey Fushi, Jim Futris, John Futris, Gunther Gafton, Phillipe Gaille, Sheila Gaiman, Linda Galardo, Bianca Galbiati, Giancarlo Galbiati, David Gale, Marie Gale, Jose-Luis Galicia Jr, Gisela Galicia, Guillermo Galicia, Jose Galicia, Jose-Luis Galicia, Ernesto Galli, Eugenio Galli, Marilena Galli, Mauricio Galli, Margaret Gallivan, Ursula Gambert, Carmen Gamboa, Alessandro Gangidino, Pino Gangidino, Pino Gangislino, Steve Ganns, Marianne Garatti, Alfred Garbutt, Manuel Garces, Maria Garces, Cecilia Garcia, Ernesto Garcia, Evangelina Garcia, Gisela Garcia, Gladis Garcia, Ignacio Garcia, Jesus Garcia, Martha Garcia, Maria-Pia Gardini, Claire Gardner, Eva Gardner, Lilia Garduno, Benjamin Garner, Trisa Garner, Marc Garnier, Alicia Garrido, Gloria Garrido, Dolores Garriga, Manuel Gartces Linda Garver, Celia Garza, Laura Garza, Nadina Garza, Nadine Garza, Jane Gatliff, Gary Gatliffe, Eduardo Gatti, Fabrizio Gatti, Luciana Gatti, Chantal Gauthier, Harvey Gauthier, Luisa Gavazzi, Adelio Gaviraghi, Elena Gaviraghi, Fabrizio Gaviraghi, Paul Gawrello, Larry Geis, Malcom Gellatly, Barb Gendusa, Barbara Gendusa, Angelo Gentile, Martino Gentile, Marianne Genton, Antoine Geoffre, Kitty Georgius, Ken Gerbino, Victoria Gerbino, Peter Gerhards, Chris Gerson, Jan Gerson, Stan Gerson, Theresa Gerson, Reto Gfeller, Benjamin Ghiora, Benny Ghiora, Wendy Ghiora, Giovanni Giambarini, Mauro Gianfranco, Sergio Giannini, Dave Gibbons, Anne Giblin, Ingrid Gibson, Cathy Giesecke, Ellen Giffin, Irma Giger, Felipe Gil, Sandra Gil, Linda Gilbert, Louise Gilbert, Richard Gilbert, Steve Gilbert, William Gillette, Per Ginge-Nielsen, Giovanni Giocamezzi, Angelia Gioffre Angela Gioffre, Massimo Giordanengo, Luisa Giovanna Bellagamba, Fabio Giovannelli, Linda Giovanni, Phil Giovinco, Giorgio Girardi, Ernst Girnus, Allan Giroler, Alfredo Gironella, Antonio Gironella, Luisa Gissi, Luisa Gissy, Lorenzo Gizzarelli, Michelle Gizzi, Kurt Glassel, Anne Glenski, Bernadette Glenski, Alba Gloor, Greg Gloor, Lois Gloor, Albert Glow, Franziska Glur, Giorgio Gobbi, Sandra Godding, Tom Godfrey, Vivian Godfrey, Peter Godwin, Georgio Goffe, Alberto Goffy, Giorgio Goffy, Gerri Golashesky, Calla Gold, Marshall Goldblatt, Eden Golden, Emily Goldfield, Steve Goldfield, Lynne Goldstein, Allan Gomery, Mercedes Gomez, Roberto Goncalves, Kay Gonsolin, Ed Gonsoulin, Leona Gonsoulin, Carlos Gonzales, Leon Gonzales, Lillian Gonzales, Lou Gonzales, Maria Gonzales, Monica Gonzales, Penny Gonzales, Pilar Gonzales, Raoul Gonzales, Rom Gonzales, Silvana Gonzales, Susana Gonzales, Alvaro Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Oscar Gonzalez, Pilar Gonzalez, John Good, Kevin Good, Marianne Good, Sherry Good, Randy Goode, Ann Gordin, Anne Gordin, Dawn Gordon, Gerald Gordon, Jerry Gordon, Gabriele Gordt, Emilia Gorini, Edward Goss, Rose Goss, Liane Gottwald, Hank Gould, Mark Gould, Sylvain Goulet, Christian Gounord, Daniele Gounord, Ignacio Gracia, Robert Graf, Jill Graham, Eva Gramm, Alba Grande, Alfonso Grande, Maurizio Grande, Carlo Granito, Theo Grant, Thoe Grant, Alicia Gray, Bob Gray, Maria Grazia Rocco, Linda Graziano, Anita Grechi, Betty Green, Jane Greenberg, Martin Greenberg, Marty Greenberg, John Greene, Maurice Greene, Peter Greene, Jayne Greenwalt, Anita Gregory, Kathy Gregory, Scott Gregory, Anne Greig, Mark Greisen, Simon Grenier, Anne Grieg, Nancy Griffith, Cristina Groenewold, Ricardo Groenewold, Cristina Groenwold, Jaime Groesbeck Michael Grope, Dominique Gropper, Carla Grossbohlin, Harry Grossbohlin, Larry Grout, Cathy Grown, Wilmie Gruber, Bertha Guadalajara, Mariani Gualtiero, Marianne Gubeli, Pierre Guenette, Lauri Guerin, Antonieta Guerrero, Francisca Guerrero, Irma Guerrero, Maria Guerrero, Virginia Guerrero, Anne-Marie Guertin, Duncan Guertin, Diana Guillen, Javier Guillen, jaime Guillertin, Brigitta Gustafsson, Brigitte Gutermann, Rolf Gutermann, Giuliana Gutierrez, Javier Gutierrez, Veronica Gutierrez, Peter Guy, Victor Guzman, Steve Guzzetta, Enza Guzzo, Helga Habiger, Gisela Hackenjos, Holger Hackenjos, Marie Hadjian, Jill Hagen, Diane Hahn, Helgard Hahn, Ernst Haible, Gali Halamish, Dave Haldy, Bob Hall, Cindy Hall, Betty Halliday, Lisa Halverson, Susan Hamady, Bob Hamilton, Edward Hamlyn, Ted Hamlyn, Michael Hancock, Lynne Haney, Michael Haney, Wally Hanks, Bill Hanley, Stina Hans, Henning Hansen, Wiebke Hansen, Eve Hanson, Janet Hanson, Larry Hanson, Lawrence Hanson, Randy Hanson, Margaret Hardy, Charlotte Harness, Connie Harris, Oliver Harris, Roger Harrison, Sioux Hart, Gunter Hass, Wenche Haugen, Lynn Hauptman, Bob Hay, Steven Hayes, Steve Head, Tom Head, Gary Hedge, Janet Hedge, Elisabeth Hedinger, Robert Hedinger, Peter Heer, Betsy Heess, Barbara Hegetschweiler, Helmut Heinzel, Mary Heldt, Katie Heller, Nina Helms, Jean Helpert, Monika Helpert, Berenice Hemsani, Moises Hemsani, Bev Henderson, Diane Henderson, Michael Henderson, Craig Hendrick, Jack Henessey, Bill Henley, Tim Henley, Robin Hennessy, Hans Henriksen, Cyril Henry Holman, Keren Hepner, Randy Hepner, Enrique Hernandez, Isabel Hernandez, Madalena Hernandez, Maria Hernandez, Martha Hernandez, Robert Hernandez, Mario Herold, Janet Herring, Norman Herring, Nan Herst, Pam Hertz, Axel Hesse, Anette Hevillon, Martha Higareda, Jim Highsmith, Saul Hildebrand, Jonathan Hill, Patricia Hillard, Sonia Hines, Robert Hinson, Peggy Hitchman, Tony Hitchman, Eva Hitz, Andy Hoare, Joe Hochman, Edith Hodgskinson, Edith Hodgson, Margaret Hodkin, Terry Hodosi, Hans Hodosy, Terry Hodosy, Otmar Hofer, Lucie Hoffmann, Rose Hogg, Doug Hoisington, Paula Hoisington, Debby Holder, Alan Hollander, Janet Hollander, Karen Hollander, Mimi Holm, Steven Holmes, Fred Holtby, Frederick Holtby, Ursula Holub, Gilles Homier, Francoise Hooks, Vera Hopkins, Joel Hord, Cynthia Horton, Dale Horton, Bill Horwich, Fred Houck, Guy Houston, Karen Howard, Bill Howey, David Howson, Faith Hudon, Faith Hudson, Ana Huelva, Debbie Hughes, Greg Hughes, Harriette Hughes, Peter Hughes, Rick Hull, Sherene Hull, Paul Hulme, Debbie Hulthen, Deborah Hulthen, Leena Hungerbuhler, Fred Hunt, Midge Hunt, Peter Hunt, Beatrice Hunziger, Peter Hunziker, Elena Hurtado, Nicolas Hurtado, Jane Hutchins, June Hutchins, Fawn Hutton, Marilyn Hydie, Jeff Hyland, Ellen Hyrne, Seija Hytonen, Sharon Imburgia, Mavis Imra, Barbara Inbody, Bob Inbody, Werner Indermuhle Deborah Indursky, Michael Ingbar, Renato Ingenito, Judith Irons, Judy Irons, Lynn Irons, Anne Isabelle, Anna Iverson, Jim Jackson, Brigitte Jacobi, Michael Jacobi, Dan Jacobs, Myrna Jacobs, Paul Jaconello, Albert Jacquier, Ariane Jacquier, Hamida Jafferji
, Elias Jafif, Sandra Jager, Henry Jaggers, Mary Jane Luniewski, Bernt Janssen, Carmen Jaramillo, Keith Jarrett, Luisa Javier, Sally Jeans, Georg Jecel, David Jelley, Molly Jelley, Dane Jenkins, John Jennings, Barbara Jensen, Britta Jensen, Craig Jensen, Mary Jensen, Sally Jensen, Karen Jepson, Alexandra Jimenez, Claudia Jimenez, Javier Jimenez, Manuel Jimenez, Ramon Jimenez, Raoul Jimenez, Gust Johanesson, Wendel Johanesson, Hakan Johansson, Peter John, Berenice Johnson, Brent Johnson, Bruce Johnson, Jay Johnson, Jervis Johnson, Judy Johnson, Larry Johnson, Mark Johnson, Richard Johnson, Stacia Johnson, steve Johnson, Tyrone Johnson, Andrew Johnston, DeDe Johnston, Drew Johnston, Terry Johnston, Evelyn Johnstone, Lisa Johonnsesson, Lisa Johonnsson, Mark Jonathan Kloss, Debbie Jones, Iain Jones, Mark Jones, Robin Jones, Henning Jorck, Peter Jorck, Andrea Jordan, Paul Joseph, Claudia Joss, Danielle Jossi, Carol Joyal, Carolyn Judd, Karen Judkin, Hans Juel, Claudia Jugo, Diane Jullian, Abby Juneau, Michael Juneau, Mike Juneau, Unice Juneau, Andre Jurt, James Justice, Suzanne Justus, Alan Juvonen, Allan Juvonen, Susan Juvonen, Magda Kahanu, David Kahn, Mary Kahn, Barbara Kalergis, Bob Kalergis, James Kalergis, Carla Kammer, Gloria Kamph, Magda Kanahu, Rory Kaplan, Cheryl Kapuler, Mauri Karger, Michael Karger, Susan Karnovsky, Lamia Kashoghi, Carlo Katchi, Eurlich Katschzmann, Ulrich Katzschmann, Emil Kauer, Emile Kauer, Hugo Kaufmann, Mary Kaufmann, David Kaup, Bob Kaye, Robert Kaye, David Keat, Jamie Keavic, Dietmar Kecht, Goerge Keck, Gary Keenan, Guy Keenan, Jeanne Keenan, Richard Keeney, Grace Kefover, Patrick Kegel, John Keldami, Ingrid Keller, Alan Kellman, Kathy Kemmerer, Steve Kemp, Klaus Kempe, Marieta Kempe, Bonnie Kempner, Rudi Kempner, Robert Kenny, Carla Kent Grossbohlin, James Keppler, Kifumi Keppler, Stefan Kerber, John Kerr, Kitty Kerr, Naomi Kerr, Vivien Kerslake, Marianne Kessler, Denis Keyes, Ike Kezsbom, Peter Khaled, Christopher Kight, Bruno Kihm, Bill Kilpatrick, Kyung Kim, Scott Kimball, Sharon Kimball, Ivy Kimmich, Michael King Hancock, Eddie King, Fred King, Frederick King, Isabel King, Liz King, Susi Kinglefuss, Carol Kingsley, Siegfried Kiontke, Carmine Kischke, Christine Kischke, helen Kitchen, Helen Kitchin, Andrew Kitt, Andy Kitt, Any Kitt, Tara Kitt, John Kitzinger, Jens Kjeldsen, Niels Kjeldsen, Ken Klaebe, Monroe Kleiderman, Andreas Klein, Barry Klein, Jan Klein, Janet Klein, Naomo Klein, Martha Kleinbaum Lolita Kleinbaum, Ricardo Kleinbaum, Rosita Kleinbaum, Ruben Kleinbaum, Salvador Kleinbaum, Richard Kleinberg, Naomi Kleyn, Sandra Kleyn, Heidi Klinger, Michael Klinger, Gad Klopstock, Yaffa Klopstock, yaffa Klopstock, Sharon Kloss, Andrea Kluge, Dave Kluge, Housi Knecht, Nancy Kneighten, Angie Knewitz, Elsa Knewitz, Elvira Knewitz, Nancy Knighten, Ruth Knudsen, Emilio Kobeh, Andi Koch, Andres Koch, Christa Koch, Elizabeth Kochsiek, Walter Koenig, Walter Kolabruski, Felix Kolla, Klaus Koller, Emilie Kong, Martha Korringa, Wouter Korringa, Juliane Kostinger, Hans-Peter Kotzli, Dick Kraman, Jayne Kraman, Roswitha Kratz, Rolf Krause, Susan Krause, James Krebsbach, Nancy Kredel, Pam Kresse, Randy Kretchmar, Rene Kristal, Karl Kroeger, Sandy Kroeger, Elizabeth Kroll, Herwig Kroll, Greg Krueger, Daniel Kuhn, Maina Kuhn, Roland Kuhn, Ron Kule, Josef Kunz, Steve Kurth, Tuula Kuusisto, Sandy Kuypers, Iria La Vaccara, Phil La Claire, Michele Labarile, Elena Labarrure, Andre Laberge, Johnny Laboriel, Bob Labre, Nick Labuschagne, Rocky Lackey, Steven Lackey, Richard Lacy, Andy Ladd, Nicole Lafreniere, Connie Lahmann, Simone Laine, Bert Laing, Joachim Laiss, Stevie Lake, Josette Lambert, Giovanni Lamberti Frederica Lambertini, Enzo Lamorgese, Federica Lampronti, Bernardo Lan, Carlos Lan, Jeannie Lan, Miguel Lan, Morris Lan, Sarah Lan, Victorina Landra, Janet Langdon, Gennaro Langella, Andree Langevin, Michael Lanza, Serge Lapointe, Thierry Laprevote, Angela Laramea, Charla Larch, Donna LaRock, Elena Larrabure, Miguel Larrabure, Allen Larsen, Alan Larson, Arwen Larson, Janet Larson, Sherry Larson, Christina Larsson, Urban Larsson, Albert Lasala, Finn Lassen, Connie Latch, Lloyd Latch, Brenda Latchman, Pat Lathrom, Marjorie Laughlin, Tom Laughran, Joe Lauricella, Marie-Margrethe Lauritzen, John Laursen, Iria Lavacarra, Angelo Lavazza, Peggy Laverdiere, Andre Lavergnat, Charles Lavin, Joseph Lavin, Janet Lawrence, Greg Layton, Philippe Le Bourveau, Marc leach, Bruce Leavitt, Luis Leceta, Didier LeClercq, Steve Lederman, Carol Lee Womble, James Lee Antoinette Lee, Barbara Lee, Michael Lee, Mike Lee, Sydney Lee, Alain Lefebre, Eva Lefevre, Sam Lefkowitz, Pierre LeFrancois, Alain Lefrancois, Monique Lefrancois, Giuliana Legnani, Merriad Lehman, Monica Lehman, Yves Lehman, Hannes Lehmann, Klaus Lehmann, Meinrad Lehmann, Vivian Leifield, Al Leighton, Carol Leipsic, Ruth Lennie, Bente Lenz, Maurizio Lenzi, Ingrid Lenzke, Luis Leon, Ricardo Leon, Marsha Leone, Fabrizio Leonelli, Ben Leong, Gunter Leonhardt, Sergio Leoni, Gary Lerner, Diane Leroux, Vanella Lesevre, Andrea Lettieri, Tobias Leutenegger, Joe Levin, Johnny Levin, Alvah Levine, Barbara Levine, Daniel Levine, Doris Levine, Caspar Levman, Jan Levy, Sam Levy, Stew Levy, Barbara Lewis, Carita Lewis, Donna Lewis, James Lewis, Laura Lewis, Michael Lewis, Myron Lewis, Norman Lewis, Ronald Lewis, Victor Lidchi, Maria Lienert, Janet Light, Mari-Ann Lind, Per Lindberg, Ole Lindell, Christina Lindroth, Artur Lindskog, Virginia Lindskog, Michael Lindström, Lenny Lindstrom, Michael Lindstrom, Lil Linson, David Lipchitz, Elizabeth Lippert, Lee Lippert, Heidi Lipscher, Juraj Lipscher, Albert Lipschutz, Mireille Lipschutz, Ken Lipton, Francesco Locilento, Frnaco Locilento, Jurg Locker, Rachel Lockwood, Maria Lodovici, Mario Lodovici, Leona Logan, Beatrix Lohman, Claus Lohmann, Leonardo Loi, Robert Lolln, Salvatore Lombardo, Desiree Long, Steve Longbotham, Joan Lonstein, Joan Loosli, Angel Lopez, Juan-Baptista Lopez, Leticia Lopez, Charla Lorch, Pier-Angelo Loreggia, Bill Lorentzen, Vikki Lorentzen, Carlos Lores, Michel Loron, Christi Losh, Mary Losty, Albert Lotz, Bjorn Lotz, Trey Lotz, Marlys Lotzer, Jan Loup Gilliot, Krystyna Louw, Anita Lowe, Jill Lowe, Madeline Lowe, Susan Lowe, Bernie Lowenstein, Grace Lowrance, Maria Lozano, Borghild Lozio, Nicola Lozio, Henry Lubbe, Harry Lucas, Nick Lucchesi, Hannelore Luck, Beth Ludwig Beth Ludwig, Patrick Lue Fan, Carlo Lugli, Claudio Lugli, Maria Lugli, Renata Lugli, Jerry Lull, Steve Lund, Conny Lundberg, Betty Lunde, Borje Lundgren, Anita Lundstedt, Mary-Jane Luniewski, Ron Luniewski, Ronald Luniewski, Paolo Luoni, Tarcisio Luoni, David Luscombe, Christian Lussi, Ernie Lutz, Hania Lux, Sally Lyn Zwan, June Lynch, Mary Lynne Wolfe, Bobby Lyons, Bruno Maca, Lenny Macaluso, Deanne Macdonald, Debbi Mace, Debbie Mace, Rick MacFarlane Sylvia Machado, Marco Macias, Phyllis Mack, Daniel MacKenzie, Bernadette Macullo, James Madia, Jim Madia, Stephen Mage, Maurizio Maggione, Janine Magnan, Janine Magnan, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Mario Majorski, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Lina Majorsky Marc Majorsky, Mario Majorsky, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, M
arco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, Dan Marino, Daniel Marino, Gennaro Marino, Christie Marion, Jessica Marks, Susan Marple, Ray Marquardt, Pura Marquez, carlo Martelli, Carlos Martelli, Diana Martelli, Michele Martelli, Pedro Martin-Moreno, Christina Martinez, Francisco Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lucinda Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Pilar Martinez, Sergio Martinez, Veronica Martinez, Luisella Martini, Marc Marty, Robert Marx, Laura Mason, Mary Mason, Mary-Clare Mason, Dedo Maspero, Giusy Maspero, Patrizio Maspero, Valerio Maspero, Denise Masse, Alessandro Massolo, Donato Masucci, Antonelo Matar, Angela Matarazzo, Antonello Matarazzo, Luis Mateos, Dwight Matheny, Konrad Matt, Leon Matthews, Sue Mattinson, Giorgio Mattioli, Maria Mattioli, Maria-Teresa Mattioli, Pietro Mauro, GianFranco Mauro, Mary Mauser, Thomas Maxwell, Jeanette May, Elena Maya, James Mayer, Jim Mayer, Ulrich Mayer, Ursi Mayer, Regula Mayor, Kate Mays, Todd Mays, Christine Mazarand, Riccardo Mazza, Tito Mazza, Scott Mazzanarella, Elisabetta Mazzorato, Evangelina Mazzorato, Loris Mazzorato, Vincenzo Mazzoratto, Rose McAffee, Pam McCall, Mary McCarran, Mike McCaudles, Peter McCord, Carlynn McCormick, John McCormick, Margee McCormick, Rod McCormick, Gwen McCoy, Michael McCoy, Mick McCoy, Joseph McCusker, Janice McDaniels, Janice McDannel, Carolann McDonald, Michael McDonald, Shannon McDougall, Gill McEnery, Robert McFarlane, Jeff McGee, Lee McGee, Tom McIntyre, David McKee, Thomas McKee, Dennis McKenna, Mark McKenna, Breck McKinley, Jean McKinnon, Terry McKnee, Beth McLeod, Kenny McLeod, Debbie McNeely, Gerald McNeely, Jerry McNeely, Mario McQuade, Simon Meadmore, Gisela Medina, Lee Meekcoms, Karen Megan, Giovanna Megna, Jeannette Meier, Ursi Meier, Paolo Meini, Bob Meinsma, Betsy Melchior, Tim Melchior, Claire Melgren, david Melis, Alexia Melocchi, Al Melone, Penny Melrose Fernando Mena, Brigitte Meneau, Raquel Menoa, Guy Mercier, May Meriwether, Stefania Merlino, Clarisse Meschoulam, Tom Messick, Helen Meuley Ract, Alex Meyer, Christine Meyer, Otto Meyer, Ursi Meyer, jackie Meyers, Jacquellyn Meyers, Francoise Michaillet, Ron Michalski, Louis Michel Brolles, Lana Micheletti, Lina Micheletti, Tony Milan, Renato Milani, Uwe Millan, Gil Miller, Tina Miller, Karen Milligan, Rick Milner, Terry Milner, Gisella Minacci, Tudy Ming, Jacqueline Mingard, Peter Miranda, Loretta Miscavige, Ron Miscavige, Joe Miskowiecz, Paul Missonis, Tess Mobilia, Lucio Modegna, Joe Modica, Gunter Mohl, Rudi Mohl, Antonello Moi, Vera Moklowya, Paolo Molini, Don Moll, Fritz Mollman, Brigitta Mollmann, Kurt Molman, Jacky Molnar, Theo Molten, Charles Momsen, Greg Montangero, Susanne Montangero, Luisa Montero, Vicky Montesinos, Vito Montini, Vittorio Montini, Ed Mooney, Pat Mooney, Art Moore, Brigid Moore, Bruce Moore, David Moore, Peter Moore, Wendy Moose, Jose-Luis Morales, Paul Morel, Pablo Moreno, Tas Morfopoulos, Jeaninne Morissette, Angela Moro, Livia Morone, Loreno Moroni, Magda Morra, Brian Morrell, Silvana Morri, Kathy Morrill, Patricia Morrill, Terry Morrill, Bob Morris, Deborah Morris, Faye Morris, Gloria Morris, Mavis Morrison, Karen Morrissett, Carol Morse, David Morse, Joan Mort, Cecilia Mortano, Mina Moschini, Mildred Moscona, Lauren Moseley, Cathy Moss, Kathy Moss, Ron Moss, Lena Moufarej, Linan Moufarres, Art Mould, Richard Moulton, David Mowbray, david Mowbray, Roger Mueller, Walter Mueller, Elly Muller, fred Muller, Josef Muller, Peter Muller, Robert Muller, Roger Muller, Walter Muller, Jean-Christophe Mulliez, Javier Munoz Carmen Munoz, Hector Munoz, Javier Munoz, Alejandra Munro, Klaus Munz, Evelyn Murdock, Dan Murillo, Peter Murphy, Jerry Murray, Marvin Murray, Pat Murray, Barbara Musach, Bob Musack, Janice Myerberg, Paul Myerberg, Beth Nabors, Betyh Nabors, Lorena Nacif, Linda Nadir, Bill Nagengast, Judy Nagengast, Douglas Nagy, Mike Napier, Ed Naranjo, Antonio Narcisco, Cecilia Nascimento, Silvia Nascimento, Anne Nash, Bob Nastas, Claudio Natale, Marco Natale, Silvia Natale, Silvio Natale, Orlando Navarro, Patricia Navarro, Ann Naylor, Darrel Naylor, Astrid Neal, James Neal, Ron Nedd, Dennis Negley, Wendy Negley, Linda Neilson, Robert Neilson, Pamela Nelson, Donna Nemier, Art Nermiah, John Ness, Douglas Neuman, Rebecca Neuman, Gloria Neumeyer, Walter Neuschitzer, Herman Newkirk, Josh Newkirk, Alex Newman, Anita Newman, Arnold Newman, Becky Newman, Buzz Newman, John Newman, Mark Newman, Mary Newman, Phil Newman, Steve Newman, Willie Newman, Edith Nichols, Carol Nickols, John Nickols, Anne Nielsen, Bob Nielson, Celia Niemerow, Guillermo Nietes, Norma Nieto, Oscar Nieves, Ruth Nighswonger, Franco Nigro, Meryl Nilsson, Betty Nimger, Christian Nissen, Christian Nitart, Claude Nitart, Brodie Noeske, Rodie Noeske, Robert Nordlund, Thomas Nordlund, Robert Nordstrom, nadine Normal, Michael Norris, Mike Norris, Nadia North, Derrick Northcross, Gianfranco Notari , John Novello, Norm Novitsky, Mark Noyes, Bruna Nucci, Richard Nuccio, Jeff Nuckols, John Nuckols, Steve Nuckols, Judy Nugent, Antonio Nunes, Ann Nunez, Carlos Nunez, Jose Nunez, Maria-Elena Nunez, Mario Nunez, Jose-Luis Nuno, Manfred Nussle, Maria Nutgeren, David Nutter, Sally Nutter, Tom Nyerges, Elaine O’Connell, Kevin O’Donnell, Maryann O’Donnell, Melissa O’Hara, Steve O’Hara, Maureen O’Keefe, Kieran O’Leary, Peter Obolensky, Hugo Ocalo, Steven Ogmon, Therese Oliva, Barbara Oliver, Joy Ollemans, Dolores Olmos, Geri Olson, Giuseppe Onesti, Michel Oneyron, Churlya Ong Wurfel, Enrico Opipari, Luisa Opipari, Giuseppe Oresti, Luisa Orlandini, Umberto Orlandini, Pilar Orozco, Dolores Ortiz, Jesus Ortiz, Veronica Orvananos, Hazel Osborne, Mario Osborne, Mike Osborne, Rick Osborne, Carol Osinaga, Inger Ostlund, Vega Ostlund, Peter Otanjac, Patrick Ouellette, Bill Owen, Brooke Owen, Dan Owen, James Owen, Jim Owen, Michael Owen, Nancy Owen, Robert Pace, Adrian Padilla, Ariel Padva, Robert Page, Mary-Jo Pagel, Per Pagh, Rebecca Pagovich, Paula Paiewonsky, Mauricio Palacios, Chris Palmer, Garnet Palmer, Margie Palmer, Dario Pandolfi, Alessandra Panigalli, Roberto Panigalli, Jennifer Pantermuehl, Daniela Paolini, Paolo Paolini, Pietro Paolini, Daniele Paoloni, George Papaheraklis, Juan Paredes, Louise Parent, Serge Parent, Floriana Paris, Anna Parise, Beverly Park, Margaret Parke, Phillip Parke, Debbie Parker, James Parker, Francois Parmentier, Nancy Parodi, Pat Parodi, Stephen Parodi, Bennett Parrish, Helen Parselle, Jeanine Pasche, Ron Patella, Jo Patti, Bonnie Paull, Cindy Payer, Beatrice Payne, Graham Payne, Chip Payson, Sheri Payson, Jose-Luis Paz, Colleen Peabody, Dee Pearson, Dee-Dee Pearson, Delores Pearson, Rosie Peck, Sally Peck, Ernie Pecoraro, Nydia Pecoraro, Robert Pedersen, Karen Pedre, Patrizia Pedroza, Heidi Peens, Louis Peens, Antonella Peghin, Patrizia Pelizzari , Sylvie Pelletier, Andree Peloquin, Anne Peloquin, Diane Peloquin, Guy Peloquin, Michel Peloquin, Hector Pena, Fred Penna, Jeanette Penwell, David Percival, Antonio Perez, Arturo Perez, Elisa Perez, Jose Perez, Samuel Perez, Dennis Pero, Giugliana Peroni, Eliana Perotti, Silvio Perotti, Genevieve Perrin, Steven Perrin, Alessandra Pesce, Gisella Pesce, Silvia Pestiddo, Lynn Peters, Kifumi Peterson, Bradford Petit, Pino Petrotto, Angelo Petruolo, Marzia Pezzali, Don Pfendler, Linda Phillip, Christine Phillips, Diane Phillips, Michael Phillips, Maria Pia Gardini, Pier Piaceri, Laura Piazza, Lucio Piazza, Enzo Piccone, Isella Piccone, Patricia Piccone, George Pick Geoffrey Pick, Jean Pierre Deleze, Jean Pierre Lehman, Luciano Pietrobuoni, Giuseppe Pietrobuono, George Pilat, Irit Pillo, Bernard Pimont, Giovanni Pin
chietti, Claire Pinelli, Gustavo Pinto, Katharina Piotrowski, Colleen Piper, Collen Piper, Claire Pirelli, Alain Pitre, Letizia Pizzi, Dominic Pizzinat, Veronique Pizzinat, Ariel Podva, Daniel Podva, Marie-Louise Podva, Beatrice Pogouch Armando Pogoush, Dieter Pohlmann, Manuel Poiatti, Jean Poitras, Carl Polk, Dan Polk, Mireille Pollack, Fay Pollard, Ina Pollins, Mario Polverini, Maurizio Polverini, Bruce Pomaville, Martha Pomroy, martha Pomroy, Angelo Ponchetti, Maria-antonieta Ponchetti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchetti, Giovanni Ponchietti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchietti, Dick Pool, Cal Poole, Calvin Poole, Mark Poole, Fred Pope, Hermann Poppinga, Hans-Jorge Porner Claude Portais, Joanne Porter, Carlos Portillo, Paula Portmann, Joanne Portner, Graham Potter, Jack Potter, Christian Pouliot, Maria Pozzebon, Priscilla Presley, Leonie Price, Paul Price, Rosa Prieto, Clay Primrose, Earl Prince, Marty Prince, Nicolas Prince, Bruce Pringle, Carlyn Pringle, Carolyn Pringle, Daniela Prior, Tommy Pritzkau, Antonella Prosali, Massimo Prosperi, Peter Przybylla, Pia Pskowski, Hamida Puatti, Susana Puente, Marco Pugelli, Luisella Pugliatti, Hamida Puiatti, Wayne Pullen, Lee Purcell, Betsy Putterman, Larry Putterman, Michel Puzzolante, Sigrun Quetes, Rod Quinn, Bolivar Quinones, Francisco Quiroz, Ken Rabey, Nornie Rabey, Pat Rabey, Sheri Rabey, Janice Racheff, Jerry Racheff, Norma Rachel Brian Rackham, Helene Ract, Orelio Radaelle, Oreste Radaelli, Silvio Radaelli, Jerald Radroblo, Ron Radstrom, Leon Raffoul, Erika Rail, Rob Rainer, Aino Raisanen, Mauno Raisanen, Jaakko Raita, Pirjo Ramberg, Graciela Ramirez, Jaimes Ramirez, Lidia Ramirez, Norma Ramirez, Jose Ramon Amondarain, Eduardo Ramos, Giovanni Rampazzo, Mauro Rangeloni, Michel Raoust, Farhad Raschidi, Heidi Raschidi, Victoria Rashidi, Bruce Raston, Keith Raymond, Sandy Raymond, Joe Reaiche, Serge Rebeillard, Nelia Redondo, Nena Redtmann, Jan Regan, Sissy Reginato, Gayle Rego, Jim Rego, Marian Reguera, Sherwood Reichard, Brian Reichenberg, Helmut Reichert, Jean Reid, Gerhard Reile, Kathy Reilly, Eric Reinertaen, Felix Reinhard, Liliane Reinhard, Felix Reinhardt, Maggie Reinhart, David Reinken, Bruno Reisch, Richard Reiss, Manfred Renker, Gerard Renna, Karen Renna, Ian Rennie, Ann Rentachler, Lisa Rentschler, Brian Reso, Joan Reso, Michel Reveillere, Odile Reveillere, Virginia Rex, Edelia Reyes, Gino Reyes, Olivia Reyyes, Emil Rhodes, Mary Ribero, Gay Ribisi, Giuseppina Riccardi, Duane Rice, Mischa Rice, Arlene Rich, Frances Rich, Gary Rich, gary Rich, John Rich, Jean Richardson, Dan Richier, Harry Rickard, Dee-Dee Riechel, Frank Riemer, Paul-Unko Rieter, Nicola Rinaldi, Barbara Rinder, Ian Rinder, Jan Rinder, Crister Ringkvist, Fernando Rios, Gian-Luigi Ripamonti, Patricia Ripetta, Michael Rischer, Giancarlo Rivolta, Giovanna Rizetti, Giovanni Rizza, Carol Rizzardini, Giovanna Rizzetti, Costanzo Robasto, Francisco Robasto, Silvano Robasto, Don Roberts, Donald Roberts, Gracia Roberts, Lynn Roberts, Suzanne Roberts, Hunter Robertson, James Robertson, Maggie Robertson, Marguerite Robin, Allison Robinson, Mary Robinson, Myron Robinson, Patrick Robinson, Robbie Robinson, Dan Robison, Jose Robles, Ricardo Robotton, Francisco Rocha, Rene Rochat, Kathleen Roche, Kathy Roche, Craig Rocheau, Norma Rochelle, Michael Rock Mike Rock, Bonnie Rockwell, Jean Rockwell, Ginger Rodeghero, Linda Rodgers, Tony Rodgers, Jose RodriGuez, Susan RodriGuez, Antonia Rodriguez, Juan-Salas Rodriguez, Martin Rodriguez, Noemi Rodriguez, Gina Rogers, Mimi Rogers, Rick Rogers, Pablo Rohrig, Sabine Rohrig, Helena Rojo, Dennis Roland, Doc Roland, Kay Roland, Kaye Roland, Len Roland, Riccardo Romanini, Romano Romanini, Tiziana Romanini, Claudio Romano, Laura Romano, Patrizia Romano, Jose Romeo, Jose-Manuel Romero, Rocio Romero, Jorge Roncal, Bruno Ronchi, Ricardo Rosales, Louise Rose, Sandi Rosen, Sandy Rosen, Alain Rosenberg, Alain-Frank Rosenberg, Sarit Rosenberg, Charles Rosenkranz, Allyne Rosenthal, Jean Rosko, Gwen Ross, Ron Ross, Rino Rossetti, Alessandro Rossi, Giorgio Rossi, Christian Rossini, Marianne Rossini, Riccardo Rosso, Harry Rostig, Sandra Rostig, Marco Rota, Alon Roth, Bernard Roundhill, Karen Rounds, Cristina Roveyaz, Elaine Rowles-Poole, Susan Royal, Kristina Royce, Richard Royce, Jaime Ruane, Pat Rubey, Michael Rubin, Sy Rubin, Bet Ruddell, Steven Ruddell, Alfons Ruegg, Alfonse Ruegg, Gery Ruegg, Sleven Ruggiero, Guido Ruiu Hector Ruiz, Roberto Ruiz, Linda Rule, Giovanni Rusconi, Sara Russo, Margaret Rutherford, Susan Ryan Eastin, Gerard Ryan, Howard Ryan, Joan Ryan, Corry Ryke, Tony Ryke, Bernardo Sacchi, Bianca Sacchi, Vittorio Sacchi, Doug Sadwick, Douglas Sadwick, Nancy Sadwick, Fernando Sakuray, Marco Salame, Russell Salamon, Kenneth Salazar, Oscar Saldarriaga, Andres Saldivar, Tom Saliga, Mauricio Salinas, Ritva Salmela, Leon Salsberg, Matty Salsberg, Adriana Saltamerenda, Michael Saltz, Landru Salvo, Tony Sampson, Paolo San Agostino, Robert San Filippo, Roberto San Filippo, Alejandar Sanchez, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrea Sanchez, Benites Sanchez, Firmin Sanchez, Gisela Sanchez, Pilar Sanchez, Eileen Sanders, Sunny Sanders, Claude Sandoz, Diana Sandrin, Michel Sansfacon, Paolo Santagostino, Luis Santiago, Pablo Santiago, Alberto Santinato, Mavi Santinato, Graziella Santo, Massimo Santoro, Frances Santos, Hernan Santos, Laura Santos, Roberto Santos, Bonifacio Saponaro, Alberto Sarrocco, Ennio Sarrocco, Mike Savales, Andy Savas, Kathy Savas, Martha Savelo, Saveria Savocchia, Iris Sawtelle, Fabio Scarabelli, Alex Schabes, Volker Schalthoff, Denise Scherer, Guido Scherer, Theo Scherer, Olga Shermayer, Ursula Scherwinzer, Catherine Scherzinger, Denise Scherzinger, Rolf Scherzinger, Clarisse Schmid, Heinz Schmid, Dieter Schmitt, Heide Schnabl, Hermann Schnabl, Susan Schnabli, Anita Schneider, Ingeborg Schneider, Joanne Schnitzer, Ingeborg Schnitzler, Hilda Schoemaker, Paul Scholten, Martin Schonenberger, Jeanne Schrodinger, Hermann Schubotz, Claudia Schuhbock, Inge Schuhbock, Ruth Schuler, Peter Schultz, Dieter Schulz, Joseph Schumacher, Vreni Schurtenberger, Cheryl Schwalbe, Gerhard Schwandt, Carole Schwartz, Joe Schwartz, Pam Schwartz, Robert Schwartz, Judith Schwyter, Giorgio Scialuga, Flavio Sciotti, Jeannie Scoglio, Jeff Scott Jeffrey Scott, Karen Scott, Sonya Scott, Susan Seagal, Jon Sears, Bernadette Segal, Frank Seibert, Rob Seibert, Andy Seidler, George Seidler, Philip Seifleir, Marie Selosse, Jacques Senior, Maria Serato, Vincenzo Servidio, Vincenzo Servilio, Vincenzo Servodio, Jacob Sevilya, John Sexsmith, Mario Sgamarella, Pietro Sgaramelli, Peter Sgroi, Mike Shadowski, Anita Shain Reichenberg, Avishai Shalev, Bill Shannon, Pat Shannon, Hyam Shaull, Wendy Shaw, Rick Sheey, Hanna Shefi, Joanne Shelby, Larry Shelton, Kathy Shepard, Kathy Sheperd, Eric Sherman, Manon Sherman, Martin Sherman, Renee Sherman, Ron Sherwood, Bill Shields, Megan Shields, Chris Shipman, Ilana Shippony, Donald Showalter, Susan Shugart, Gloria Sierra, Joan Sigal, Jan Silber, Marc Silber, Penny Silber, Bruce Silton, Larry Silver, Dennis Simmons, Karen Simons, Tony Simpson, David Singer, Martine Sitbon, Gro Skov, Tina Slack, Benetta Slaughter, David Slaughter, Larry Sliver, David Sloane, Pascal Smakdji, Margaret Smidt Van Gelder, Brian Smith, Dieter Smith, Greg Smith, John Smith, Lena Smith, Louise Smith, Peter Smith, Steven Smith, Jessie Snow, Kathy Snow, Scott Snow, Peter Snyder, Deborah Sobocinski, Lawrence Sobocinski, Flavio Sofia, Tom Solari, Elena Soldati, Liesel Soley, Linda Solomon, Lee Some, Donna Sommer, Ann Sophie Wago, Beatrice Sopprarono, Ronit Soracco, Bengt Sorensen, Daniel Sorensen, Eric Sorensen, Scott Sorensen, Dick Sorenson, Josse-Luis Sosa, Jose-Maria Sousa, Vicki Southard, Maurizio Sozzi, Joe Spencer, John Spencer, Torrey Spencer, Michal Spencer-Smith, Paul Spencer-Smith, Massimiliano Speri, Ann Spielberg, Rick Spies, Jim Spina, Michael Spinelli, Jean Spinner, Fritz Spohn, Maggie Spohn, Bruno Spolenak, Jenny Sprecher, Stephen Spreecher, Luisa Sprefilio Richard Springsteed, Robert Sprungli, David St-Lawrence, Herbert Stahl, Maike-B Stahl, Hansueli Stahli, Darrell Staley, Aldo Stanzani, Roberto Stanzani, Chiara stanzani, Ch
ristina Staples, Peter Staples, Velli Stefneki, Rolf Steimer, Art Stein, Paul Stein, Cathy Steiner, George Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Lewis Steinman, Charles Stephens, George Stermer, Jennifer Stermer, Cheryl Stewart, Donna Stewart, Tony Stewart, Egon Stiebel, Edith Stockli, Ilse Storfer, Paul Storfer, Dan Stover, Joe Stover, Peter Stowes Travis Stracener, Betty Stradford, Dan Stradford, Gene Streett, Anne Strickland, Peter Strickler, Bengt Strom, Jeanine Struchen, Dominique Struder, Jo Struthers, Kathrin Stuckenbrock, Marilyn Stuckli, Brian Sturgeon, David Sturgiss, Gloria Suarez de Romero, Alberto Suarez, Denise Suarez, Maria Suarez, Leo Suchor, Bob Sudalnik, Susanne Sudalnik, Bonnie Sue Krumpe, Michael Suggs, Jon Supak, Margaret Supak, Jurgen Suplit, Libia Susana Calvete, Angela Sushko, Lana Susman, Marie Suter, Max Suter, Betty Sutphin, Herb Sutphin, Christian Svensson, Staffan Svensson, Sherry Swanson, Ralph Swarens, Paul Sweeny, Renee Swisko, Jim Sydejko, Linda Sydejko, Francois Sylvestre, Debbie Taffe, Joseph Taffe, Veikko Taivainen, Peter Talbot, Mitch Talevi, Pierre Tamboise, Harry Taplin, Roberto Tarabini, Serge Tardif, Tania Tarpico, Elena Tarqui, Jaime Tauchi, Berndt Taylor, Bruce Taylor, Claire Taylor, John Taylor, Sue Taylor, Pierre Tedeschi, Sylvie Tedeschi, Jaime Tello, Ralph Temps, Grace Ten Oever, Sax Ten Oever, Carmine Terra, Meri Tertelman, Aline Testa, Gerd Teutsch, Peter Thalmann, Laurent Theberge, Len Their, Marie Therese Meili, Yves Thibodeau, Marc Thies, Ann Thomas, Bob Thomas, David Thomas, Dina Thomas, Laurie Thomas, Meredith Thomas, Miguelle Thomas, Pat Thomas, Serge Thomas, Bruce Thompson, Frank Thompson, Raymond Thompson, Anne Thurston, Fatima Thut, Dottie Tillberg, Tomas Tillberg, Tina Tinbri, Chris Tingley, Alain Tizzioli, Don Tolan, Maureen Tolan, Ildiko Tombolini, Kristin Tomczak, Jacqueline Tomlinson, Stefano Tonellotto, Claudio Toppi, Ernesto Toro, Ricardo Toro, Graciela Torres Graciela Torres, Maria Torres, Miguel Torres, Ricardo Torres, Sergio Torres, Silvia Torres, Giullio Toso, Kader Toumi, Larry Trainor, larry Trainor, John Travolta, Nicole Tremblay, Pierre Tremblay, Daniel Tremblay, Anne-Marie Tremday, Angie Trent, Gian-Paolo Trivella, Gigi Troglio, Dave Tropf, Irv Trudell, Irving Trudell, Gunter Tschauder, Hans-Peter Tschudin, Susi Tschupp, Bill Tucker, Bodil Tucker, Stefan Tunedal, Philip Tunison, Paul Turnbull, Bruce Turner, Nancy Turner, George Turney, Andrea Turroni, Rudiger Tuschen, Catherine Tweed, Rusty Tweed, Vera Tweed, Enrique Ugarte, Maggie Uitz, Francesca Ulivieri, Anette Ungerman, Marian Upton, Alessandro Urbini, Mikel Urizarbarrena, Dario Usai, Franco Useri, Charlie Uslander, Ornella Vaccari, Marco Vaccarone, Mario Vaccarone, Marie-France Vachon, Nola Vains, Antonio Valentini, Hector Valenzuena, Jane Van Pelt, Jone Van Hoecke, Marc Van den Lynde, Michael Van Masters, Timothy Van De Pelt, Victoria Van Harasz, Eden Vanning, Manuel Vargas, Anita Vasquez, Cesar Vasquez, Sergio Vavalle, Jean Vavrus, Anita Vazquez, Frank Vedder, Judy Vedder, Enrique Vega, Manuel Vega, Maria Vega, Fredrich Veit, Manuel Velasco, Maria Velasco, Ricardo Velazquez, Jose Veloz, Diana Venegas, Sam Venti, Velia Vera, Yolanda Vergara, Susan Verger, Angela Vescovi, Norman Vespi, Marc Vianna, Anne Vicino, Elaine Vidal, Tania Vilchez, Tom Villaire, Val Villaluz, Jose Villareal Acosta, Antonieta Villareal, Antono Villareal, Jose Villareal, Maria Villareal, Rodrigo Villareal, Rudolfo Villareal, Jose Villarreal, Charni Vilnar, Angelina Vincent, Sylvie Vincent, Margarita Vinyallonga, Mireya Vinyallonga, Vera Vitale, Lore Vlemmings, Bob Voight, Christie Voight, Jon Voight, Steve Vollum, Giuseppe Volpari, Connie Von Adelung, Edith Von Thungen, Erik Vos, Marijke Vos, Sally Voss, Larry Voyer, Beatrice Vuille, beatrice Vuille, Erik Wagel Sorensen, Ann Wagle, Helga Wagner, Tom Waite, Peter Wakley, Marc Walby, Andrea Walker, David Walker, Doff Walker, Estelle Walker, Jack Walker, Jill Walker, Nancy Walker, Peter Walker, Rene Walker, Roger Walker, Rohn Walker, Margot Wall, Janie Wallace, Jim Wallace, Tony Walpert, Siegfried Walser, Marc Walter, Therese Wanner, George Ward, Lana Ward, Laura Ward, Bruce Warren, Jerry Watson, Susan Watson, Susie Watson-Taylor, Barey Wayne Critzer, Art Webb, Alice Webber, Bennet Webber, Carolyn Weber, Gerd Weber, Harriet Weber, Joan Weber, Maria Weber, Patricia Weber, Regula Weber, Winfred Weber, Paula Webster, Edouard Weesely, Doug Weigand, Judith Weigand, Judy Weigand, Scott Weigand, Nancy Weilgart, Peter Weis, Odile Weisgerber, Rebecca Weiss, Kathy Welch, kathy Welch, Brad Wells, Martha Wells, Ted Wells, Heidi Wendel, Janine Wenger, Marcel Wenger, Chris Wertin, Julien Wessenberger, Dorothy West, Kathy West, Kirk Westerman, Peggy Westerman, Jeanne Weston, Anette Westphal, Kjell Westphal, Joanne Wheaton, Bob Wheeler, Ellyn Wheeler, Janice Wheeler, Larry Wheeler, Lydia Wheeler, William Wherry, Tom Whipple, Betsy White, George White, Judy White, Rosalind White, Kurt Wicki, Monika Wieneke, Sherri Wiktor, Ruth Wilette, Peggy Wiley, Virgil Wilhite, Ernie Wilkens, Janet Wilkens, Cary Wilkins, Janet Wilkins, John Wilkins, Bob Wilkinson, James Wilkinson, John Wilkinson, Fran Willardson, Judith Willardson, Judy Willardson, Ruth Willett, Christine Williams, Dick Williams, Elizabeth Williams, Jack Williams, Karla Williams, Peter Williams, Eve Willner, Neil Willner, Barbara Wilson, Curt Wilson, David Wilson, Duke Wilson, Phil Wilson, Rosa Wilson, Ted Winegar, Dennis WInfrey, Gil Winter, Marge Wirick, Barbara Wiseman, Nikki Wiseman, Adele Witkin, Joan Witt, Judy Witt, Else-Margarete Wojan, Meggie Wojan, Nancy Wold, Barbara Wolf, Shirley Wolf, Mary Wolfe, Benjamin Wolff, Tova Wolff, Leslie Wolleinstein, Gus Wollitzer, Aurora Wong, Bill Wong, Harry Wong, Percy Wong, Roberto Wong, Claire Woodruff, John Woodruff, Diane Woods, Michael Woods, Neil Woods, Steven Woodworth, Diane Workman, Heinz Wrege, Sara Wright Lister, Bonnie Wright, Cyndy Wright, Chris Wrightsman, Pam Wrightsman, Bonnie Wubben, Bia Wunderer, Churlya Wurfel, Hubert Wurfel, Kathy Wydler, Verena Wyss, Alexandra Yacoulef, David Yanrenko, Richard Yared, Brenda Yates, Marie Yates, Bill Yaude, Kathy Yaude, Beat Yogel, Jeff Youmans, Ofelia Yunes, Wolfgang Zabel, Alberet Zack, Anders Zacks, Ed Zacks, Marjorie Zacks, Larry Zagler, Bill Zahn, Bill Zalin, Lorenzo Zambelli, Giovanni Zamboni, Arturo Zamora, Maria Zanaboni, Gianni Zanetti, Lucia Zangrandi, Jack Zani, Laura Zani, Pauline Zani, Peter Zani, Gisela Zapata, Rita Zarahn, Helga Zaun, Robert Zchwartz, Susan Zea, Irina Zecchina, Ivan Zecchina, Bob Zeltzer, Jose Zenas, Heinz Zepernick, Alfredo Zetune, Martha Zetune, Andrea Zhinaghi, Ros Ziebart, Edda Ziehe, Helmut Ziehe, Deborah Zimmatore, Peter Zimmatorre, Michael Zimmer, Oreste Zinaghi, Massimo Zocche, Waki Zollner, Diana Zottola, Glenn Zottola, Antonio Zucchelli, Beatrice Zulauf, Kaija Zulker, Paula Zulli, Harry Zunicky, Elena Zurloni, Giovanna Zurloni, Bryan Zwan, Robert Zwan, Kaspar Zwicky, Robert Zwiegers

Black Ops of the Church of Scientology

 OPERATIONS OFFICER

Successful:

(1) Allowing outer Org B1s to develop their own Ops ideas to submit for
      approval -- and demanding such.

(2) Allowing outer Org B1s to run approved Ops based on first hand data
      as long as it's kept within the framework of the Op.

(3) Providing a believable source of an operation, thereby filling the
      vacuum, so that Scn. isn't dubbed in as source.

(4) When planning an Op, mentally following it all the way through
      looking for areas which need to be taken into account; and taking
the
      enemy's viewpoint of the Op for the same purpose.

(5) Full and correct use of target series for each Op.  Targets simply
      stated and specific as possible.  (Helps in debugging and to hat
      inexperienced persons)

(6) The major target of the Op is based on a *real*, current situation.

(7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm
      lines.

(8) Getting an enemy to attack another enemy.

(9) Working off of programmes which align Ops actions to other Br 1
      sections and other Bureaus and which contain command intention from
      LRH on down.  (Admin scale and priorities aligned)

(10) Working for VFPs and having such reflected in the statistics, rather
      than a lot of sub-products.

(11) Exposure of real, documented enemy crimes and material of a
      scandalous nature.

(12) Utilizing current events and trends (and finding the right buttons)
      for exploitation in Ops channels.

(13) Keeping plans bright and simple and on target.

(14) Finding real buttons.

(15) Keeping up persistent pressure until the product is achieved.

(16) Establishing some type of feedback line so that exact effects are
      known.

(17) Mini-hatting by giving examples of successful Ops.

Unsuccessful:

(1) Ops on random attackers instead of WHOs, just to be doing Ops for Ops
      sake.

(2) Dubbing in buttons.

(3) Trying to do everything on an Op by yourself from a management or
      senior executive level, and therefore not allowing origination or
      juniors to wear their hats.

(4) A one shot approach, rather than persistent pressure and several
      channels to a product.

(5) Harassment actions.

(6) Not planning or providing for a believable source of the Op so that
      a vacuum is left allowing the recipients to dub in Scn amongst
      others.

(7) When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs it's
      full course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving critical
      holes in the plan which will later backfire on you, make your
      scramble on an emergency basis to handle or make the Op less
      effective.

(8) No use of, or misuse of, target series.  (too few, unspecific
      targets; many unaligned, hard to understand targets).

(9) An Op or major target based on revenge or out-of-PT situation.

(10) Producing, and stats aligned with, many sub-products as opposed to
      VFPs.

(11) Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions to
      this)

(12) Long involved and overly complex operations with many conditionals
      which if any or any one of several aren't done exactly would cancel
      out the effectiveness of the Op.  (There are rare exceptions)

(13) No feedback line; results of Ops not really known or dubbed in.

                        # # # # #

                 DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO

1.  Standard ODC with time track and a brief, summarized, well-rounded
      picture of a terminal.  (Following #2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 are the key areas
      data is needed)

2.  Criminal background of terminal.

3.  Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money)

4.  Legal involvements (summary of actions)

5.  Terminal's main interests, personal habits, fears, vices and any
      other items of interest.

6.  Friends and enemies on the terminal's 1st Dynamic
      Friends and enemies on the terminal's 2nd Dynamic
      Groups that the terminal belongs to and any groups or terminals, who
      are enemies of that group.

7.  What the terminal considers valuable & is protecting

8.  Simple org board the terminal is on, clearly noting his position and
      his seniors and noteworthy juniors.

9.  What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position he
      holds.

10.  Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal to
      lose his job/position.

11.  Any regulations concerning licenses that the terminal holds that
      would cause him to lose his license if violated (i.e. law, medical,
      contractor, etc.)

12.  Scandals, conflicts, disputes directly or indirectly connected to
      terminal.

13.  Documents that show criminality of terminal (i.e. cheating on income
      tax, discrediting data in personal letters, use of drugs, etc.)

14.

15.

Ops Planning

Ops planning goes over all the data on the WHO that Ops research has
compiled and with all the data available on the WHO, plans out channels of
attack on the WHO that will effectively remove/restrain the WHO from his
position of power.  Ops planning on a WHO is done using the data series,
target series, all Scientology tech applicable, and intelligence tech.
The following points should be followed in doing an operation:

1.  Initially plan out at least 3 channels of attack with the data you
      have at hand.  Do not wait forever to getall data collected, but
      also do not run Ops that would be dangerous without essential data.
      Basically a brighter idea is needed with less data available.  3
      channels being done instead of less is because there is a higher
      percentage of getting results and also this will tend to confuse and
      spin the WHO as there are 3 attacks instead of just one.

2.  Continue to plan Ops utilizing feedback from completed Ops so that
      the WHO has persistent attack on him and continual pressure.  Do
this
      consistent attack until the WHO is obliterated.

3.  Stay away from harassment actions that are only for the sake of doing
      channels or revenge.  ie: Sending pizzas from every Pizza delivery
      restaurant.  These basically have been unsuccessful as they do not
      achieve any real effective result, except for letting the WHO know
      that he is under attack.  There may be times when 50 pizzas every
day
      being sent to a WHO would be effective, but this would be in such a
      case where the WHO was restimulated heavily by seeing pizzas,
      smelling pepperoni or seeing pizza delivery boys, etc.

4.  Always include a way of getting feedback in an operation, so you know
      what type of result you are getting and for further planning of
      channels in those areas that give good results.

5.  Ensure proper security is planned in an operation, ie: use of an
      untraceable typewriter, paper without fingerprints, proper covers by
      FSM's, etc. (See security write-up and security section data in hat
      materials of Ops US hat checksheet)

6.  Use the target series exactly to programme out an operation on a WHO.
      Ensure the major target is based on a *real*, current situation and
      is an achievable purpose.

7.  Find out what the exact resources are for the area the Op will be
      implemented in and what the capabilities are of your terminals
      implementing the Op.

8.  Keep the targets in an operation simple, yet complete.

9.  Analyze properly the actual situation with the WHO and what the best
      line of attack should be done by the GO as a whole.  It may be
      necessary to suggest that PR or Legal do some specific action as a
      finishing off of the WHO.  Never wait for another bureau to handle a
      WHO, as Ops is responsible and has the capabilities to handle WHO's
      totally without the other Bureaus in the GO.  Liaison though is very
      important with the various GO bureaus, specifically the Legal Branch
      2 (attack area of Legal) and PR Branch 1 (attack area of PR).

10.  A believable source must be provided in an operation, thereby
      "filling the vacuum," so that Scientology isn't dubbed in as source
      of the attack.  A1 Ops are planned in such a way that they in no way
      could be traced back to the Church.

11.  Channels should be various and ever changing types of channel of
      attack, rather than sticking to one type of Op, such as an anonymous
      flyer that 3-P's a WHO.

12.  Mentally follow-thru your plan and ensure all factors concerning
      security and workability are taken into account.  It is a good idea
      to also take the enemy's viewpoint when working out your strategy in
      the operation.

Once the plan is fully targeted out, CSW with full complete data your
operation to the Dir Br1 US.  When it is approved, then the Ops plan and
the applicable data is flowed to Ops execution part of the Ops section.

Ops Execution

Ops execution implements the targeted-out approved operation.  If an AGI
in the field is to receive the targeted plan or orders to do a part of the
operation then this is routed in the following manner:

            Branch 1 Director US
            DG I US
            Ops mail line
            AGI _______
            _________________
            OPS OFF US

      The "Ops mail line" is a point where the Ops targets are mailed
      directly on a confidential line directly to the Ops terminal in the
      field.  (See the attached Ops Write-up 1R and the attached write-up
      of the US Ops Com-Lines)

Flexibility is important when doing a targeted out plan.  An operation
should not be done robotically, as at times an Operation can be found to
be unworkable for any number of different reasons.  As execution observes
the PT scenes of the Op and obtains feedback, it may be more applicable to
re-CSW new actions or alter targets because of threat of exposure of the
Op, etc.

Execution gets the Operation implemented and acts as Ops programmes
officer, 8-Cing Ops units to get the necessary targets done and debugging
bogged targets.  Execution works very close to planning in that the
necessary PT scene of the Op with feedback of the results is immediately
infoed to Ops planning, so new channels can be drawn up or revised as
necessary.

Ops execution ensures that the stat and report lines are in from his Ops
units implementing the operation.  (Ops Write-up 2R and 3 attached)

Source: http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/ops.htm

Thanks to  Arnaldo Lerma and Ida Camburn (http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn )

The origin of NOTs materials obtained through the legal system

Source: http://www.modemac.com/nots/nots7.html

On September 5th, 1996 a person in Sweden by the name of Zenon Panoussis filed NOTs with the Swedish Parliament Office. “Scientology responded by demanding that the court case be placed under “secrecy” — effectively sealing the case and thus ensuring that NOTs would not made accessible to the public in the way that the OT levels were entered as part of the Fishman Affidavit. But the secrecy order was initially denied. Zenon posted instructions on how to order copies of legal documents from the court on September 9, including copies of NOTs. The issue of secrecy was evidently vital to Scientology: in this message, Zenon notes that Scientology filed a second request for secrecy, and they appealed their first request. But these motions of secrecy were again dismissed by the Stockholm court of appeals. On Friday the 13th (ironically?), as Zenon writes, “the OTs and NOTs are still public documents and will most probably remain so forever.” As the OT court cases demonstrated in America, it is currently legal to order a copy of NOTs from the Stockholm court. (However, the legality of making copyrighted materials available for download on the Internet is questionable.)

Why were Scientology’s requests for secrecy repeatedly denied? The reason has to do with a unique policy in Sweden called offentlighetsprincipen. This is a provision of the Swedish constitution that guarantees access to public documents in order to prevent corruption and fraud, and it is considered a basic civil right in Sweden. The policy is explained in more detail in this email from an anonymous Swedish official.”

Currently number of people in the free field who have ordered copies of NOTs through the justice system may own a perfectly legal copy of NOTs materials. Please note that this article does not constitute a legal advice in regard to the status of those documents as the law vary in different jurisdictions. In addition it appears the authentic NOTs materials filed in the legal system have been stolen on a number of occasions and allegedly replaced with “Black Scientology” materials in order to sink in the free field. The replacement of the originally filed materials is on record.

NOTE: Some of the upper level materials that were independently leaked have been seeded with subverted issues designed to bring about instability or potential insanity within the unfortunate recipient.  Therefore it would be wise to authenticate the source materials used.

Related link: History of NOTs on the Net

Scientology, Myths and Copyright

In mid 1983 the Corporate Church of Scientology started a massive program to register LRH material. This is the reason most copyright filings have a date of 1983 forward. By then most of the HCOBs written by LRH prior to 1978 had fallen into Public Domain. To get around this the HCOBs were issued into tech volumes and then a copyright  was gotten to cover the whole book. But, if you look at the individual HCOBs in the tech volumes, the copyright is missing on each individual one. This is because most of the original works are individually not copyrighted anymore and fell in the Public Domain! It became a common practice  to take an issue that has fallen into the public domain, change a few lines of it, then get a copyright on their revised edition. This is why the original works were revised and changed.

The failure of LRH to place notice of copyright on the original works and documents he published before 1978 seem to have resulted in those works falling into Public Domain. The copyright law changed in 1978 , when the copyright notice was no longer required to reserve the authors rights.

In the RTC vs FACTnet case, Judge Kane wrote a Memorandum Opinion and an Order, where he noted that once a work enters the public domain, it remains there irrevocably. The 1909 Copyright Act required, inter alia, that the copyright owner of a published document affix proper notice to each publicly distributed copy of the work. Non compliance with the notice requirement could inject the work into the public domain. Indeed the Copyright Act of 1909 contained a very strict notice requirement. A work published without a valid copyright notice was automatically injected into the public domain. 17 U.S.C. SS10, 19 et. Seq. (1909 Act) ; New Era Publications International, APS v. Carol Pub. Group, 904 F.2d 152, 161 (2d Cir.), cert. Denied, 111 S. Ct. 297 (1990).

In the RTC vs FACTNet case, the church alleged that FACTNet violated 1900 of their copyrights. All 1900 issues in the FACTNet case were copyrighted between 83 and 87 and they were not copyrighted earlier. In some instances they do have earlier registrations but the majority of them do not. Below is affidavit by Jesse Price in regard to the copyright issues of the original works.

In addition to some of the original works falling into the Public Domain, the Corporate Church of Scientology no longer maintains the trademark for L10, L11, L12 as of 2005 due to failure to renew their trademark registration.( for example: “On Tuesday, January 24, 1984, a U.S. federal trademark registration was filed for L 10 by Religious Technology Center, Los Angeles 90028. The USPTO has given the L 10 trademark serial number of 73462364. The current federal status of this trademark filing is CANCELLED – SECTION 8. The correspondent listed for L 10 is JOAN K. LARKIN of BAKER & MCKENZIE, 725 S. FIGUEROA ST., LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 . The L 10 trademark is filed in the category of Computer & Software Services & Scientific Services . The description provided to the USPTO for L 10 is Religious and Ministerial Services, Including Pastoral Counselling. “)

Link to check US trademark :http://tess2.uspto.gov/

L10 – dead trademark as of 2005

L11 -dead trademark as of 2005 

L12- dead trademark as of 2005

List of dead trademarks related to Scientology: http://www.fzglobal.org/trademarks.htm

—-

Jesse Prince Affidavit

I, Jesse Prince declare as follows:

1. I am over 18 years of age and currently reside in the state of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. This declaration is of my own personal knowledge and if called upon to testify to the facts herein I could and would be competently able to testify thereto.

2. I am intimately familiar with the Scientology organization, movement and beliefs because I was in Scientology for 16 years (1976-92) and served in the highest ranks, including as the second in command of the Religious Technology Center (RTC). At that time, my position was “Deputy Inspector General, External” which meant being in charge of all activities outside the body of Scientology. This included being in charge of all litigation by or against any Scientology organization, intelligence (spying, covert operations) brought against perceived or imagined “enemies” (which ranged from critics to media to the courts), trademark registrations, and the licensing of trademarks to other Scientology organizations, which was how we tightly controlled all Scientology corporations while creating the false impression of “corporate integrity.”

3. It is incumbent on this and every court, as well as the authorities, to realize the amount of deception, chicanery, lying, manipulation and outright criminality that Scientology will employ to hide the truth about their criminal activities. They will spend any amount of money to do this. I know because I was part of it for years. I received orders to break the law. I issued orders to break the law. I got others to break the law, and then I helped to hide these criminal activities just as they are hiding them now.

4. In fact, this tactic is one of the most coercive used by the Scientology hierarchy: to involve members in criminal acts for which they are then liable, which then prevents the person from speaking out. Even if the member manages to leave or flee, they will be reluctant to speak to the courts or the authorities because they were part of criminal activities. Plus the organization is ready to use Mafia-like tactics to threaten an ex-member if the hierarchy is afraid of their testimony. If the ex-member does speak, the organization will claim no knowledge and blames the individual, calling them a criminal when that person was doing nothing more than following orders under duress.

5. Members of Scientology are induced to confess to acts that, if not outright criminal, are embarrassing or possibly destructive to the person’s job, marriage or profession, for example, shoplifting, adultery, masturbation, or drug abuse. The member is urged to write these down in their own handwriting, under the guise that it is a “religious confessional” for the member’s good. The truth is that these “confessions” are kept to blackmail and extort the member should they dare to speak out. The member is also coerced to sign documents that are self-damaging while protecting the organization, solely in case the member dares to leave their control and speak the truth. I know because I watched this done to others, I did it to others and it was done to me. That is why I respectfully urge this court to recognize Scientology’s tactics and treat them for what they are: criminal deceit to defraud this court at any cost.

6. For the past five years since I fled Scientology, I have been silent because it was my intent to create a new life for myself, away from their obsessive control, and it required all the energy that I could muster to do that. About two weeks ago, I finally became curious as to what was happening within the Scientology world and I used the Internet to look up Scientology and was stunned to discover former friends who had also left and the conflicts being waged in the courts. I contacted one (Stacy Young) who had been a close friend for many years in the cult who told me what had been happening, with former members fighting to have the abuses and the criminality exposed.

7. Because I have intimate and personal knowledge of issues in this case, she put me in touch with attorney Dan Leipold and I traveled to his offices in Santa Ana, California. After speaking with him and others, I realized that this level of criminal fraud and deceit can no longer continue without opposition. I could no longer remain silent, regardless of their terrorism. I offered to tell the court how Scientology really operates with trademarks, copyrights and the courts. In fact, I am doing this at the risk of enduring the hate campaign this pseudo-religion will wage against me, as they have against others, including judges.

8. Let me begin with some basic information about my own Scientology history:     I first became involved with Scientology in September 1976, in San Francisco. In late 1976 I joined the elite Scientology paramilitary organization known as the Sea Organization, also known as the “Sea Org” or the acronym “SO.” The Sea Organization is the actual nexus that controls the Scientology empire. Sea Organization personnel are authorized to take over and control Scientology organizations and to demote personnel, move bank accounts and run the corporation as if the SO personnel were employees or representatives of that corporation but they are not. This is true if the organization was part of the “Church of Scientology” or one of the secular areas such as Bridge Publications. This is possible because the only personnel allowed into executive positions in these organization are those who are in full agreement that the Sea Organization is the commanding organization. This weeding out process guarantees there will be no executives who will resist or protect their corporate integrity. This is how the Sea Organization can operate with impunity, and continue to claim that it is merely a “fraternal organization.” The Sea Organization is a “fraternal organization” the way the Cosa Nostra is.

9. Before I was recruited into the Religious Technology Center (RTC) in 1982, most of my experience was with Scientology technical material; the actual codified techniques used within the organization. This gave me considerable time to become familiar with the material, most of which was written by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. It was that familiarity that prompted my promotion to a technical position at RTC.

10. Physically, I was transferred to and lived and worked at what is known as “Golden Era Studios,” near Hemet, California. It is also known as “Gold” or simply “the base.” RTC’s presence at Gold was fully known to all at the base, but was kept hidden from all others, to try to make it appear that Gold was merely a movie/tape production studio when really the movie/tape production is nothing but a front to mask, hide and protect the top of Scientology’s actual power structure so they cannot be served with subpoenas. (The security system is more befitting a top secret military installation, with its motion detectors, buried sensors, high-speed cameras, night cameras, guards on motorcycles, and barbed wire fences wired to detect anyone touching it etc.)

RTC was at that time the most senior, most powerful and most influential organization in all of Scientology. All at RTC were Sea Org members, as are all at the base. But because of RTC’s position, we were the elite at the base.

11. In March 1983, I became the Deputy Inspector General, External, and a member of the Board of Directors for RTC, as Treasurer. (The only other board members were Warren McShane as Secretary and Vicki Aznaran as President, during this time.) At the time I was appointed a member of the Board of Directors of RTC I was forced to sign an undated letter of resignation. This is standard practice with all Scientology board members and is another means by which the Scientology corporations are controlled while giving the appearance of corporate integrity.

12. In that capacity for the next few years, I traveled about the US and outside of the US on behalf of RTC. I traveled to Germany, Italy, Australia, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Mexico and Canada, with several trips to some of these countries. These trips were to put together an infrastructure that would then interface with RTC for the purpose of trademarks. I became familiar with the law with regard to each area, interviewed and approved law firms, and put the personnel in place that would report to RTC and be our on-the-ground representatives in dealing with the attorneys etc.

13. When Hubbard died in 1986, there was a power struggle in Scientology for the next 18 or so months that resulted in Hubbard’s closest and most powerful aide (Pat Broeker) being removed. The power was taken over by David Miscavige who purged the organization of anyone who was friendly with Broeker. In mid-1987, I was removed from my position and put under armed guard at Happy Valley, a property the organization owns that is a few miles west of Gold and located deep in the Soboba Indian Reservation. I assume the undated resignation I provided on being appointed to the Board was then dated and used to make it appear that I had resigned, when I had not. After a few months, it was decided that I would not escape and I was given various jobs at Gold but kept under watch. My pay was standard Sea Org pay, $24 per week.

14. I should clarify why I (and others) tolerated such treatment for so long. The ability to tolerate such abusive conditions and treatment are one of the most basic requirements for promotion in the Sea Organization and RTC. We were selected and promoted because we vowed such loyalty and demonstrated it daily. Not unlike a military unit, it is the ability of the Sea Org member to take orders, carry out the assignment and to tolerate self-degrading conditions that ingratiates them to their seniors and to the system. That was why I was promoted so highly and why I then tolerated more. Looking back on it, I cannot believe that I actually tolerated such denigration and such abuse and actually deluded myself that it was for my good as well as the good of others.

15. In late 1991, my wife Monika became pregnant and although we were elated, she was ordered to abort the child. The reason for the abortion order is that Sea Org members were not allowed to have children. The order devastated both my wife and me. Our dedication as Sea Org members clashed violently with our intentions as parents and we went through a personal nightmare with me opposing it, to no avail. She got the abortion and afterwards she was not the same. She was devastated at the impact of what she did and that was when she told me she wanted to leave. We fled, with the organization close behind us, trying to find us. They finally did and convinced us to return so we could “leave properly.”

16. Once they had us again behind the barbwire and watched by security, my wife was threatened that if we did not sign certain papers, she would no longer be able to see her father and her sister, who were both in the Sea Organization.

17. This is another coercive power that the organization wields. Like a police state, it can order and enforce family members to alter their relations, and even get them to turn against each other. Monika and I knew that if the organization said she would be kept from her father and sister (by control over them), that she would not again be able to talk to them or see them, let alone visit. This is called “disconnection” in Scientology. We agreed to sign the papers and were able to leave.

18. On July 26, 1998, one of the cult’s attorneys sent a long fax to Dan Leipold that is their first not-so-veiled threat to me, warning me to be silent. The attorney included the document they prepared for me and that I signed under the conditions I just described. I am attaching his letter and the documents I was forced to sign under duress as my first evidence of what this criminal cult does to silence anyone speaking out. (Exhibit 1). It does not surprise me, as it is a standard tactic, to force a person to create or sign a self-damaging document to use when ready.

19. I have also been privy to the destruction and alteration of documents to protect the group. On or about April of 1983 I was present at a meeting, which took place in Los Angeles, California at a Scientology office called Author Services, Inc. (ASI). ASI presented itself as the “literary agency” for Hubbard but it was actually the top of the Scientology empire at that time. All of Scientology was being directed from ASI in 1982. ASI was where various Scientology corporations went to receive orders.

20. Present at the meeting was David Miscavige, then the chairman of the board of ASI, Vicki Aznaran then the Deputy Inspector General of Religious Technology Center, (RTC) and Lymon Spurlock, who was “Director of Client Affairs” for ASI. Mr. Miscavige expressed concern at this meeting that there might possibly be a raid on Scientology by the IRS. At that time, none of the churches of Scientology had received tax exempt status.

21. One principle reason why tax exempt status had not been granted was the IRS’s position that Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard (LRH) was actually the managing agent of Scientology in complete disregard of the corporate structure of Scientology. We knew this to be a fact but also knew that it violated IRS rules and thus had to be hidden.

22. There was concern that the IRS would obtain the hundreds of daily, weekly and monthly LRH orders written by Mr. Hubbard and distributed throughout Scientology. These orders were commonly referred to in Scientology as “advices” to avoid the appearance that LRH was actually running Scientology. In fact, LRH was running Scientology. The principle concern expressed at this meeting was that the LRH orders or “advices” would be used to name L. Ron Hubbard as the managing agent of Scientology.

23. Because of an already existing fear that an LRH “advice” might fall into the wrong hands, these orders from him were written in a way that we could deny it was from him. His name was not on them. He was never cited in the dispatch except in the third person. There was no signature and a salutation in reply was never more than “Dear Sir.” The routing at the top referred to him merely as “*,” an asterisk. However if a person (or an agency) got enough of these, there would be little doubt that we were in touch with Hubbard (via ASI) and he was telling us and each corporation what to do to make him more money.

24. David Miscavige specifically stated that ASI was “already dealing with the problem”, ridding ASI of any documents that would implicate L. Ron Hubbard as managing agent of Scientology. He stated that under his directive the LRH orders, or “advices”, were being collected and transferred by truck to a Riverside County recycling plant where the documents were to be “pulped”. This method of destruction was considered to be better than shredding. I was also given instructions that I was in charge of purging the remainder of the Scientology organization of LRH orders. This was to include Church of Scientology of California (CSC); Church of Scientology International (CSI); and RTC.

25. Several weeks after this first meeting I attended a second meeting at the ASI offices concerning the continuing destruction of Scientology corporate documentation. In attendance at the second meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Norman Starkey and Marty Rathburn. At this meeting, David Miscavige for the first time stated that Scientology had been ordered by a court to produce various documents concerning a former Scientology member named Lawrence Wollersheim who had a lawsuit pending in Los Angeles against the Church of Scientology of California. The court had ordered Scientology to produce Mr. Wollersheim’s entire “preclear” (PC) file.

26. A “PC ” file is one of several files kept on members. The PC file is the file that includes all written records of all “confessionals” done by the member. This means that it includes not only the most self-damaging material but it also reflects every problem the person might have had with the organization, including complaints. This PC file grows with the person’s tenure in Scientology.

27. Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file was several thousand pages in length and stood as high as a six-foot tall man. Initially at this meeting it was decided that Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file would be redacted and culled of any evidence or documentation which might assist Mr. Wollersheim in his lawsuit against CSC. There was also concern that the materials known as Clear, OT I, OT II, OT III and NED for OT’s (NOTS) would be open to public inspection if Mr. Wollersheim’s files were produced as ordered. Scientologists are taught that a person could catch pneumonia and die if that person is prematurely exposed to these “upper level” materials without first having taken many hours of preparatory auditing. Ultimately, approximately 50 pages were produced pursuant to the court order. Mr. Wollersheim’s PC file was culled based on a direct order from David Miscavige.

28. Later, I was informed that a second court order was issued to produce Mr. Wollersheim’s entire file. Faced with the prospect of having to produce the entire file David Miscavige gave orders that the entire file simply be destroyed by being pulped.

29. Pursuant to Mr. Miscavige’s orders I ordered Rick Aznaran to take Mr. Wollersheim’s PC files to the recycling plant in Riverside to be pulped. Several hours after I gave the order to have Mr. Wollersheim’s PC files destroyed, Mr. Aznaran returned and confirmed that the records had been pulped and even showed me a small bottle of pulped material, saying “Here’s what’s left.”

30. The material that David Miscavige ordered destroyed and which Rick Aznaran had pulped was the same material that the court had ordered produced in Mr. Wollersheim’s Los Angeles court case against CSC.

31. In early 1983 I attended a meeting at Scientology’s ASI office in Los Angeles. In attendance at this meeting were David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicki Aznaran, Patricia Brice and Edith Buchele. The meeting concerned Scientology copyrights. In particular, David Miscavige stated that Scientology was “in trouble” concerning the copyright status of the many published materials of founder L Ron Hubbard. Concern was expressed that many of Mr. Hubbard’s published materials had become ‘public domain” because the materials had not been registered with the United States Copyright office for many years. David Miscavige stated that Scientology had failed to register copyrights for thousands of pages of Scientology material written by Mr. Hubbard. These records included the numerous policy letters and bulletins published by Mr. Hubbard. In particular, Mr. Hubbard published “Policy Letters” (always published in green ink on white paper and intended as administrative directives) LRH ED’s (Executive Directives) which are used for various topics, (always issued as blue ink on white paper) and “Technical Bulletins” published with red ink on white paper covering technical aspect of Scientology such as Auditing techniques, Policy and Ethics.

32. At the same meeting in early 1983 David Miscavige specifically ordered Patricia Brice (who at the time was L. Ron Hubbard’s personal secretary and an employee of ASI) to begin the process of mass copyright registration filings for all of L. Ron Hubbard’s materials. This order was given despite the fact that Mr. Miscavige was already aware that many of the materials in question were already in the public domain. Thus, I know from personal knowledge that in mid 1983 Scientology began a massive program to register Mr. Hubbard’s material with the United State’s Copyright office.

33. Based on my many years of reading and studying Scientology directives including my time as a “Co-Audit Supervisor” and “Inspector General Cramming Officer” I became intimately familiar with the content, form, manner of distribution and publication of Scientology works and directives including the works of L. Ron Hubbard. As a Cramming Officer it was my job to insure that those who employ Scientology “tech” properly adhere to the official guidelines adopted by Scientology.

34. I was requested by counsel for Mr. Wollersheim to review the exhibits to BPI’s renewed motion for summary judgement. These were contained in more than 20 banker’s boxes.

In reviewing these boxes of exhibits I selected out documents at random to inspect. The chart below explains the result of my examination of certain of the exhibits. In examining the plaintiff’s exhibits I compared the alleged LRH originals submitted by the plaintiff’s as exhibits to some early editions of Scientology compilations which contains the policy issues in question. I employed a “1st edition” of the Organization Executive Course, and a “First printing of the Scientology Technical Bulletins for comparison to what BPI has claimed are the LRH originals.

35. I have attached hereto copies of various LRH materials that were published by Scientology in the early 1970’s that prove conclusively that the copy right notices on BPI’s purported “LRH originals” were not present then, but placed on the “originals” at a later date.

Exhibit	Date Issued	Copyright Registration	Title
B-1287	1954	27 January 1975	The Church of Scientology Creed	FACTNet copy bears no resemblance to original
B-1289	1953,ca.endMay	2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983)	LRH PAB No. 2 A Summary of SOP 8A	Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1292	1953 ca.end July	2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983)	LRH PAB No. 6 No title	Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1293	1953 ca. mid. August	2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983)	LRH PAB No. 7 Six Steps to Better Beingness	Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
B-1290	1953 ca. mid June	2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983)	LRH PAB No. 3 Certainty Processing	Copyright notice 1953 Copyright res. for compilation published Dec. 1955
Exhibit	Date Issued	Copyright Registration	Title
B-4	2 June 1959	22 December 1987 (renewal 22 December 1987)	HCO PL Purchasing Liability of Staff Members	Copyright notice 1959 but original contains reference to CSI which did not exist until 1981
B-2	2 May 1957	24 December 1985 (renewal 24 December 1985)	HCO PL Dissemination	Original offered by BPI is substantially different from that published as an original in OEC Vol. II 1st Ed. 1970 ; Copyright notice 1957, registration 1985
B-1291	Ca. mid-July 1953	2 May 1956 (renewal 7 February 1983)	LRH PAB No. 5 About PABs	B-1291 BIP original contains no copyright notice. However FACTNet copy and copy of document published in 1st printing of Technical Bulletins Vol. I contain 1953 copyright notice. Copyright registration is 1955 as part of compilation
B-1288	20 July 1956	22 September 1983 (renewal 26 December 1984)	Article From LRH to HGC Staff “How to really split a valance.”	No Copyright notice in claimed original
B-371	16 December 1958	12 May 1983 (renewal 22 January 1986)	HCOB Extension Course Curriculum	BPI original contains notice 1958, however copy of document published by Scientology in 1976 in Technical Bulletins Vol. III 1st printing contains no copyright notice
Exhibit	Date Issued	Copyright Registration	Title
B-59	21 March 1965	28 January 1988 (renewal 9 September 1993)	HCO PL Staff Members Auditing Outside PCs	BPI original contains copyright notice 1958, however, copy of document published in 1970 OEC Vol. I 1st Ed. contains no copyright notice.
B-249	28 April 1973	28 April 1988	HCO PL Good Service	BPI original shows on face it was 1st published Dec. 23, 1968, not claimed date of April 28, 1973
B-157	2 September 1968	28 January 1988	HCOPL Chaplain	BPI original shows on face 1st appeared as Sea Organization Flag Order
B-94	24 August 1965	28 January 1988 (renewal 3 November 1993)	HCO PL Cleanliness of Quarters and Staff Improve Our Image	BPI “original” contains 1965 copyright notice. However, “original” references CSI which did not exist until 1981
B-248	27 December 1972	28 January 1988	HCO PL Speed of Service	BPI original shows on face published 1968, not claimed date of 1972
Exhibit	Date Issued	Copyright Registration	Title
B-214	4 January 1971	2 May 1991	HCO PL Competence	BPI original contains no copyright notice
C-3	5 February 1958	27 January 1995	HCO PL No New Charters	BPI original contains no copyright notice
B-215	25 January 1971	28 January 1988	HCO PL Squirrel Admin	Claimed original contains 1971 copyright notice. However, also contains reference to CSI which did not exist until 1981
B-1	25 January 1957	24 December 1985 (24 December 1985)	HCO PL Concerning the Separateness of Dianetics and Scientology	BPI original shows on face not original but Issue II
B-369	25 November 1958	12 May 1983 (renewal 22 January 1986)	HCOB Step 6	BPI “original” contains a 1958 copyright notice. However, 1st printing of Technical Bulletins in 1976 Vol. III contains no copyright notice for this document
Exhibit	Date Issued	Copyright Registration	Title

36. The above chart documents my observations in reviewing the documents that I selected at random to review. The important points that I believe the Court should note with reference to these documents are as follows:

1. Exhibits B-1289; 1290; 1291; 1292 and 1293 contain a 1953 copyright notice. However, the copyright registrations submitted by BPI are for a compilation published in 1955.

2. Exhibits B4; B-94 and B-215 all contain copyright notices from the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s that contain notations to CSI. CSI is the Church of Scientology International, which did not come into existence until 1981. Therefore, either BPI’s “originals” are not originals as claimed, or the copyright notices were placed on these documents long after they were published. (Exhibits 2, 3 and 4 attached hereto).

3. Exhibits B-59; B-369; and B-371 contain copyright notices from 1958. However, when these originals are compared to first printings or first editions of compilations put out by Scientology in the 1970’s, these copyright notices are not present, indicating that they were placed in the “originals” subsequent to the compilations being published. (Exhibits 5-7).

4. Exhibit B-2 is substantially different from that published as an original in OEC Vol. II, 1st Ed. 1970. (Exhibit 8 attached hereto).

5. Exhibit B-1287. The FACTNet copy bears virtually no resemblance to the BPI original.

6. Exhibits B-1288; B-214; and C-3. The BPI originals contain no copyright notice.

7. Exhibit B-1 shows on its face it is not an original but “Issue II.”

8. Exhibits B-248; B-249; and B-157 show on their face they were published elsewhere prior to the claimed original publication.

37. Based on my knowledge gained as a staff member of Scientology, including my assignment as “Chief Cramming Officer” and based on my examination of the exhibits submitted by BPI in support of their renewed motion for summary judgment, it appears that numerous “originals” submitted by BPI are not originals at all and that copyright notices were placed on documents long after publication back-dating them to the date of publication.

Further declarant sayeth naught.

I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 27th day of July, 1998, at Santa Ana, California.

JESSE PRINCE

—-

AFFIDAVIT DE Jesse Prince

    Je soussigné, Jesse Prince , déclare ce qui suit

         1. J’ai plus de dix-huit ans et j’habite actuellement dans le Minnesota, Comté de Hennepin. Cette déclaration est faite en vertu de mon savoir personnel et si l’on me demande de témoigner sur les faits ci-après, je le pourrai et serai en mesure de le faire avec compétence.

         Je suis tout à fait familiarisé avec l’organisation, le mouvement et les croyances scientologiques du fait que j’y suis resté durant seize ans (1976-1992) et que j’y ai servi aux  postes les plus importants, y compris second du RTC – Centre de Technologie Religieuse [direction globale de la secte, ndt]. J’étais alors “Député Inspecteur Général Externe”, ce qui veut dire que j’avais la responsabilité de toutes les activités hors du corps scientologue proprement dit. Cela comprend tout litige de la part ou contre toute organisation scientologique, le renseignement (espionnage, opérations cachées) contre tout “ennemi” perçu ou imaginaire (ce qui va des critiques aux médias et aux tribunaux), les enregistrements des droits d’auteur, le fait de licencier ces droits et marques à d’autres organisations scientologiques – ce qui constituait la manière de contrôler au plus près toutes les entités légales scientologiques tout en créant une fausse impression d’intégrité des divers corps.

         3. Il incombe à tout tribunal ainsi qu’aux autorités de bien réaliser la masse de tromperie, chicanerie, mensonge, manipulation et criminalité pure et simple qu’emploiera la scientologie pour cacher les faits mêmes de ses crimes. Ils y dépenseront autant d’argent qu’il le faudra: je le sais pour en avoir fait partie des années durant. J’ai reçu des ordres de violer la loi. J’ai donné des ordres qu’on viole la loi. J’ai fait violer les lois à d’autres, puis je les ai aidés à camoufler ces activités criminelles exactement de la façon dont ils le font.

         4. Cette tactique est en réalité l’une des plus coercitives utilisées par la hiérarchie scientologique: impliquer ses membres dans des actes criminels pour lesquels ils peuvent être poursuivis, ce qui les empèche dès lors de parler. Même lorsque l’adepte réussit à fuir, il craindra de parler en justice ou aux officiels, ayant lui-même participé à ces crimes. En outre, l’organisation use de tactiques maffieuses pour menacer tout ancien membre, au cas où la hiérarchie craint son témoignage. Si l’ex-membre parle, l’organisation prétendra ne rien savoir et accusera l’individu, le qualifiant de criminel alors que cette personne n’a rien fait d’autre que suivre les ordres en raison de la pression exercée.

         5. Les membres de la scientologie sont poussés à confesser des actes qui, même s’ils ne sont pas carrément criminels, sont génants et pourraient détruire son emploi, son mariage ou sa profession. Exemples: vol dans les magasins, adultère, masturbation, usage de drogue. On exige que l’adepte écrive ces faits de sa main, sous prétexte de “confession religieuse”, soi-disant pour le “bien” de cette personne. Ces “confessions” sont conservées aux fins de chantage et extorsion, au cas où le membre parlerait. On le force aussi à signer des documents l’impliquant personnellement tout en protégeant l’organisation, au cas où l’adepte s’en irait et oserait parler. Je le sais pour l’avoir vu faire à d’autres, pour l’avoir moi-même demandé à d’autres, et pour l’avoir fait moi-même. C’est pourquoi je demande respectueusement à ce tribunal de reconnaître les tactiques scientologues et de les traîter pour ce qu’elles sont: tromperie criminelle afin de leurrer le tribunal à n’importe quel prix.

         6. J’ai fui la scientologie depuis cinq ans, je me suis tu, car je voulais me recréer une existence différente, loin de leur contrôle obsessionnel, et il m’a fallu rassembler beaucoup de force pour y parvenir. Il y a une quinzaine, j’ai voulu savoir ce qu’il advenait du monde scientologue et me suis servi d’Internet pour enquèter. J’ai été très surpris d’y découvrir d’anciens amis ayant également quitté la secte, et les conflits en cours devant les tribunaux. J’ai contacté l’une de ces amies (Stacy Young) qui fut très proche dans la secte des années durant; elle m’a raconté ce qui se passait, en particulier tous les anciens membres dévoués à faire connaître les abus et la criminalité.

         7. Ayant été au coeur des affaires, elle m’a mis en contact avec l’avocat Dan Liepold de Santa Ana, Californie; je lui ai rendu visite. Après avoir parlé à Me Leipold et à d’autres, je me suis rendu compte que ce niveau de tromperie criminelle ne pouvait se perpétuer sans rencontrer d’opposition. Je ne pouvais plus me taire, quel que soit le terrorisme exercé. J’ai offert au Tribunal de démontrer comment la scientologie fonctionne vis à vis des marques , des droits d’auteur et des tribunaux. J’encours donc le risque d’une campagne de haine de la part que cette pseudo-religion lancera contre moi, comme elle le fit à l’encontre d’autres gens, y compris des juges.

         8.  Commençons par quelques informations sur mon passé de scientologue. J’ai rencontré la scientologie en septembre 1976 à San Francisco. Fin 76, je me suis engagé dans le coprs para-militaire d’élite connus sous le nom de ‘Sea Org’ (organisation maritime). La Sea Org est le coeur même de l’empire scientologue. Le personnel Sea Org a plein pouvoir pour prendre le coçntrôle de toute organisation scientologique et d’en démettre du personnel, d’en modifier les comptes bancaires, et de  faire fonctionner cette organisation comme si les employés Sea Org s’y trouvaient employés ou en étaient fondés de pouvoir, alors qu’ils ne le sont pas.

    Cela se produit lorsque l’organisation fait partie de “L’Eglise de Scientologie”, ou qu’il s’agit d’une zone séculière (laïque) telle que Bridge Publications. Ceci n’est possible qu’en raison du fait que le seul personnel admis à encadrer ces organisations se compose de ceux qui sont pleinement d’accord sur le fait que la Sea Org est l’organisation de commandement suprème. Ce procédé d’élimination garantit qu’il n’y aura pas de cadres résistant ou protégeant l’intégrité de leur affaire. C’est ainsi que la Sea Org peut impunément opérer et continuer à se déclarer “organisation confraternelle” – à la manière de la Cosa Nostra.

         9. Avant mon recrutement au RTC (Centre de Technologie religieuse) en 1982, j’ai surtout exercé au moyen des techniques scientologiques, techniques codifiées qui sont utilisées dans l’organisation. Ceci m’a considérablement familiarisé avec le matériau, dont l’essentiel est l’oeuvre du fondateur de la scientologie, L. Ron Hubbard. C’est cette expertise qui m’a fait choisir pour tenir un poste au sein du RTC.

         10. On m’a transféré alors aux “Golden Era Studios”, près de Hemet, Californie, où j’ai alors habité et travaillé. C’est aussi appelé “Gold” ou “La Base”. La présence de RTC est tout à fait connue à Gold, mais tout y est caché aux gens qui n’en font pas partie, afin que Gold semble n’être qu’un studio de production, alors qu’il ne s’agit que d’une façade destinée à protéger et cacher la structure véritable de pouvoir de la scientologie, pour qu’on ne puisse lui délivrer d’assignations à comparaître. (Le système de sécurité convient tout à fait à une organisation militaire ultra-secrète, avec des détecteurs de mouvement, des senseurs enterrés, des caméras haute vitesse, des caméras avec vision de nuit, des gardes à moto, des barbelés qui détectent tout mouvement, etc).

          RTC était à l’époque l’organisation la plus puissante, la plus élevée dans la hiérarchie et la plus influente des organisations scientologues. Tous ses membres étaient membres de la Sea Org. De ce fait, nous étions l’élite de la Base.

         11. En Mars 1983, je devins Député Inspecteur Général Extérieur, membre du Conseil d’Administration de RTC et Trésorier. (Uniques autres membres : Warren Mc Shane, secrétaire, Vicky Aznaran, Présidente à l’époque). Lorsque l’on m’a nommé membre de RTC, j’ai dû signer une lettre de démission non datée. C’est une pratique normale pour tous les membres de Conseils scientologues, constituant un autre moyen destiné à contrôler les corporations scientologiques tout en  leur laissant une apparence d’intégrité légale.

         12. A ce poste, j’ai voyagé aux USA et à l’étranger pour le compte du RTC. Je suis allé en Allemagne, Italie, Australie, Royaume-Uni, Danemark, Mexique et Canada, parfois à plusieurs reprises. Ces voyages avaient pour but de créer des infrastructures servant d’interface avec le RTC en matière de marques commerciales. Je suis donc familiarisé avec la loi dans chacune de ces pays, où je me suis entretenu avec des cabinets d’avocats dont j’approuvais les documents, et j’y ai placé du personnel en mesure de faire les rapports au RTC, personnel servant de représentant sur place dans les affaires légales etc.

         13. Lorsqu’Hubbard mourut en 1986, il y eut un lutte de pouvoir au sein de la scientologie durant quelques 18 mois, ayant pour effet l’expulsion de l’assistant d’Hubbard le plus puissant alors, Pat Broeker. Le pouvoir fut pris par David Miscavige qui purgea alors l’organisation de tous ceux qui étaient amis de Pat Broeker. A mi-87, on m’ôta de mon psote et on m’emprisonna à “Happy Valley”, propriété de l’organisation située quelques kms à l’Ouest de Gold, largement dans l’enclave de la Réserve Indienne de Soboba. Je suppose que la résignation que j’avais écrite lors de ma nomination au Conseil d’Administration fut alors utilisée pour faire croire que j’avais démissionné, alors que ce n’était pas le cas. Quelques mois plus tard, il était décidé que je m’enfuirais, on me donna diverses tâches à Gold, mais sous bonne garde. Je touchais la paye ordinaire de la Sea Org, 140 F par seminae (24$).

         14. Il me faut clairifier pourquoi j’ai (ou d’autres ont) toléré un tel traitement aussi longtemps. L’aptitude à supporter des conditions et un traîtement aussi abusif fait partie d’une des exigences les plus nettes dans la Sea Org et du RTC. Nous étions sélectionnés et promus en raison de notre loyauté et tolérance démontrées jour après jour. C’est l’aptitude d’un membre de la Sea Org à recevoir les ordres, les éxécuter, tolérer des conditions dégradantes pour l’être qui donne de la valeur vis à vis des supérieurs et du système. C’est pourquoi on m’a promu aussi haut, pourquoi j’en ai toléré davantage encore. Si je revois ceci, je ne peux croire que j’ai réellement supporté un tel avilissement , une tel abus, et à quel point je me suis trompé sur ce qui était bon pour moi et pour les autres.

         15.  Fin 1991, ma femme Monika tomba enceinte. Malgré notre exaltation à cette idée, on lui ordonna de se faire avorter: en effet, on n’autorise pas les membres de la Sea Org à avoir des enfants. cet ordre nous désespéra tous deux. Notre dévouement à la Sea Org était en complète contradiction avec notre désir d’avoir un enfant. En dépit de notre cauchemar et de ma résistance à cet ordre, cela fut fait. Monika fut totalement abattue par le contrecoup de ce qu’elle subissait, et c’est alors qu’elle m’annonça son désir de partir. Nous fuîmes, avec l’organisation à nos trousses cherchant à nous récupérer. Ils y parvinrent et nous convainquirent de revenir afin que nous “partions convenablement”.

         16. Dès que nous fûmes à nouveau derrière les barbelés et les gardes, c’est sous la menace de ne plus revoir son père et sa soeur (également membres de la Sea Org) que Monika dût signer certains documents.

         17. Voilà donc une autre méthode de pression que cache l’organisation. Tout comme dans les états policiers, elle peut ordonner et imposer à ses membres de ne plus avoir de relations familiales, voire, de se retourner contre la famille. Monika et moi savions que si elle le dsirait, l’organisation pourrait la tenir à l’écart de son père et de sa soeur (grâce aux contrôle exercé sur eux), si bien qu’elle ne pourrait plus les voir ni leur rendre visite. Ceci s’appelle “déconnection” en scientologie Nous avons accepté de signer les papiers et avons pu partir.

         18. Le 26 juillet 1998, l’un des avocats de la secte expédia un long fax à Dan Liepold, pour m’obliger au silence; ce n’était pas leur première menace voilée à mon encontre. L’avocat de la scientologie avait inclus les documents qu’ils m’avaient fait signer, que j’avais accepté de signer sous les conditions ci-dessus. J’inclus cette lettre et les documents que j’ai été forcé à signer sous contrainte comme première preuve de ce que pratique la secte pour faire taire ceux qui voudraient parler. (pièce jointe n°1). Cela ne me surprend pas, puisqu’il s’agit d’une tactique courante de créer ou faire signer un document mettant la personne en cause, document qu’on utilisera en cas de besoin.

         19. J’ai aussi assisté à la destruction et à l’altération de documents pour la protection du groupe. Vers Avril 83, j’étais présent lors d’une réunion à Los Angeles, Californie, au bureau scientologique d’A.S.I. (Société de Services à l’Auteur). ASI se présentait comme “agent littéraire” pour Hubbard, mais c’était en réalité la tête de l’empire hubbardien à cette époque. Toute la scientologie était dirigée depuis ASI. C’est à ASI que diverses entités scientologues venaient prendre leurs ordres.

         20. David Miscavige était présent lors de cette réunion – il  était alors patron d’ASI, ainsi que Vicky Aznaran, qui tenait le poste de Député Inspecteur Général du RTC et Lymon Spurlock, “Directeur des affaires de Clientèle” pour ASI. M. Miscavige s’est inquiété lors de ce rassemblement de la possibilité d’une descente du FBI sur la scientologie. Aucune des églises n’avait encore reçu le statut d’exemption d’impôt aux USA.

         21. Une des causes de principe ayant empèché cet accord d’exemption par l’IRS venait du fait que le fondateur de la scientologie, Hubbard, était en fait agent dirigeant de l’organisation , en complète contradiction avec les statuts légaux. Nous  savions pertinemment que cela violait les règles de l’IRS et qu’il fallait le cacher.

         22. On s’inquiétait du fait que l’IRS puisse obtenir des centaines d’ordres quotidiens, hebdomadaires et mensuels écrits par Hubbard et distribués dans toute la scientologie. Ces ordres étaient en général appelés des “conseils” afin d’éviter qu’ils ne fassent apparaître le commandement scientologique exercé par Hubbard. C’était le fait que ces ordres et “conseils” puissent servir pour démontrer le commandement exercé qui constituait le coeur du problème.

         23.Comme on craignait déjà qu’un “avis” de LRH ne puisse tomber en de mauvaises mains, ses ordres étaient écrits de façon à pouvoir nier qu’ils émanaient de lui. Son nom n’y apparaissait pas. Il n’était jamais cité, sauf à la troisième personne. Il n’y avait pas de signature et les réponses qu’on faisait ne portaient qu’un “Dear Sir” – Cher Monsieur. L’envoi ne comportait qu’un simple “*” astérisque pour le routage. Néanmoins, si quelqu’un mettait son nez là-dedans, il serait fort peu resté de doutes quant au fait que nous étions en communication avec Hubbard via ASI., et qu’il nous disait , à nous et à toutes les entités, comment faire plus d’argent pour son compte.

         24. David Miscavige déclara précisément qu’ASI “s’occupait déjà du problème” en se débarrassant de tous les documents impliquant le commandement exercé par Hubbard sur la scientologie.  Il annonça qu’il avait ordonné que les “conseils” et ordres de LRH soient rassemblés et expédiés par camion dans une usine de recyclage du Comté de Riverside, où les documents seraient mis en pâte, méthode paraît-il meilleure que le simple déchiquetage.  Je reçus des instructions afin de débarrasser les autres organisations scientologues des ordres de LRH. Ceci incluait la CSC (église de scientologie de Californie), la CSI (église de scientologie, Internationale) et le RTC.

         25. Plusieurs semaines après, je fus convié à une seconde réunion au sujet de la poursuite de la destruction de la documentation concernant l’organigramme légal des entités. Etaient présents: David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicky Aznaran, Norman Starkey et Marty Rathbun. Nous apprîmes de Miscavige qu’un tribunal avait ordonné pour la première fois de produire des documents concernant un ancien membre de la scientologie nommé Lawrence Wollersheim, qui était en procès contre l’église de scientologie de Californie (CSC). La Cour avait ordonné la production du dossier de “préclair” complet de M. Wollersheim.

         26. Un “dossier de préclair” n’est que l’un des dossiers conservés au sujet des membres. Le dossier de pc contient les enregistrements écrits de toutes les “confessions” faites par l’adepte. Cela signifie qu’il contient non seulement les choses les plus génantes, mais qu’il indique aussi les problèmes qu’une personne peut avoir avec l’organisation, y compris ses réclamations. Ce dossier de préclair grossit au fur et à mesure de l’avancée en scientologie.

         27. Le dossier de M. Wollersheim contenait plusieurs milliers de pages, et faisait 1,80 d’épaisseur. Au début de cette réunion, il fut décidé que ce dossier serait rédigé et arrangé afin  de faire disparaître toute preuve ou document pouvant assister M. Wollersheim lors de son procès contre la CSC. On s’inquiétait aussi du fait que des matériaux confidentiels des niveaux Clair, OT 1, OT2, OT 3 et ‘NED pour OTs” seraient accessibles pour inspection publique au cas où l’on produirait bel et bien les dossiers. On enseigne aux scientologues qu’on peut mourir de pneumonie si l’on apprend, sans une très longue préparation, ce que contiennent ces niveaux secrets. En définitive, nous produisîmes une cinquantaine de pages au tribunal. Le dossier de M. Wollersheim fut purgé sur ordre expresse de David Miscavige.

         28. On m’informa par la suite qu’un second ordre du tribunal exigeait de produire tout le dossier de M. Wollersheim. Face à cette menace, David Miscavige donna ordre de réduire tout le dossier à l’état de pâte à papier.

         29. Toujours sur ordre de David Miscavige, j’ai ordonné à Ricky Aznaran de prendre les dossiers de M. Wollersheim et de les amener à l’usine de recyclage de Riverside pour qu’ils soient ainsi détruits. Quelques heures plus tard, M. Aznaran revint et confirma que les dossiers avaient été mis en pâte et me montra même une petite bouteille en disant “voilà ce qu’il en reste”.

         30.  Le matériel dont David Miscavige avait ordonné la destruction et que Ricky Aznaran avait fait réduire en pâte était celui que le tribunal avait ordonné de produire dans le procès Wollersheim contre CSC à Los Angeles.

         31. Début 1983, j’ai assisté à une réunions au bureau scientologue d’ASI de Los Angeles. S’ytrouvaient: David Miscavige, Lymon Spurlock, Vicky Aznaran, Patricia Brice et Edith Buchele. Il avait trait aux droits d’auteur (copyrights) de la scientologie. David Miscavige indiqua entre autres que le scientologie avait des “problèmes” à propos du statut des droits d’auteur de nombreux matériaux publiés par Hubbard en train de devenir “matériaux publics” du fait qu’ils n’avaient pas été enregistrés durant des années au bureau des Copyrights des USA. David Miscavige indiqua que la scientologie avait omis de faire enregistrer les copyrights de milliers de pages de matériaux scientologiques écrits par Hubbard. Ceci comprenait nombre de Lettres de Règlements et Bulletins publiés par LRH. Hubbard écrivait différents documents, dont les “Policy Letters, ou Lettres de Règlements” – imprimées en vert sur blanc; des ‘LRH EDs’ ou Directives de l’Exécutif de LRH, utilisées pour diverses causes (imprimées en bleu sur blanc) et des “Bulletins Techniques ou HCOBs” au sujet des aspects techniques de la scientologie, des technologies d’audition, des règlements et d’éthique.

         32. A cette même réunion, David Miscavige ordonna spécifiquement à Patricia Brice (qui était alors secrétaire personnelle d’Hubbard et employée par l’ASI) de commencer à procéder à l’enregistrement en masse de toutes les oeuvres d’Hubbard. Ceci fut ordonné en dépit du fait que M. Miscavige savait déjà que nombre de ces matériaux faisaient déjà partie du domaine public. Je sais donc personnellement qu’au début 1983, la scientologie entama un vaste programme destiné à enregistrer l’oeuvre de M. Hubbard au Bureau des Enregistrements des Copyrights pour les USA.

         33. Compte tenu des nombreuses années passées à lire les directives scientologiques, dont le temps passé comme “Superviseur de la Co-audition” [audition d’étudiants en tandem, ndt] et comme “Inspecteur Général Officier de Repèchage”, je connais très bien le contenu, la forme, la distribution et la publication des oeuvres et des directives scientologiques, y compris celles de Ron Hubbard. En tant qu’officier de Repèchage, ma tâche consistait à m’assurer que ceux qui utilisaient la “technologie” scientologue collent parfaitement aux directives officielles de la scientologie.

     34. Le conseiller de M. Wollersheim m’a demandé de revoir les pièces BPI (émission au grand public, ndt)  jointes  aux fins de la révision de la demande de jugement sommaire. Elles occupaient plus de 20 cartons. En parcourant ces boites de pièces, j’ai choisi des documents au hasard pour les inspecter. Le tableau ci-après explique le résultat de cet examen de certaines pièces. Lors de l’examen des pièces du plaingnant M. Wollersheim, j’ai comparé les originaux supposés de LRH à certaines éditions antérieures dans une compilation contenant ces mêmes documents. J’ai utilisé une “Edition n° 1” de l’OEC, le “Cours d’Organisation pour Cadres” de la scientologie pour comparaison avec ce que “BPI ” dit être des originaux de LRH.

         35. J’ai joint ici des copies des diverses pièces de matériaux de LRH qui furent publiées par la scientologie au début des années 70, prouvant de façon évidente que les notices de copyright sur les documents supposés “originaux” n’étaient pas présentes, mais avaient été ajoutées comme “originaux”  postérieurement.

VOIR ICI LE TABLEAU en ANGLAIS

36. Ce tableau documente les observations que j’ai pu faire à l’examen des documents choisis au hasard. A ce propos, je pense que le Tribunal  devrait noter ce qui suit:

         1. Les pièces B-1289; 1290; 1291; 1292 and 1293 contiennent une notice de copyright de  1953 . Les enregistrements ont pourtant été exécutés pour une publication de compilation datant de 1955.

         2. Les pièces  B4; B-94 and B-215 ont des notices des années 50, 60 et 70 parlant de la CSI. La CSI est l’église de scientologie internationale, née en 1981. Par conséquent, ces “originaux” n’en sont pas, ou bien les notices ont été placées sur les documents longtemps après leur publication. (voir pièces 2,3,4 jointes).

         3. Les pièces B-59; B-369; and B-371 ont des notices de copyright de 1958. Pourtant, ces originaux comparés à ceux de la première édition des compilations des années 70 n’ont pas ces notices de copyright, ce qui indique qu’elles ont été ajoutées dans les “originaux” après la compilation en question. (Pièces 5 à 7)

         4.  La pièce B-2 est nettement différente de celle publiée dans le cours OEC d’origine, dans le volume 2, 1ère édition de 70 (Pièce jointe n°8)

         5.La pièce fournie à Factnet B-1827 ne ressemble pratiquement pas à l’original BPI.

         6. Pièces  B-1288; B-214; and C-3. Les originaux BPI ne contiennent pas de notice de copyright.

         7. La pièce B-1 montre qu’il s’agit non pas d’un original, mais d’une “publication II”

         8. Les pièces B-248, B-249 et B-157 indiquent au début qu’elles ont été publiées ailleurs avant la publication “originale”.

         37. En vertu de mes connaissances en tant que membre du staff scientologue, comprenant ma fonction “d’Officier de Repèchage en Chef”, et d’après l’examen des pièces soumises par BPI pour supporter leur demande renouvelée de jugement sommaire, il apparaît que nombre des “originaux” soumis par BPI ne sont pas du tout des originaux et que les notices de copyright ont été ajoutées aux documents bien après la publication, en faussant cette date de copyright;

    Le déclarant n’a rien d’autre à ajouter pour l’instant.

    Je déclare, sous peine de pénalité de parjure, en vertu des lois des Etats-Unis d’Amérique et de celles de l’tat de Californie, que ce qui précède est vrai et correct. Exécuté ce jour 27 juillet 1998, à Santa Ana, Californie.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute a legal advice. Please review our disclaimer

Menopause in women

 Possibly helpful advice 

Menopause is a challenge that most women face in their lifetime. Menopause will bring several changes to a woman’s body, including hormone production. This is a big change causing  mood swings , often behavioral  issues emerge very much like two minds talking at the same time about love and hate, appetite changes significantly as the stress levels increase.

 There are symptoms of major depression related to menopause that include:

• Depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day for 2 weeks or longer and/or
• Loss of interest or pleasure in activities that the person usually enjoys.

 Other symptoms can include:

• Fatigue or lack of energy
• Restlessness or feeling slowed down
• Feelings of guilt or worthlessness
• Difficulty concentrating
• Trouble sleeping or sleeping too much
• Recurrent thoughts of death or suicide

Source: please follow the link , OB/GYNs list included

Other useful links:

• Menozac Review
• Hot Flash Remedies
• Menopause Remedies
• Menopause Management
• Hot Flash Remedies
• Natural Remedies For Menopause
• Perimenopause Treatment
• Menopause Remedies
• Menopause Relief
• Herbal Remedies For Menopause
• Natural Menopause Treatment
• Natural Remedies For Hot Flashes
• Menopause Supplements

Please consult a medical doctor in regard to any medical treatments and medical conditions.

Speech from the Throne

The Premier Kathleen Wynne’s swearing-in ceremony on Feb. 11. set a new beginning with her Throne Speech. I met Kathleen personally on a number of occasions and I was truly impressed by her flawless public specking skills, her warm personality  and her ability to get the tings done.  I am very optimistic and certain that she will set the right social priorities and confidently reach common grounds across the political opponents. Kathleen Wynne’s speech called for a balance between fiscal prudence and social justice, and attempted to define those goals as mutually supporting leading to economic prosperity.

The Brain at Work – Humor

Black Propaganda – no comments

Source: Link

Juan Ferrara

Pierre Ethier audited Juan Ferrara

Juan is a son of the well known actress Ofelia Guilmáin and brother of Lucía Guilmáin y Esther Guilmáin. He was married to the famous Mexican actress, Helena Rojo. Ferrara was interested in acting since he was a young child, but it wasn’t until he was 22 that he had his first acting job. He changed his name to Juan Ferrara before playing a small role in the 1965 movie, “Tajimara”. In 1966, he got his first major movie role, as Sonny in Los Angeles de Puebla. Ferrara graduated from Televisa’s – a well known acting school and also a producer that was decided to cast him as a star in his own telenovela, El Espejismo Brillaba. The novel became a major hit across Mexico and Latin America. In 1970, he starred in two extremely successful novels, Yesenia and La Gata. In 1978, Ferrara was in Viviana, another extremely successful novel. He portrayed Julio Montesinos. 1983 proved to be an important career year for Ferrara, as he established himself as an actor in Puerto Rico as well. Hired by Canal 2, he filmed Laura Guzman, Culpable!, a soap opera that became one of Puerto Rico’s most seen television programs ever. Due to the novel’s overwhelming popularity in Puerto Rico, the network decided to bring Ferrara back in 1985, to film a tele-novel called Tanairi. Ferrara starred alongside Von Mari Mendez in this soap opera, which went on to become one of Puerto Rico’s most critically acclaimed television shows of all time, as well as the most expensive tele-novel produced in Puerto Rican history.

Helena Rojo & Juan Ferrara

Helena Rojo is one of the most popular actresses of the Mexican cinema and TV. Helena has played set of roles at theater and cinema. Pierre mentions that the actress adores travels and loves Europe. She is also an admirer of Elvis Priestly.

Helena Rojo began her career as a model in the early-1960s. Toward the end of the decade, she studied drama with renown Mexican directors Carlos Ancira and José Luis Ibáñez, making her film debut in 1968 in the film El club de los suicidas. That same year, Helena also appeared in her second film, Los amigos. She continued working as a model and appearing in small film roles in the late 60’s and early 70’s.

Helena’s career lead her to work with the most important Mexican film directors of the 1970s and 80’s, such as Felipe Cazals, Arturo Ripstein, Rafael Corkidi, Alberto Bojórquez, Marcela Fernández Violante and Jorge Fons, among others.

Pierre Ethier audited Helena Rojo

She has worked with international talent, such as German director Werner Herzog and actor Klaus Kinski with a role in the film Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972). She also appeared in the film Fox Trot (1976), directed by Arturo Ripstein and alongside actors Charlotte Rampling, Peter O’Toole and Max von Sydow. In 2006 Helena appeared on the American series Ugly Betty.

Pierre Ethier audited Helena Rojo and Juan Ferrara

 

 

 

 

 

Squirreling

republished 

 

The word squirreling has had several meanings and has evolved through the years.

Its original definition and concept still remains the most valid.

A poorly trained auditor is unable to obtain results doing the usual. (typically one or more of the following are present: his TRs are poor, he has MUs, he hasn’t learned the auditor comm. cycle properly, his metering is flubby, he is having case trouble). He dreams up “brand new technology” from the top of his head, and without testing it on anyone, except perhaps himself, seeks to supplant the standard processes with it. He squirrels.

The Church reaction has been to savagely and brutally denounce him and to attack. This always results in the hardening of the Squirrel position and any followers, not the changing of his views. Far from discouraging it,
they end up strengthening it. The way to deal with the squirrel, besides not giving him any endorsement or validation, is to ignore him. His practice will die all on its own from the lack of results and poor word of mouth.

I have now de-politicized the definition of Squirreling. It is now simply defined as the inventing of processes, which violate the fundamentals of auditing, basic Axioms or the structure of the Human Mind. It is generally
a solution to its author’s own problems and his inability or confusions in applying the technology in the first place.

With the thousands upon thousands of legitimate processes in existence, you will need to be reach a pretty Mighty High level of OT before you run out of actions to run. Why rack your brain trying to re-invent the wheel, when it is already right there in front of you ready to be used?

I am not here to debate the legitimacy or illegitimacy of doing other practices. But please don’t call it Scientology or auditing when it isn’t. Call it Squirellogy or Bushology (if your name is Bush) or something else.

What would you think about someone who is teaching the Koran as a way to live and called it Christianity? Or someone playing on ice with a stick and a puck and claiming he is doing “basketball”?

In recent decades CSI* view on Squirrels has tremendously hardened. Labelling someone as a Squirrel has been changed into meaning someone pronounced guilty of the any departure from Tech, according to RTC self-defined standards. It has now become an entirely politicized process.

Pierre Ethier Class XII

Definitions:
CSI*= Church of Scientology International. The Official Organization as endorsed by RTC.
Politicize: Alter something solely based on or motivated by partisan or self-serving objectives

Happy Valentine’s Day – success story – over 20 years strong!

Fort Harrison Hotel – Flag Service Organization – Church Of Scientology

This is a picture of our wedding night at Fort Harrison Hotel – Flag Service Organization. The wedding reception was organized by Dreyfus who was a Greek by origin and was managing the Hotel Operations at the time. The Church claimed  that before becoming staff  Dreyfus was a manager at the luxury Waldorf Astoria.

We did not have a honeymoon as my husband was back to work in the very same morning after the wedding at the very same Ford Harrison Hotel where the Class XII HGC was located just across the pool . The wedding reception was organized quickly , actually we had gotten a wedding permit from the state beforehand. Alain Kartuzinski , Class XII had approached us on the Sea Org day suggestively mentioning that if we need a minister to perform our wedding he can volunteer. I am thinking now if that meant that our marriage was “politically correct” and approved by the “inner circle”.  This is the way it works in the Sea Org as strangers have a say on private matters like who lives and dies and who gets married and divorced ( disconnected). At lunch break Pierre surprised me with the news that he had contacted the hotel manager and ordered a wedding reception for 10 p.m. I did not have a wedding dress and he did not have a wedding suit. I took his dress white uniform and Mary Pesh helped me to get it ready in a  “ship shape”  during my dinner break. I remember Mary Pesh as a very fine, fair and impressive woman. I been told by her ex-husband Matt that since she has been sent to RPF , had remarried and left the Church but is still in good standing. My best wishes to her and always.

We did not have wedding preparation , we did not have wedding invitations per say , just announced at the Class XII HGC that everyone is invited. All Class XIIs did present on our wedding , staff , celebrities and other public. Someone from the public had grabbed a video camera and gave us our wedding video as a wedding gift.

Pierre paid for the wedding five star prices with the savings of his Sea Org allowance which was $30/week for working 110 hours. He was Sea Org staff for about 20 years. On many occasions Pierre had to audit till midnight and report to work at 7 a.m. next  morning which was basically abusive. This is the Church money making machine where the Church was changing PCs for Pierre’s services at rate up to $1000/hour and treating the auditor as a slave at no pay. He had to audit on the day of our wedding and was still delivering a session flat out till the wedding reception. My wedding rehearsal was 20 minutes before the wedding, the groom was delivering a session to public and was not allowed to leave his post even for this exceptional day in life. Allain Kartuzinsky did the rehearsal 20 minutes before the wedding without the groom and  asked me if I want the short or the long wedding ceremony , then briefly went with me through the script. By 10 p.m. Minty Alexander , Class XII was my maid of honor and  the groom rushed down the  isle to the reception right away after session. A Sea Org staff took me down the isle with Minty Alexander by my side. Few months after we were wed at the Church of Scientology my husband got a written order to “dump me” for their convenience and political agenda. Been told the same person writing this order to split my family was involved later on in Lisa McPherson’s death. This was one of many attempts to destroy my husband’s life by destroying his family.

We do not believe in family disconnection for serving the interests of cult groups ( both in the Church and outside the Church). Now over 20 years later our marriage is still going strong through the ups and downs in life, despite of the abusive attempts to split our family with gossip ( third party) and smear campaigns by evil fanatics both in the Church and their unauthorized offshoots.

People do fall in love and create a family. No religion have a say over your family ! 

Our best wishes on Valentines day, do  fall in love, create a family, raise children  and be happy together for many years to come! Count your blessings and always remember the true POWER is in your family.

A loving heart from us to you on Valentine’s day

——-

“…only true marriage; which is beyond the power of any individual or group of individuals to add to or detract from in the slightest manner.” Scientology Wedding Ceremony

Related:

• Marriage ceremony
• Sea Org Divorce

• Briefing 112 Belogradchik – About Family
• Briefing 113 Plovdiv – Children

” “With this symbol of my love, I take thee, (bride) As my true and lawful wedded wife”
“I pledge thee to keep this love, Ever living, ever real”
(The same vow is repeated by the Bride)

And now, in the name of the Church of Scientology … and by virtue of the powers vested in me by the state of Florida, I declare you (groom) and you (bride) to be truly and legally, Husband and Wife. I will ask that you seal this ceremony with your lips.

And I will ask these witnesses present to join me in blessing this ceremony with the postulate that the trust and love of the present shall become ever stronger with each passing year.

Did you do it ?
Thank you.” Scientology Wedding Ceremony

Meeting our friend the astronaut John Blaha

Source: https://pierreethier.wordpress.com

Find us on Google+

Robert F. Lyons

Pierre Ethier did audit the actor Robert F. Lyons

Robert Lyons attended the American Academy of Dramatic Arts. He spent his high school years in a very strict military school. Robert Lyons was a tap dancer at age six. He studied with legendary coaches Stella Adler, Milton Katselas and Arthur Storch.

“An actor thinks in terms of emotions and the effects he/she wants to create. One must make them real and natural, not forced and ‘performed.’ The acting of today is more a matter of ‘being,’ therefore it is important to go beyond ‘acting.'”

ROBERT F. LYONS

Today Bobby Lyons is coaching actors to learn new skills for confidence in auditioning using Scientology tools. He also covers the practical application of specific chapters from the book Scientology: The Problems of Work  authored by L. Ron Hubbard that show  how to have certainty in the individual auditioning and help with techniques to build personal security through an acting career.

Москва-Одесса – Владимир Высоцкий

Владимир Высоцкий – Песня о переселении душ

"Пускай живешь ты дворником - родишься вновь прорабом,
А после из прораба до министра дорастешь.
Но, если туп, как дерево - родишься баобабом
И будешь баобабом тыщу лет, пока помрешь."

Thinking outside the box in Scientology

There is a discussion thread on a blog covertly denigrating those holding technical standards by comparing them to obsolete “cold, chrome steal (sic)” cars of the 1950s.

The author main argument is the silly notion that adhering to best practice or keeping proven and accepted standards puts a glass ceiling on Scientology when it does the exact opposite. There are millions of ways to apply the incredible vast array of technology (all of them actually following the tenets of Standard Tech), many generally never conceived by most Independents ,and especially the New Order within the Church itself.

There is an odd concept rampant in the Freezone that if one fails to get the results in spite of never having been properly trained in the first place or being quicky-trained, typically with missing materials, that the poor results one is getting are entirely to blame on the technology and fundamental flaws within it, never on its poor and inexpert application.

If a bridge collapses, do Engineers start challenging the laws laid down by Newton over 300 years ago, or do they look for a misapplication of Enginnering principles or a failure to follow what is recognized as best practice?

If I have spent in excess of 40,000 hours auditing some 5000 cases, I have spent about 20,000 additional hours doing Folder Errors summaries on another 5000 cases. This makes 10,000 cases in Scientology that I have studied,spanning 5 decades. This is very significantly more than the few hundred hours that make some people feel the top experts in the field. I feel quite certain that I have seen by now just about every possible error, squirelling and approach that could be done to address a case. Therefore I know from experience alone what works and does not. I know from mere observation what make people go insane and suffer nervous breakdowns or worse, because I have been called all too often to fix the messes both in the Church and in the Independent Field.

A long and verbose argument has been made by an Independent that people be allowed to philosophize”. There is nothing wrong with people thinking on their own. Scientology is well known to have manufactured more than its share of robots.

But somehow few people among the Leading Independents seem to be able to grasp the concept that it is possible to think freely and yet to adhere to a strict discipline and followed proven and accepted principles. NASA would have never sent a Man on the Moon, or bring back safely on Earth the Astronauts of Apollo 13 if they had not done that.

I keep repeating to people: Contrarily to some of my peers and co-workers, I NEVER ONCE followed technical directives solely because “LRH said so”, but only because it made sense and I could integrate the data within the vast array of knowledge I already possessed. This is largely why I became and remained Flag star Auditor for over a decade: I never sold out my Integrity, no matter what were the pressure or the threats. Nobody ever forced me to think one way or another. I did things because I honestly felt it was the best thing to do.

Therefore I have no reverse pendulum swing to follow and have no need to execute a 360 degree since I was never affected by the obtuseness of tunnel vision or fanaticism.

Invoking Freedom to think as an excuse for exploring blind alleys at the expense of proven achievable results,with the preclear paying for it at the cost of his own sanity, appears to me to be a particularly specious argument.

When an auditor is applying the tech, he is not merely theorizing about the Universe, but applying precise technology that has proven to make people potentially worse when it is misapplied. When you invalidate the strict adherence to a standard by mislabelling an Dogmatism or a prohibition from “Philosophizing”, Quality Control (Cramming) Required Specifications (Case Supervision) end up in the trash heap. When Laws and Standards are discarded Anarchy and Self-proclaimed Gurus rule.

There are hundreds of scholars or people of substantial education that view LRH as luminary in the field of the Mind.

Does any of those Independents actually think they can research and produce better, before they can satisfactorily learn they could do it right in the first place? Do they actually think that a hundred years hence their names will stand in bold letters above LRH own?

LRH repeatedly sought to compare the application of the technology of Dianetics and Scientology to the practice of Engineering.

It appears that few of the Leading Independents have a good grasp about how one goes about applying Engineering and the responsibilities connected with an activity proven to make things worse (or potentially fatal) when it is wrongly done.

What about the concepts of “Best Practice” “Duty of Care” “adhering to Proven Standards” or “Doing what has been proven to work”

There is a world of difference between blindly following Dogma and adhering to methods that thousands of hours of experience have shown to work.

Consider the Ethical implications of treating prospective public like guinea pigs to be experimented on, all too often without their explicit consent.

In the Information Technology World there is a saying about “not re-inventing the wheel” when proven solutions are known to already exist.

Why do so many seem unable to grasp the above simple truths?

My experience with “wheels re-inventors” is that all too often their wheel looks more like a triangle or won’t even spin.

Pierre Ethier

The “musketeer” fought tax increase seeking Russian citizenship

The actor Gerard Depardieu  had sought Russian citizenship as part of his battle against a proposed super tax on millionaires in France. The Frenchman has spent a fair bit of time in Russia in recent years, including for the filming of the French-Russian film “Rasputin,” and he expresses an admiration for Putin. But it is Russia’s flat 13 percent income tax that appears to be the biggest draw at the moment as he flees high taxes in France.

France’s new Socialist government tried to raise the tax on income above (euro) 1 million ($1.3 million) to 75 percent from the current 41 percent. That plan was struck down by the highest court, but Budget Minister Jerome Cahuzac said that the government is reworking the law so the superrich will still be asked to pay an elevated rate. He said the government is also considering putting the new tax in place for longer than the two years initially imagined.

Humor

Update on who is reading us ?  Server logs:

——

This was the reaction at my desk when we reviewed the server access logs of our blog and discovered that one of our readers is possibly David himself. Needless to tell that 198.77.155 ( Church of Scientology International) made an attempt to access the section  designated for authorized users only. We are watching what you have been watching. And sure you have been trying to get the “forbidden fruit”. Partial copy of collected analytics:

IP Address		198.77.155.# (Church of Scientology International)
ISP		Level 3 Communications
Location		Continent : North America Country : United States State : California City : Los Angeles Lat/Long : 34.1006, -118.3275

Stay tuned. There is more to come. We will publish records about ops, snoops and stoops and about the bought out stalkers and stooges infiltrating the free field . We have a lot more to bring to the sunshine for disinfection! Just a reminder: “The Church of Scientology, Church of Spiritual Technology and their known affiliates, but not limited to RTC, OSA, WISE,…are specifically DENIED the right to copy, or use the materials on those pages in any form.”

Below we traced the domains using the same mail server:

*.scientology-caracas.org
*.truescientology.org
acceptedhubbard.net
acceptedscientology.org
acceptedtraining.net
actualhubbard.net
approvedhubbard.com
approvedhubbard.net
authenticauditing.net
authentictraining.org
bonafidescientology.org
conventionaldianetics.net
correctdianetics.net
dianetica.com.pr
dianetics.com
dianetics.dk
dianetics.fm
dianetics.jp
dianetics.ru
dianetika.com
doctrinaldianetics.com
drugs-information.org
exactscientology.com
freedommag.org
freedomontheinternet.org
fsm.org
genuineauditing.net
goldenageofknowledge.com
goldenageofknowledge.net
goodscientology.com
goodscientology.net
hubbard.com.br
hubbard.org.br
hubbard.ru
humanrights4all.org
iasmembers.net
iasmemberships.net
iastrust.com
incomm.org
joyofcreating.org
ladianetique.com
loyaldianetics.com
lronhubbard.com.pr
lronhubbard.sn
lronhubbard.to
lronhubbard.vg
miscavigedave.vu
miscavigedavid.kz
miscavigedavid.se
miscavigedavid.vu
originaltraining.net
orthodoxauditing.net
orthodoxscientology.com
pop.scientology.org
postmaster.scientology.net
postmaster.scientology.org
qualifiedauditing.com
realhubbard.com
recognizedauditing.net
recognizedscientology.com
reformeddianetics.net
reformedhubbard.net
sainthill.org.uk
scientologist.com
scientologist.dk
scientology-brisbane.org
scientology-ccdallas.org
scientology-cclondon.org
scientology-ccnewyork.org
scientology-clermontferrand.org
scientology-columbus.org
scientology-dallas.org
scientology-durban.org
scientology-europe.org
scientology-harare.org
scientology-longisland.org
scientology-ottawa.org
scientology-pordenone.org
scientology-sandiego.org
scientology-verona.org
scientology.cc
scientology.cn
scientology.co.nz
scientology.gs
scientology.net
scientology.org.mx
scientologycross.org
scientologymexico-chapultepec.org
scientologytoday.org
scripturaldianetics.com
scripturalscientology.com
standardadmin.com
standardscientology.com
sys001.scientology.org
sys002.scientology.org
sys007.scientology.org
sys009.scientology.org
sys010.scientology.org
sys011.scientology.org
sys015.scientology.org
sys021.scientology.org
sys024.scientology.org
sys025.scientology.org
sys027.scientology.org
sys031.scientology.org
sys050.scientology.org
sys083.scientology.org
sys085.scientology.org
sys086.scientology.org
sys087.scientology.org
sys089.scientology.org
sys092.scientology.org
sys093.scientology.org
sys094.scientology.org
sys095.scientology.org
sys096.scientology.org
sys097.scientology.org
sys098.scientology.org
sys106.scientology.org
sys112.scientology.org
sys113.scientology.org
sys116.scientology.org
sys117.scientology.org
sys118.scientology.org
sys120.scientology.org
sys121.scientology.org
sys122.scientology.org
sys123.scientology.org
sys129.scientology.org
sys130.scientology.org
sys131.scientology.org
sys133.scientology.org
sys134.scientology.org
sys137.scientology.org
sys139.scientology.org
sys144.scientology.org
sys148.scientology.org
sys149.scientology.org
sys152.scientology.org
sys153.scientology.org
sys158.scientology.org
sys159.scientology.org
sys161.scientology.org
sys164.scientology.org
sys165.scientology.org
sys166.scientology.org
sys167.scientology.org
sys168.scientology.org
sys174.scientology.org
sys175.scientology.org
sys178.scientology.org
sys179.scientology.org
sys180.scientology.org
sys182.scientology.org
sys184.scientology.org
sys185.scientology.org
sys189.scientology.org
sys190.scientology.org
sys192.scientology.org
sys194.scientology.org
sys195.scientology.org
sys197.scientology.org
sys198.scientology.org
sys199.scientology.org
sys200.scientology.org
sys208.scientology.org
sys209.scientology.org
sys210.scientology.org
sys211.scientology.org
sys214.scientology.org
sys216.scientology.org
sys217.scientology.org
sys218.scientology.org
sys219.scientology.org
sys220.scientology.org
sys222.scientology.org
sys223.scientology.org
sys226.scientology.org
sys227.scientology.org
sys229.scientology.org
sys232.scientology.org
sys238.scientology.org
sys239.scientology.org
sys241.scientology.org
sys243.scientology.org
sys245.scientology.org
sys246.scientology.org
sys252.scientology.org
sys253.scientology.org
theflaglandbase.org
theta.com
traditionaldianetics.net
truehubbard.net
truescientology.com
unaltereddianetics.com
unalteredscientology.com
untouchedauditing.net
wise.eu
dianeticclearing.com

Caught up trying to get the “forbidden fruit”

198.77.155.0 IP address Information

The IP address 198.77.155.0 was found in Los Angeles, California, United States. It is allocated to Church Of Scientology International. Additional IP location information, as well as network tools are available below.

IP address:	198.77.155.0
ISP:	Church Of Scientology International
City:	Los Angeles
Region:	California
Country:	United States (US)
Postal code:	90001
latitude:	34.0416
longitude:	-118.2988

traceroute check latency whois blacklist check

NetRange:       198.77.154.0 - 198.77.155.255
CIDR:           198.77.154.0/23
OriginAS:       
NetName:        CHSCIEN-154-17
NetHandle:      NET-198-77-154-0-1
Parent:         NET-198-76-0-0-1
NetType:        Reassigned
RegDate:        2000-08-18
Updated:        2012-07-13
Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-198-77-154-0-1

OrgName:        Church of Scientology International
OrgId:          CSI-13
Address:        6331 Hollywood Blvd.
City:           Los Angeles
StateProv:      CA
PostalCode:     90028
Country:        US
RegDate:        1997-02-13
Updated:        2012-07-13
Ref:            http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/CSI-13

OrgTechHandle: CKN23-ARIN
OrgTechName:   No, Contact Known
OrgTechPhone:  +1-800-555-1234 
OrgTechEmail:  nobody@example.com
OrgTechRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/CKN23-ARIN

OrgTechHandle: OPERA392-ARIN
OrgTechName:   Operations Admin
OrgTechPhone:  +1-323-960-3550 
OrgTechEmail:  peteroram@scientology.net
OrgTechRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/OPERA392-ARIN

OrgAbuseHandle: CKN23-ARIN
OrgAbuseName:   No, Contact Known
OrgAbusePhone:  +1-800-555-1234 
OrgAbuseEmail:  nobody@example.com
OrgAbuseRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/CKN23-ARIN

RTechHandle: PEABO3-ARIN
RTechName:   Peabody, Brad ( linkedin )
RTechPhone:  +1-323-960-3500 
RTechEmail:  bradpeabody@scientology.net
RTechRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/PEABO3-ARIN

RTechHandle: SYSTE384-ARIN
RTechName:   System Administrator
RTechPhone:  +1-323-960-3500 
RTechEmail:  sysadmin@scientology.net
RTechRef:    http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/SYSTE384-ARIN

Notes:

Computers connected to a network are assigned a unique number known as Internet Protocol (IP) Address. IP (version 4) addresses consist of four numbers in the range 0-255 separated by periods (i.e. 127.0.0.1).  Most IP addresses can be mapped to host/domain names (i.e. http://www.speedguide.net) and sometimes traced to individual user.

 

OSA Juvenile Funnies

Since David is reading this blog we decided to feature the juvenile behavior of his promoters.

Under this section we will feature the juvenile absurdities published possibly by OSA or affiliates of COS on the internet. On few hate pages along with promotions of “successful” completions in the Church of Scientology, the “promoters” of the Church have posted doctored pictures with absurd claims while otherwise engaging in variety of facebook stalking . If you look at a site featuring articles that lack common sense , you will gain better understanding why people in  their right mind and professional capacity are unwilling to associate with an organization that has devolved into a kinder garden.

Below are pictures published by what appears to be OSA operative. who claims that by some reason while Pierre was in Milan , the front door of the Milan Org. was barred with steel bars. This was done around or after Pierre visited the city.  We wondered about the reasons of this juvenile argument why would someone want to obstruct the access to the Org. with what appears to be horizontal rigid piece of metal. One suggestion we had was that the steel bars were used so that the visitors trip and their wallets fall into the Church. More feasible sounded the assumption that the building was condemned. In retrospect to the Catholic Cathedral down the streets where the doors were wide open , apparently the Church promoters were claiming that the doors of the Church of Scientology were locked solid to keep parishioners away and the Financial Police was at the door. This led to the following parodies based on comparative analysis and root cause conclusions. Hope you have some laugh. ” The blind is leading the blind”

Why the door of the Org. in Milan is barred? Apparently due to lack of entry traffic

Milan Ideal Org today on Google Earth. It seems an ideal org. today has its front door permanently locked .

Picture doctored by OSA juveniles

With the courtesy from ex-KGB

Our response to juvenile funnies from the latest smear campaign

Brain, Brain, Brain…..

Church of Scientology and dissemination in Russia – No comments

On the wrong side of the “Berlin” wall.

What is the price of Freedom you are willing to pay if you end up on the wrong side of the Berlin wall? The condition of being free relates to the power to act or speak or think without externally imposed restraints. So if we have to define free society is not as a society where people are free to do what they wish, but as one in which we freely choose to surrender certain behaviors in exchange for the benefits of living within that society. But spiritual freedom brings us in a whole new realm beyond the existing physical limitations.

True spiritual freedom is realizing that one can have rewarding and fulfilling life existence without the boundaries and the repression of the group. An individual truly grows down the path of spiritual discovery in seeking the truth as he/she gets closer to the answers of true meaning of life and self existence.

True spiritual freedom is accompanied with release from the bonds of restrictive groups and gaining the ability to think for yourself without guilt. The power to move beyond the spiritual dogma enables you to pursue spiritual growth and knowledge in the absence of fear and unhealthy restraints, ties, and obligations. The true power is to exercise our personal liberty in our spiritual journey to find our purpose and fulfill our destiny in this lifetime.

To become truly free one has to be able to move beyond the obstacles of the brick walls without a remorse from the boundaries of a group that has regressed into opposing spiritual freedom and true human values like respect, kindness, understanding and honest and open communication.

If you truly want to be free It is time to climb over the “Berlin” wall!

About needless violence

No comments

WARNING – OSA & the same old, same old

WARNING FROM ADMIN – OLD NEWS IN A NEW TUNE – Promoting the enemy lines of the Church , cowardly individuals have been stalking and circulating emails and other communication to provoke hatred with altered posts of warped and perverted communication seeking to attribute them to Pierre. In most cases this is significantly altered and embellished communication that is coming from individuals who are afraid to use their own names and make the above hate distributions under variety of handles. The negative information and critiques about the Corporate  Church of Scientology and DM, as well as their vested interests and relations have been “conveniently” cropped out and/or omitted  in order to alter the essence of the meaning and the context. One can easily establish to the author of such a  hate propaganda and their ulterior motives pointing to OSA agenda.  This propaganda is targeted to enterbulate and manipulate unstable crowd with no good purpose in life. At the same time when we are seeking to promote inner peace, joy and kindness , there are people who promote hatred, disconnection and fairgame. Be aware of impersonations, fraudulent misrepresentations and collecting your private information under false pretense by the very same covert individuals.

Below is a fresh reminder about the kind of abuse Pierre (working 110 hours a week at no pay) and other Sea Org members had to endure while being used as some sort of a slave labor by the Church. What is actually puzzling that instead of helping to comfort dying and terminally ill Scientologists (link), the Church spends the donations of their parishioners on vexatious litigation (see below the example with Debbie Cook) and other scare tactics. This is NOT “The Way to Happiness”!

Enough abuse! Enough of your EVIL!

FBI’s Scientology investigation: Balancing the First Amendment with charges of abuse and forced labor

By Joe Childs and Thomas C. Tobin, Times Staff Writers
In Print: Sunday, January 13, 2013

Link: CTV Interview- ” Church in a big trouble”

Sofia – Bulgaria

Fire and Ice

Songwriters: DEN ADEL, SHARON J. / WESTERHOLT, ROBERT / SPIERENBURG, MARTINUS J. E. MARTIJN

Every word you’re saying is a lie
Run away my dear
But every sign will say your heart is dead

Bury all the memories
Cover them with dirt
Where’s the love we once had
Our destiny’s unsure
Why can’t you see what we had
Let the fire burn the ice
Where’s the love we once had
Is it all a lie?

And I still wonder
Why heaven has died
The skies are all falling
I’m breathing but why?
In silence I hold on
To you and I

Closer to insanity
Buries me alive
Where’s the life we once had
It cannot be denied
Why can’t you see what we had?
Let the fire burn the ice
Where’s the love we once had
Is it all a lie?

And I still wonder
Why heaven has died
The skies are all falling
I’m breathing but why?
In silence I hold on
To you and I

You run away
You hide away
To the other side of the universe

Where you’re safe from all that hunts you down

But the world has gone
Where you belong
And it feels to late so you’re moving on
Can you find your way back home?

And I still wonder
Why heaven has died
The skies are all falling
I’m breathing but why?
In silence I hold on
To you and I

Every word you’re saying is a lie.

Overcoming life`s ups and downs

Source: https://pierreethier.wordpress.com

Find us on Google+

The true objective of life is to attain wisdom through experience. This cannot be accomplished by giving in to the difficulties of life, but only by overcoming them. There is no assurance that you shall have an easy time and be happy ever afterwards. Yet, the true rewards are not made to those who fail in life’s battle, but to those who overcome the obstacles of life.

It is common phenomena that the majority of people are after an easy life, a good time, freedom from responsibilities and care. But it seems that in spite of all their seeking of superficial things in life, they can never find what they desire. There is always a deep emptiness in their fundamental feelings of pleasure, something that robs them of true happiness; or, possibly, combinations of circumstances conspire to upset all their plans.

The paradox in life is that the true goal of life is not the attainment of happiness, yet if we attain the true goal of life we find happiness. Those who are ignorant of life’s true purpose and who seek happiness high and low, year after year, fail to find it. On the other hand, those who recognize the true goal of life, and follow it, attain happiness without seeking for it.

In times, people seek joy of achieving things with little effort, but the easy life they seek constantly eludes them, simply because there is no such thing. The only life that is easy is the life of the strong soul who has overcome the ups and downs in life. This life is not easy in reality, but appears relatively so because of the personal spiritual strength.

It is impossible to have an easy life, and, if it were possible, then life would be not worth living, for the sole goal of life is the building of character and the attainment of wisdom through experience. Life to all of us must always be full of brick walls, and by overcoming those brick walls we show our dedication and how badly we want to gain certain experiences. True happiness is achieved by those wise and awakened souls who are seeking for Truth and Spiritual Fulfilment and who desire to overcome life and its difficulties, instead of weakly giving in to them.

We know that we have to meet trouble and overcome difficulty in order to attain wisdom and build up character. The question, then, is not whether we shall meet the trouble and adversity or not, but rather, how we shall meet them. Shall we be winning or shall we be overwhelmed? Shall we overcome life’s difficulties or shall we give in to them?

Some people have submerged as drifters on the sea of life. They are also carried by the current. It is only the few who realize that they have the Power within themselves to raise superior to all their difficulties, overcome their own weaknesses, and, through winning experience, attain wisdom.  Success depends, more than anything, upon true faith in the good purpose of life: the faith in the Power within yourself and the ability to overcome every obstacle in your path.

The extent of the Power that you can bring into your life is the measure of your faith in your own abilities. If your faith is small, then your life will be lacking in achievements. If your faith is large and strong, then great things will happen in your life. All that is required is an unquenchable belief and trust in the Power within you. Even the weakest and most timid can make use of this Power. There is the same Power in the timid and weak as in the brave and strong. The weakness of the former is due to a lack of faith and belief in their own abilities.

People who realize their own real spiritual identity, know that their soul can never die, that they can never be defeated, that they can never really fail. They may lose the physical body through the change that is called death; but the true spiritual being, can never die. Neither can truly fail, though in our feelings we can perceive as defeated a thousand times we must realise our Power to rise again.

Only have faith in the Spiritual Power within you and you can know all the joys of overcoming and achievement.