Pierre Ethier does not endorse any groups , associations and independent auditors unless otherwise specified via updated private communication.
Any arrangements for Case Supervision must be confirmed directly with Pierre, as well as the current status validation of training, certifications and good standing related to ethics, cramming and application of standard tech. Pierre Ethier DOES NOT endorse the delivery of the Ls by other auditors and/ or trainees. Trey Lotz has not completed training with Pierre and is NOT certified to deliver the Ls by Pierre. Trey Lotz is NOT C/Sed by Pierre.
It is well known fact that field auditors affiliated with the Corporate Church of Scientology deliver auditing up to Clear and typically have NO EXPERIENCE with delivering upper levels .Field auditors refer their PC to the Orgs for 15% FSM commission which they receive for services purchased by the PC from the Church. A field auditor usually comes out in the free field with no experience auditing beyond Clear and lacks the discipline to audit under C/S..
Flag only rundowns (which Pierre studied and delivered - e.g. Original Super Power Rundown, Knowledge Rundown , Case Cracker Rundown , New Vitality Rundown , Fixated Person Rundown , Dynamic Sort-out Assessment , NOTs Stability Rundown, Held Down Seven Rundown, Int. by Dynamics Rundown, Havingness Rundown , The Prosperity Rundown, The Money Rundown, Profession Intensive ) address variety of handlings like spiritual difficulties, issues, ethics , case situations and other. The Ls , Flag Only Rundowns [Delivered at Flag Only] , NOTs [Delivered only in Advanced Organizations / Sea Orgs] , Power and Superpower require advanced auditor skills and trained C/S. The above rundowns should not be delivered without the supervision of a trained C/S. C/S training is required as some of the handlings are in the C/S materials. The authentic Flag Only Rundowns materials have not been released in the Free Field.
All information contained, written and/or supplied shall be deemed to be without prejudice and is intended only for general educational use.
Disclaimer
Find us on Google+
The Sanctuary of Standard Scientology Technology is dedicated to Pierre Ethier: a Flag trained Class XII Auditor honored as The Best Auditor on the Planet for over a decade.
This type of judicial process is rather like the Star Trek characters known as “Cardassians”. On their planet the person is guilty at once. Sentence is already known. The trial is always about how the justice system established the guilt. One is required to confess. The whole process is arranged so this race can sleep safely knowing “justice” has prevailed. I sat on many Comm-Evs myself but was fortunate enough to be able to examine evidence and be fair in the findings and recommendations. I never allowed a senior exec to tell me what to do. This did make me a problem for them.
Excellent lecture Pierre. Thanks
Dear Pierre,
I’m glad to realize that we came to the same conclusion regarding this second point of the Code Of Honour. I have even found a rule to avoid miss-allegiances: never joint or stay in a group which, in its daily base, violates the goals it claims. Like of the goal of the Church would be “Total Freedom”, so it couldn’t restrain churchgoers’ freedom, or if it is “Infinite ARC”, “Infinite KRC”, means Infinite Affinity and Infinite Responsibility, so it should demonstrate then in the daily behaviour. So do we find this in the Church?
I am 100 % agree with you (if I have well understood you, dear Pierre) : it is not to the people who could change that we have to give our allegiance, nor an organization which could change too because of the people changes, but to higher principles we have found ethics in a long term duration and large range. But even so: conditions can change too and what was good in a specific time and place could no more fits then, and what was “ethic” at a time, could no longer be.
I have found too for myself, but I’m not at all the only one, that The Creation Of Maximum Of Happiness, present and future, in the near area as in the largest range, is the Highest Goal We can have. It could be a good stable data to evaluate such situations.
An other rules We need to keep in mind to avoid perversion: We should not say “the best for the greatest number of Dynamics”, but “the best for ALL the Dynamics”! Why? Because the first one allow to kill, to violate other freedom, while the second avoid these perversions, IMHO.
Infinite Love, Felicity, Harmony, Prosperity And Fun!
Didier.