Now you can take advantage of the famous Humor Rundown which includes Head Rundown , Water Rundown , Quatro Rundown, Double or Nothing Rundown and After Super Power Rundown. The EP of each Rundown is documented below. I want to thank all contributors. The Humor Rundown will void a significant gap in the field practice.
Very special thanks to Michelle Butcher – Sterling for creating back links and increasing our Google ratings.
WHO OR WHAT IS A SUPPRESSIVE GROUP?
ARE SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS TRULY SUPPRESSIVE?
L. Ron Hubbard originally defined the concept of Suppressive Groups in a Policy Letter dated 29 June 1968 (Enrollment in Suppressive Groups).
He stated “SUPPRESSIVE GROUPS, are defined as those which seek to destroy Scientology or which specialize in injuring or killing persons or damaging their cases or which advocate the suppression of mankind”.
However, in actual practice, the Church of Scientology (and Hubbard himself for that matter), has branded as Suppressives anyone who started a splinter or divergent group.
WHAT TRULY CAUSES A GROUP TO BE BRANDED SUPPRESSIVE
By actual record, the Church of Scientology declares as Suppressive:
1- Any splinter group, whatever were their motives or activities.
2- Any whistleblower or group denouncing illegal acts performed or ordered by the Church of Scientology or any of its principals.
3- Anyone refusing to comply with orders issued by the Church Elite, no matter how much these may contravene approved policy or the published aims of Scientology.
4- Anyone found to be applying Scientology, or a derivative of it without the official approval or without the paying of tithes to the Church of Scientology. Contrarily to any mainstream Church, unqualified and untrained people will make the assessment of such activities and uniformly find them to be bad and harmful without any real investigation or competence to do so..
5- Any organization whose principals are known by the Church of Scientology to be former members and that teaches anything of a mental, Spiritual or Religious nature, even when it has no real connection with Scientology nor seeks to compete with it.
6- Any group or Association that has copied ideas found in Scientology or L. Ron Hubbard writings and seek to apply them, without the official approval of the Church of Scientology and the payment of large amounts of royalties. This especially applies to any new Churches created in accordance with the laws of the land.
7- Any group of individuals that seeks to challenge the activities of the Church of Scientology or its leaders, even when invoking the writings of L. Ron Hubbard and the original materials written by Hubbard in the 1950s, which the current Church of Scientology is very fond of calling scriptures.
A exhaustive and impartial analysis of top 50 splinter or dissenting group from the Church of Scientology reveals the following facts:
THE TRUE ATTRIBUTES OF SPLINTER OR DIVERGENT GROUPS
1- Each and every Splinter/Divergent group purported and sought to promote the ideas contained in Scientology and consistent with its philosophy. This includes the entirety of what is labeled as “FREEZONE” or Independent Field. Therefore far from suppressing Scientology, they uniformly tried to promote it. FACT: Splinter/Divergent Groups do not seek to suppress Scientology.
2- People who have claimed that a splinter Group or FREEZONE/Independent caused someone’s actual injury or Death are very few in number (less than 3%) and every instance dates from the 1990s or the 21st Century as a small clique of particularly unethical, poorly trained and ignorant individuals started to rule or influence the key factions of the Freezone/Independent Field . The majority of the assertions of actual harm or death in the Freezone/Independent Field are anonymously made and easily traceable to the Church of Scientology or its agents. Since the Church of Scientology is among the most DEAD-AGENTED organization on the planet (except in the blind eyes of its fanatical promoters and OSA agents/collaborators), the validity of those claims is very easy to dispute.
On the other hand, the number of people documented with claims that the Church of Scientology has caused injury or contributed directly to the death of people is in the high Hundreds, or perhaps in the thousands. All one has to do is use the Internet Search Engine or visit the detailed files contained thousands of different accounts, testimonies and News media stories in the Internet web sites that are dedicated to the denunciation of abuses by the Church of Scientology.
1001- TH WAY TO DIE
A statistical analysis and study of OTs remaining faithful to the Church reveal a truly scary trend: Life expectancy for them is a mere 57 years of age: that is 20 to 25 years below the national average for all but the poorest and under-developped countries on Earth. Active membership and participation in the Church of Scientology current activities ought to be labeled: “the 1001th way to die“.
Therefore, even giving reports exclusively written for the benefit of the Church of Scientology credibility, the ratio of people allegedly injured or killed by the Church of Scientology outnumbers the Splinter Groups/Freezone/Independents by over 300 to 1.
FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in injuring or Killing persons.
3- As far as advocating the Suppression of Mankind, there is no evidence that any of the 500 groups listed on any list of Splinter or Divergent groups has ever advocated or encouraged such acts. On the other hand, the Church of Scientology has regularily promoted ideas described in the “ten stages of genocide” and frequently advocated that people be deprived or liberty or their Human rights should they happen to be blacklisted for whatever reason.
FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever advocated the Suppression of Mankind.
DO FREEZONE/INDEPENDENTS GROUPS TRULY HARM CASES?
4- While the results achieved by Splinter groups and Freezone factions tend to vary according to ideas and quality in their application, only a small handful of Independent practitioners (less than 5% – none of them being member of an organized group) has shown that they may be possibly labeled as “harmful”. Even that claim is in dispute.
The matter of damaging people’s cases is largely a subjective one.
What of the auditor who falsely validates the hallucinatory claims of a pc to please him/her? Is he truly damaging the case of the person?
What of the auditor who validates the pc who is convinced that he audits remotely and telepathically the world leaders, including President Obama?
Or how about the one who believes he/she gets daily instructions from the spiritual plane where LRH gives them daily advice on where to purchase anything from picnic foam plates to a large Plasma TV?
What of people attesting to OT8, OT48 or even OT 1008?
Most of these people claim to be happy, though many of their peers tend to view them as delusional.
For each person pointing them up as “damaged cases”, there will be those who promote them as exemplary cases.
Merely making people happy with their state of case is a questionable criteria. A number of cases, by actual record, incompetently audited people can turn on some form of Psychosis and Deep Hatred after having been audited as a victim, when they were actually a chronic aggressor and abuser of the rights of others. If one was to audit an “Hitler type” personality, the latter may enjoy his newly gained abilities as a wonderful tool for more effectively committing genocide or spread his hatred against those he feel should be destroyed.
PREVIOUSLY DAMAGED CASES
Lastly, of supreme, but often neglected importance is whether the person’s case was already damaged by the Church of Scientology or its predecessors in the field of Mental and Spiritual practices.
In the vast majority of cases, it is simply impossible to ascertain. The Church of Scientology, typically blames its failed cases on Psychiatry and often invents newly discovered psychiatry related links to rationalize even the most justified of attacks on them.
Every case that has openly testified against a Freezone or Independent auditor for being abused, misaudited or otherwise mishandled, had done the exact same thing toward the Church of Scientology a number of years earlier.
Policies on Sources of Troubles written by L. Ron Hubbard describes responsible-for-condition cases as those insisting things such as some auditor or thing being “wholly responsible for the terrible condition I am in.” the same policy states that a “review of these cases show that they were in the same or worse condition long before auditing… and that their antagonism extends to anyone who seeks to help them”.
FACT: None of the Splinter/Divergent Groups has ever specialized in Damaging Cases. Damaged cases are nearly always attributable to many causes and the evidence supports that the Church of Scientology does far more toward Damaging people’s cases than any Splinter/Divergent group ever has.
HOW TO DETERMINE IF A PRACTICE IS DAMAGING TO A CASE
The correct method of determining if someone’s case has been harmed by a practice is to confine oneself to the actions of the person (something that can be impartially examined) rather than the person feelings, beliefs or alleged character (something largely subjective)
The following questions should be examined and answered based on honest and thorough examination, while brushing away any and all bias and rumors:
1- Is the individual, according to the world at large, as opposed to groups he/she is associated with (due to the likelihood of mutual out-rudiments) becoming a better person? By better person is meant someone who help others and who behave in accordance to a Moral Code such as the one written in the Way to Happiness. Because delusional or unethical individuals tend to PR themselves an actual thorough and independent examination of their activities is required.
2- Is the person more successful along their dynamics? (especially the first three)
3- What is the level of Communication of the person? Is it highly destructive toward selected individuals or are they focusing on constructive activities
4- Is the person a PR artist?
5- Are the friends or associates of the individual people of Good-Will, (even if they may have made mistakes), or people actually involved in, actually PR artists and/or con men due to their destructive activities? Who are their friends? Who are their enemies?
6- Are they hypocritically posing as “Free Independent” while covertly acting as Informant for the Church of Scientology (the one organization who has publicly vowed at trying to destroy all Independent Scientologist and practitioners). Are their enemies the same as the Church of Scientology?
LAW OF EXCLUDED MIDDLE
“THE ENEMY OF MY ENEMY IS MY FRIEND”
Logic, in spite of the existence of the Data Series, is something largely unknown to Scientologists. The data Series written by L. Ron Hubbard were meant to complement the fundamentals of LOGIC. But most Scientologist (both within the Church and without) view it as a replacement, therefore they tend to act in a completely illogical manner.
Normal and ethical people often state that “The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend”.
Many people who have been indoctrinated by some of the false ideas taught within the Church of Scientology tend to stick to those false ideas long after they have left or even publicly disavowed any beliefs in that organization or even its philosophy and original ideas.
It is a typically action by the same kind of people to willy-nilly provide assistance to the Church of Scientology when it seeks to malign its enemies, by providing all manner of Black PR and lies against their common enemies.
In most cases, the providing of Black PR against their perceived or imaginary enemies, in forums carefully chosen because OSA and Church agents are known to frequent them is meticulously calculated to harm its target by teh typical weapons of choice of the coward: Lies, Blackmail and defamation.
The result, uncomforted by those who have a low ability to confront Evil or Reality, is that the individuals publicly attacking the Church of Scientology Enemies by using defamation, Blackmail and lies, have become de facto collaborators of the Church of Scientology and are treated as informants and reliable sources by that organization.
The net result is to weaken the target of their hatred (often an individual with limited resources or time to defend himself) and strengthen the Church of Scientology (an organization documented to allocate unlimited resources toward the suppression of its enemies).
The only possible conclusion is that the individuals claiming to be enemies of the Church, yet actively aid the Church in its attacks of its enemies are either incredibly stupid, hypocritical or an unholy mixture of both.
Many of the EX-Scientologist boards starting with their owners and moderators act that way. The same goes with a number of Freezone/Independent Boards, in particular those controlled by the self appointed Freezone PRs, who know very well their board is infested by OSA agents and operatives, though they profess otherwise.
The only reason a board like ESMB has been allowed to continue to exist, in spite of it numerous violations of the law, and the vast resources and connections of the Church of Scientology (and its ability to get it shut it down any day it chooses to), is that it is viewed by OSA as an invaluable tool to malign its enemies and the eagerness of those who portray themselves as Victims of Scientology to do its own dirty work. And they do it for free!
Such Church allies can be created by incompetent or reckless Freezone/Independent auditors when they bypass the case of their pc and allow them to remain stuck in earlier bad and/or traumatic experiences at the hands of the Church of Scientology, yet attempt to audit them on Upper Levels or Rundowns. The resulting Blind fury or Hatred is typically targeted at anyone who may point out, especially correctly, the technical shortcomings of their auditor (the one largely responsible for restimulating the person).
THE LIST OF ENEMIES AND SUPPRESSIVE PERSONS/GROUPS
SOED Flag ED 2830RB published on the 25 July 1992 is the last list of Suppressives published by the Church of Scientology. It proved to be such an embarrassment when it was leaked on the Internet, that the Church amended its policy of updating it and has since kept its ever-growing list of Declared Suppressive Persons, a secret.
All one has to do is look at the historical records of the history and development of Scientology or the names of LRH former close associates and confidantes to recognize a veritable “Who is Who” of the History of Scientology in that issue alone.
The Church of Scientology use blind zealots, fanatics and extremists such as those dedicating themselves at making Hatred web pages on imaginary enemies of the Church of Scientology, those stalking defectors to harass them and those who believe that spying on people of good-will to satisfy the pernicious agenda of OSA. The common denominator of all these people is a deep fear of the light of Truth and the exposing of their own crimes, lies and atrocities. That terror dominates their should so much that they become unable to recognize as an OUTPOINT (or illogic) the simple fact that anyone who sees 90% of one their former associates or comrades has all the attributes Paranoia. Paranoia is a condition largely created by having committed earlier a large number of harmful acts.
Labelling Splinter or Divergent Groups as Suppressive is based on lies and used as an expedient to rationalize the blatant disregard by the Church of Scientology for people rights to practice their own religion as they see fit or express their opinion.
True Suppressive Groups obviously do exist: The Nazis, Organized Crime, Al-Qaeda are a few of them, but they are never listed by the Church of Scientology in the lists of Enemies of Mankind, while their own defectors always are.
Declaring Splinter or Divergent groups as Suppressives is an entirely political tool whose main aim is to stamp out competition. Further it attempts to maintain what is advertised as “the only road to Spiritual Freedom” and Spiritual redemption for Man as a Monopoly in the hands of a self-appointed Elite. That latter point is Ethically as reprehensible as can be, since its only possible result should it come to fruition is the Enslavement of Mankind.
Observation of the actual actions done by that Elite clearly indicates that the personal Aims of the Individuals that control that Elite have nothing to do with the purported Aims of Scientology nor its published Credo. On the contrary the aims of the Elite have mainly to do with the accumulation of wealth in the most expedient possible way (typically through the secret use of Slave labour, Sweat Shops and Intimidation) and in satisfying an insatiable thirst for Power over the souls that the Church of Scientology still controls.
The way to minimize the formation of Splinter Group is for the organization to remain open to the fruits of observation and to suggestions and to acknowledge people. Most Splinter Groups were created as a result of an unhandled upset or ARCX (Disagreement, Injustice, Invalidation). By keeping quality controls high and verifying that the proper standards and protocols are adhered to, results automatically follow and the demand for switching to wild unproven ideas will remain to a minimum. To utterly prevent the formation of Splinter or Divergent groups is simply impossible without adopting totalitarian measures and keeping a thought a police active.
If one is to be in the business of helping people achieve higher levels of self-determinism, one need to accept that fact. The Church of Scientology has become akin to a 1984 type Orwellian nightmare because it refused to understand that simple principle.
The voices of Bulgarian women are divine. Bulgarian folk music stands out with incredible vocal performances, in particular the layered, diaphonic harmonies along with an intricate multi-layering, and the timbre of the vibrato-free female Bulgarian voices. The Bulgarian folk performances preserve the unique traits of an ancient music, most notably the delivery from the diaphragm that restricted the vocal chords, enabling the production of the distinctive tones and drones beyond the traditional (read “western”) scale, as well as delivery techniques such as Melisma – the production of a single syllable of text in a range of notes or scale of quarter tones (to Western ears, a trance-like wailing reminiscent of Arabic chants or perhaps Flamenco), grace notes and trill, which punctuate the performances with a rarely experienced agility, grace and power.
How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate.
Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have “outlived their usefulness”.
Sometimes around the advent of its “Golden Age”, the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.
In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.
The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.
The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.
Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30 years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.
Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.
I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and “having outlived her usefulness”.
Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.
She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:”Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much…” I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.
In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference for the better.
The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.
That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.
The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as “useless” and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies) destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that “Enemy of the Church”. It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of “an Extremist Organization”. I was successful in helping that individual as well.
I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.
I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those “award winners” basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.
That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said. I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a “LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE” by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.
Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.
This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.
The voice of the victim of a Class VIII speaks louder than just words.
Somehow the voice of the victim has been ignored by PR artists promoting the abuser.
Coming soon “The Baobabs of Tomorrow”
GOOD AND EVIL
The Church of Scientology actions to suppress the Independent Field and Dissenters are actually making them stronger
L. Ron Hubbard repeatedly stated: Create God and you have to create the Devil.
As usual the Church of Scientology gets its wrong and does anything that seems to make sense in reverse. Since that organization now dedicate itself almost exclusively into creating EVIL, through it callous and depraved acts, it logically follows that it is willy-nilly incenting the creation of GOOD through that ever increasing number of people of good will who oppose their pernicious agenda.
A quote frequently attributed to Edmund Burke (though there is no evidence he ever stated it) is: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing”.
Along with the Code of Honour rules that “Your self-determinism and your honour are more important than your immediate life” and “Your integrity to yourself is more important than your body” this summarizes my personal philosophy in life and why threats that “I’d loose my Eternity” have always been entirely ineffectual on me. If you sell out your Integrity then, you have lost everything and there is no Eternity to be had. The big secret is that one cannot loose his Eternity except through his abandonment of his own Integrity. All threats to make one loose it are empty threats. Through the action of an Oppressor like the Church of Scientology actions against anyone who refuse to comply or who departs on his own determinism, one may suffer inconvenience, material discomfort. But when all is said and done, those who suffered through the fanatical actions of an organization or individuals bent on revenge and Evil will have moved up several notches on the Spiritual Scale and come that much closer toward true Enlightenment.
Those tormented souls acting on behalf of the Church (or on their own) to oppress people of Good Will pay very dearly by sliding toward an inexorable dwindling spiral of Spiritual degeneration, turmoil and unhappiness.
I happen to agree with L. Ron Hubbard, when he says, in complete agreement with the Laws of Karma that those who perpetuate Evil and refuse to self-examine to ensure they continue to act in accordance with Morality, Ethical Behaviour and Decency will get very much worse than just their deserved comeuppance.
When someone has become freed from the fetters imposed by Life, material considerations, the body and the environment, and has moved on beyond what we call as “Life”, one typically becomes faced with the most inexorable judge of all (oneself|)and sometime get a punishment so severe that few people can perhaps conceive of it.
Traditionally the concept of Hell was created to describe the most unpleasant possible of fates, but that concept was full misconceptions and sought to describe entirely Spiritual Phenomena with things that are only meaningful in the material universe.
L.Ron Hubbard described the ultimate punishment could be was “to become an Animated Cluster: i.e. a single Being completely glued within a large group of degraded/ Insane beings intent on dramatizing the most perverse and destructive acts and continuously and violently at war with itself “. Or try to imagine becoming a Bacteria capable feeling pain and threats to survival while being incessantly attacked by antibodies.Or as a weak inmate in a room full of highly unfriendly and aggressive Hannibal Lecters.
Evil has a way to torment the righteous and the Ethical. One may even loose the battle, but as long as one has not sold out his Integrity he will remain undefeated.
If Man is basically good, then anyone attacking people of Good Will or perpetrating Evil on them is admitting having already succumbed and admitted defeat face to those dark areas within his case he dares not face.
Evil is therefore the product of cowardice and the vast majority of people doing Evil acts are indeed cowards: they hide their identity while committing their crime. They use pseudonyms on the Internet, always very afraid of being exposed and confronting the fact that what they call their soul is nothing more than a little clinker.
Both the Evil intended individual and the Criminal share the following : Inability to conceive that another thinks differently or is motivated by different Aims than their own.
Life is full of Choices: it is very easy to engage in unethical behavior prompted by ignorance, bigotry or a desire for revenge or greed. The temporary rewards can seem to be great,but sooner or later it will be PAYBACK TIME. and the penalties will completely obliterate the amount of comfort or pleasure one had because of not thinking through the fact that there are always eventual consequences for one’s acts.
On the other hand, the one who said no to unethical behavior or invitations to Hate, may have to go through some rough patches, but the rewards will be far beyond the realm of material or physical gratification.
They say that: “To err is Human. To forgive, divine”.
I, for one, would rather emulate, the divine, even though it may require a greater effort, than do like too many and act the easy (and potentially evil way) “because it is Human”.
This is why I seldom respond to even the most outlandish acts of defamations made by a few bigots who somehow think that spouting lies about myself will end up helping them. They seem to be unable to grasp the fact that only the relatively few individuals with a like bigot frame of Mind agree with them.
The truth is that my many true friends will continue to have faith in me and what I say no matter what lie or drivel is spread about me. False friends and Enemies, will never have faith in me, no matter what I state or would prove.
If enough people would say NO to abuse and Evil, it would greatly diminish its impact in the World. After all, those behind Evil tend to be lazy and cowards. They will therefore follow the path of lesser resistance and eventually when enough doors get closed in their face, seek to oppress those still willing to sell out their integrity.
American actress and businesswoman Priscilla Presley, the ex-wife of cultural icon Elvis Presley and mother of singer-songwriter Lisa Marie Presley, was born on May 24, 1945. She starred in three Naked Gun movies with Leslie Nielsen, and played the character Jenna Wade on the television series Dallas. Presley founded Elvis Presley Enterprises and helped to turn Graceland into a multimillion-dollar tourist attraction.
Eight years after they met, Priscilla and Elvis were married in Las Vegas, Nevada. Their daughter, Lisa Marie, was born the following year, in 1968. Although their marriage didn’t last (they divorced in 1973), Elvis and Priscilla remained friends, and raised Lisa Marie together, until his death in 1977.
2011 2011 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys (in person), 2010 The ONE Show (in person), 2008 The Insider (in person), 2008 Jimmy Kimmel Live! (in person), 2008 Dancing with the Stars (in person), 2008 Access Hollywood (in person), 2007-2010 Larry King Live (in person), 2007 Elvis: Viva Las Vegas (in person), 2007 Dinner: Impossible (in person), 2006-2010 Entertainment Tonight (in person), 2006 This Morning (in person), 2006 The 50 Greatest Comedy Films (in person), 2006 Canada A.M. (in person), 2006 Breakfast (in person), 2005-2008 The Oprah Winfrey Show (in person), 2005 The Tony Danza Show (in person), 2005 Rove Live (in person), 2005 Late Show with David Letterman (in person), 2005 Friday Night with Jonathan Ross (in person), 2005 Elvis by the Presleys (in person), 2004 Between the Lines (in person), 2002-2005 Biography (in person), 2002 After They Were Famous (in person), 2002 After Dallas (in person), 2000 Hayley Wagner, Star (Performer), 1999 The Rosie O’Donnell Show (in person), 1999 Spin City (Performer), 1998 Finding Graceland (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Producer), 1998 Breakfast with Einstein (Performer), 1997 Touched by an Angel (Performer), 1997 Elvis: His Life and Times (in person), 1997 Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (Performer), 1996 Melrose Place (Performer), 1995 Wetten, dass.. (in person), 1994 Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult (Performer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (Producer), 1994 Elvis: The Tribute (in person), 1993 Tales from the Crypt (Performer), 1993 Rock the Vote (in person), 1992 The 9th Annual American Cinema Awards (in person), 1991 Wogan (in person), 1991 The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (Performer), 1990 The Adventures of Ford Fairlane (Performer), 1990 The 1990 Annual ShoWest Awards (in person), 1990 Live! With Kelly and Michael (in person), 1990 Elvis (Producer), 1989 The 3rd Annual American Comedy Awards (in person), 1988 The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (Performer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Producer), 1988 Elvis and Me (Writer), 1985 The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (in person), 1985 Night of 100 Stars II (in person), 1984 Elvis Presley’s Graceland (in person), 1984 Elvis 85 (in person), 1983-1988 Dallas (Performer), 1983 The Fall Guy (Performer), 1983 Love Is Forever (Performer), 1981 The 7th Annual People’s Choice Awards (in person), 1980 Those Amazing Animals (in person), 1980 The John Davidson Show (in person), 1978-2008 Good Morning America (in person)
OT VIII and beyond what lies ahead of us???
While all evidence points to the fact that no new OT Level will be released by the Church in our lifetimes, for those lucky enough to have “strayed” away from the yoke of that Institution, the bridge needs not dead-end at OT VIII.
Throughout the years, there have been many speculations as to what OT VIII and beyond were about. A number of uninformed individual even started to broadcast, quite erroneously that LRH had never even researched or written those. The same people are also content to tell that the world that the “last technical lecture from LRH dates from 1972”, utterly oblivious of the fact that in late 1975, LRH gave a series of 22 lectures on the Flag Only “Special Rundown” (later to be called “New Vitality Rundown” or NVRD, to a group of over 40 Tech People.
In 1977, in broadly released issues LRH announced that at least 15 new Levels were fully researched and merely awaiting final write-up. Also the Class X, XI and XII materials make repeated and specific references to these Rundowns coming from “research on OT VIII-XV”.
I have also confirmed from private discussions with a number of individuals, some of which I have known for decades, and whom I consider to be honest and reliable that they even saw the materials themselves.
NEW OT LEVELS VS OLD OT LEVELS
There is no such thing as OLD and NEW OT Levels, except within RTC‘s feverish mind (and therefore those of its followers). Except for “old OT I” (originally developed in 1966 and found in 1967 by LRH to be a dead-end), there has not been, since 1967 any “OLD OT Levels”.
Its core issues written up in 1969, LRH found OT VIII to be “only for a High level Thetan“, and the gradient simply too steep for most people, even a Full OT 7 completion. It took nearly a decade for tech to be developed to address those points.
All I have done so far is to communicate publicly for them to knock off their Evil ways and to cooperate in ethical and honest ways to promote the spiritual Freedom of individuals. All my communications addressed to the Church and its agents and puppets so far, have fallen on deaf ears.
It is costing them their shirt: Church membership has dwindled by 60% in the past 10 years alone. Their Magazines (Auditor, Advance,Source, Freewinds) betray the true numbers. One has merely to compare the statistics of completions and the names to discover some disturbing facts:
1- The Number of Completions to Major Levels and Rundowns is on a continuous decline, which contradict the generalities and soaring graphs with no scale nor reference points published at events. The events themselves are largely boycotted by its public, which has prompted Senior Management to hire busloads of Extras (non scientologists generic actors) to give the illusion of attendance. Virtually every photo of a crowd at events is photoshopped to multiply its size. It has become so gross that in some cases even a casual observer can discover it on his own.
2- The organizations are almost entirely deserted. Except for a few large organizations, most Class IV Org around the world have less than a dozen staff. Some of the same organizations had upward of 100 staff in the late 1970s.
3- When David Miscavige high-jacked Scientology resources to defend himself in a copy of Freedom Magazine 2 years ago, the following points could be observed. For each mention of L. Ron Hubbard, David Miscavige name was mentioned three times. Nowhere was there a mention of the TRUE statistics of Scientology; CLEARS AND OTs (because these statistics are dreadfully low and on a steady decline).The only statistics mentioned were the number of square feet and value of Real Estate Property under the Church control. It clearly shows that the Church is primarily interested in the acquisition of wealth.Nowhere does Spiritual Freedom come in the equation any more.
It has been well documented that acquisition of Real Estate property is meant to be distraction for the few remaining faithfuls, to hide the horrible truth that the Church of Scientology is on a toboggan ride toward the bottom.
4- The number of defectors from the Church of Scientology now surpasses its membership Over 30,000 people have been declared suppressives since RTC came into being in 1982. This is twice as many active Scientologists in good standing within the Church worldwide.
In Scientology every statistic of its Management is now false to protect against the Church worst fear: the discovery of truth by its members: that its leadership is corrupted to the core (David Miscavige denying food and rest to his juniors, but extorting the Sea Org underpaid staff to buy him a $100,000 motorcycle and finance a life of luxury while some Sea Org staff live in conditions more appalling than those found in the poorest countries on Earth). This is why the Church has abandoned LRH ideas of making each org “saint Hill size” and has “ideal orgs” instead. Saint Hill size is based in numbers. Ideal org is based on opinion and fudginga few meaningless stats. All one has to do is look at the pictures of those ideal orgs in action: they are quiet like morgues and the course rooms are empty.
Stress and invalidation of preclears and Pre-OTs has grown exponentially over the years. Life expectancy for an Upper Level Scientologist on Church lines is now below 57 years.
The Ls are about to become an extinct technology at Flag.Last year the FSO lost two Class XII C/S to cancer (A Kartuzinsky and Richard Reiss). There are only 9 Class XII remaining at Flag and most of them are already Senior Citizens . The Ls are now being mistaught and run differently than the way L Ron Hubaard taught it to the original Class XIIs. They are now run “Miscavige style” and their failure ratio is now 50%. (prior to my departing in 1992, any Class XII with less than 95% success ratio was removed from auditing and sent on a retrain)
The Church actually amuse me whenever they promote the most aberrant fabrications about me or others that they are unable to blackmail because the only one dirty with crimes is the Church itself.The Church typically recruits renegades with a long history of betrayal and people who are according to their own records insane and unfit for services. I have studied enough pc folders of those GO or OSA puppets cases in the past to know it. The Church hires in lieu of journalists, people so aberrated and crazy that the only uniform they should wear is a straight-jacket.
I recognize the recent frenzy of attacks by OSA and the Church for what it is: the death throws of a wild Beast that has been mortally wounded by the black PR that has backfired upon themselves from decades of lies, deceptions and unethical acts and a list of defectors twice as long as its current membership.
One would think that those running the Church would grown a brain or have a sudden attack of sanity and try to reform the Church, but everything including quality of Services seems to be getting worse every year.
One of the lies promoted by the Church is that I keep desperately searching for PCs to audit. Thanks to the great stupidity and incompetence of OSA and the zombies that now abound on Church staff, I am literally besieged by inquiries from traumatized and disgruntled public of the Church. I just cannot find the time to look for new public. I even had to hire a secretary just to address the load.
Their pc complaints are multiple: Gross Auditor code violations: evaluation, Invalidation, squirrel procedures not written in any HCOB but ordered by the failed auditor who now runs the Church (David Micavige was expelled from his Class IV internship at Saint Hill in the 1970s for gross Auditor code violations and reports of physically assaulting the pc in the session). Registrars and executives pillaging the accounts of public to get book sales and earn a 15% commission. Denigration of the state of Clear,etc.
The numbers are multiplying Thanks to the Publcity from the Church of Scientology itself. Who believes them? The Ku Klux Klan, the Neo Nazis and the Taliban have now more credibility that the Church of Scientology has remaining.
I certainly would not go out of my way to defend myself against the raving and insane fabrications of lunatics and mass murderers such as Charles Manson,Timothy McVeigh or Osama Bin Laden.In fact I would view personal attacks and parroting of the insane fabrication by these or their stooges,dupes or fans as a form of compliment, meaning that I must be doing something right to get such a degree of attention.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. described bigotry in the following quotation: “The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.”
My Life philosophy can be resumed in the following sentence:
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Anyone who thinks that the Church of Scientology has not become an EVIL organization has either become mentally lobotomized or seeks to purposefully promote Evil because of the advantages he or she thinks it will afford him/her.
I have departed the Church of Scientology because by 1992,under its leadership it violated the core principles taught in the fundamentals of its philosophy of helping people and seeking to live with the truth.
I developed disagreement in the view that L. Ron Hubbard had reached a permanent state of Infallibility and could never err. (something by definition reserved only for Deity).
I developed disagreement in the fanatical application of the Scientology procedures,observing that I had a near 100% success rate and those under tight control of the Church had a success below 70% by the time I left and that this ratio has continue to go down since.
I decided that it was wrong for the Church to hide its corrupt activities and to keep on telling tell gross lies to its membership for the sole purpose of increasing the amount of Money controlled by its elite.
Therefore attempt to silence me (Church, Freezone,Independents) simply means that:
1- Those attacking me are deeply afraid. Criticism is defined by L. Ron Hubbard as the desire to Harm with a covert admission that one is incapable of actually doing so. Therefore after too many failures to harm someone of goodwill, the mind becomes psychotic and starts to dream the most frantic and absurd fabrications and soon starts to hallucinate believing in their own lies.
2- Those who propagate Hatred believe they have the right to violate the Human Rights of others if it threaten in their eyes the triumph of their ideology. (This is in itself the definition of Extremism)
Anyone who departs from the Church by dissenting or embracing different beliefs and religious views than those taught by its current leadership is uniformly treated in the following manner
1. Classification: People are divided into “us and them”. The Church (or fanatical opponent group like Freezone factions) views itself as the good guys no matter how Evilly they act and feel that attacks anyone who try to show them howto reform Evil.
2. Symbolization “When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups…”
3.Dehumanization “One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, or diseases.” (squirrels) or ridiculing any handicap, old age etc.
4.Organization Attacks are always organized. Special groups or Specialists execute the pernicious agenda seeking to destroy the targeted individuals/group
5. Polarization “Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda…”
6. Preparation “Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity…” My disagreements with the Church are philosophical and religious in nature.
7.Extermination “It is ‘extermination’ because the perpetrators feel the target is a liability to the greater group or Dynamic and is viewed with deep Hatred. Ostracism, boycott and Isolation are merely the first stages before violence becomes justified in the eyes of the perpetrators because their victims are not truly human.”
8. Denial:The perpetrators… deny that they committed any crimes…” OSA (and its agents) and the Freezone are frequently accomplished liars.
9. Discrimination: Because of its dissenting views and the enactment of the previous steps, both the Church and its offshoots (Freezone/Independents) promote the FAIR GAME LAW and the spreading of calumnies and vilification toward dissenters.
10.Persecution:systematic mistreatment of an individual or group of individuals as a response to their religious beliefs or affiliations or lack thereof.
The Above 10 steps are known as the 10 Stages of Genocide.
It describes very precisely the tactics of the Church toward religious dissension.
Anyone who still promotes the ideals of the Church of Scientology in maligning its religious dissenters and/or who promotes Hatred toward those it dislikes or have physical disabilities,or belong to the “wrong ethnic group” should be labelled for what he or she is: A GENOCIDE ADVOCATE.
Thank you for the recognition ! I am fully flattered . WoW. My juvenile stalker labeled me as`The Brains“and here how a tale got born. My stalker is ” Pinky” . At least I got a brain. This reminds me the song from The Pinky and The Brain about the two mice who every night are trying to take over the world : `…. One is a genius and the other is insane`… Now we have the new version of the tune about the genius and the insane. Two Catherine’s are” trying” to take over ……….hmmm The Internet……….or The FreeZone ?
Madonna is not the only one having a stalker. I have one as well !
Below are few emails recently received:
I want to thank you for all the info on your blog. It really has gotten me closer to confronting my own dynamics and wanting to go OT. I am going to continue reading your blog and frankly feel safe doing so knowing you have done so much and have a lot of experience with the tech. I have a ton of questions. I would be honored if you would be a terminal for me in my quest for the truth. I have been a Scientologist since the late 60s.
I have followed your blog over the past year, having been affiliated with the church. It has been helpful and enlightening in many ways. I am a successful executive in Europe. I also work in the US and South America from time to time. I advanced in my auditing, and couple of years ago I desisted in my auditing as I had clear differences with the church. I underwent endless ethics sessions trying to fix the matter, saw many things in session, and yet, the situation did not change, reason for which I decided to go on with my life as the Way to Happiness preaches, rather than being forced to be something that I feel I should not. However, this radical disconnection from source is difficult as my spiritual goals remain stagnant for the time being. I am hesitating whether or not to go back to auditing in the church. I thank you for your efforts to heighten the values of this spiritual path. It has been soothing and helpful in understanding many points of confusion.
[Introduction]…..I became aware of Scientology in the 90-es and had life-changing win right away. Since then it has been over two decades of unsuccessful trying to achieve any progress or win despite my efforts, involvement and resources spent. In the last couple of years, as I could see within Scientology organizations I visited for help increasing outpoints which were in direct conflict with my purposes to achieve positive changes to my life. I felt indoctrinated and started to look for alternatives and data to explain what I saw in the Church. That is how I found your videos and your blog and that is how I decided to contact you. I don’t want to waste your time by writing long stories about my experience nor I would expect any technical opinions based on e-mail communication. To be perfectly honest, I don’t know really, what to do, it seems, after all I did and tried, I would need some expert handling that I believe I can get in the Church. Would it be possible to get some help and guidance from you?
A few years back, I hit a point where I was in need of some answers and became willing to communicate with anyone or anything to come up with some answers. I’ve found plenty of answer. I never knew how deep the rabbit hole went.
I’ve enjoyed your Web site, I enjoy your blog.
….Thank you for the link to Pierre`s blog !!! I see weeks worth of reading and enlightenment and catching up .. After all these years. …..I am very encouraged after decades of hopelessness. And I look forward to seeing Pierre again. It is so comforting to know that there is hope again for spiritual progress … and by such a friend and high caliber auditor as you Pierre!!!
AVAILABILITY AND INTEGRITY OF TECHNICAL MATERIALS SERIES
TECHNICAL VOLUMES 13 AND 14
A number years ago, an enterprising individual took it upon himself to compile the entirety of the Upper Level materials (mainly confidential ones) that were available to him.
Those two volumes were prepared in PDF format and made to look just like the original Technical Volumes issued in 1976
Immediately, the bulk of the Independent field took the compilation as complete, entirely authentic and accurate, three things it simply was not. It seems that acknowledging the fact that some materials were incomplete would have run afoul of a number or practitioners vested interests, especially financial ones. As a result, a number of auditors have been running boot-leg rundowns or rundowns that are attributed to LRH but are in fact the entire creation of Independent auditors of questionable competence.
I have denounced the inaccuracies within those two volumes, to little avail in the past.
Here is an exact summary based on facts by someone who has had access to the entirety of the materials covered in those volumes:
Whereas all materials but one issue is complete and authentic, the materials are not complete. The way the materials are presented has led a number of auditors to assume very incorrectly that any Class IV, including those who have not even interned would be competent enough to audit those processes. This is definitely not the case. It requires the highest skill to run those processes competently. Particularly notable in their omission, are the materials that explain the actual auditing style and why running Power processing on Clears is destructive to their case and why it is suppressive to do so.
The checksheet is missing, but 80% of required materials are present, all of them bona fide. Missing are 5 C/S only or confidential HCOBs that are crucial for proper guidance on the level.
The entirety of the Clearing Course written materials is presented minus the checksheet.
Missing are all of the Clearing Course Films. Also three HCOBs that are only found on the SOLO C/S course (and the AO Review Auditor course) that deal with the state of Clear and are crucial in determining the mechanics of Clearing and on what type of auditing it is possible (or impossible) to achieve Clearing. Failure to apply those principles has led to numerous false attests to the state of Clear from pcs on lower levels in the In dependent field, where the Auditor-C/S was simply not qualified to make the adjudication. The self-appointed Freezone PR has been fanatically active falsely validating those attestations, and chastised me for “speaking against Upstats” even after I showed him evidence that those “Upstats” were in fact very much Downstats and in lower conditions as far as the Tech is concerned. I hope that those who read my comment decide to enlist competent help before blindly attesting people to Clear with no independent test and without someone who is fully trained to validate Clear. A particular organization that specializes in false Clear attest at lower levels decided to direct people on OT II to run the Clearing Course Materials at the same time, “because the pc is very much interested in running those” If those who perpetuate that out-tech had only bothered to train properly they would have realized that the reason for such interest was that the fact that these individuals had never archived the state of Clear in the first place!
Some ignorant individuals have renamed their own copies of the 1958 Clearing Congress Films held in Washington DC as “Clearing Course Films”
For the record: there are 6 Clearing Course films (5 technical briefings, one demo session)
The Bank and its pattern (1964)
The Materials of the R6 Bank (1965)
Composition of the Bank (1966)
The Technical Materials (1966)
General Information (1966)
Auditing Demonstration (1966)
Complete and authentic materials of all past and present version of OT I
Complete and authentic materials. One page from the platens is omitted, most likely the result of an error. The text version of Volume 14 has the missing page.
Complete and authentic materials as far as the student OT III course pack goes.
5 OT III C/S and Remedy/Review HCOBs are missing. These HCOBs are crucial for programming certain types of remedy. Only auditors who have audited OT III reviews at an AO or Flag or trained on the Solo C/S course are likely to have ever read those bulletins.
ORIGINAL OT IV-VII
Each of those levels is in some way altered from the version written by LRH.
The original materials of these levels were entirely written in LRH hand. The materials presented in Volume 14 are typed materials.
OT IV has some crucial Processes/Drills omitted from it. The C/S instruction on C/Sing the level are entirely missing. The first step of OT IV is an audited rundown audited by a Class VIII. Misguided Freezone C/Ses with the Quickie impulse are known to instruct people to do that step Solo, even though it is clearly a Review Action and has a secret purpose not revealed to the pc but known by the C/S.
OT VII is entirely different than the version written by LRH. It turns out to be the “EDUCTIVISM” version. Eductivism was Jack Horner (pronounced squirrel by LRH and persecuted for it) own take and version of Scientology in the 1960s and 1970s. Jack Horner believed in the vital importance of running Creative Processing. LRH ordered Creative Processing abandoned during the 1950s, after observing that it tended to beef up the bank in a number of cases.
Anyone reading that version of OT VII will instantly notice that it contains many Creative processing processes and therefore an immediate giveaway that it cannot be authentic.
The true version of OT VII start with an assessment before any process is run.
And last but not least, the End Phenomenon of OT VII is not mentioned, making one wonders if all those who trumpet completing people on OT VII are truly giving their pcs what they had been promised ,if neither they nor the pc truly know the EP.
NEW OT V: NOTS
Mainly Complete. Authentic materials. A few of the NOTs series are missing.
There are a total of 55 NOTs series Bulletins plus a number of additions and attachments.
NOTE: NOTs 53 is missing. It was a useful bulletin called ERRORS ON NOTs, which gave useful and realistic examples on how NOTs cases could be debugged. Because it was written by David Mayo, in 1982 all copies were ordered to be pulled out of packs and anywhere else and turned over to RTC. Everyone having access to that bulletin was sec-checked to ensure no copy had survived.
NOTS 56 is a forgery. I am told that a “FREEZONE AUTHORITY” had certified it as authentic.
All one has to do is use to google to discover it was a parody written by Keith Henson.
NEW OT VI: SOLO NOTS
No checksheet exist. most of the Solo NOTS only materials are missing. For a full rundown on what the full Solo NOTs materials consist of, please read my essay on the Synopsis of Solo NOTs
ORIGINAL OT VIII
The lone HCOB in that section is authentic. It is the only HCOB ever issued that has OT VIII in either the title or the distribution.
Paradoxically that HCOB has never been part of OT VIII as delivered on the Freewinds or by the Church.
NEW OT VIII
This is one of the three versions of OT VIII released by the Church. It was released after the fiasco of the first version of OT VIII on the Maiden Voyage. Out of 300 people who did that version of OT VIII, more than 40 had dropped dead within 3 months. This was a tightly kept secret. Since i was working in the OT VIII Eligibility HGC at the time, I became privy to all sort of information on the matter.
In late 1988, the following Tech terminals were secretly RPFed:
Ray Mithoff, actual author of the Freewinds OT VIII with some assistance from LRH handwritten notes. As is the case with all Scientology compilations since 1985, David Miscavige had absolute veto power over it and approved its release.
The entire Freewind (FSSO) OT VIII delivery team except for one course Supervisor, the OT VIII review Auditor and the Tech page. It specifically included Margaret Supak (Senior C/S FSSO) and the late Laura Wolfe (OT VIII C/S)
At the FSO the following two C/Ses were RPFed for having an unusually high proportion of the dead among people they had C/sed: Ruthe Humprey and Dan McNicholl.
A number of year ago, Ariane Jackson, a former friend and pc of mine became livid when she discovered how abused and ripped off her ex-husband had been by the Church and had literally died of a broken Heart with Scientology. (His diary has been published on the Internet under the title: Diary of a Dying Scientologist).She decided to punish the Church by telling all she knew about OT VIII on the Internet.
I immediately emailed Ariane and we had a series of pleasant communications. The next day she wrote me, informing me that there were 8 lawyers representing the Church in her living room. Ariane was never heard of again. It requires no great ability to speculate what happened next: the two million dollars in loans arranged by the Church that her ex-husband had made to dead-beats, being reimbursed to her and their child, plus hush money and a gag order..
Grossly inaccurate and incomplete materials.
It includes the Class X course checksheet. For some reason all of the auditors who claim to deliver L-10 in the independent field make nothing of the fact that there are 24 theory bulletins on the Checksheet that are not available in any form nor even an abridged summary. Those bulletins explains the procedures, the auditing style and general prerequisites and core theory of the rundown.
Most of the process sheets in that section are as Warren McShane had testified in court “unartful and severely incomplete reconstructions”.
I have repeatedly stated that one of the missing bulletins states that you can seriously deteriorate a case or even kill him by misrunning L-10. This has been always glossed over by those who have a financial interest in delivering rundowns they are not qualified for, since most of these pseudo-auditors instantly wash their hands of any overt product they make, much like a cheap mechanic who refuse to honor any warranty on his repairs as long as the car has been driven out of his lot.
This pathetic reconstruction fails to explain the theory behind the rundown nor how it is achieved. Some of the steps are even given in the wrong sequence.
Very poor reconstruction with none of the theory behind L12 explained in any way. Several of the techniques used on L-12 are only described in an LRH briefing. Neither the tape, nor a transcript, or even notes or summary of it are known to exist outside of the Church
Anyone who delivers that rundown under those conditions is deeply out-ethics and can have only financial motives for delivering a rundown that can easily deteriorate a case (and in some celebrated cases in the Independent field) make them act like ranting lunatics.
NEW VITALITY RUNDOWN
Quickiest of the quickies is the only way to describe this laughable write-up by Russ Meadows who was declared Suppressive in 1976 under orders by LRH. The 1976 HCOB “Auditing reports, Falsifying of” summarize Russ’s career. His write up omits almost everything of importance, starting with the fact that the New Vitality Rundown is a Dianetics Rundown. This has led a Squirrel in the US Midwest to market that “LRH Rundown” while he delivers processes of his own manufacture instead. Having failed to produce the expected result of a Valence shift, the pseudo-auditor then runs NOTs commands and procedures on lower level pcs. When I privately chastised the auditor for both Fraud (selling an out-tech Rundown of his own manufacture while claiming it is LRH) and squirreling (auditing NOTs procedures on lower level cases), his reaction was extremely violent. He wrote a Suppressive Person Declare on me and distributed it to his “Friends”. He then added the heinous fabrication that I wished his wife dead. I did not even know he was married and to this day I do not even know the name of that woman nor anything about her. I never wish people dead. It is against my basic philosophy. I want criminals to stop being out-ethics and I wish liars to stop lying because according to my fundamental belief, anyone can redeem himself. Only someone cruel wish to see people dead.
BRIGHT THINK RUNDOWN
These bulletins are authentic. They were released in 1978 but soon after were withdrawn stating that their use was restricted to SuperPower only.
The version of SuperPower is a pure work of fantasy from the Freezone.
The correct SuperPower Rundown as originally conceived by LRH consist of the following 12 steps:
C/S 53 (as included in the Tech Volumes)
Ethics repair list (the original list issued in 1978 is NOT the same as the one in Volume 14.The Ethics Repair List in Volume 14 was written by a person with a long history of out 2D and alcoholism)
Personal revival rundown (not released /known in the Independent field)
Consequences rundown (not released/known in the Independent field)
Bright think rundown (as described above)
Study green form (in the New Tech Volumes)
False data rundown parts I and II (not released/known in the Independent field)
Cause rundown (not released nor known in the Independent field)
Power of choice rundown (not released nor known in the Independent field)
Perception rundown (not released nor known in the Independent field)
Learning drills (not released nor known in the Independent field)
Physical universe drills (not released nor known in the Independent field)
The original purpose of SuperPower was to resolve all the ills that make staff members poor workers or ineffective.
ANALYSIS OF THE BOGUS SUPERPOWER STEPS
1- A ludicrous statement is made about there being a “condition of No Condition” Obviously the one who designed that step failed to word Clear the word Condition, which means state of being. One cannot avoid being in some form of state of being, even postulating oneself in the lowest possible levels of unconsciousness or non-existence causes someone to still be in some type of state of being or condition. It is followed by the command to “Find a Viewpoint”. If the author of that process had understood the axioms well, he would have written “Assume a Viewpoint” instead.
2- The next step directs the person to violate all known references on exterior and ending sessions, plus those on persistent F/N. It then introduces the false datum that one can audit over a big win and over a persistent F/N. The author appears to never have read the definition of a persistent F/N: it persists, therefore by definition you could no longer get reads without having killed it first, yet the authors insinuate that only a Floating TA cause an F/N to be truly persistent.
3-This is followed by a Creative Processing Process. Owing to their having been abandoned by LRH long ago, it is proof by itself that the process cannot be genuine.
4- A seriously altered version of the Ethics Repair list with a number of important questions omitted.
5- The next step is another Creative Processing Action
6- The last set of process shows its author confusion on flows, some of the commands have Flow one reversed with Flow 2 or have flow 3 omitted.
The last Creative Processes in this rundown are a form of Validation Processing. Long experience with that kind of process has shown that they have built in instability within them and that the key-outs created by that type of process not only do not last long, but frequently result in an eventual very strong key-in days or months later. At least one case in the Independent field that had been doing well before the rundown was started committed suicide shortly after completing it.
Therefore consider as out-ethics any auditor still running this rundown once they have been appraised of the data above.
Obviously those whose overts are restimulated by my analysis above will probably attack me.
It is my hope that others, which form the majority, will benefit greatly from my statements and be able to make better and effective progress toward improvement and a better state of well-being.
“Anyone engaging in black propaganda is either using a wrong way to right a wrong or confessing he can’t make it in open competition”
Hubbard, L. Ron, Hubbard Communication Office Policy Letter 11 May 1971 “Black PR“
OPERATIONS OFFICER Successful: (1) Allowing outer Org B1s to develop their own Ops ideas to submit for approval -- and demanding such. (2) Allowing outer Org B1s to run approved Ops based on first hand data as long as it's kept within the framework of the Op. (3) Providing a believable source of an operation, thereby filling the vacuum, so that Scn. isn't dubbed in as source. (4) When planning an Op, mentally following it all the way through looking for areas which need to be taken into account; and taking the enemy's viewpoint of the Op for the same purpose. (5) Full and correct use of target series for each Op. Targets simply stated and specific as possible. (Helps in debugging and to hat inexperienced persons) (6) The major target of the Op is based on a *real*, current situation. (7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm lines. (8) Getting an enemy to attack another enemy. (9) Working off of programmes which align Ops actions to other Br 1 sections and other Bureaus and which contain command intention from LRH on down. (Admin scale and priorities aligned) (10) Working for VFPs and having such reflected in the statistics, rather than a lot of sub-products. (11) Exposure of real, documented enemy crimes and material of a scandalous nature. (12) Utilizing current events and trends (and finding the right buttons) for exploitation in Ops channels. (13) Keeping plans bright and simple and on target. (14) Finding real buttons. (15) Keeping up persistent pressure until the product is achieved. (16) Establishing some type of feedback line so that exact effects are known. (17) Mini-hatting by giving examples of successful Ops. Unsuccessful: (1) Ops on random attackers instead of WHOs, just to be doing Ops for Ops sake. (2) Dubbing in buttons. (3) Trying to do everything on an Op by yourself from a management or senior executive level, and therefore not allowing origination or juniors to wear their hats. (4) A one shot approach, rather than persistent pressure and several channels to a product. (5) Harassment actions. (6) Not planning or providing for a believable source of the Op so that a vacuum is left allowing the recipients to dub in Scn amongst others. (7) When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs it's full course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving critical holes in the plan which will later backfire on you, make your scramble on an emergency basis to handle or make the Op less effective. (8) No use of, or misuse of, target series. (too few, unspecific targets; many unaligned, hard to understand targets). (9) An Op or major target based on revenge or out-of-PT situation. (10) Producing, and stats aligned with, many sub-products as opposed to VFPs. (11) Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions to this) (12) Long involved and overly complex operations with many conditionals which if any or any one of several aren't done exactly would cancel out the effectiveness of the Op. (There are rare exceptions) (13) No feedback line; results of Ops not really known or dubbed in. # # # # # DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO 1. Standard ODC with time track and a brief, summarized, well-rounded picture of a terminal. (Following #2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 are the key areas data is needed) 2. Criminal background of terminal. 3. Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money) 4. Legal involvements (summary of actions) 5. Terminal's main interests, personal habits, fears, vices and any other items of interest. 6. Friends and enemies on the terminal's 1st Dynamic Friends and enemies on the terminal's 2nd Dynamic Groups that the terminal belongs to and any groups or terminals, who are enemies of that group. 7. What the terminal considers valuable & is protecting 8. Simple org board the terminal is on, clearly noting his position and his seniors and noteworthy juniors. 9. What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position he holds. 10. Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal to lose his job/position. 11. Any regulations concerning licenses that the terminal holds that would cause him to lose his license if violated (i.e. law, medical, contractor, etc.) 12. Scandals, conflicts, disputes directly or indirectly connected to terminal. 13. Documents that show criminality of terminal (i.e. cheating on income tax, discrediting data in personal letters, use of drugs, etc.) 14. 15. Ops Planning Ops planning goes over all the data on the WHO that Ops research has compiled and with all the data available on the WHO, plans out channels of attack on the WHO that will effectively remove/restrain the WHO from his position of power. Ops planning on a WHO is done using the data series, target series, all Scientology tech applicable, and intelligence tech. The following points should be followed in doing an operation: 1. Initially plan out at least 3 channels of attack with the data you have at hand. Do not wait forever to getall data collected, but also do not run Ops that would be dangerous without essential data. Basically a brighter idea is needed with less data available. 3 channels being done instead of less is because there is a higher percentage of getting results and also this will tend to confuse and spin the WHO as there are 3 attacks instead of just one. 2. Continue to plan Ops utilizing feedback from completed Ops so that the WHO has persistent attack on him and continual pressure. Do this consistent attack until the WHO is obliterated. 3. Stay away from harassment actions that are only for the sake of doing channels or revenge. ie: Sending pizzas from every Pizza delivery restaurant. These basically have been unsuccessful as they do not achieve any real effective result, except for letting the WHO know that he is under attack. There may be times when 50 pizzas every day being sent to a WHO would be effective, but this would be in such a case where the WHO was restimulated heavily by seeing pizzas, smelling pepperoni or seeing pizza delivery boys, etc. 4. Always include a way of getting feedback in an operation, so you know what type of result you are getting and for further planning of channels in those areas that give good results. 5. Ensure proper security is planned in an operation, ie: use of an untraceable typewriter, paper without fingerprints, proper covers by FSM's, etc. (See security write-up and security section data in hat materials of Ops US hat checksheet) 6. Use the target series exactly to programme out an operation on a WHO. Ensure the major target is based on a *real*, current situation and is an achievable purpose. 7. Find out what the exact resources are for the area the Op will be implemented in and what the capabilities are of your terminals implementing the Op. 8. Keep the targets in an operation simple, yet complete. 9. Analyze properly the actual situation with the WHO and what the best line of attack should be done by the GO as a whole. It may be necessary to suggest that PR or Legal do some specific action as a finishing off of the WHO. Never wait for another bureau to handle a WHO, as Ops is responsible and has the capabilities to handle WHO's totally without the other Bureaus in the GO. Liaison though is very important with the various GO bureaus, specifically the Legal Branch 2 (attack area of Legal) and PR Branch 1 (attack area of PR). 10. A believable source must be provided in an operation, thereby "filling the vacuum," so that Scientology isn't dubbed in as source of the attack. A1 Ops are planned in such a way that they in no way could be traced back to the Church. 11. Channels should be various and ever changing types of channel of attack, rather than sticking to one type of Op, such as an anonymous flyer that 3-P's a WHO. 12. Mentally follow-thru your plan and ensure all factors concerning security and workability are taken into account. It is a good idea to also take the enemy's viewpoint when working out your strategy in the operation. Once the plan is fully targeted out, CSW with full complete data your operation to the Dir Br1 US. When it is approved, then the Ops plan and the applicable data is flowed to Ops execution part of the Ops section. Ops Execution Ops execution implements the targeted-out approved operation. If an AGI in the field is to receive the targeted plan or orders to do a part of the operation then this is routed in the following manner: Branch 1 Director US DG I US Ops mail line AGI _______ _________________ OPS OFF US The "Ops mail line" is a point where the Ops targets are mailed directly on a confidential line directly to the Ops terminal in the field. (See the attached Ops Write-up 1R and the attached write-up of the US Ops Com-Lines) Flexibility is important when doing a targeted out plan. An operation should not be done robotically, as at times an Operation can be found to be unworkable for any number of different reasons. As execution observes the PT scenes of the Op and obtains feedback, it may be more applicable to re-CSW new actions or alter targets because of threat of exposure of the Op, etc. Execution gets the Operation implemented and acts as Ops programmes officer, 8-Cing Ops units to get the necessary targets done and debugging bogged targets. Execution works very close to planning in that the necessary PT scene of the Op with feedback of the results is immediately infoed to Ops planning, so new channels can be drawn up or revised as necessary. Ops execution ensures that the stat and report lines are in from his Ops units implementing the operation. (Ops Write-up 2R and 3 attached) Source: http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn/ops.htm Thanks to Arnaldo Lerma and Ida Camburn (http://www.lermanet.com/idacamburn )
On September 5th, 1996 a person in Sweden by the name of Zenon Panoussis filed NOTs with the Swedish Parliament Office. “Scientology responded by demanding that the court case be placed under “secrecy” — effectively sealing the case and thus ensuring that NOTs would not made accessible to the public in the way that the OT levels were entered as part of the Fishman Affidavit. But the secrecy order was initially denied. Zenon posted instructions on how to order copies of legal documents from the court on September 9, including copies of NOTs. The issue of secrecy was evidently vital to Scientology: in this message, Zenon notes that Scientology filed a second request for secrecy, and they appealed their first request. But these motions of secrecy were again dismissed by the Stockholm court of appeals. On Friday the 13th (ironically?), as Zenon writes, “the OTs and NOTs are still public documents and will most probably remain so forever.” As the OT court cases demonstrated in America, it is currently legal to order a copy of NOTs from the Stockholm court. (However, the legality of making copyrighted materials available for download on the Internet is questionable.)
Why were Scientology’s requests for secrecy repeatedly denied? The reason has to do with a unique policy in Sweden called offentlighetsprincipen. This is a provision of the Swedish constitution that guarantees access to public documents in order to prevent corruption and fraud, and it is considered a basic civil right in Sweden. The policy is explained in more detail in this email from an anonymous Swedish official.”
Currently number of people in the free field who have ordered copies of NOTs through the justice system may own a perfectly legal copy of NOTs materials. Please note that this article does not constitute a legal advice in regard to the status of those documents as the law vary in different jurisdictions. In addition it appears the authentic NOTs materials filed in the legal system have been stolen on a number of occasions and allegedly replaced with “Black Scientology” materials in order to sink in the free field. The replacement of the originally filed materials is on record.
NOTE: Some of the upper level materials that were independently leaked have been seeded with subverted issues designed to bring about instability or potential insanity within the unfortunate recipient. Therefore it would be wise to authenticate the source materials used.
Related link: History of NOTs on the Net
Possibly helpful advice
Menopause is a challenge that most women face in their lifetime. Menopause will bring several changes to a woman’s body, including hormone production. This is a big change causing mood swings , often behavioral issues emerge very much like two minds talking at the same time about love and hate, appetite changes significantly as the stress levels increase.
There are symptoms of major depression related to menopause that include:
- Depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day for 2 weeks or longer and/or
- Loss of interest or pleasure in activities that the person usually enjoys.
- Fatigue or lack of energy
- Restlessness or feeling slowed down
- Feelings of guilt or worthlessness
- Difficulty concentrating
- Trouble sleeping or sleeping too much
- Recurrent thoughts of death or suicide
Source: please follow the link , OB/GYNs list included
Other useful links:
- Menozac Review
- Hot Flash Remedies
- Menopause Remedies
- Menopause Management
- Hot Flash Remedies
- Natural Remedies For Menopause
- Perimenopause Treatment
- Menopause Remedies
- Menopause Relief
- Herbal Remedies For Menopause
- Natural Menopause Treatment
- Natural Remedies For Hot Flashes
- Menopause Supplements
Please consult a medical doctor in regard to any medical treatments and medical conditions.
Helena Rojo is one of the most popular actresses of the Mexican cinema and TV. Helena has played set of roles at theater and cinema. Pierre mentions that the actress adores travels and loves Europe. She is also an admirer of Elvis Priestly.
Helena Rojo began her career as a model in the early-1960s. Toward the end of the decade, she studied drama with renown Mexican directors Carlos Ancira and José Luis Ibáñez, making her film debut in 1968 in the film El club de los suicidas. That same year, Helena also appeared in her second film, Los amigos. She continued working as a model and appearing in small film roles in the late 60’s and early 70’s.
Helena’s career lead her to work with the most important Mexican film directors of the 1970s and 80’s, such as Felipe Cazals, Arturo Ripstein, Rafael Corkidi, Alberto Bojórquez, Marcela Fernández Violante and Jorge Fons, among others.
She has worked with international talent, such as German director Werner Herzog and actor Klaus Kinski with a role in the film Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972). She also appeared in the film Fox Trot (1976), directed by Arturo Ripstein and alongside actors Charlotte Rampling, Peter O’Toole and Max von Sydow. In 2006 Helena appeared on the American series Ugly Betty.