Pierre and the family have kindly asked everyone to provide support by respecting their privacy. Wish you all well. Send your way ARC. Love to you and your families. Contrary to Christianity, Scientologists believe that the upper levels provide the keys to exteriorization and crossing over to the next lifetime. But you ought to know this? According to the Scientology scriptures, the body is mortal but the thetan is immortal and the Sea Org Elite is to come back to help mankind to live without wars, conflicts, sickness, and poverty. They have been dedicated to their humanitarian mission and out of selfless concern for the well-being of others.
The Sanctuary of Standard Scientology Technology – Inner Peace and Joy
Source: https://pierreethier.wordpress.com
Many of us get messages from an early age that our individual creative expression, which is another way of saying who we really are, is somehow not good enough. We lose touch with our natural creative source and thus lose touch with that core energy that allows us to feel nourished, grounded, fully alive and connected to ourselves and others.
Creative self expression is an important and often underutilized tool for those of us on the path of spiritual growth. Creativity is an essential ingredient of success and satisfaction in any area of our lives.
Getting back in touch with your creative self can reconnect you with a sense of meaning and purpose, regain your joy and help you maintain greater flexibility in the face of life’s many challenges. Creativity is one of the most unique and precious aspects of who we are.
About kindness
Source: https://pierreethier.wordpress.com
“My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness” Dalai Lama 1935
Kindness is a universal language that blind men see and deaf men hear. If I have to talk about the amazing human abilities I would talk first about human kindness. It separates us from the rest of living things. It exposes our spirit and gives us the means to prevail. If people around us base every action on a conscious kindness our world will be beautiful and our lives will be fulfilled with meaning. If the mankind wasn’t so busy being greedy or power hungry or ego-driven, they would have more time to devote to being more kind. For some like Pierre Ethier there is “light at the end of the tunnel”. People without kindness are empty inside.
Kindness comes in many forms and sizes. Kindness can be something as small as a quick smile or an acknowledging nod. It can be something as large as adapting an unwanted child. Large or small kindness is kindness.
When you are the lucky one and on the receiving end of someone’s kindness never miss the chance to acknowledge them. Don’t ever take a single kindness for granted. Treat each one special like it’s the first one you have ever received. People have shown pretty consistent to claim that one is creating enemies. They never seem to find the key to live in harmony and without conflicts, war or struggle for power. If you are truly kind it is hard to hate. True kindness is a strength to finding peaceful co-existence.
In order to be more kind to others you must first be most kind to you. It is important to strike the right balance between them and you. Kindness makes you feel a certain way. That feeling is good. We are all connected and the kindness thread is an important link that holds us all together in compassionate and harmonious way.
May be you are reading this right now and realize that you have not been cognizant of the importance of being genuinely kind and what it means to your life and the life of others. It is worthed to be kind to yourself if you want to do better in life. Do simple acts of kindness and don’t look for reward or return. You will be pleasantly surprised how kindness feels.
Once, President Abraham Lincoln spoke to a young soldier who was near death. Lincoln went over to his hospital bedside and asked: “Is there anything I can do for you now?” The soldier didn’t recognize Lincoln, and with some effort whispered: “Would you please write a letter to my mother?” The president carefully began to write down what the young man was able to say: “My dearest mother, I was badly hurt while doing my duty. I’m afraid I’m not going to recover. Don’t grieve too much for me, please. Kiss Mary and John for me. May God bless you and father.” The soldier was too weak to continue, so Lincoln signed the letter for him and added, “Written for your son by Abraham Lincoln.” The young man asked to see the note and was astonished when he discovered who had written it.
He asked: “Are you really the president?” .Lincoln replied softly: “Yes, I am,” Then he asked if there was anything else he could do. “Would you please hold my hand?” the soldier asked. “It will help to see me through to the end.”
In the hushed room, the tall gaunt president took the soldier’s hand in his and spoke warm words of encouragement until death came and the young solier left the body.
What makes great people are the simple acts of kindness.
Upperbridge.org
Pierre Ethier***Class XII ***
&
Church of Scientology and FREEZONE Whistleblower
LAST UPDATE: November 17 2012
Check my my YouTube Channel with a its series of Briefing Videos
PIERRE ETHIER CLASS XII – TRAVELLING GURU
RECENT UPDATES
August 2-22: Huge Wins from the application of TRUE STANDARD TECH OUTSIDE THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY by people whose cases were grossly SABOTAGED at Flag through verbal tech and suppressive. These people are actually beaming and extroverted now, compared to their being cowed and introverted when they first contacted me.
1- The FSO now instructs its auditors to violate the LAWS OF LISTING AND NULLING, by telling them to disregards items because they are too verbose, because only items that are two words or more are “invalid”. Pcs are routinely invalidated in session being told “They Q&A”.
2- Itsa has been redefined as a form of listing, and anything but a terse answer is invalidated by the Flag auditor as “Q&A” and pcs are chopped. Auditors who let pcs properly itsa are crammed for “OUT-TR2”.
3- SOLO NOTS AUDITORS get confidential briefing where they are told: “At your level, there is no more Pre-OT, only SOLO NOTS CASE, THERE IS NO YOU. (this is an actual whole track implant command), and from now on they are not expected, (nor even wanted) to make any gains as a pre-OT.
4- A NEW SQUIRREL TECHNIQUE IS BEING TAUGHT: “HOW TO KILL AN F/N”, so that they have no more reason to not do high hours and do long sessions. The Freewinds OT VIII C/S now indoctrinates her public that “There is no more YOU, no more basic personality and only a duty to audit and cooperate with the church, and that any disagreement is solely a NOTs type case dramatization.
July 2011: MOE CoS INSANITY: The CoS “sponsored” web pages against the FZ retaliate, but in a fashion worthy of a mental retard by using names of people they have been thoroughly “dead agented” as their prime source for “reliable sources” to spread their brand of yellow journalism… 2 1/2% of people approve…
June 30 2011: WIN AGAINST THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY!Forced two of CoS fronts/stooges to remove Slanderous, Hate Web Pages about me. Immediately after, some of their well know stooges, using Yellow Journalism, tried to poison my repute on a number of boards. Using suppressive generalities and deliberate fabrications they posted 1.1 comments in retaliation. Their avowed sources: people they have been dead-agenting and called liars for years…
(work is still in progress)
All materials on this web page, unless stated otherwise are Copyrighted by myself. Copyright � 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010,2011 by Pierre Ethier. The Church of Scientology, Church of Spiritual Technology and their known affiliates, but not limited to RTC, OSA, WISE,…are specifically DENIED the right to copy, or use the materials on those pages in any form.
This page is not endorsed by the Church of Scientology .
This Web Page is available in Multiple languages.
INTRODUCTION
Definition of a Whistleblower: (from the American Heritage Dictionary) One who reveals wrongdoing within an organization to the public or to those in positions of authority in the hope of reforming it.
I have worked for and with the Church of Scientology for over two decades, assuming various posts and eventually reaching the Highest training level (Class XII) achieved by only a handfull few. During that time I was able to experience first hand the numerous paradoxes and conflicts within. The same organization has been professing the highest possible humanitarian goals and has provingly helped, at least for a time, many to achieve better lives. Yet in far too many documented cases, it has sought to enslave others through Mental and Emotional Manipulations or been guilty of Human Rights Violations..
THE SCIENTOLOGY PARADOX
To explain the Scientology paradox, it is vital to distinguish its three components:
1- Scientology, according to the very first recorded mention of it on November 28th 1951 (lecture titled: The Chart of Attitudes) “is a route: it is the study of science or the study of truth or the study of knowledge”.
The reason I undertook that study was to help myself and others achive greater abilities, develop more fully our potential and to reach higher levels of Spirituality. Many years ago, I established the firm postulate that no individual or Organization will ever ever be able to stray me away from those goals. Nearly 15 years after my departure from the Church of Scientology, those goals are more present than ever in both my life and my daily activities.
2- L.Ron Hubbard , the individual (1911-1986). An important distinction is required here between it and “L. Ron Hubbard. the Trademark”..
L. Ron Hubbard the individual is of course a Man (not deity, hence by definition prone, at least in some form, to some of the imperfections of humankind) born in 1911 and deceased in 1986.
“L. Ron Hubbard, the trademark” is that trademark owned by the “Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), a FOR PROFIT organization (and acknowledged as such by the IRS) who is led by three non-scientologists Special directors. (It main figure head being Meade Emory, a non-scientologust who was the IRS High Comissioner for many years. The Church of Scientology DOES NOT CONTROL CST, but rather the opposite. The Trademaks, L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology and Dianetics are controlled by them and the Church of Scientology has agreed to not appoint or remove any of its Senior Management structure without their approval. Note that the President of CST (a Scientologist) has no true power and that only its non-scientologist board of Directors has. Some have even argued that due to the direct links between CST’s directors and the American Government, that the Church of Scientology had actually fallen under the control of Big Brother…
L. Ron Hubbard Library is ficitious name officially registered by CST. In other words an alias. L. Ron hubbard Library is found as the final signatory and authority in all current Church of Scientology documents, revisions of LRH originals and their publication, and new directives. Therefore anything revised after 1986, no matter how contradictory to the original philosophy of Scientology and to LRH (the individual) writings and recordings can be freely stamped “L. Ron Hubbard” as its author since it is legally defensible (as absurd it may be in the mind of most people).
So this leaves us with two new paradoxes.
A) L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology may not necessarily 100% of the time be in full harmony
B) L. Ron Hubbard library has legal license to authorize the complete re-writing or editing of the works of L. Ron Hubbard (the individual), even if those were to satisfy somebody else’s pernicious agenda. It can therefore, at its whim, grant the right to appose the name L.Ron Hubbard to any perversion of the original technology or of its original intent.
3- The Organization: currently known as the Church of Scientology and including the Sea Organization and its numerous affiliates. Legally the Church of Scientology is accountable to no one but its leadership. It’s Supreme leader is accountable to one but himself. By its very design the Church of Scientology has no provisions of any kind for any “Checks and Balances” since by Policy it is assumed that it is exempt from ever doing any wrong and that its leader is by definition infallible. (This is amply covered in the Organizational Executive Course Volumes). There has not been a single instance in Human History of an Organization without Checks and Balances, not eventually sinking into complete corruption. Corruption is like Cancer, if left untreated, it will lead to the death of the organism. The Church of Scientology ‘s actions are based upon the dictate of a self-appointed clique. This is not opinion but fact. The only legal defense to justify the take over of current Management of the Church in 1986 is a Will signed by L. Ron Hubbard the hours before his death, when it is doubtful from the amount of medication found in his body at death time that he would have been conscious or been able to sign the document in a full conscious state on his last day. After 20 years the same clique is intact, in spite of wholesale lower statistics and no evidence of stable expansion. (It lists of completions as published in Advance and Source Magazines, shows it is still falling seriously short of earlier levels). That clique per its own public admission is able to rewrote policy and does not tolerate any attempt to correct it or challenge it. It has ruthlessly declared a Supressive Person anyone challenging their orders or anyone attempting to correct them, no matter how they contravened LRH own policies or how destructive their actions may be. It is almost trivial, under those circumstances to demonstrate that the philosphy of Scientology and the Church of Scientology as it is being operated today, are virtually in complete contradiction one from the other.
In Summary one cannot truly judge Scientology, or the philosophy of what stands for through the actions of the Church or even to a lesser degree to its author.
Whathever reprehensible actions the Church may be currently doing is generally the product of aberrant behaviour by its leaders, and is not necessarily due to a fault in the design of the philosophy.
Something remains workable because it is so or can be demnonstarted to be valid. The actual biographical details or shortcomings of its designer do not necessarily invalidate the workability of something, especially when supported by experience and logic.
From the 3 March 1952 lecture: “Introduction to Scientology” “Out of Scientology you could formulate, …a very fine type of “thought warfare” which you could use enslave people utterly”
My statement is therefore that the philosophy of Scientology correctly applied by someone in a benign way will routinely help people reach greater self-determinsim, awareness and spititual enlightenment. Perverted or used by people with ulterior motives and it will trap or enslave people
my email address:
ARTICLES AND ESSAYSNEW ARTICLE: THE SUPPRESSION AND PERVERSION OF NOTs TECHNOLOGY by the CHurch of Scientology and RTC.
For the past 3 years, I have travelled across 5 continents, from Brazil to the Middle East, from California to South Africa, from England to Russia, to gather information, make contacts with people in the know and establish more accurately the truth.
The following series of articles and bulletins are the result of those meetings and interviews.
I went through great pains and personal expense to contact some of these people. Most wish to preserve their anonymity.
Because all the information was gathered at my own expense and as a result of my labours, I intend to release some or all of it, as I personally see fit, oblivious, as always to the slanderer, the denier, the extortionist or those who feel they are owed everything without the slightest exchange or contribution.
I have started to apply the unreleased technology to my pcs with astonishing results. Therefore, I feel motivated at this time to release it broadly, as I can find the time to do it.
What follows is a summary of data from handwritten, typed materials and taped recorded interviews.Telepathy vs Mental Telegraphy : two entirely unrelated phenomena.
Auditing Pitfalls: How to Avoid
THE 8th DEADLY SIN: a revealing analysis of the Bulletin PAIN and SEXThe Black Panther Mechanism Demystified: An old Mechanism explained by more recent discoveriesRATIONALISM VS REVELATION: The natural Evolution of Scientology
What do I think about investments proposals run from Scientologists?
RECENT SUCCESS STORIES
FORTCOMING ARTICLESA much maligned subject clarified: 10 MYTHS ABOUT STANDARD TECH DEBUNKED.The Stable Datum Conundrum: Will it save your life… or cost your own sanity?The Scientology Justice System: Utopian Equity or a sinister antithesis to the American Bill of Rights?Hubbard Last Public Lectures (Daytona 1975) – The New Vitality Rundown: Hubbard’s Explanations and practical pproaches toward the “Bipolar Case”.Principles and applications stemming from Infinite Value Logic.Remote Viewing as a functional discipline.Article written: Telepathy vs Mental Telegraphy : two entirely unrelated phenomena.The secrets of telepathy and clairvoyance.Where was I buried? a personal test of whole-track recall.Succesfully adressing Amnesia on the Whole-Track.The lost Art of Two Way Communication.Fads and Fallacies in the name of Scientology.The False Memory caper: Anatomy of bottomless abyss.The use of synthetic identities as substitute for self or for ReasonThe Unholy Legacy of Homo NovisThe renaming of Standard Technologies as an exercize in propaganda and re-educationWhat is Hatred?Tips for Prevailing over OSA phony PR and tacticsLost technologies: in each article, the author explores the theory, background, technical validity, subsequent alterations and perversions and the reasons for abandonment as well as results related to each one.I Creative ProcessingII The Lost Art of Two Way CommunicationIII Goal Listing and Criss Cross TechnologiesIV Whole Track Implants and GPM handlingV The accurate adjudication and rehabilitation of the state of ClearVI L-10 and its derivativesVII Expanded DianeticsVIII Standard DianeticsIX Integrity ProcessingX The New Vitality RundownXI The Introspection RundownXII The Humongous RundownXIII The Body Blue Print RundownXIV The Case Cracker RundownXV The Dynamic Assessemnt RundownXVI The Student Booster RundwownXVII The Rehabilitaion of Intention RundownXVIII The Hubbard “Dianetics for OTs” Rundown.XIX The Power ProcessesXX The Vital Information RundownXXI The true meaning of Standard techXXII Adverse effect (PTS) TechnologiesXXIII The Culling and FESing of past and recent sessions.XXIV The art of remote Case SupervisionFAQ
Subjects without link are under preparation
1- Who are You?
2- How did you get to leave the Church?
3- What are you doing Now?
4- In what daily activities do you apply your knowledge.
What alternate is there to the Church of Scientology?
What is Standard Tech?
Why is there all this jargon in Scientology?
What should I do if I decide I dont want to want to continue with the Church or disagree with its practices?
Does Scientology promotes Hatred?
Is Scientology the ONLY ROAD TO TOTAL FREEDOM?
Does premature exposure to confidential materials (such as the Clearing Course or OT III) makes someone goe mad, sick or even die?
Does Scientology Kills? Are the reports of numerous deatha ssociated with Scientology exaggerated or in any way true?
Does Scientology Make people go Insane?
Are the stories presented by the media of Sceintology prmoting the belief in Space Aliens (or space Invaders) true?
Official Church of Scientology FAQ errata sheet (correction about misleading information given on the Church in Society on the orfficial CoS Web site)
Does the Church still believe or apply the FAIR GAME LAW?
What is the Church of Scientology “FINAL SOLUTION” to the Opposition Problem?
Has the Tech being altered?
Why are some many good people gone from the Church?
What LRH a Con Man?
How can you explain reports of LRH harsh behaviour?
Why are there so many discrepancies between LRH offcial biography and documentary evidence.?
Is the Tech Valid?
Why are so many OTs (including OT VIIIs) dead?
Have you corrected OT VIII and IX?
Why did LRH change over the years?
Was David Mayo as bad as the Church said he was?
What do you think of the Free Zone (The Free Zone is loose term for the Scientology Underground, for those who seek to practice it safe from persecution by the Church)?
A SCIENTOLOGY WEDDING
Want to know the scoop on what a True Scientology Marriage looks like? What is said, what are the promises? Want to know the exact details of the very same ceremony used by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes?
Click on the link above for details on the ceremony and exclusive photos of my own wedding. A complete Video with audio of the entire ceremony is available.St-Hill was the ideal organization. Today each organization seek to emulate it and achieve the same size. But who made the original St-Hill?? Another deeply hidden secretA stunning revelation: According to current Church management, St-Hill was composed of 97 1/2% supressives. I think anyone can figure out the rest…
INTRODUCTIONTHE UNTOLD CASE HISTORY OF LISA MCPHERSON
How a technology meant to help people can be perverted to harm or to kill
IN MEMORIAM: MARY SUE HUBBARD 1931-2002
1- OT VIII AND BEYOND: What awaits us?2- FOOL’S GOLD: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH3- ADDRESSING AUTISM WITH SCIENTOLOGY4- FREE ZONE BULLETINS:
This is a brief introduction about myself and my search and struggle for Spiritual Freedom and enlightenment.My long term goal for this life time and for many others has been the seeking of the truth and the spiritual improvement and accomplishment that come with it.I consider anyone who honestly and truthfully seeks the truth to be my friend.Thanks to the correct application of a working Spiritual Technology, I have not only handled all the character and Spiritual traits that bothered me years or decades ago, but have continued to increase my awareness and understanding of both life and myself.Through personal experiences, I have found the philosophy and Technology developed by L.Ron Hubbard (LRH) to be highly workable in thousands of people.I am again continuing on the Spiritual journey that was laid in the “Bridge” as formulated by LRH. It is my strict intention not to deviate from the Standards set in Scientology Technology by strictly applying its Axioms and Logics and the wealth of information I have accumulated training and applying his Technology for several decades.Hence, I have corrected the errors made by RTC who have perverted the Upper OT Levels and I have found the answer as to why so many people died, became sick or sour after completing RTC’s rendition of OT VIII. (It is not the one they believe) Better yet, I have found the answers of OT IX (a level that was never designed to be done years apart from OT VIII and is kept dangling like a carrot to cadge the loyalty of those who completed OT VIII toward RTC.Thanks to a decade of progress and improvements, I have reached a point where I feel that my recall for this lifetime events and those I was personally involved in, for the past 2000 years to be excellent.A few years ago, I ran, based on my recall, an experiment based on the Project “Where are You buried?” and I was quite satisfied with the results.(The Project Where are you buried was conceived by LRH after the publication of “Have You lived before this life? and consists of locating one’s past burial’s locations and tombstones)THE FUTURE OF THE UPPER BRIDGEI do not believe in “Invented Technology” as a solution to improving or continuing the Bridge. These unusual solutions are merely a hodge-podge of “other practices”, case dramatizations from its instigator and reactive ideas gotten as a result of self-auditing.The end result is clearly described in HCOB 30 June 1971 “Confused Ideas”.However, it might be possible for someone who has sufficiently freed himself from the constraints of his case, and who possesses a conceptual and thorough understanding of the entirety of Scientology Tech to be able to continue in LRH footsteps beyond OT VIII.However it has become amply clear to me from observing and studying the “Free Zone” that every “researcher” who claims having looked beyond OT VII, was so heavily introverted into his case, that they found nothing of value, except perhaps pointers to addressing their own private cases through Repair and Advance Programs which are entirely covered within existing and published Technology.
EARLY YEARS THIS LIFETIMEI was born and raised in Canada, majored in Pure Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) and always have had the highest Academic grades in the application of logic and deductive reasoning, which to this day I still consider to be my strongest intellectual skill.While I did not particularly fare well at School in subjects such as History or Geography, which I regarded at the time in great part as the byproducts of irrational human activities, and a number of facts and dates to merely memorize, I absolutely excelled at Analytical Geometry. In fact, I never had less than a perfect score in all exams I ever had on the subject, and never found a new Geometry problem or theorem that I was unable to resolve and prove completely on my own. I even recall, being called more than once to the blackboard at the request of the teacher, when he had forgotten the solution or embarrassingly discovered that his book did not contain the solution after he had started to explain it . I took great pride in those accomplishments.Later on, I was very favorably impressed, by the discovery of the Scientology Axioms and Logics, where all subsequent rules, processes and applications are merely extensions, albeit convoluted and complex of those same fundamental axioms and Logics.During my school years, I was always much more concerned about my intellectual development and achievements, contrary to most of my peers who judged others through their athletic (and later on, romantic) performance. On that point, LRH and I are clearly very different as I recall reading in one of his Biographies that he scored Lowest in Geometry and Highest in Physical Education. I scored the exact opposite: Highest in Geometry and Lowest in Physical Education.I skipped Grade 5, due to exceptionally high Academic Grades. I went to one of the best Schools in Canada (I like to think it is so, since two of the six prime Ministers of Canada born in my province frequented it).Unfortunately I then became the target of older bullies who were content with “repeating grades”. Many were 3 or 4 years older than I. My Academic performance never recovered, a fact I understood only later when I became acquainted with the Mechanics of Suppression and PTSness.I pursued my undergraduate studies in Pure Sciences, keeping my options open as I had not quite decided whether I wanted to become a Mathematician or a Physicist.EARLY INVOLVEMENT IN SCIENTOLOGYHaving discovered Scientology in Montreal in early 1973, and experienced life altering changes in my introductory services, I decided to join staff full time, and put my studies indefinitely on hold.The organization became prosperous and expanded by leaps and bounds, thanks to an FEBC trained Executive Director and to my effective activities running Divison 6 (New Public into the org).The organization eventually moved to the main street, a mere one block away from what was the busiest intersection in the country.I was made in charge of Divison 1 (HCO) supervising Communication and “Ethics” and doing recruitment myself.In just over 6 months, the organization more than doubled in size and personnel. The best staff were hired during that period. In 1992, I felt a great sense of pride when I discovered than the entire Senior Executive structure and the 6 oldest staff members in Montreal org were all people that I had either personally hired or introduced to Scientology in the 1970s.I eventually fell out of favor with the Executives running Montreal org in 1975, and it was agreed that I would complete my 2 1/2 year contract working under the Executive Director in Quebec City (a 4 hour drive from Montreal), in exchange for one of their staff who wanted to be transferred.The Executive Director made me his assistant, and essentially allowed me the full run of the Org, merely filling in reports and acting as the contact person with the Flag Liaison office, so that he could pursue other activities and training.I had a “different understanding” of Ethics than my Superiors at Montreal and those at the Flag Liaison office wanted.To them, Ethics was “Harsh”, absolutely punitive and degrading in its application, and you had to go through Hell to get through it. Ethics to them was something meant to be as unpleasant as an amputation performed without anesthetics.I differed in that viewpoint (and still do), in that Ethics was merely a tool to get the job done and the application of Ethics should be an activity where “Everybody Wins”.Degradation, torments and humiliation seem in my eyes to be merely relics belonging to Medieval History and are largely Whole-Track Dramatizations, not a component of a Science of Life that boasts to be on par with the man’s Highest Technological Achievements. In my Technical view someone who thinks and act like Ethics is something savage, harsh, unreasonable and even cruel, not only demonstrate a clear need to have his Evil Purposes (and Rockslams) on the subject of Help addressed, but is a serious candidate for receiving a GF40 (earlier practices assessment), as he is clearly confused between some earlier humanoid practices and that of Scientology.Looking back at it, Quebec City of the 1970s is one of the few places in Scientology where Ethics was applied in a Benign and Benevolent Manner.The result: High Stats and Morale. No blows, no cries, no grief. Staff so happy being there that each and everyone instinctively disseminates and recruits whenever he steps out of the org for an errand, a meal or taking the bus. Staff not fighting with each other to “get their own stat up”, but sincerely cooperating one with the other with their foremost interest being expanding the Org and the broad Dissemination of Scientology. Almost no more PTS Type A situations to handle as entire families are on lines getting Services and drilling each others. Body routers were frequently being recalled from passing hand outs on the street, because unexpected high inflows of interested public would just walk in. The Number of Well Done Auditing Hours in the Staff HGC was competing with those from the Public HGC…MY MEETING WITH LRHIt was in the Fall of 1973. Unknown to anyone at the time, even to the entire Scientology world, but only to a selected few, LRH had resided in Queens, New York for the previous 10 Months. Some say, he was hiding, from attempts at indicting him for fiscal reasons.Whatever the case, he deemed it best to return to the Ship (which was in Lisbon) at that point in time.Accompanied by his two body guards (Jim Dincalci and Paul Preston), he decided, to avoid possible FBI scrutiny on American based International flights, to take the train to Canada, and to fly to Lisbon directly from there.Upon arrival in Montreal and after booking a room as “Mr Harris” at the Queen Elizabeth Hotel in Downtown Montreal, LRH was pleased to discover that Montreal Org was within a mere 10 minute walk from the hotel. Montreal had some significance for LRH, since a personal friend and one of the first people to train as an auditor in Elizabeth, New Jersey in the Summer of 1950 had opened one of the very first Dianetics Foundation, in Montreal later that year.In spite of the obvious, if unvoiced, misgivings his companions had on the fear that he may end up being publicly recognized, LRH decided to pay a visit to the new fledging Org…Upon emerging from my office that was adjacent to the reception area, I was introduced by a young man calling himself “Jim” who looked just like a “Sea Org Missionaire” to “Mr Harris” who was decribed as an “Old personal friend of LRH”. Mr Harris appearance was anything but ordinary. A stout Man in his late 50s or maybe early 60s, he had bright red hair, penetrating blue eyes, muscular arms, and he literally exuded the Beingness of a “Seaman”. Upon gazing at him, the instant thought that raced to my mind was: “By Gosh, this is LRH”, but being an introverted type person at the time, I felt uneasy at the fact that nobody else’s seemed to have recognized that obvious fact. I kept glancing back and forth between the Man standing in the Lobby and the large picture of LRH on the wall and the more I looked, the more I saw similarities and the less I saw differences. Finally, I almost blurted out: “This is LRH!!!”, but some invisible force seemed to have gotten hold of my throat and I received a form of telepathic communication from the man who was friendlily staring at me straight into the eyes across the room.I am not certain how much I understood at the time from that communication cycle. It must have lasted a mere few seconds, but it had enough bandwidth to have kept someone occupied for a whole hour. There was no denial about his true identity. there was nothing that could be construed as a lie, even in retrospect, but there was a definite and deliberate suggestion that I had “better things to do”.A few years later, after I joined the Sea Org at Flag, three times, when I wrote to LRH about my taking constructive steps and making concrete progress toward my goal of becoming a Class XII Auditor, I had both the incredible thrill and experience of receiving my reply, not on the standard SO-1 stationery, but in LRH own handwriting on my own letter. Those letters will continue to remain amongst my most precious possessions and clearly indicate how special becoming a Class XII has always been to LRH.I am not aware of anyone else, having received handwritten replies on the SO-1 line (letters to Ron), and certainly not from any other Class XII that I ever worked with. I have also verified with SO-1 staff during the 1980s, that my encounter with LRH was historically possible and it was their opinion that in most probability my description of the events was entirely accurate.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF MY CAREER as a Class XII
After a shaky start, I eventually rose through the ranks and became Flag Top producing auditor and held that title undisputed for many years.I spent 4 years in the Class IV HGC, auditing the world’s most difficult cases, including people who come to Flag having received over 20 intensives of “No results” in the field and looking forward to getting their first win and their first cognition in Auditing.I became an expert at the Case Cracker Rundown and acquired the utter unshakeable conviction that “There are No Failed Cases” and that a properly trained C/S and auditor will resolve 100% of the cases when applying the Tech correctly. I delivered Clear Checks and in spite of the confusion and numerous revisions about Clear Checks, Dianetics Clear Intensive, Clear Certainty Rundowns through the years, I am satisfied that to this day, that I have neither allowed someone to attest Clear who wasn’t or failed to acknowledge someone who had made it.I eventually went through the OT levels. Sheer determination, not luck was the reason that I made it. Unless an auditor is flubless, has continually good results and can routinely pass the continual checks made with his auditing and submit passing Videotaped sessions, he will simply not be allowed to progress up the Bridge. Not only that, but one must take arrangements to get the required auditing as absolutely nobody is going to offer you to get up the bridge and do it for you..After completing OT III and IV, I went onto NOTS training, I was eventually transferred to the NOTs HGC and audited thousands of cases at that level. I then went onto Solo NOTS and with the formation an HGC for Solo NOTS only, was transferred there.In the mean time, I was made to do a plethora of specialist courses along with their Internships. The only way, someone could move on up the bridge was by doing all the Tech Course and all the Internships.Among the more Interesting courses I did: the very lengthy and extensive AO review Auditor Course, seldom done by anyone, which deals with the entirety of the Clearing Materials ( a great deal more than any Clearing Course student would be required to go through), OT III, the Upper OT levels and contains data by LRH that are not part of any other course even the Class VIII materials.It is a sad fact that a few untrained individuals, who have not even read the materials in that course have elected themselves as “Supreme Authorities” on the Subject of Clear and OT III in the FZ. When I tried to inform them they did not have all the data, I was invariably told that they preferred to deny the existence of any LRH materials that had not been leaked to the FZ, calling what I knew, even if written or spoken by LRH, to be a “Hidden Data Line”Another fascinating course I did was the “New Vitality Rundown”.Contrarily to statements made by uninformed people in Ron’s org, the last set of Public Technical Lectures made by LRH was made in November 1975 in Daytona Beach, Florida to all Flag Auditors on what was called at the Time “The Special Rundown”.The course, which I did directly under the Supervision of the Snr C/S Flag Land base has the 22 LRH lectures Series from late 1975 for its core. I was pleasantly surprised when I listened in their Introduction that I was listening to a Master, not a Copy and therefore no editing of any kind had been made, including a number of passages, where LRH suddenly paused, after having made a statement with political or other unsavory ramifications, would say loudly to a messenger :”You will have to cut that off, boy!”.I spent several years in the Solo NOTS review HGC. Once there, I started doing the Solo NOTS EP Checks, as I could do them in all required languages but one and they wanted to strictly limit the exposure to the confidential EP of Solo NOTs (which is not shown to Solo NOTS pre-OTs). I did 95% of the Solo NOTS EP checks for the following 3 years.Since Solo NOTs completions count for a huge amount of the FSO Statistics and that traditionally in Scientology there is an incredible push to get sthe stats as High as possible before 2PM on Thursday, I would have seldom something else to do but Solo NOTS EP checks on Thursdays between 11AM and 2PM. I had the entire FSO and Flag Land Base Senior Executive structure flocking around me like a bunch of groupies for the last hour, as my actions would frequently dictate whether they were upstat or downstat for that week.This further cemented my repute as Flag Top auditor as in 3 years, contrairily to all others who had done them, I never flubbed one of those checks (flubbing would have been a virtual garantee to fail to attest the person before 2PM). and that I became utterly impervious to the Huge amount of expectation and demands that were put on my shoulders.I even managed to do high hours on my own Solo NOTS, being the only full time Sea Org Auditor to earn a special pin for doing 25 hours Solo in a week (This was on top of doing 45-50 hours on public and other Staff member duties).I managed to complete Solo NOTS to its true EP and became Solo NOTS completion #801. I would have been Number #800, but I was bumped so they could give that Number to a Celebrity.As the release of OT VIII neared, a new HGC was formed for OT VII completions only and I was transferred there, auditing now Solo NOTs completions exclusively.Then a new project came to get 5 Solo NOTS Review Auditors to become 100% flubless sec-checkers.Flubless sec-checkers are not merely people who are good at doing Confessionals. Confessional Technology encompasses the all fundamental auditing technique and all five styles of auditing. A flubless Sec Checker is a Flubless auditor Period. The standard and ante were raised to unimaginable levels, as Senior management expected only chronic perfection as the only acceptable standard.I was the first auditor to pass. The Snr C/S FSO was a distant second. Then one by one the remaining four. Even RTC had not managed to get any of their personel to pass before the first two people in our group. Part of the unique materials provided for the course was the ONLY VIDEO session of LRH auditing with both TRS and Metering being observable. I saw the video over 100 times until the time my auditing skill became undistinguishable.In 1989 I finally completed the Saint Hill Special briefing Course. This is no small feat, as I had never been on full time study. The course is so long. In fact, I have never heard of anyone else completing the course on a part time basis and still working in the Sea Org. I spent so many days off, meal breaks, listening to tapes or going through the checksheet that only Tone 40 determination made me successfully go through.Shortly after, I found myself, doing full time training, for the first time in my life, on the Class VIII course.Then the Class X, XI, XII course and Internships, which I completed in short order.Alain Kartuzinski, a Class XII C/S who was for a long time one of the Snr C/Ses at the Flag Service Org, used to call me �The King� when referring to me as an auditor, perhaps because I had in a way become to Scientology auditing what Elvis became for Rock and Roll.I am not complaining about “mistreatment” while in the Sea Org. Though I would have more than enough legitimate reasons to complain, I view my experiences, both good and bad as important experiences. I have fully outgrown any desire or need at complaining, retribution or any type of hate mongering.MY LAST DAYS IN THE SEA ORGI reluctantly left the Sea Org in December 1992, after conditions became simply impossible to live under, and after Senior management failure to brainwash me with their non-sense. I had never anticipated to leave the Sea Org before.When I heard with my own ears David Miscavige (Chairman of the Board of RTC) gloating with Marc Yager (IG Admin) and Marc Ingber (CO CMO Int) about his latest new invented unusual and cruel punishment of a staff member, (a completely off-beat Ethics handling) and later heard him voicing evil purposes that he had toward my organization (the FSO), I decided that I did not wish to continue to support such a degenerate any longer. This was the final straw, having witnessed in a single week, more injustices and cruelty than any level of human decency should be allowed to tolerate. What I personally witnessed coming out of the mouths of David Miscavige, Mark Ingber and Marc Yager was far closer to Joseph Stalin’s ideals than even a corrupted version of Scientology could have been. While I would have undoubtedly tolerated someone dramatizing LRH Valence, even if it was one of his darker sides, I drew the line at following a trio who could only remind me of Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler and Hermann Goering.So I left.I left Flag through the front door, after completing all the requirements that were asked from me (including getting sec-check by an auditor who had just been declared a suppressive). I left the Flag Land Base under amiable terms.That auditor was declared Suppressive for allegedly doing out-tech on John Travolta. He audited me at length on Sec-checks and FPRD. Perhaps I was expected me to somehow become PTS to him, since he was still under his suppressive declare during our sessions together, since the suppressive is traditionally supposed to do in the people they audit.I had been personally drilled and individually coached within an inch of my life on Sec-checking by IG Tech and Senior C/S Int. I was the first auditor to successfully go through this program of being a �PERFECT sec-checker�. This was a requisite for doing the New OT VIII Eligibility check on the OT VIII hopefuls for the Freewinds Maiden Voyage in 1988. They had disregarded the fact that the end product of that course was my unequalled ability to detect and recognize any and all manifestations of Overts, Withholds and Evil Purposes on everyone I dealt with. (including Senior Management, RTC and others).I had produced in the vicinity of 25 000 Well Done auditing Hours in my career as an auditor, which was substantially more than any auditor had ever done at the time, anywhere. All my pcs (with virtually no exceptions) were rave (and still are) about their wins and were smoothly progressing up the Bridge. I have always found the experience of auditing very rewarding, when I have seen how much people can change and improve their lives for the better.Becoming a Class XII is extremely difficult, due to the thoroughness of the training, where everything one does is put under a microscope, and because �unreasonable� standards of perfection are expected in every single thing. If anyone thinks that a Class XII is merely an auditor trained to deliver the L-10,11,12 procedures, they have no concept of it whatsoever.I do not hide it that I find it annoying that an “auditor” with less than 1% of my technical baggage, picks up an altered version of the Ls on the Internet and satisfied that he has a list of commands and processes he can now robotically repeat with no understanding whatsoever of the underlying theory, labels himself a Class XII or claims to be my “Technical Peer”.FAKE L Rundowns delivered in the Free ZoneOne for one each and every individual that I have examined that received the “Ls” (or whatever you call their alter-ised rendition) from someone who did not train correctly on the full theory with all the approprate drills done with an experienced Class XII had the following three symptoms months and years after “completing them”:1- General case state seriously deteriorated2- Doing significantly worse in life after the auditing. (many compared their life as little better than being flotsam)3- Noticeable worsening of physical condition.I know it well, I have done some reviews of those botched cases and people were in truly miserable condition.The reasons are obvious: Cases are not being setup, the “Auditor” doesn’t have a clue what he is auditing. Botched L&Ns, Unblown case, Unflat Evil Intentions and partially run Succumb Postulates.Also since these auditors have obviously the quickie impulse (they do not even try to train completely on the materials), they invariably quickie those rundowns in one quarter to one tenth of the time they should be spending on them. The full phenomeon is described in C/S Series 77.The following should be read by anyone considering delivering without adequate training or receiving the Ls from same:It is rumoured that the Ls Materials that were leaked on the Internet and are in use by various FZ auditors today were purposely leaked by the Church with the unavowed intention to “spin the squirrels”. Their “release” contained major steps out of sequence, carefully misworded commands meant to cave in the entire case on the recipient and core steps meant to blow Succumb Postulates were carefully omitted.Whether this is true or not I lack concrete evidence to state with certainty, but having read the versions of the Ls in use by FZ auditors, I can state unequivocably that the version they use is completely consistent with that theory. It certainly aligns with the Church philosophy about applying “FAIR GAME” to those they regard as “Squirrels”.Thank to a remarquable memory and years of practice auditing and translating the Ls Rundowns in 5 languages, I have been able to reconstruct the entirety of the Ls Rundowns and their remedies. My write up is well over 500 pages long and contains the totality of all 3 rundowns as well as their entire history, background, theory and remedies. (Compare this to the paltry 50 pages released on the Internet).COMPLETE LIST OF ALL CLASS XII AUDITORS EVER MADEIn 1990, I became the 41st Class XII to be made.Following this, is the entire list of Class XII auditors ever made. The list is complete and absolute. I have checked it and cross-referenced it with many individuals. The list reflects information as of 1998. Only the few (if any) Class XIIs made after 1998, would not be on the list. If someone’s name is not on the list, they are not, nor ever were a Class XII, PERIOD. In other words they are a fake, if they claim to be one.
List of ALL Class XII ever produced, in sequence:
The 8 original Class XIIs (trained by LRH)
The ship trained Class XII (trained by the original XIIs)
The FLag Land Base Class XIIs.
Total: 54 Class XIIs. Does not include anyone trained AFTER 1998, but does include everybody else.
It does not include people who enrolled onto the Class X course, but never completed training to Class XII
(such as Greg Wilhere, Kerry Gleason, Christine Marquardt)In RED are name of people who are still on Tech lines either at Flag or with International Management.All others are no longer in the Sea Org, due to departure. Current status is witten under the name. Those without mention are either Auditing or C/Sing.
OJ Roos
(Declared)Liese Klingvall
(Declared)Tommy Klingsvall
(Declared)Mike Mauerer
(Departed the Sea Org)Leon Steinberg
(Declared)Quentin Hubbard
(Deceased)Alex Sibersky
(Declared)Brian Livingston
(Declared) – – — John Ausley
(Declared) (Deceased)Ron Shaffran
(Declared)Merril Mayo
(Declared)David Mayo
(Declared)Jeff Walker
(Declared)Murray Chopping
(Declared)Russ Meadows
(Declared)Alex Gerber
(Declared)John Eastment Robin Lindsell
(Declared) Paulette Ausley
(Declared) Karen DelaCarriere
(Departed the Sea Org) —- Gwen North
(Declared)Ray MithoffCarolyn WebbAlain Kartuzinski
(Off tech Lines)Minty AlexanderAlan StaveMyriam Stave (OT VIII)
(Deceased)Ted Cormier
(Deceased) David Gellie
(Permanently ORDERED
Off tech Lines by RTC)Rick Sheehy
(Permanently ORDERED
Off tech Lines by RTC)Peter Buttery (OT VIII)
(Permanently ORDERED
Off tech Lines by RTC)Claire Reppen (OT VIII)
(Deceased)Bodil TuckerTony RogersLinda SydejkoMalin GelfanRichard Reiss, Snr C/S FSOLisa RentschlerCarole SchwartzRick Alexander
(Off Tech Lines)Jo Struthers(Departed the Sea Org)Pierre Ethier
(Departed the Sea Org)Jim Sydejko
(Off Tech Lines)Ingrid Keller
(Departed the Sea Org)Peggy EastmentAnn GlushakowEdie Lundeen
(Off Tech Lines)Bruce Glushakow
(Departed the Sea Org)Jerome Bloom Nina PaullSheryl WeigandHank Bourland Norman Herring Sheri Rabey
LINKS AND ARTICLESWhat it means to become a Class XIIWhat nobody has been told about Lisa MacPhersonThe Truth about OT VIII and OT IXWhat Standard Tech Truly MeansNew ArticlesMy Personal Test of Whole Track Recall
(Under preparation)
PARTIAL LIST OF PEOPLE I HAVE AUDITEDThe following is a partial list of pcs I have audited. It is not in any way exhaustive and consists of roughly 3500 people out of about 5000. It may include a very few cases I FESed when I could count the hours. Anyone on this list (or not) is welcome to contact me at the email shown at the top of the page. With virtually no exception, I enjoyed auditing each of those people and going over the list and recalling the gains and life changing improvements I saw in those people provided me with hours of happy memories.My ultimate desire is for each of these people to reach happiness and spiritual Freedom, whether they achive it in the Church of Scientology or in another.A lot of those names have not been on Flag completion list for a very long time. Each and everyone should be told that “NO CHURCH HOLDS A MONOPOLY ON SPIRITUAL FREEDOM OR THE STATES OF BEINGNESS PROMISED BY L. RON HUBBARD”. Anyone can move forward from whatever point they have been stopped, betrayed or given arbitrary actions that were not designed to help them.Alberto Abate, Mario Abbiati, Stefania Abbiati, Tom Abrams, Delia Acheson, Doug Acheson, Hans-Ruedi Ackle, Suzette Ackle, Angela Acosta, Mary Acosta, Ramon Acosta, Robin Adair, GianFranco Adami, Bob Adams, Gene Adams, June Adams, Mary Adams, Chris Adler, Fernando Adler, Lloyd Adler, Lottie Adler, David Agami, Elias Agami, Roberto Agami, Theresa Agami, Vicky Agami, Viviane Agami, Frank Aggio, Eliana Aguilar, Patricia Aguilar, Elaine Aguirre, Peter Aguirre, Juan Aguirrebeitia, Robert Ahoua, Margaret Ainsworth, Aldo Airoldi, Debra Aitken, Lena Akesson, Linda Aldrete, Angela Alemania, Alex Alemis, Cathy Alessandrini, Maurizio Alessi, Peter Alevizos, Lee Alexander, Minty Alexander, Peter Alexander, Rick Alexander, Dixon Allen, Gabrielle Allen, Jane Allen, Terry Allen, Lynda Allender, Patricia Almeida, Robert Almqvist, Richard Almstead, Stephen Alpert, Felix Altorfer, Heidi Altorfer, Marianna Altorfer, Diana Alvarado, Enrique Alvarado, Lucio Alverez, Maria-Fernanda Amaya, Konrad Ambach, Amanda Ambrose, Roland Ambuhl, Carol Anahu, Clare Anahu, Bob Anderson, Candy Anderson, Carol Anderson, Cindy Anderson, Doug Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rick Anderson, Sherry Anderson, Roland Andersson, Joe Andruscavage, Greg Angus, Pamela Angus, Dee Ann Rule, Lisa Ann Malmquist, Mary Ann Durham, Jo Anne Beachy, Jo Anne Christensen, Dodley Anson, Elizabeth Anstrin, Peter Anstrin, Luis Antoni Perez, Tiziano Antonini, Peter Antonio, Philip Antonio, Luis Antonios Vasquez, Stefano Antonucci, Luciano Apperti, Mariano Apperti, Mauro Apperti, Juan Arambula, Edurne Aranguren, Michel Archambault, Carlos Arena, Cherie Arend, Tony Arend, Ruth Arguelles, Miguel Arguello, Alejandro Aristi, Michael Armentrout, Janice Armstrong, Raoul Arnal, Gerry Arnett, Ramon Arnold, Vicky Arnold, Rafael Arredo, Philippe Arsac, John Arvanitakis, Tomas Arvidsson, Peter Asberg, Sandro Asnaghi, Harout Assadourian, Bob Asselin, Robert Asselin, Doug Atcheson, Douglas Atcheson, Bruce Atkinson, Peter Atkinson, Bertha Aubert Llorens, Armando Aubert, Bertha Aubert, Helen Audrey Stewart, Pierre Auget, Peter August, Carol Austin, David Austin, Jeff Avrin, Karen Aylor, Rebecca Azares, Inma Azpitarte, Irma Azpitarte, George Baca, Mariella Baccari, Adelio Bacchi, Ornella Bacchi, Frederick Badger, Edwin Baer, Susan Baez, Gianfranco Baggio, Robert Bagnall, Paul Baikie, Roland Baikley, Brigitte Bailke, Wolfgang Baitz, Joanne Baker, Sally Baker, Yiva Balazs, Mike Ball, Mike Ballard, Otis Ballard, Frederick Balmaele, Fulvio Balmelli, Edgar Bammatter, Fulvio Bandera, Giovanni Bandieri, Giuseppe Bandierini, Henvelle Bandroin, Ken Banfield, Britta Bang, Alison Banks, David Banks, Hanna Baram, Michael Baram, Paul Barbaro, Steve Barbera, Alain Barbier, Jean-Luc Barbier, Antonella Barbieri, Giorgio Barbieri, Sandra Barbieri, carlos Barcena, Vivian Bardavid, Gavin Bargate, Dee Barker, Mary Barne Mann, Debra Barnes, Cathy Barnett, Gabriela Baroni, Michael Barram, Kay Barres, Chuck Barron, Elizabeth Barron, Olivia Barron, Bob Bartell, Donna Barton, Geoffrey Barton, Pamela Barton, Ray Barton, Win Barton, Steve Basin, Chere Bauman, Molly Baxter, Randy Baxter, Liz Bayback, Robin Beaman, Sarah Bean, Joan Beats, Shane Beats, Anne Beatty, Karin Beatty, Richard Beatty, Karen Beaty, Joanne Beaubien, Phil Beaubien, Jocelyne Beauregard Jocelyne Beauregard, Pierre Beauregard, Pierre Beauregards, Donna Beaven, Carlos Becerra, Gabi Beck, Peter Beck, Emily Becker, Stephanie Becquet, Susanne Beeh, Suzanne Beeh, Carol Beeny, carol Beeny, Hannelore Behdig, Ray Behm, Jean Beigantz, Robert Beilhart, Robert Bein, Susana Bejarano, Enzo Beletti, Enzo Belletti, John Bellmaine, Vanessa Bellmaine, Gale Belsel, John Belue, Javier Benet, Martha Benilles, Gracia Bennish, Gisele Benoit, Rolly Berdna, Jacqueline Bergantz, Bobbie Berger, David Berger, Yogi Berger, Linda Bergman, Mitzi Bergman, Albie Berk, Anthony Berka, candy Berman, Ray Bernard, Sergio Bernardini, Roberto Bernazzoli, Eva Berryman, John Berryman, Sylvie Berson, Marino Bertoli, Luigi Bertoni, Sylvie Bertrand, Alain Berube, Franco Beschi, Sharon Besio, Steve Besio, Jean Besre, Richard Best, Leni Betes, Sue Bettinger, Florence Bezazian, Paul Bezazian, Hennie Bezuidenhout, Fabbian Biagio, Loredana Biancolini, Cathy Bible, Monica Biddle, Gaby Bilodeau, Dario Binda, Donato Biondi, Rick Birkenshaw, Donatella Birolo, Laurie Bittner, Karen Black, Michael Black, Stephanie Black, Tina Black, Doris Blair, Eva Blake, Corinne Blanc, Yves Blanc, Sandrine Blanchet, Alain Blanchette, Tony Blanco, Charles Blankenship, Ellie Blankenship, Lise Blankertz, Angelika Blaskovich, Carol Blaut, Jay Blaut, Alexander Blechinger, Dean Blehert, Pamela Blehert, Henry Blumenthal, Frank Blumer, Dieter Blumler, Lorentz Blumler, Paolo Boarato, Dan Boardsen, Silvano Bobadilla, Remo Boden, Arlene Boeger, William Boeger, Serd Boehm, Ginny Boehme, Patrice Boesinger, Donald Bohn, Donna Bohn, Pierre Bolduc, Ellie Bolger, Maureen Bolisczak, Michael Bollen, Michel Bollen, Michael Bolln, Giorgi Bonardi, Giorgio Bonardi, Sonia Bonfiglioli, Simone Bongiovanni, Caroline Bonifas, Rosa Bonisoli, Donald Bonn, Massimo Bonoldi, Paolo Boratao, Christa Bordewieck, Gianluca Bordoni, Jorg Borgmann, Al Born, Kai Bornemann, Susanne Bornemann, Carl Borowski, Carlos Borrero, Giuseppe Borsarini, Jane Bosan, Christian Bosiger, Patrice Bosiger, Patrice Bosinger, Jane Boson, Glen Bostrom, Wendy Bostrom, Nick Bot, Carol Bottle, Claude Boublil, Julian Bouchard, Calisre-Marie Boujon, Francois Boulbil, Francoise Boulbil, Hank Bourland, Denise Boutin, Richard Bovey, Bill Bowen, David Bowers, Janet Bowes, Theo Box, Stephen Boyko, Steven Boyko, Alejandro Bozzone, Bernard Brackenshaw, Ulrich Bracunig, George Bradley, Gregory Bradley, Hugh Bradley, Jeff Bradley, Jeff Bradshaw, Lisa Bragato, Lucia Bragg, Ted Braggin, Antonio Braggion, Antinio Braggione, Antonio Braggione, Brigitte Brandle, Christian Brandle, Karl Braun Steiner, Morgans Bredsdorf, Gabi Brendel, Peter Brendel, Giovanna Brenicci, Pino Brenicci, Annette Brennan, Rob Brennan, Sandra Brennan, Naomi Bresaham, Dee-Dee Bressert, Jim Brewer, Carleen Bridgetown, David Brier, Maureen Brigatti, Rita Bright, Anne Briscoe, Naomi Brisnehan, Bill Broderick, Christa Broderick, Ed Broderick, Cammie Brodie, Patrick Broeker, Louis-Michel Brolles, Madeline Broman, Harry Bronsoiler, Lilis Bronsoiler, Gaetan Brouilette, Christine Brovcenko, Cathy Brown, Charles Brown, Judy Brown, Hans Brugemann, Gro Brugermann, Greg Brumley, Marie-Therese Brunet, Alain Brunette, Larry Bruning, Ruth Brunner, Ed Bryan, Daniel Bryenton, Giacomo Bucchi, Heimo Bucerius, Anna Buch-Hansen, Doris Buchel, Annabel Bueno, Beth Bueno, Sue Bueno, Kathy Bulawa, Hamish Bulger, Lorraine Bulger, Martine Bullot, Claudio Burchi, Irene Burgener, Ray Burgess, Don Burgett, Donald Burgett, Jane Burgett, Arnell Burghorn, Florence Burghorn, Jim Burghorn, Shannon Burke, Lynn Burkhart, Monika Burkli, Roberto Burlone, James Burnham, Jeffrey Burr Johnson, Nancy Burton, Jim Bush, Rex Bush, Ray Butera, Laura Butki, Debbie Butler, William Butler, Tony Butzlaff, Jarrett Buys, Peter Buzzelli, Karen Bydlo, Dan Byl, Peter Byrne, Char Byrnes, Jessica Byrnes, Larry Byrnes, Lawrence Byrnes, Alejandro Cabrera, Elvis Cabrera, Idea Cabrera, Patrizio Cabrini, Elena Cabrino, Lisa Cabrino, Warren Caggiano, Cinzia Cagnoni, Alessia Cairoli, Giorgio Cairoli, Juliette Calame, Sergio Calcinai, Ida Calder, Antionetta Calderon, Guillermo Calderon, Letitia Calderon, Maria-Antonieta Calderon, Sarah Calderon, Barbara Caldwell, Elaine Caldwell, Eric Caldwell, Giovanni Calicchio, Giuseppe Calicchio, Haracio Caligiuri, Fausto Callegarini, Rosette Calliauw, George Calpin, Lisetta Calzolari, Lisette Callarata, Lee Cambigue (Mr), Lee Cambique (Mrs), Nancy Cameron, Antonio Cammarata, Gaetano Cammarata, Salvatore Cammarata, Mark Campbell, Baby Campos, Dolores Campos, Jose-Luis Campos, Susana Campos, Frank Camuso, Gilbert Canali, Paolo Canali, Bruno Cantalupi, Gianni Canuti, Hector Cardenas, Barbara Cardona, Juan Cardona, Maria-Terese Cardona, Chuck Carel, Pat Carel, Pat Carey, Ruth Carey, Jerry Caril, Dixie Carlisle, Hank Carlson, Marti Carlson, Mike Carlson, Scott Carmichael, Ida Carrera, Gina Carrerra, Joanne Carrier, Steve Carrier, Julie Carrol, Gail Carroll, Noel Carroll, Ann Carter, Marylin Carvin, Vickie Case, Doug Casey, Carlos Casillas, Juan Casillas, Claudia Caspary, Raymond Cassano, Sheryle Cassano, Alfonso Castaneira, Jorge Castaneira, Lisa Castellani, Jacinto Castellano, Virgilio Castellano, Carlos Casteneira, Virginia Casteneira, Antonella Castignoli, Carlos Castillo, Lucinda Castillo, Rosana Castillo, Eugenio Castillo,, Betty Castleman, Elizabeth Castleman, Ken Castleman, Rosita Castro, Massimo Cavadenti, Stephanie Cayouette, Nadia Cedro, Julian Cerati, Denise Ceresnak, Berenice Cervantes, Jean Chacon, John Chadder, Mary Chadder, Andrew Chalmers, Alan Chamberlain, Allen Chamberlin, Don Chamberlin, James Chamberlin, John Chambers, Rebecca Chambers, Luis Chamorro, Julie Champness, Mick Champness, Michael, Chandler, Tom Chandler, Karin Chapman, Peter Charbonneau, Jean Charbonnier, Jeanie Charles, John Charlesworth, Louise Charnonneau, Mike Chatelain, Julio Chavez, Martha Chavez, Jeff Chee, Brigitte Chelin, Hellen Chen, Nancy Chepey, Murie Cheshire, Alain Chevrot, Henriette Chevrot, Felipe Child, Filipe Child, Maria-Teresa Child, Roberto Child, Rosario Child, Pam Chipman, Pamela Chipman, Corine Chiquet, Francoise Chiquet, Gerard Chiquet, Josette Chiquet, Luisa Chiricho, Jay Chitteroe, Mireille Chouraki, Lorna Chrichton, Monica Christen, Carl Christensen, James Christensen, Jamie Christensen, Joanne Christensen, Kurt Christensen, Mie Christensen, Malcolm Christiansen, Gillian Christie-Cullen, Gerd Christoffel, Gerry Chromoy, Jeanie Chromoy, Michael Church, Mauro Cinquepalmi, David Cintron, Bruce Cladwell, Bruce Clark, Evelyne Clark, Fran Clark, Jane Clark, Jeanne Clark, Jenny Clark, Michael Clark, Mike Clark, Shirley Clark, Garrison Clarke, Peter Clarke, Jean Claude Smadja, Karl Clausen, Nancy Clay, Peter Clay, Robert Clay, Tom Clay, Emily Clayton, John Clegg, Charles Clements, Dale Clerk, Maria Clovet Bridget Cobb, Maxine Cocain, Giuliano Cocchetti, Guigliana Cocchetti, Jan Cockerill, Judith Code, Keith Code, Joaquim Coelho, Art Colaianni, Lucy Cole, Ross Cole, Allen Collins, Jim Collins, Regina Collins, Sally Colloden, Franco Comi, Carlo Comincini, Maria-Luisa Como, Kathy Conable, kathy Conable, Maria Conceicao, Kathy Condon, Maggie Condon, Margaret Condon, Robert Condon, Ron Condron, Robert Conn, June Connelly, Lynn Connor, Bernd Conradi, Elke Conradi, fabian Conti, Richard Cook, Giancarla Coppi, Ernest Corbett, Gaye Corbett, Arlette Corbi, Paolo Corbi, Jose Cordero, Andre Cordet, Maria Cordova, Shirley Coriveau, Rebecca Cormier, Skip Cormier, Daphne Cornelius, Vernon Cornelius, Ewald Cornelsen, Marc Coromina Hector Cortes, Patty Cortes, Noemi Cortinovis, Luisa Cossini, Giuliano Cossu, Robasto Costanzo, Jennifer Costello, Denis Cote, Ghislan Cote, Paul Cote, Marie-Louise Courvoisier, Marianne Couvoisier, Helen Covary Fritsch, Michael Covin, Maria Covini, John Cowden, Brian Coyle, Bryan Coyle, Ed Cramb, Larry Cramer, Susan Crausaz, Bill Crawford, Ginger Crawler, Michele Crescetino, Bruno Crestino, Adelio Crippa, mario Crippa, Miriam Crippa, Ralph Criscione, Rick Crites, Ron Crites, Gabrielle Crittendon, Barry Critzer, Beppe Crivella, Malcolm Croft, Jim Crosser, Bill Crossley, Roddie Crouch, Emil Crough Allan Crouse, Lisa Crundall, Peter Crundall, Virgilio Cruzado, Gerardo Cucciniello, Mariana Cuenca, Gwen Culbert, Chris Cullen, Sally Culloden, Patrick Cultiera, Peter Cunningham, Elizabeth Currier, Glenn Currier, Jaye Curry, Mike Curry, David Curtis, Patricia Curtis, Yolande Curty, Matteo D’Agnelli, Louis Da Re, Susan Da Re, Alicia Dabbah, Lucy Dabbah, Salomon Dabbah, Bob Dahlquist, Robert Dahlquist, Jacinthe Daigle, Barbara Dakin, Sonja Dal Borgo, Luciano Daldosso, Raoul Dallaire, Antonella Dallari, kathy Dalziel, Karin Damian, Marisa Damiani, Marcos Dana, Cindy Dangberg, Gunther Dangela, Dana Danhoff, Nazmy Daniel, Dick Danilobb, Peter Daniloff, Alycia Danilovich, Harold Danko, Roberto Danne, Francesco DaPasquale, Silvia Dare Susan Daugherty, Jose-Luis Davila, Cathy Davis, Chris Davis, Kennny Davis, Les Davis, Leslie Davis, Lonnie Davis, Nancy Davis, Naomi Davis, Paul Davis, Vicki Davis, Peggy Day Westerman, Brian Day, Doreen Day, Andree De Thiersant, Beatriz De Aguilar, Bernard De La Cour, Celia De Mello, Gisele De Benoit, Hennie De Ridder, Henri De Bruyn, Iria De La Vaccarra, Javier De Aguinaga, Jill De Hochepied, Jim De Grosa, Justa De Villiers, Maria De Landez Ferreira, Marie De Thiersant, Peter De La Cour, Pierre De Thiersant, Tom De Grandpre, Ursula De Leon, Galee Dean, Gaylee Dean, Richard Dean, Alicia Debbah, Henri DeBryun, Thiery DeChaunac, Madeleine DeFreitas, John Dekiewitt, Antonio Del Francia, Bernard Delacour, Jacqueline Delafraye, Odile Delafraye, Patrick Delafraye, Pierre Delance, Jean-Pierre Deleze, Antonio Della Giovanna, Marc Delomez, Odile Delomez, Giovanna Delzanno, Henry DeMarco, Jutta Demeler, Dan Deming, Jane Deming, Thomas Demogines, Paul Denev, Peter Denev, Camille Denholme, Eugenia DeNieto, Francesco DePasquale, Bertrand DePetigny, Marie-Therese DePetigny, Carole DeRoo, Charles Deschambury, Daniel Descombaz, Andree DeThiersant, Andre Dettieri, Justa DeVilliers, Pino Devitini, Candace Devoe, Chuck Devoe, Eloy Dewey, Albert Dewisme, David DeZelle, Anna Di Lorenzo, Anna Di Meo, Antonio Di Gioia Bob Di Diego, Antonio Diaz, Barbara Diaz, Pat Didear, Rosemary Didear, Carlo DiFrancesco, Sergio DiFrancesco, Antonio DiGoia, Tina Dillard, Julia Dimmock, Dana Dineen, Anita Dingler, Raul Dingler, Thomas DiPaola, Loren Dirks, Claes Ditleusen, Else-Marie Ditleusen, Claes Ditlevsen, Bruno Divitini, Dan DiVito, Janet Dixon, Dusan Djukich, Michael Dlack, Bruce Dobin, Forrest Dockery, Eddie Dodd, Linda Doering, Willy Doestschman, Sass Doetschmann, Willy Doetschmann, David Dolan, Mary Dolan, Paul Dolan, Mike Dolbaczuk, Karin Don Braber, Graham Donavan, Angelo Donghia, Christa Donker, Graham Donovan, Cecile Donze, Therese Donze, Karen Doobi, Mercedes Dorelia, Anna Dorigo, Elen Dorset, Ellen Dorsett, Eugenio Dos-Santos, Denyse Doudan, Alan Douglas, Jim Douglas, Joan Douglas, Richard Douglas, Robert Drake, Chris Dresser, Robin Drimmer, Ronnie Drimmer, Mitchell Drobbin, Jeff Drumm, Veronique DuBellay, Horst Dubiel, Dennis Dubin, Stan Dubin, Martin Dubow, Bob Duggan, Tom Duggan, Bob Duggin, Helene Dugmore, Georgette Dumas, Scott Duncan, Joe Duncanson, Joseph Duncanson, Lindy Duncanson, Ann Dunev, Camille Dunholme, Jean-Jacques Dunki, James Dunn, Brigitte Duquesne, Francoise Durand, Dave Durnan, Jurgen Durnberger, Peter Durnil, Corrie Dutko, Brenda Dyer, Trevor Eade, Dick Eastin, John Eastment, Edna Eaton, Lolita Echavarria, Fred Eckfeld, Lilliane Eckharter, Margaret Eckold, Tina Eckstein, Anders Eckwell, Eve Eden, Donna Edison, Steve Edison, Ellen Edmondson, Eloise Edmonson, Louise Edmunson, Luis Eduardo Cuello, Carlton Edwards, Deborah Edwards, Harold Edwards, Darlene Eggen, Dean Eggen, Jerry Ehrlich, Debbie Ehst, Ilse Eich, Alexander Einkhour, Jay Eisenbach, Else-Brith Ekstrom, Roland Ekstrom, Maria Elana Nunez, Maria Elena Martini, Amy Elliot, Hugh Elliot, Kay Elsner, Catherine Emard, Philip Embick, Susan Embick, Pat Emery, Tucker Emmett, Susan Emory, Shahab Emran, Shahab Emrani, David Ender, Edi Ender, Sabine Ender, Christine Engler, Thomas Engler, Walter Erb, Lothar Erdtmann, Nena Erdtmann, Ramses Erdtmann, Gert Eriksson, Gunilla Eriksson, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Espinoza, Christopher Estey, Tina Estey, Carol Estrada, Julio Estrada, Beverley Ettinger, Wendy Ettricks, Gus Evans, Noel Evans, Suzanne Evans, Virginia Fair, Andre Fakir, Tony Falcaro, Steve Falcy, Caroline Falone, David Farca Lorna Farca, Raquel Farca, Franco Farina, Jana Farr, Valerie Fasnakis, Floriana Fassi, Gianfranco Fassi, Marina Favilla, Marino Fazi, Marisa Fazi, Stephen Fedele, Dennis Feeney, Eloisa Feeney, Axel Fehling, Liv Fehn, Maria-Luisa Feirrara, Leon Feldbrill, Maria Feldman, Sikica Feldman, Caroline Felons, John Fenton, Enrico Fermi, Slvador Fernanderz, Salvador Fernandez Herrero, Juan Fernandez, Salvator Fernandez, Jose Ferrano, Juan Ferrara, Vivian Ferrara, Bruno Ferrari, Mario Ferrari, Rosaria Ferrario, Robert Ferrarro, Lourdes Ferreira, Maria Ferreira, Alberto Ferrerro, Linda Ferry, Lynn Ferry, Richard Ferry, Steven Ferry, Cindy Feshbach, Kathy Feshbach, Lynn Feshbach, Matthew Feshbach, Sheryle Festa, Ron Fiandaca, James Fiducia, Margrit Fierz, Angel Figueroa, Fred Filios, Robin Filios, Giusy Filippini, Renata Filippini, Betty Filisky, robert Filisky, Beatrice Findlay, David Findlay, Lena Findlay, Bill Findley, Bob Fine, Elena Fine, Mike Fine, Robert Fine, Mary Finley, Hans-Peter Fischer, Dianne Fisher, Joan Fisher, Leslie Fisher, Gary Fishman, Patrice Fishman, Jonny Fjall, Jim Flahive, Bob Flanagan, Dave Fleershoff, Debby Flemming, John Flemming, Mary Float, Irma Flores, Walter Flosser, Willi Flosser, Luigi Fogazzi, Leslie Foglesong, John Foglio, Ed Fomby, Astrid Fontana, Gerald Foos, Bob Forrest, Nancy Forrest, David Forsman, Suzanne Fortin, Fabio Fortunat, Sarina Foster, Christian Fouche, Rex Fowler, Jonathan Fox, Marsha Fox, Russell Fox, Marie France Carpentier, Albert Franceschetti, Clara Franceschetti, Maria Franceschinelli, Alessandra Franchi, Maria Franchini, Carlo Francisco, Fabrizio Francomano, Veronica Francomano, vincente Francomano, Jim Frankel, Massimo Franzoni, Neil Fraser, Susana Frederick, Judy Freedman, Rosy Freihoff, Bertha Frias, Roxanne Friend, Hanne Fries, Fabio Frigerio, Thomas Frigge, Harry Frisch, Nancy Frisch, Helen Fritsch, Arda Froese, Diane Froese, Linda Frommer, Greg Frost, Claude Froute, Mary Fry, Rafael Fuentes, Valerie Fuetris, Hamida Fuiatti, Debra Fuller, Terry Fuller, Wayne Fuller, Graziano Fumari, Dudo Func, Richard Furbish, Geoff Fushi, Geoffrey Fushi, Jim Futris, John Futris, Gunther Gafton, Phillipe Gaille, Sheila Gaiman, Linda Galardo, Bianca Galbiati, Giancarlo Galbiati, David Gale, Marie Gale, Jose-Luis Galicia Jr, Gisela Galicia, Guillermo Galicia, Jose Galicia, Jose-Luis Galicia, Ernesto Galli, Eugenio Galli, Marilena Galli, Mauricio Galli, Margaret Gallivan, Ursula Gambert, Carmen Gamboa, Alessandro Gangidino, Pino Gangidino, Pino Gangislino, Steve Ganns, Marianne Garatti, Alfred Garbutt, Manuel Garces, Maria Garces, Cecilia Garcia, Ernesto Garcia, Evangelina Garcia, Gisela Garcia, Gladis Garcia, Ignacio Garcia, Jesus Garcia, Martha Garcia, Maria-Pia Gardini, Claire Gardner, Eva Gardner, Lilia Garduno, Benjamin Garner, Trisa Garner, Marc Garnier, Alicia Garrido, Gloria Garrido, Dolores Garriga, Manuel Gartces Linda Garver, Celia Garza, Laura Garza, Nadina Garza, Nadine Garza, Jane Gatliff, Gary Gatliffe, Eduardo Gatti, Fabrizio Gatti, Luciana Gatti, Chantal Gauthier, Harvey Gauthier, Luisa Gavazzi, Adelio Gaviraghi, Elena Gaviraghi, Fabrizio Gaviraghi, Paul Gawrello, Larry Geis, Malcom Gellatly, Barb Gendusa, Barbara Gendusa, Angelo Gentile, Martino Gentile, Marianne Genton, Antoine Geoffre, Kitty Georgius, Ken Gerbino, Victoria Gerbino, Peter Gerhards, Chris Gerson, Jan Gerson, Stan Gerson, Theresa Gerson, Reto Gfeller, Benjamin Ghiora, Benny Ghiora, Wendy Ghiora, Giovanni Giambarini, Mauro Gianfranco, Sergio Giannini, Dave Gibbons, Anne Giblin, Ingrid Gibson, Cathy Giesecke, Ellen Giffin, Irma Giger, Felipe Gil, Sandra Gil, Linda Gilbert, Louise Gilbert, Richard Gilbert, Steve Gilbert, William Gillette, Per Ginge-Nielsen, Giovanni Giocamezzi, Angelia Gioffre Angela Gioffre, Massimo Giordanengo, Luisa Giovanna Bellagamba, Fabio Giovannelli, Linda Giovanni, Phil Giovinco, Giorgio Girardi, Ernst Girnus, Allan Giroler, Alfredo Gironella, Antonio Gironella, Luisa Gissi, Luisa Gissy, Lorenzo Gizzarelli, Michelle Gizzi, Kurt Glassel, Anne Glenski, Bernadette Glenski, Alba Gloor, Greg Gloor, Lois Gloor, Albert Glow, Franziska Glur, Giorgio Gobbi, Sandra Godding, Tom Godfrey, Vivian Godfrey, Peter Godwin, Georgio Goffe, Alberto Goffy, Giorgio Goffy, Gerri Golashesky, Calla Gold, Marshall Goldblatt, Eden Golden, Emily Goldfield, Steve Goldfield, Lynne Goldstein, Allan Gomery, Mercedes Gomez, Roberto Goncalves, Kay Gonsolin, Ed Gonsoulin, Leona Gonsoulin, Carlos Gonzales, Leon Gonzales, Lillian Gonzales, Lou Gonzales, Maria Gonzales, Monica Gonzales, Penny Gonzales, Pilar Gonzales, Raoul Gonzales, Rom Gonzales, Silvana Gonzales, Susana Gonzales, Alvaro Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Oscar Gonzalez, Pilar Gonzalez, John Good, Kevin Good, Marianne Good, Sherry Good, Randy Goode, Ann Gordin, Anne Gordin, Dawn Gordon, Gerald Gordon, Jerry Gordon, Gabriele Gordt, Emilia Gorini, Edward Goss, Rose Goss, Liane Gottwald, Hank Gould, Mark Gould, Sylvain Goulet, Christian Gounord, Daniele Gounord, Ignacio Gracia, Robert Graf, Jill Graham, Eva Gramm, Alba Grande, Alfonso Grande, Maurizio Grande, Carlo Granito, Theo Grant, Thoe Grant, Alicia Gray, Bob Gray, Maria Grazia Rocco, Linda Graziano, Anita Grechi, Betty Green, Jane Greenberg, Martin Greenberg, Marty Greenberg, John Greene, Maurice Greene, Peter Greene, Jayne Greenwalt, Anita Gregory, Kathy Gregory, Scott Gregory, Anne Greig, Mark Greisen, Simon Grenier, Anne Grieg, Nancy Griffith, Cristina Groenewold, Ricardo Groenewold, Cristina Groenwold, Jaime Groesbeck Michael Grope, Dominique Gropper, Carla Grossbohlin, Harry Grossbohlin, Larry Grout, Cathy Grown, Wilmie Gruber, Bertha Guadalajara, Mariani Gualtiero, Marianne Gubeli, Pierre Guenette, Lauri Guerin, Antonieta Guerrero, Francisca Guerrero, Irma Guerrero, Maria Guerrero, Virginia Guerrero, Anne-Marie Guertin, Duncan Guertin, Diana Guillen, Javier Guillen, jaime Guillertin, Brigitta Gustafsson, Brigitte Gutermann, Rolf Gutermann, Giuliana Gutierrez, Javier Gutierrez, Veronica Gutierrez, Peter Guy, Victor Guzman, Steve Guzzetta, Enza Guzzo, Helga Habiger, Gisela Hackenjos, Holger Hackenjos, Marie Hadjian, Jill Hagen, Diane Hahn, Helgard Hahn, Ernst Haible, Gali Halamish, Dave Haldy, Bob Hall, Cindy Hall, Betty Halliday, Lisa Halverson, Susan Hamady, Bob Hamilton, Edward Hamlyn, Ted Hamlyn, Michael Hancock, Lynne Haney, Michael Haney, Wally Hanks, Bill Hanley, Stina Hans, Henning Hansen, Wiebke Hansen, Eve Hanson, Janet Hanson, Larry Hanson, Lawrence Hanson, Randy Hanson, Margaret Hardy, Charlotte Harness, Connie Harris, Oliver Harris, Roger Harrison, Sioux Hart, Gunter Hass, Wenche Haugen, Lynn Hauptman, Bob Hay, Steven Hayes, Steve Head, Tom Head, Gary Hedge, Janet Hedge, Elisabeth Hedinger, Robert Hedinger, Peter Heer, Betsy Heess, Barbara Hegetschweiler, Helmut Heinzel, Mary Heldt, Katie Heller, Nina Helms, Jean Helpert, Monika Helpert, Berenice Hemsani, Moises Hemsani, Bev Henderson, Diane Henderson, Michael Henderson, Craig Hendrick, Jack Henessey, Bill Henley, Tim Henley, Robin Hennessy, Hans Henriksen, Cyril Henry Holman, Keren Hepner, Randy Hepner, Enrique Hernandez, Isabel Hernandez, Madalena Hernandez, Maria Hernandez, Martha Hernandez, Robert Hernandez, Mario Herold, Janet Herring, Norman Herring, Nan Herst, Pam Hertz, Axel Hesse, Anette Hevillon, Martha Higareda, Jim Highsmith, Saul Hildebrand, Jonathan Hill, Patricia Hillard, Sonia Hines, Robert Hinson, Peggy Hitchman, Tony Hitchman, Eva Hitz, Andy Hoare, Joe Hochman, Edith Hodgskinson, Edith Hodgson, Margaret Hodkin, Terry Hodosi, Hans Hodosy, Terry Hodosy, Otmar Hofer, Lucie Hoffmann, Rose Hogg, Doug Hoisington, Paula Hoisington, Debby Holder, Alan Hollander, Janet Hollander, Karen Hollander, Mimi Holm, Steven Holmes, Fred Holtby, Frederick Holtby, Ursula Holub, Gilles Homier, Francoise Hooks, Vera Hopkins, Joel Hord, Cynthia Horton, Dale Horton, Bill Horwich, Fred Houck, Guy Houston, Karen Howard, Bill Howey, David Howson, Faith Hudon, Faith Hudson, Ana Huelva, Debbie Hughes, Greg Hughes, Harriette Hughes, Peter Hughes, Rick Hull, Sherene Hull, Paul Hulme, Debbie Hulthen, Deborah Hulthen, Leena Hungerbuhler, Fred Hunt, Midge Hunt, Peter Hunt, Beatrice Hunziger, Peter Hunziker, Elena Hurtado, Nicolas Hurtado, Jane Hutchins, June Hutchins, Fawn Hutton, Marilyn Hydie, Jeff Hyland, Ellen Hyrne, Seija Hytonen, Sharon Imburgia, Mavis Imra, Barbara Inbody, Bob Inbody, Werner Indermuhle Deborah Indursky, Michael Ingbar, Renato Ingenito, Judith Irons, Judy Irons, Lynn Irons, Anne Isabelle, Anna Iverson, Jim Jackson, Brigitte Jacobi, Michael Jacobi, Dan Jacobs, Myrna Jacobs, Paul Jaconello, Albert Jacquier, Ariane Jacquier, Hamida Jafferji, Elias Jafif, Sandra Jager, Henry Jaggers, Mary Jane Luniewski, Bernt Janssen, Carmen Jaramillo, Keith Jarrett, Luisa Javier, Sally Jeans, Georg Jecel, David Jelley, Molly Jelley, Dane Jenkins, John Jennings, Barbara Jensen, Britta Jensen, Craig Jensen, Mary Jensen, Sally Jensen, Karen Jepson, Alexandra Jimenez, Claudia Jimenez, Javier Jimenez, Manuel Jimenez, Ramon Jimenez, Raoul Jimenez, Gust Johanesson, Wendel Johanesson, Hakan Johansson, Peter John, Berenice Johnson, Brent Johnson, Bruce Johnson, Jay Johnson, Jervis Johnson, Judy Johnson, Larry Johnson, Mark Johnson, Richard Johnson, Stacia Johnson, steve Johnson, Tyrone Johnson, Andrew Johnston, DeDe Johnston, Drew Johnston, Terry Johnston, Evelyn Johnstone, Lisa Johonnsesson, Lisa Johonnsson, Mark Jonathan Kloss, Debbie Jones, Iain Jones, Mark Jones, Robin Jones, Henning Jorck, Peter Jorck, Andrea Jordan, Paul Joseph, Claudia Joss, Danielle Jossi, Carol Joyal, Carolyn Judd, Karen Judkin, Hans Juel, Claudia Jugo, Diane Jullian, Abby Juneau, Michael Juneau, Mike Juneau, Unice Juneau, Andre Jurt, James Justice, Suzanne Justus, Alan Juvonen, Allan Juvonen, Susan Juvonen, Magda Kahanu, David Kahn, Mary Kahn, Barbara Kalergis, Bob Kalergis, James Kalergis, Carla Kammer, Gloria Kamph, Magda Kanahu, Rory Kaplan, Cheryl Kapuler, Mauri Karger, Michael Karger, Susan Karnovsky, Lamia Kashoghi, Carlo Katchi, Eurlich Katschzmann, Ulrich Katzschmann, Emil Kauer, Emile Kauer, Hugo Kaufmann, Mary Kaufmann, David Kaup, Bob Kaye, Robert Kaye, David Keat, Jamie Keavic, Dietmar Kecht, Goerge Keck, Gary Keenan, Guy Keenan, Jeanne Keenan, Richard Keeney, Grace Kefover, Patrick Kegel, John Keldami, Ingrid Keller, Alan Kellman, Kathy Kemmerer, Steve Kemp, Klaus Kempe, Marieta Kempe, Bonnie Kempner, Rudi Kempner, Robert Kenny, Carla Kent Grossbohlin, James Keppler, Kifumi Keppler, Stefan Kerber, John Kerr, Kitty Kerr, Naomi Kerr, Vivien Kerslake, Marianne Kessler, Denis Keyes, Ike Kezsbom, Peter Khaled, Christopher Kight, Bruno Kihm, Bill Kilpatrick, Kyung Kim, Scott Kimball, Sharon Kimball, Ivy Kimmich, Michael King Hancock, Eddie King, Fred King, Frederick King, Isabel King, Liz King, Susi Kinglefuss, Carol Kingsley, Siegfried Kiontke, Carmine Kischke, Christine Kischke, helen Kitchen, Helen Kitchin, Andrew Kitt, Andy Kitt, Any Kitt, Tara Kitt, John Kitzinger, Jens Kjeldsen, Niels Kjeldsen, Ken Klaebe, Monroe Kleiderman, Andreas Klein, Barry Klein, Jan Klein, Janet Klein, Naomo Klein, Martha Kleinbaum Lolita Kleinbaum, Ricardo Kleinbaum, Rosita Kleinbaum, Ruben Kleinbaum, Salvador Kleinbaum, Richard Kleinberg, Naomi Kleyn, Sandra Kleyn, Heidi Klinger, Michael Klinger, Gad Klopstock, Yaffa Klopstock, yaffa Klopstock, Sharon Kloss, Andrea Kluge, Dave Kluge, Housi Knecht, Nancy Kneighten, Angie Knewitz, Elsa Knewitz, Elvira Knewitz, Nancy Knighten, Ruth Knudsen, Emilio Kobeh, Andi Koch, Andres Koch, Christa Koch, Elizabeth Kochsiek, Walter Koenig, Walter Kolabruski, Felix Kolla, Klaus Koller, Emilie Kong, Martha Korringa, Wouter Korringa, Juliane Kostinger, Hans-Peter Kotzli, Dick Kraman, Jayne Kraman, Roswitha Kratz, Rolf Krause, Susan Krause, James Krebsbach, Nancy Kredel, Pam Kresse, Randy Kretchmar, Rene Kristal, Karl Kroeger, Sandy Kroeger, Elizabeth Kroll, Herwig Kroll, Greg Krueger, Daniel Kuhn, Maina Kuhn, Roland Kuhn, Ron Kule, Josef Kunz, Steve Kurth, Tuula Kuusisto, Sandy Kuypers, Iria La Vaccara, Phil La Claire, Michele Labarile, Elena Labarrure, Andre Laberge, Johnny Laboriel, Bob Labre, Nick Labuschagne, Rocky Lackey, Steven Lackey, Richard Lacy, Andy Ladd, Nicole Lafreniere, Connie Lahmann, Simone Laine, Bert Laing, Joachim Laiss, Stevie Lake, Josette Lambert, Giovanni Lamberti Frederica Lambertini, Enzo Lamorgese, Federica Lampronti, Bernardo Lan, Carlos Lan, Jeannie Lan, Miguel Lan, Morris Lan, Sarah Lan, Victorina Landra, Janet Langdon, Gennaro Langella, Andree Langevin, Michael Lanza, Serge Lapointe, Thierry Laprevote, Angela Laramea, Charla Larch, Donna LaRock, Elena Larrabure, Miguel Larrabure, Allen Larsen, Alan Larson, Arwen Larson, Janet Larson, Sherry Larson, Christina Larsson, Urban Larsson, Albert Lasala, Finn Lassen, Connie Latch, Lloyd Latch, Brenda Latchman, Pat Lathrom, Marjorie Laughlin, Tom Laughran, Joe Lauricella, Marie-Margrethe Lauritzen, John Laursen, Iria Lavacarra, Angelo Lavazza, Peggy Laverdiere, Andre Lavergnat, Charles Lavin, Joseph Lavin, Janet Lawrence, Greg Layton, Philippe Le Bourveau, Marc leach, Bruce Leavitt, Luis Leceta, Didier LeClercq, Steve Lederman, Carol Lee Womble, James Lee Antoinette Lee, Barbara Lee, Michael Lee, Mike Lee, Sydney Lee, Alain Lefebre, Eva Lefevre, Sam Lefkowitz, Pierre LeFrancois, Alain Lefrancois, Monique Lefrancois, Giuliana Legnani, Merriad Lehman, Monica Lehman, Yves Lehman, Hannes Lehmann, Klaus Lehmann, Meinrad Lehmann, Vivian Leifield, Al Leighton, Carol Leipsic, Ruth Lennie, Bente Lenz, Maurizio Lenzi, Ingrid Lenzke, Luis Leon, Ricardo Leon, Marsha Leone, Fabrizio Leonelli, Ben Leong, Gunter Leonhardt, Sergio Leoni, Gary Lerner, Diane Leroux, Vanella Lesevre, Andrea Lettieri, Tobias Leutenegger, Joe Levin, Johnny Levin, Alvah Levine, Barbara Levine, Daniel Levine, Doris Levine, Caspar Levman, Jan Levy, Sam Levy, Stew Levy, Barbara Lewis, Carita Lewis, Donna Lewis, James Lewis, Laura Lewis, Michael Lewis, Myron Lewis, Norman Lewis, Ronald Lewis, Victor Lidchi, Maria Lienert, Janet Light, Mari-Ann Lind, Per Lindberg, Ole Lindell, Christina Lindroth, Artur Lindskog, Virginia Lindskog, Michael Lindstr�m, Lenny Lindstrom, Michael Lindstrom, Lil Linson, David Lipchitz, Elizabeth Lippert, Lee Lippert, Heidi Lipscher, Juraj Lipscher, Albert Lipschutz, Mireille Lipschutz, Ken Lipton, Francesco Locilento, Frnaco Locilento, Jurg Locker, Rachel Lockwood, Maria Lodovici, Mario Lodovici, Leona Logan, Beatrix Lohman, Claus Lohmann, Leonardo Loi, Robert Lolln, Salvatore Lombardo, Desiree Long, Steve Longbotham, Joan Lonstein, Joan Loosli, Angel Lopez, Juan-Baptista Lopez, Leticia Lopez, Charla Lorch, Pier-Angelo Loreggia, Bill Lorentzen, Vikki Lorentzen, Carlos Lores, Michel Loron, Christi Losh, Mary Losty, Albert Lotz, Bjorn Lotz, Trey Lotz, Marlys Lotzer, Jan Loup Gilliot, Krystyna Louw, Anita Lowe, Jill Lowe, Madeline Lowe, Susan Lowe, Bernie Lowenstein, Grace Lowrance, Maria Lozano, Borghild Lozio, Nicola Lozio, Henry Lubbe, Harry Lucas, Nick Lucchesi, Hannelore Luck, Beth Ludwig Beth Ludwig, Patrick Lue Fan, Carlo Lugli, Claudio Lugli, Maria Lugli, Renata Lugli, Jerry Lull, Steve Lund, Conny Lundberg, Betty Lunde, Borje Lundgren, Anita Lundstedt, Mary-Jane Luniewski, Ron Luniewski, Ronald Luniewski, Paolo Luoni, Tarcisio Luoni, David Luscombe, Christian Lussi, Ernie Lutz, Hania Lux, Sally Lyn Zwan, June Lynch, Mary Lynne Wolfe, Bobby Lyons, Bruno Maca, Lenny Macaluso, Deanne Macdonald, Debbi Mace, Debbie Mace, Rick MacFarlane Sylvia Machado, Marco Macias, Phyllis Mack, Daniel MacKenzie, Bernadette Macullo, James Madia, Jim Madia, Stephen Mage, Maurizio Maggione, Janine Magnan, Janine Magnan, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Mario Majorski, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Lina Majorsky Marc Majorsky, Mario Majorsky, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, Dan Marino, Daniel Marino, Gennaro Marino, Christie Marion, Jessica Marks, Susan Marple, Ray Marquardt, Pura Marquez, carlo Martelli, Carlos Martelli, Diana Martelli, Michele Martelli, Pedro Martin-Moreno, Christina Martinez, Francisco Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lucinda Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Pilar Martinez, Sergio Martinez, Veronica Martinez, Luisella Martini, Marc Marty, Robert Marx, Laura Mason, Mary Mason, Mary-Clare Mason, Dedo Maspero, Giusy Maspero, Patrizio Maspero, Valerio Maspero, Denise Masse, Alessandro Massolo, Donato Masucci, Antonelo Matar, Angela Matarazzo, Antonello Matarazzo, Luis Mateos, Dwight Matheny, Konrad Matt, Leon Matthews, Sue Mattinson, Giorgio Mattioli, Maria Mattioli, Maria-Teresa Mattioli, Pietro Mauro, GianFranco Mauro, Mary Mauser, Thomas Maxwell, Jeanette May, Elena Maya, James Mayer, Jim Mayer, Ulrich Mayer, Ursi Mayer, Regula Mayor, Kate Mays, Todd Mays, Christine Mazarand, Riccardo Mazza, Tito Mazza, Scott Mazzanarella, Elisabetta Mazzorato, Evangelina Mazzorato, Loris Mazzorato, Vincenzo Mazzoratto, Rose McAffee, Pam McCall, Mary McCarran, Mike McCaudles, Peter McCord, Carlynn McCormick, John McCormick, Margee McCormick, Rod McCormick, Gwen McCoy, Michael McCoy, Mick McCoy, Joseph McCusker, Janice McDaniels, Janice McDannel, Carolann McDonald, Michael McDonald, Shannon McDougall, Gill McEnery, Robert McFarlane, Jeff McGee, Lee McGee, Tom McIntyre, David McKee, Thomas McKee, Dennis McKenna, Mark McKenna, Breck McKinley, Jean McKinnon, Terry McKnee, Beth McLeod, Kenny McLeod, Debbie McNeely, Gerald McNeely, Jerry McNeely, Mario McQuade, Simon Meadmore, Gisela Medina, Lee Meekcoms, Karen Megan, Giovanna Megna, Jeannette Meier, Ursi Meier, Paolo Meini, Bob Meinsma, Betsy Melchior, Tim Melchior, Claire Melgren, david Melis, Alexia Melocchi, Al Melone, Penny Melrose Fernando Mena, Brigitte Meneau, Raquel Menoa, Guy Mercier, May Meriwether, Stefania Merlino, Clarisse Meschoulam, Tom Messick, Helen Meuley Ract, Alex Meyer, Christine Meyer, Otto Meyer, Ursi Meyer, jackie Meyers, Jacquellyn Meyers, Francoise Michaillet, Ron Michalski, Louis Michel Brolles, Lana Micheletti, Lina Micheletti, Tony Milan, Renato Milani, Uwe Millan, Gil Miller, Tina Miller, Karen Milligan, Rick Milner, Terry Milner, Gisella Minacci, Tudy Ming, Jacqueline Mingard, Peter Miranda, Loretta Miscavige, Ron Miscavige, Joe Miskowiecz, Paul Missonis, Tess Mobilia, Lucio Modegna, Joe Modica, Gunter Mohl, Rudi Mohl, Antonello Moi, Vera Moklowya, Paolo Molini, Don Moll, Fritz Mollman, Brigitta Mollmann, Kurt Molman, Jacky Molnar, Theo Molten, Charles Momsen, Greg Montangero, Susanne Montangero, Luisa Montero, Vicky Montesinos, Vito Montini, Vittorio Montini, Ed Mooney, Pat Mooney, Art Moore, Brigid Moore, Bruce Moore, David Moore, Peter Moore, Wendy Moose, Jose-Luis Morales, Paul Morel, Pablo Moreno, Tas Morfopoulos, Jeaninne Morissette, Angela Moro, Livia Morone, Loreno Moroni, Magda Morra, Brian Morrell, Silvana Morri, Kathy Morrill, Patricia Morrill, Terry Morrill, Bob Morris, Deborah Morris, Faye Morris, Gloria Morris, Mavis Morrison, Karen Morrissett, Carol Morse, David Morse, Joan Mort, Cecilia Mortano, Mina Moschini, Mildred Moscona, Lauren Moseley, Cathy Moss, Kathy Moss, Ron Moss, Lena Moufarej, Linan Moufarres, Art Mould, Richard Moulton, David Mowbray, david Mowbray, Roger Mueller, Walter Mueller, Elly Muller, fred Muller, Josef Muller, Peter Muller, Robert Muller, Roger Muller, Walter Muller, Jean-Christophe Mulliez, Javier Munoz Carmen Munoz, Hector Munoz, Javier Munoz, Alejandra Munro, Klaus Munz, Evelyn Murdock, Dan Murillo, Peter Murphy, Jerry Murray, Marvin Murray, Pat Murray, Barbara Musach, Bob Musack, Janice Myerberg, Paul Myerberg, Beth Nabors, Betyh Nabors, Lorena Nacif, Linda Nadir, Bill Nagengast, Judy Nagengast, Douglas Nagy, Mike Napier, Ed Naranjo, Antonio Narcisco, Cecilia Nascimento, Silvia Nascimento, Anne Nash, Bob Nastas, Claudio Natale, Marco Natale, Silvia Natale, Silvio Natale, Orlando Navarro, Patricia Navarro, Ann Naylor, Darrel Naylor, Astrid Neal, James Neal, Ron Nedd, Dennis Negley, Wendy Negley, Linda Neilson, Robert Neilson, Pamela Nelson, Donna Nemier, Art Nermiah, John Ness, Douglas Neuman, Rebecca Neuman, Gloria Neumeyer, Walter Neuschitzer, Herman Newkirk, Josh Newkirk, Alex Newman, Anita Newman, Arnold Newman, Becky Newman, Buzz Newman, John Newman, Mark Newman, Mary Newman, Phil Newman, Steve Newman, Willie Newman, Edith Nichols, Carol Nickols, John Nickols, Anne Nielsen, Bob Nielson, Celia Niemerow, Guillermo Nietes, Norma Nieto, Oscar Nieves, Ruth Nighswonger, Franco Nigro, Meryl Nilsson, Betty Nimger, Christian Nissen, Christian Nitart, Claude Nitart, Brodie Noeske, Rodie Noeske, Robert Nordlund, Thomas Nordlund, Robert Nordstrom, nadine Normal, Michael Norris, Mike Norris, Nadia North, Derrick Northcross, Gianfranco Notari , John Novello, Norm Novitsky, Mark Noyes, Bruna Nucci, Richard Nuccio, Jeff Nuckols, John Nuckols, Steve Nuckols, Judy Nugent, Antonio Nunes, Ann Nunez, Carlos Nunez, Jose Nunez, Maria-Elena Nunez, Mario Nunez, Jose-Luis Nuno, Manfred Nussle, Maria Nutgeren, David Nutter, Sally Nutter, Tom Nyerges, Elaine O’Connell, Kevin O’Donnell, Maryann O’Donnell, Melissa O’Hara, Steve O’Hara, Maureen O’Keefe, Kieran O’Leary, Peter Obolensky, Hugo Ocalo, Steven Ogmon, Therese Oliva, Barbara Oliver, Joy Ollemans, Dolores Olmos, Geri Olson, Giuseppe Onesti, Michel Oneyron, Churlya Ong Wurfel, Enrico Opipari, Luisa Opipari, Giuseppe Oresti, Luisa Orlandini, Umberto Orlandini, Pilar Orozco, Dolores Ortiz, Jesus Ortiz, Veronica Orvananos, Hazel Osborne, Mario Osborne, Mike Osborne, Rick Osborne, Carol Osinaga, Inger Ostlund, Vega Ostlund, Peter Otanjac, Patrick Ouellette, Bill Owen, Brooke Owen, Dan Owen, James Owen, Jim Owen, Michael Owen, Nancy Owen, Robert Pace, Adrian Padilla, Ariel Padva, Robert Page, Mary-Jo Pagel, Per Pagh, Rebecca Pagovich, Paula Paiewonsky, Mauricio Palacios, Chris Palmer, Garnet Palmer, Margie Palmer, Dario Pandolfi, Alessandra Panigalli, Roberto Panigalli, Jennifer Pantermuehl, Daniela Paolini, Paolo Paolini, Pietro Paolini, Daniele Paoloni, George Papaheraklis, Juan Paredes, Louise Parent, Serge Parent, Floriana Paris, Anna Parise, Beverly Park, Margaret Parke, Phillip Parke, Debbie Parker, James Parker, Francois Parmentier, Nancy Parodi, Pat Parodi, Stephen Parodi, Bennett Parrish, Helen Parselle, Jeanine Pasche, Ron Patella, Jo Patti, Bonnie Paull, Cindy Payer, Beatrice Payne, Graham Payne, Chip Payson, Sheri Payson, Jose-Luis Paz, Colleen Peabody, Dee Pearson, Dee-Dee Pearson, Delores Pearson, Rosie Peck, Sally Peck, Ernie Pecoraro, Nydia Pecoraro, Robert Pedersen, Karen Pedre, Patrizia Pedroza, Heidi Peens, Louis Peens, Antonella Peghin, Patrizia Pelizzari , Sylvie Pelletier, Andree Peloquin, Anne Peloquin, Diane Peloquin, Guy Peloquin, Michel Peloquin, Hector Pena, Fred Penna, Jeanette Penwell, David Percival, Antonio Perez, Arturo Perez, Elisa Perez, Jose Perez, Samuel Perez, Dennis Pero, Giugliana Peroni, Eliana Perotti, Silvio Perotti, Genevieve Perrin, Steven Perrin, Alessandra Pesce, Gisella Pesce, Silvia Pestiddo, Lynn Peters, Kifumi Peterson, Bradford Petit, Pino Petrotto, Angelo Petruolo, Marzia Pezzali, Don Pfendler, Linda Phillip, Christine Phillips, Diane Phillips, Michael Phillips, Maria Pia Gardini, Pier Piaceri, Laura Piazza, Lucio Piazza, Enzo Piccone, Isella Piccone, Patricia Piccone, George Pick Geoffrey Pick, Jean Pierre Deleze, Jean Pierre Lehman, Luciano Pietrobuoni, Giuseppe Pietrobuono, George Pilat, Irit Pillo, Bernard Pimont, Giovanni Pinchietti, Claire Pinelli, Gustavo Pinto, Katharina Piotrowski, Colleen Piper, Collen Piper, Claire Pirelli, Alain Pitre, Letizia Pizzi, Dominic Pizzinat, Veronique Pizzinat, Ariel Podva, Daniel Podva, Marie-Louise Podva, Beatrice Pogouch Armando Pogoush, Dieter Pohlmann, Manuel Poiatti, Jean Poitras, Carl Polk, Dan Polk, Mireille Pollack, Fay Pollard, Ina Pollins, Mario Polverini, Maurizio Polverini, Bruce Pomaville, Martha Pomroy, martha Pomroy, Angelo Ponchetti, Maria-antonieta Ponchetti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchetti, Giovanni Ponchietti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchietti, Dick Pool, Cal Poole, Calvin Poole, Mark Poole, Fred Pope, Hermann Poppinga, Hans-Jorge Porner Claude Portais, Joanne Porter, Carlos Portillo, Paula Portmann, Joanne Portner, Graham Potter, Jack Potter, Christian Pouliot, Maria Pozzebon, Priscilla Presley, Leonie Price, Paul Price, Rosa Prieto, Clay Primrose, Earl Prince, Marty Prince, Nicolas Prince, Bruce Pringle, Carlyn Pringle, Carolyn Pringle, Daniela Prior, Tommy Pritzkau, Antonella Prosali, Massimo Prosperi, Peter Przybylla, Pia Pskowski, Hamida Puatti, Susana Puente, Marco Pugelli, Luisella Pugliatti, Hamida Puiatti, Wayne Pullen, Lee Purcell, Betsy Putterman, Larry Putterman, Michel Puzzolante, Sigrun Quetes, Rod Quinn, Bolivar Quinones, Francisco Quiroz, Ken Rabey, Nornie Rabey, Pat Rabey, Sheri Rabey, Janice Racheff, Jerry Racheff, Norma Rachel Brian Rackham, Helene Ract, Orelio Radaelle, Oreste Radaelli, Silvio Radaelli, Jerald Radroblo, Ron Radstrom, Leon Raffoul, Erika Rail, Rob Rainer, Aino Raisanen, Mauno Raisanen, Jaakko Raita, Pirjo Ramberg, Graciela Ramirez, Jaimes Ramirez, Lidia Ramirez, Norma Ramirez, Jose Ramon Amondarain, Eduardo Ramos, Giovanni Rampazzo, Mauro Rangeloni, Michel Raoust, Farhad Raschidi, Heidi Raschidi, Victoria Rashidi, Bruce Raston, Keith Raymond, Sandy Raymond, Joe Reaiche, Serge Rebeillard, Nelia Redondo, Nena Redtmann, Jan Regan, Sissy Reginato, Gayle Rego, Jim Rego, Marian Reguera, Sherwood Reichard, Brian Reichenberg, Helmut Reichert, Jean Reid, Gerhard Reile, Kathy Reilly, Eric Reinertaen, Felix Reinhard, Liliane Reinhard, Felix Reinhardt, Maggie Reinhart, David Reinken, Bruno Reisch, Richard Reiss, Manfred Renker, Gerard Renna, Karen Renna, Ian Rennie, Ann Rentachler, Lisa Rentschler, Brian Reso, Joan Reso, Michel Reveillere, Odile Reveillere, Virginia Rex, Edelia Reyes, Gino Reyes, Olivia Reyyes, Emil Rhodes, Mary Ribero, Gay Ribisi, Giuseppina Riccardi, Duane Rice, Mischa Rice, Arlene Rich, Frances Rich, Gary Rich, gary Rich, John Rich, Jean Richardson, Dan Richier, Harry Rickard, Dee-Dee Riechel, Frank Riemer, Paul-Unko Rieter, Nicola Rinaldi, Barbara Rinder, Ian Rinder, Jan Rinder, Crister Ringkvist, Fernando Rios, Gian-Luigi Ripamonti, Patricia Ripetta, Michael Rischer, Giancarlo Rivolta, Giovanna Rizetti, Giovanni Rizza, Carol Rizzardini, Giovanna Rizzetti, Costanzo Robasto, Francisco Robasto, Silvano Robasto, Don Roberts, Donald Roberts, Gracia Roberts, Lynn Roberts, Suzanne Roberts, Hunter Robertson, James Robertson, Maggie Robertson, Marguerite Robin, Allison Robinson, Mary Robinson, Myron Robinson, Patrick Robinson, Robbie Robinson, Dan Robison, Jose Robles, Ricardo Robotton, Francisco Rocha, Rene Rochat, Kathleen Roche, Kathy Roche, Craig Rocheau, Norma Rochelle, Michael Rock Mike Rock, Bonnie Rockwell, Jean Rockwell, Ginger Rodeghero, Linda Rodgers, Tony Rodgers, Jose RodriGuez, Susan RodriGuez, Antonia Rodriguez, Juan-Salas Rodriguez, Martin Rodriguez, Noemi Rodriguez, Gina Rogers, Mimi Rogers, Rick Rogers, Pablo Rohrig, Sabine Rohrig, Helena Rojo, Dennis Roland, Doc Roland, Kay Roland, Kaye Roland, Len Roland, Riccardo Romanini, Romano Romanini, Tiziana Romanini, Claudio Romano, Laura Romano, Patrizia Romano, Jose Romeo, Jose-Manuel Romero, Rocio Romero, Jorge Roncal, Bruno Ronchi, Ricardo Rosales, Louise Rose, Sandi Rosen, Sandy Rosen, Alain Rosenberg, Alain-Frank Rosenberg, Sarit Rosenberg, Charles Rosenkranz, Allyne Rosenthal, Jean Rosko, Gwen Ross, Ron Ross, Rino Rossetti, Alessandro Rossi, Giorgio Rossi, Christian Rossini, Marianne Rossini, Riccardo Rosso, Harry Rostig, Sandra Rostig, Marco Rota, Alon Roth, Bernard Roundhill, Karen Rounds, Cristina Roveyaz, Elaine Rowles-Poole, Susan Royal, Kristina Royce, Richard Royce, Jaime Ruane, Pat Rubey, Michael Rubin, Sy Rubin, Bet Ruddell, Steven Ruddell, Alfons Ruegg, Alfonse Ruegg, Gery Ruegg, Sleven Ruggiero, Guido Ruiu Hector Ruiz, Roberto Ruiz, Linda Rule, Giovanni Rusconi, Sara Russo, Margaret Rutherford, Susan Ryan Eastin, Gerard Ryan, Howard Ryan, Joan Ryan, Corry Ryke, Tony Ryke, Bernardo Sacchi, Bianca Sacchi, Vittorio Sacchi, Doug Sadwick, Douglas Sadwick, Nancy Sadwick, Fernando Sakuray, Marco Salame, Russell Salamon, Kenneth Salazar, Oscar Saldarriaga, Andres Saldivar, Tom Saliga, Mauricio Salinas, Ritva Salmela, Leon Salsberg, Matty Salsberg, Adriana Saltamerenda, Michael Saltz, Landru Salvo, Tony Sampson, Paolo San Agostino, Robert San Filippo, Roberto San Filippo, Alejandar Sanchez, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrea Sanchez, Benites Sanchez, Firmin Sanchez, Gisela Sanchez, Pilar Sanchez, Eileen Sanders, Sunny Sanders, Claude Sandoz, Diana Sandrin, Michel Sansfacon, Paolo Santagostino, Luis Santiago, Pablo Santiago, Alberto Santinato, Mavi Santinato, Graziella Santo, Massimo Santoro, Frances Santos, Hernan Santos, Laura Santos, Roberto Santos, Bonifacio Saponaro, Alberto Sarrocco, Ennio Sarrocco, Mike Savales, Andy Savas, Kathy Savas, Martha Savelo, Saveria Savocchia, Iris Sawtelle, Fabio Scarabelli, Alex Schabes, Volker Schalthoff, Denise Scherer, Guido Scherer, Theo Scherer, Olga Shermayer, Ursula Scherwinzer, Catherine Scherzinger, Denise Scherzinger, Rolf Scherzinger, Clarisse Schmid, Heinz Schmid, Dieter Schmitt, Heide Schnabl, Hermann Schnabl, Susan Schnabli, Anita Schneider, Ingeborg Schneider, Joanne Schnitzer, Ingeborg Schnitzler, Hilda Schoemaker, Paul Scholten, Martin Schonenberger, Jeanne Schrodinger, Hermann Schubotz, Claudia Schuhbock, Inge Schuhbock, Ruth Schuler, Peter Schultz, Dieter Schulz, Joseph Schumacher, Vreni Schurtenberger, Cheryl Schwalbe, Gerhard Schwandt, Carole Schwartz, Joe Schwartz, Pam Schwartz, Robert Schwartz, Judith Schwyter, Giorgio Scialuga, Flavio Sciotti, Jeannie Scoglio, Jeff Scott Jeffrey Scott, Karen Scott, Sonya Scott, Susan Seagal, Jon Sears, Bernadette Segal, Frank Seibert, Rob Seibert, Andy Seidler, George Seidler, Philip Seifleir, Marie Selosse, Jacques Senior, Maria Serato, Vincenzo Servidio, Vincenzo Servilio, Vincenzo Servodio, Jacob Sevilya, John Sexsmith, Mario Sgamarella, Pietro Sgaramelli, Peter Sgroi, Mike Shadowski, Anita Shain Reichenberg, Avishai Shalev, Bill Shannon, Pat Shannon, Hyam Shaull, Wendy Shaw, Rick Sheey, Hanna Shefi, Joanne Shelby, Larry Shelton, Kathy Shepard, Kathy Sheperd, Eric Sherman, Manon Sherman, Martin Sherman, Renee Sherman, Ron Sherwood, Bill Shields, Megan Shields, Chris Shipman, Ilana Shippony, Donald Showalter, Susan Shugart, Gloria Sierra, Joan Sigal, Jan Silber, Marc Silber, Penny Silber, Bruce Silton, Larry Silver, Dennis Simmons, Karen Simons, Tony Simpson, David Singer, Martine Sitbon, Gro Skov, Tina Slack, Benetta Slaughter, David Slaughter, Larry Sliver, David Sloane, Pascal Smakdji, Margaret Smidt Van Gelder, Brian Smith, Dieter Smith, Greg Smith, John Smith, Lena Smith, Louise Smith, Peter Smith, Steven Smith, Jessie Snow, Kathy Snow, Scott Snow, Peter Snyder, Deborah Sobocinski, Lawrence Sobocinski, Flavio Sofia, Tom Solari, Elena Soldati, Liesel Soley, Linda Solomon, Lee Some, Donna Sommer, Ann Sophie Wago, Beatrice Sopprarono, Ronit Soracco, Bengt Sorensen, Daniel Sorensen, Eric Sorensen, Scott Sorensen, Dick Sorenson, Josse-Luis Sosa, Jose-Maria Sousa, Vicki Southard, Maurizio Sozzi, Joe Spencer, John Spencer, Torrey Spencer, Michal Spencer-Smith, Paul Spencer-Smith, Massimiliano Speri, Ann Spielberg, Rick Spies, Jim Spina, Michael Spinelli, Jean Spinner, Fritz Spohn, Maggie Spohn, Bruno Spolenak, Jenny Sprecher, Stephen Spreecher, Luisa Sprefilio Richard Springsteed, Robert Sprungli, David St-Lawrence, Herbert Stahl, Maike-B Stahl, Hansueli Stahli, Darrell Staley, Aldo Stanzani, Roberto Stanzani, Chiara stanzani, Christina Staples, Peter Staples, Velli Stefneki, Rolf Steimer, Art Stein, Paul Stein, Cathy Steiner, George Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Lewis Steinman, Charles Stephens, George Stermer, Jennifer Stermer, Cheryl Stewart, Donna Stewart, Tony Stewart, Egon Stiebel, Edith Stockli, Ilse Storfer, Paul Storfer, Dan Stover, Joe Stover, Peter Stowes Travis Stracener, Betty Stradford, Dan Stradford, Gene Streett, Anne Strickland, Peter Strickler, Bengt Strom, Jeanine Struchen, Dominique Struder, Jo Struthers, Kathrin Stuckenbrock, Marilyn Stuckli, Brian Sturgeon, David Sturgiss, Gloria Suarez de Romero, Alberto Suarez, Denise Suarez, Maria Suarez, Leo Suchor, Bob Sudalnik, Susanne Sudalnik, Bonnie Sue Krumpe, Michael Suggs, Jon Supak, Margaret Supak, Jurgen Suplit, Libia Susana Calvete, Angela Sushko, Lana Susman, Marie Suter, Max Suter, Betty Sutphin, Herb Sutphin, Christian Svensson, Staffan Svensson, Sherry Swanson, Ralph Swarens, Paul Sweeny, Renee Swisko, Jim Sydejko, Linda Sydejko, Francois Sylvestre, Debbie Taffe, Joseph Taffe, Veikko Taivainen, Peter Talbot, Mitch Talevi, Pierre Tamboise, Harry Taplin, Roberto Tarabini, Serge Tardif, Tania Tarpico, Elena Tarqui, Jaime Tauchi, Berndt Taylor, Bruce Taylor, Claire Taylor, John Taylor, Sue Taylor, Pierre Tedeschi, Sylvie Tedeschi, Jaime Tello, Ralph Temps, Grace Ten Oever, Sax Ten Oever, Carmine Terra, Meri Tertelman, Aline Testa, Gerd Teutsch, Peter Thalmann, Laurent Theberge, Len Their, Marie Therese Meili, Yves Thibodeau, Marc Thies, Ann Thomas, Bob Thomas, David Thomas, Dina Thomas, Laurie Thomas, Meredith Thomas, Miguelle Thomas, Pat Thomas, Serge Thomas, Bruce Thompson, Frank Thompson, Raymond Thompson, Anne Thurston, Fatima Thut, Dottie Tillberg, Tomas Tillberg, Tina Tinbri, Chris Tingley, Alain Tizzioli, Don Tolan, Maureen Tolan, Ildiko Tombolini, Kristin Tomczak, Jacqueline Tomlinson, Stefano Tonellotto, Claudio Toppi, Ernesto Toro, Ricardo Toro, Graciela Torres Graciela Torres, Maria Torres, Miguel Torres, Ricardo Torres, Sergio Torres, Silvia Torres, Giullio Toso, Kader Toumi, Larry Trainor, larry Trainor, John Travolta, Nicole Tremblay, Pierre Tremblay, Daniel Tremblay, Anne-Marie Tremday, Angie Trent, Gian-Paolo Trivella, Gigi Troglio, Dave Tropf, Irv Trudell, Irving Trudell, Gunter Tschauder, Hans-Peter Tschudin, Susi Tschupp, Bill Tucker, Bodil Tucker, Stefan Tunedal, Philip Tunison, Paul Turnbull, Bruce Turner, Nancy Turner, George Turney, Andrea Turroni, Rudiger Tuschen, Catherine Tweed, Rusty Tweed, Vera Tweed, Enrique Ugarte, Maggie Uitz, Francesca Ulivieri, Anette Ungerman, Marian Upton, Alessandro Urbini, Mikel Urizarbarrena, Dario Usai, Franco Useri, Charlie Uslander, Ornella Vaccari, Marco Vaccarone, Mario Vaccarone, Marie-France Vachon, Nola Vains, Antonio Valentini, Hector Valenzuena, Jane Van Pelt, Jone Van Hoecke, Marc Van den Lynde, Michael Van Masters, Timothy Van De Pelt, Victoria Van Harasz, Eden Vanning, Manuel Vargas, Anita Vasquez, Cesar Vasquez, Sergio Vavalle, Jean Vavrus, Anita Vazquez, Frank Vedder, Judy Vedder, Enrique Vega, Manuel Vega, Maria Vega, Fredrich Veit, Manuel Velasco, Maria Velasco, Ricardo Velazquez, Jose Veloz, Diana Venegas, Sam Venti, Velia Vera, Yolanda Vergara, Susan Verger, Angela Vescovi, Norman Vespi, Marc Vianna, Anne Vicino, Elaine Vidal, Tania Vilchez, Tom Villaire, Val Villaluz, Jose Villareal Acosta, Antonieta Villareal, Antono Villareal, Jose Villareal, Maria Villareal, Rodrigo Villareal, Rudolfo Villareal, Jose Villarreal, Charni Vilnar, Angelina Vincent, Sylvie Vincent, Margarita Vinyallonga, Mireya Vinyallonga, Vera Vitale, Lore Vlemmings, Bob Voight, Christie Voight, Jon Voight, Steve Vollum, Giuseppe Volpari, Connie Von Adelung, Edith Von Thungen, Erik Vos, Marijke Vos, Sally Voss, Larry Voyer, Beatrice Vuille, beatrice Vuille, Erik Wagel Sorensen, Ann Wagle, Helga Wagner, Tom Waite, Peter Wakley, Marc Walby, Andrea Walker, David Walker, Doff Walker, Estelle Walker, Jack Walker, Jill Walker, Nancy Walker, Peter Walker, Rene Walker, Roger Walker, Rohn Walker, Margot Wall, Janie Wallace, Jim Wallace, Tony Walpert, Siegfried Walser, Marc Walter, Therese Wanner, George Ward, Lana Ward, Laura Ward, Bruce Warren, Jerry Watson, Susan Watson, Susie Watson-Taylor, Barey Wayne Critzer, Art Webb, Alice Webber, Bennet Webber, Carolyn Weber, Gerd Weber, Harriet Weber, Joan Weber, Maria Weber, Patricia Weber, Regula Weber, Winfred Weber, Paula Webster, Edouard Weesely, Doug Weigand, Judith Weigand, Judy Weigand, Scott Weigand, Nancy Weilgart, Peter Weis, Odile Weisgerber, Rebecca Weiss, Kathy Welch, kathy Welch, Brad Wells, Martha Wells, Ted Wells, Heidi Wendel, Janine Wenger, Marcel Wenger, Chris Wertin, Julien Wessenberger, Dorothy West, Kathy West, Kirk Westerman, Peggy Westerman, Jeanne Weston, Anette Westphal, Kjell Westphal, Joanne Wheaton, Bob Wheeler, Ellyn Wheeler, Janice Wheeler, Larry Wheeler, Lydia Wheeler, William Wherry, Tom Whipple, Betsy White, George White, Judy White, Rosalind White, Kurt Wicki, Monika Wieneke, Sherri Wiktor, Ruth Wilette, Peggy Wiley, Virgil Wilhite, Ernie Wilkens, Janet Wilkens, Cary Wilkins, Janet Wilkins, John Wilkins, Bob Wilkinson, James Wilkinson, John Wilkinson, Fran Willardson, Judith Willardson, Judy Willardson, Ruth Willett, Christine Williams, Dick Williams, Elizabeth Williams, Jack Williams, Karla Williams, Peter Williams, Eve Willner, Neil Willner, Barbara Wilson, Curt Wilson, David Wilson, Duke Wilson, Phil Wilson, Rosa Wilson, Ted Winegar, Dennis WInfrey, Gil Winter, Marge Wirick, Barbara Wiseman, Nikki Wiseman, Adele Witkin, Joan Witt, Judy Witt, Else-Margarete Wojan, Meggie Wojan, Nancy Wold, Barbara Wolf, Shirley Wolf, Mary Wolfe, Benjamin Wolff, Tova Wolff, Leslie Wolleinstein, Gus Wollitzer, Aurora Wong, Bill Wong, Harry Wong, Percy Wong, Roberto Wong, Claire Woodruff, John Woodruff, Diane Woods, Michael Woods, Neil Woods, Steven Woodworth, Diane Workman, Heinz Wrege, Sara Wright Lister, Bonnie Wright, Cyndy Wright, Chris Wrightsman, Pam Wrightsman, Bonnie Wubben, Bia Wunderer, Churlya Wurfel, Hubert Wurfel, Kathy Wydler, Verena Wyss, Alexandra Yacoulef, David Yanrenko, Richard Yared, Brenda Yates, Marie Yates, Bill Yaude, Kathy Yaude, Beat Yogel, Jeff Youmans, Ofelia Yunes, Wolfgang Zabel, Alberet Zack, Anders Zacks, Ed Zacks, Marjorie Zacks, Larry Zagler, Bill Zahn, Bill Zalin, Lorenzo Zambelli, Giovanni Zamboni, Arturo Zamora, Maria Zanaboni, Gianni Zanetti, Lucia Zangrandi, Jack Zani, Laura Zani, Pauline Zani, Peter Zani, Gisela Zapata, Rita Zarahn, Helga Zaun, Robert Zchwartz, Susan Zea, Irina Zecchina, Ivan Zecchina, Bob Zeltzer, Jose Zenas, Heinz Zepernick, Alfredo Zetune, Martha Zetune, Andrea Zhinaghi, Ros Ziebart, Edda Ziehe, Helmut Ziehe, Deborah Zimmatore, Peter Zimmatorre, Michael Zimmer, Oreste Zinaghi, Massimo Zocche, Waki Zollner, Diana Zottola, Glenn Zottola, Antonio Zucchelli, Beatrice Zulauf, Kaija Zulker, Paula Zulli, Harry Zunicky, Elena Zurloni, Giovanna Zurloni, Bryan Zwan, Robert Zwan, Kaspar Zwicky, Robert Zwiegers
SCIENTOLOGY MARRIAGE CEREMONY
A CLASS XII WEDDING
DISCLAIMER: This page is not endorsed by the Church of Scientology. In fact, I departed the Church of Scientology in 1992 over repeated disagreements with their secular practices.
The excerpts quoted from the original text whose copyright has incidently lapsed, are used per the fair use doctrine and in accordance to copyright laws.
In late 1992 in Clearwater, Florida and under the personal lead and guidance of David Miscavige himself, I was, along with most locally practicing auditors (auditors in the Church of Scientology are ordained ministers who hear the confessions of their parishioners and counsel individuals according to strict procedures), subjected to “Sleep Deprivation and “Diet Manipulation”. Trumped up charges where then brought up against me and widely disseminated, while I was forbidden to object or even defend myself.
My key disagreements with the Church Leadership were that:
A) Following David Miscavige Lead on what he believes to be an “exclusive communciation line to L. Ron Hubbard”. which continues to this day, more than 20 years after Hubbard’s death, that he has created within the Church and in particular in the Sea Organization (a pseudo fraternal group viewed by the Church as its elite) a Culture of Hatred, where intimidation and callousness are the daily tool of the trade along with Terror for any non-compliance with orders.
B) That the Scriptures of the Church have been subverted under his guidance and that numerous key teachings professed by the Church today are in complete contrast with the beliefs that were taught by the Church when I joined it in the 1970s.
C) I felt strongly that confession of its parishioners should be kept inviolate, contrary to the current Church Leadership beliefs that every past or present transgression must be subjected to a mandatory written up report in triplicate to be later used for entirely secular purposes. As my greatest fears later demonstrated, those reports were subsequently used to coerce donations by exploiting guilt or shame or for more effective means of control. In the more extreme cases, it could be used as ammunition for eventual blackmail. (Why would John Travolta be so terrified about the tought of his folders being kept elsewhere than special room, as opposed to the treatment gotten by “normal” Scientologist? – this a well publicly known and documented fact, but not adequately explained)
Because I have departed the Church and sought to act as a whiste-blower for its unethical activities, I have been repeatedly persecuted by the Church and in their name by some of the more zealot fanatics. Slanderous and threatening communication have been disseminated about me. Nevertheless, I view their impact as rather limited, especially in the view of the Church ghastly and dishonorable repute with the legal system and the fact that the Church of Scientology is the “only religious organization in Canadian history having been found CRIMINALLY GUILTY of BREACH of PUBLIC TRUST.
The following wedding was performed in August 1992, in Clearwater, at the Fort Harrison resort, in the Gazebo by the swimming pool. As a serving Sea Org Member I was not allowed any time-off prior to the ceremony (though I was given a short honey-moon following it). Therefore the wedding took place after 10PM on a Friday Night.
The Ceremony used was the same used by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes for their own wedding: It is called the Double Ring Cerememony.
Perhaps less traditional than other ceremonies, I personally chose it as the most meaningful one.
The ceremony was written up in 1954 by L. Ron Hubbard, right around the time he incorporated the Church of Scientology of California. It is inspired on the Catholic Ceremenoy and incorporates a number of Scientology key principles such as the ARC triangle and the Communication Cycle.
This was not the average Church staff wedding and even though I was at their employ, I had to pre-pay a large sum for the wedding and its reception at a cost that easily rivaled those charged by professional caterers, though the service given was significantly smaller and they had a “crew of one”. In spite of my significantly having been overcharged (by their own contractual agreement, written promises and actual services rendered) and in spite of a number of requests I have never been repaid what was unutilized and therefore due back to me.
Class XII auditors are the highest trained people in the history of the Church. In its 52 years history barely over 50 have been made. Aside those who had already departed the organization, more than 3/4 of the Class XII auditors in existence at the time were in attendance. They attended because they were my friends, not because of status or rank.
Contrarily to Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes wedding, my Scientology wedding whcih was performed by a Scientology ordained minister was considered to be legally binding. Both myself and the minister signed and sent the legal documents to the local Courthouse.
The complete wedding ceremony on DVD is available for a nominal fee. For details send me an EMAIL:
SCIENTOLOGY DOUBLE RING CEREMONY
<>The wedding ceremony begins: The minister officiating is Alain Kartuzinski, a Class XII Snr C/S originally from Paris, France (he was later demoted and degraded by the Church for his participation in the Lisa McPherson scandal – the poor girl died while being physically detained by the Church. Criminal charges were sought by the authorities agaisnt teh Church). <>To my right, Norman Herring a Class XII auditor from South Africa, to my wife’s left: Minty Alexander, a Class XII auditor originally from New York City.
<><>
<>“We are gathered here in the presence of these witnesses for the purpose of legally joining this man and this woman (names bride and groom). If there be any among you who know of any reason why this should not be done, let them now speak, or forever remain silent”
(The above is the opening statement for the wedding ceremony, vastly inspired from Catholic rituals)
<>
“Is your reality of the love you have for (bride) such as you will be constantly creating through health and sickness ; through adversity, as well as good fortune. Can you confront and grant forgiveness for shortcomings as readily as you give praise for all her many admirable qualities?
And have you communicated your love to (bride)? Have you acknowledged (groom’s) love?”
(repeats for bride)
(The usage of Scientology basic tenets are evident here: REALITY about love, CONFRONT and the GRANTING OF BEINGNESS (allowing someone to be who they truly are) are at the core of the Church fundamental scriptures, however distant they may be from current church practice.)
Then may I say to you both; that through your love together with your agreement upon its reality; and by your communication of these two beautiful truths, you have completed the ARC triangle, and thereby consummated the only true marriage; which is beyond the power of any individual or group of individuals to add to or detract from in the slightest manner.
(The ARC Triangle, which stands for Affinity, Reality and Communication, the sum of which gives Understanding is one of teh most basic teachings of Scientology.)
However, the law and custom of our society requires that this union shall be made a matter of public acclaim and record. It is my honor to have been selected by you to perform the ceremony.
The acceptance of an honor carries with it an obligation of comparable magnitude; and I would be remiss in that responsibility if I failed to attempt a contribution, not to what you have already created, which no one can do, but to the permanency of its continued creation on your future time track.
Time Track is the Scientologese term for “recorded existence”. The time track in itself is seen as the continuous record, like a film of the entire existence, including instantts of unconsciousness. Over 55 perceptions are said to make up the time track, including not only sight, hearing, olfactory, but sensations of weight, awareness of others, muscular tension and many others.
Man has ever employed symbols to impress upon the mind, wise and important truths, that these symbols might prove an ever present reminder of the necessity of ceaseless creation of our desires. And I am certain that your one joint desire in present time is that the love you have created shall remain a reality throughout your future years.
Best Man, have you a ring ?
May I have it please ? Thank you.
Maid of Honor, have you a ring?
May I have it please ? Thank you.
(Holding up a ring between the thumb and forefinger of each hand:)
These rings consist of circles; and the circle has been an emblem of permanency to man since time immemorial. In fact, it represents time and space—which are without ending.
I want you to look upon these two emblems and mock up the ARC triangle in the centre of each.
Have you done it? Thank you.
The above shows why this is called the Double Ring Ceremony. It is considered by most Scientologist the best Ceremony and is the favorite by most.
As long as these emblems remain with you, I want you to see that triangle in their centre as a reminder that the reality of their symbolism of permanency will hold true only so long as that triangle remains unbroken. 1 should like to see you make a pact between you that you will never close your eyes in sleep on a broken triangle. Heal any breach with the reality of your love through communication. If you will do this, these emblems of your greatest desire in present time will remain a reality throughout your future time track.
What precedes is a fundamental rule applicable by all and one of the secrets of a long living marriage: Never go to sleep over an upset with the other, but rtaher try to resolve it first.
<>
On the front row from left to right: Alan Stave, Rick Alexander, Hank Bourland, Carole Schwartz, Lisa Rentschler.
Second Row: Rick Sheehy, Carolyn Webb, Vic Fazio.
Third and fourth row: Richard Reiss (Flag Snr C/S), Cala reiss, Edy Lundeen. Bodil Tucker
(Groom) Will you take this ring and with these words, place it upon (bride)’s finger.
“With this symbol of my love, I take thee, (bride) As my true and lawful wedded wife”
“I pledge thee to keep this love, Ever living, ever real”
(The same vow is repeated by the Bride)
And now, in the name of the Church of Scientology … and by virtue of the powers vested in me by the state of Florida, I declare you (groom) and you (bride) to be truly and legally, Husband and Wife. I will ask that you seal this ceremony with your lips.
And I will ask these witnesses present to join me in blessing this ceremony with the postulate that the trust and love of the present shall become ever stronger with each passing year.
Did you do it ?
Thank you.
If you want to find out more about Scientology you can opt to check one of the few dozens Church owned propaganda sites, check one the many thousands of sites antagonistic to it (some rabidly so) or check mine, where I have tried to depict as impartially as possible what the Founder of Scientology, the Scientology Philosophy and the Church stand both in theory and in practice and how all three do not always align one with the other.
About my qualifications: my Scientology training and experience spans several decades.
The current leader of the Church (David Miscavige) is documented as having the accomplished following Scientology tarining and processing levels: Provisional Class IV auditor (basic training level), A very partial and Incomplete Organizational Executive course. Incomplete on OT 7, yet has been allowed to read and contribute to the creation of OT8. Has not been interned as an auditor by another more experienced or Hubbard trained Case Supervisor or auditor.
In contrast, my training is the highest available in the Church (Class XII auditor, only a handful were ever made), Full Organizational Executive Course (OEC), all volumes, Senior Data Series Evaluator Course (a course no longer offered by the Church, dealing with Quality Control – a course I did under the guidance of Suzette Hubbard) and OT 7 completion (My Solo NOTS completion certificate is #801. Completion No 800 was Alycia Danilovich), I have trained, been interned and been graduated with the HIGHEST POSSIBLE HONORS by every leading authority (both past and present) in the Church. Among people who graded and passed my auditing with flying colors are: David Mayo, Ron Shafran, Jeff Walker, Ray Mithoff, Hansueli Stahli, Carolyn Webb, Richard Reiss, Ann Glushakow, John Eastment, Alain Kartuzinski, Peter Buttery, Gelda Mithoff and David Miscavige. This includes every single Class XII C/S both past and present, except for Otto Roos (he left the Church before I became an auditor)
Third Partiers
“Quarrels between an individual and an organization are nearly always caused by an individual third party or a third group. The organization and the individual should get together and isolate the third party by displaying to each other all the data they each have been fed.”LRH
KR-Third PARTIERS: Patricia Krenik, Trey Lotz, and Catherine Zoltan!
I URGE YOU TO DISPLAY ALL THE DATA YOU HAVE BEEN FED BY THE THIRD PARTIERS!
One of the rumors widely spread by the third partiers is about the training of the Ls and about the Ls materials. The falsehoods are meant to create conflicts in the FreeZone and deviate PC from their true purpose to go up the bridge!
NONE of the existing FreeZone organizations had ever offered to host Pierre and help PCs to receive services from a Class XII. NONE of the existing FreeZone organizations had ever helped Pierre to deliver training to auditors. On the contrary, with rumors and falsehoods their staff sabotaged Pierre’s plans and the funding of a Training Center.
Pierre wanted to start a training center to deliver standard training to auditors, however, no one in the FreeZone wanted to contribute or help with this initiative. Rather individuals associated with the FreeZone and the Church would engage in spreading rumors and directly sabotage Pierre’s efforts to provide quality training to others as per the LRH standards.
Constant attacks are originated by THIRD PARTIERS fraudulently making others to believe that the Ls and the Standard Scientology Technology are doomed to extinction with the departure of the Class XIIs auditors. THIS IS NOT SCIENTOLOGY! The THIRD PARTIERS are so badly out-ethics that they no longer believe in Scientology. The Technology will take care of its own LEGACY through its own evolution and through truly devoted Scientologists who have gained new abilities in the upper levels. Gaining those abilities that will enable to save the technology is the purpose by going up the bridge!
Certainly, an out-ethics individual will make you believe that you will not remember anything from this lifetime. This fraudulent falsehood is because an out-ethics individual is not able to evolve until resolving their own out-ethics situation. The one who is well trained and follows good ethics standards can and will be able to deliver the Ls! The only one to be wary are the fraudsters out there.
Be aware of the TRAPS of this Non-Scientology doctrine that are only designed to deviate you from your true purpose and are meant to sabotage your BRIDGE! Third partiers also sabotage your bridge by using you as informants and pushing into questionable ethics.
Third partiers are NOT to be BELIEVED!
RIP Димос Цакирис
На фото слева направо:
Верхний ряд: Цакирис Димос Христович (доцент, к. т. н.); Волошенко Светлана Вадимовна (старший инженер); Орахелашвили Баграт Мерабович (доцент, К. Т. Н.); Вавилова Светлана Дмитриевна (ведущий инженер); Давыдов Александр Иванович (доцент, к. т. н.); Драгомиров Дмитрий Валерьевич (к. т. н.)
Средний ряд: Зюбин Игорь Александрович (доцент, к. т. н.);—;Островский Валерий Леонидович (доцент, к. т. н.); Панкратов Сергей Николаевич (доцент); Пятигорская Елена Исааковна (доцент, к. т. н.); Дунаев Александр Николаевич (старший преподаватель); Бакунин Юрий Анатольевич (инженер)
Нижний ряд: Голубев Владимир Иванович (профессор, д. т. н.); Белаш Иван Григорьевич (доцент, к. т. н); Грибков Александр Михайлович (доцент, к. т. н., зав. кафедрой); Емцев Борис Тихонович (профессор, д. т. н.); Моргунов Геннадий Михайлович (профессор, д. т. н.); Зуев Юрий Юрьевич (доцент, к. т. н.)
НИУ “МЭИ”Институт гидроэнергетики и возобновляемых источников энергии Кафедра
Гидромеханики и Гидравлических машин им. В. С. Квятковского
В 1945 г. еще до окончания войны Правительство издает постановление об открытии в МЭИ гидроэнергетического факультета (ГЭФ) в состав которого вошли новые кафедры: гидравлики, гидроэнергетики, гидравлических машин и гидротехнических сооружений…
Helping Michel Snoeck
At 20:50 2006-11-24, you wrote:
Dear Michel, I stumbled on your site while doing some
research.What got me there is your comments on the Cramming
Series.Indeed serious outpoints exists.
I believe I may know some information that you seek.
About Authorship of bulletins: To make a long story
short LRH was a busy Man. His tendency to micromanage
everything and to literally run all of Scientology
management and Orgs took a tremendous amount of his
time. So starting from about 1971, he would give
briefings and orders and get the bulletins written by
others. Sometimes the instructions were rather general
such as “Revise Cramming Series so and so”. “There
should be a sign…” Sometimes he would dictate
virtually the entire Bulletin, or other times (in
particular for checklists or longer compilations or
for checksheets) he would give a general order. The
task of the RTRC Unit (LRH Research and Compilation
Unit) was then to write the issue complety in
accordance to all written HCOBS, orders, advices and
other points. This was a very complex task and
required a lot of work. At any rate final approval was
ALWAYS GIVEN by LRH. His actual handwritten signature
was required on the document to allow it be printed
and the a copy of the first mimeo run was ALWAYS SNET
TO HIM by messenger who was always waiting in mimeo.
(I worked in Mimeo Flag myself, before I became a Flag
auditor).From 1971 onward over 50% of the bulletins were
written that way. From 1973 onward 90%, and from 1976
onward everything was recorded on a dictaphone. Only
access to the original recordings would tell what were
his actual words. To make things more complicated,
these dictaphone tapes can be a hodge podge of 20 or
more subjects. For example, on a tape he starts by
telling someting about NOTs, then the next section is
about letter writing, how to run a course, then orders
to the Flag Bureaux, Instructions about his clothing
and room requirements, data on the cramming series,
more data on NOTs, etc. There is a literal mountain
of those tapes in existence. Some of them have even
been destroyed for various reasons. (mainly legal
worries).So depending on the viewpoint, LRH did write or didnt
write those. This is where common sense and most
important, knowledge of fundamentals becomes
important, because anything that is correct will align
with the tech. For example posting up a slogan in an
appropriate location: “CRAMMING IS THE KEY…” seem
to me to be a good idea, whoever wrote it. NOBODY but
LRH would have ever originated such anyway. Policy on
tech lines has always put Inventing tech as the worst
possible heresy. Contributions by others were mainly
at the level of explanations, compilations and
technical details, never at the level of fundamentals.There is an actual confidential COLRHED (Central
Office of LRH Executive Directive) named “HOW TO WRITE
AN LRH ISSUE”. I have read it during my days at Flag.One of the thing that is a the top of the list of
Priorities of anything published or revised bearing
LRH signature is to “remove what may prove to be an
embarassment to LRH”. The idea is that an admission
of any error or mistake, no matter how small or
insignificant would undermine LRH. This idea is
applied with a vengeance by current leadership of the
Church and scapegoats are continually located to
explain any contradiction or faux-pas. Also the
criteria for “embarassment” has been tremendously been
raised higher over the years to the point that the
name of any Scientologist has been deleted from tapes
or bulletins, lest they later be declared or some
such, or if further experience demonstrates that a
revision of the bulletin is necessary.This has gone as far as removing minor stumbles or
flubs in LRH auditing demo tapes. Even some
acknowledgements have been altered from later
revisions to “make them sound better” and more in
alignment with more recent HCOBs.If you are looking for LRH materials there is a huge
amount of it floating around in the Scientology
underground. All written Scientology materials ever
published are available in digital format. Over 2000
lectures exist in MP3 format, many made from old reel
to reel tapes. Hundreds of copies of those exist as
there are thousands of people in those underground
movements.Best Regards
Pierre Ethier
Class XII
REVISITING THE MHC
INTRO
The 1982 San Francisco Mission Holder’s Conference has been recorded in the blogs and memoirs as being a milestone in Scientology’s history. I’ve read those years of ’82-’83 being compared to Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation from the early 1500’s. What the history books did not record, so much, is that the Conference was not just a single, one-off event. The original Conference was held at the S.F. Hilton Hotel on Oct. 17, 1982. During the weeks that followed, it was repeated, several times around the SF Bay area, for general staff and public. In the 1st or 2nd week of November that year, one of those replays occurred at the San Francisco Org. By the absolute chance of being in the right place at the right time, without knowing anything, I was able to sit in on that MHC replay and I watched the whole thing go down as it did. It was the very first “Scientology event” I attended. That was 39 years ago. I’ve told what I saw, bits and pieces of it, to a few people since, but haven’t written it down before.
Everybody who has spent time in the CoS and left at some point, whether they walked away or were pushed, has a story to tell. Everybody. These are usually war stories as it goes. The way I see it, the more time in you’ve spent and the further up the Bridge you’ve progressed, the bigger your story. I think of these people as having a certain amount of “Scientology Street Cred” when it comes to their efforts of trying to achieve what Scientology has to offer, while at the same time dealing with what the Church of Scientology has to offer (which would be “outpoints”, to put it mildly). Many people have a lot more of this “street cred” than I do, especially those Mission Holders themselves. I’ve known some personally and I’ve read the stories of others. I don’t claim much myself. I moved through and out of the CoS relatively unscathed. What little I might have relates to being a spectator at what history says was a watershed event; something above my paygrade at the time and one that I was completely ignorant about in the moment. It was akin to starting my bridge in the middle. As I’ll tell in this report, I never learned what that event even was until 23 years later ( thanks to the internet…didn’t the internet allow some of us to confirm what we were always suspicious about regarding the CoS before the internet? ).
At the recent request of some fellow Scientologists, I’ve put together some notes from various sources about The 1982 San Francisco Mission Holder’s Conference itself, how I came to sit in on a replay of it, what I saw then and what I’ve learned since, and the conclusions I’ve reached about it today.
A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE
I won’t go into a long description of the original Conference, as a simple web search will turn up results. I will put at the bottom of this report a few links to what I think are a few good articles. The description that is referenced the most comes from one of the Mission Holders who was there at the Conference, Bent Corydon. His book, L Ron Hubbard: Messiah Or Madman, gives the best feel for how things occurred. The Conference took place between representatives of the Senior Church Management at the time and the various Mission Holders that delivered basic Scientology services as a feeder route to more advanced services delivered by the Orgs. The purpose of the Conference was for Management to inform the Mission Holders that they were no longer going to conduct business as usual. The Church was going to exert more direct authority over them. There was a new Sheriff in town, and it was time to show’em who’s boss. Their contracts with the Church were restructured and their autonomy was taken away. Instead of being independent franchises, they were now part of a larger corporation. Legally speaking, the Church was going to use threats of Scientology copyright and trademark infringement against the Mission Holders, enforced by teams of RTC Inspectors sent into the Missions to interview personnel and review their operations. These teams would be paid for by the Mission Holders at a price of $15,000.00 a day. Fines and even jail time would be levied for violations. Exerting intimidation into the Mission Holders was a major purpose of the meeting. The Conference was intentionally delivered with overbearing brute force and bullying. According to different accounts, 4 attendees had been expelled and Declared SP at various points during that weekend. One of them was Declared because he refused to sit in the front of the room. The impact was delivered very effectively but was actually fueled by some events several years earlier which gave Church Management the “soft power” needed to really pull off what they did.
A FEW THINGS THAT LED UP TO IT
10 months earlier in Florida there was a smaller conference between Management and the Mission Holders that did not sit well with LRH. There had been tension and mistrust already developing between both sides. Back then, the Missions had much higher income than many of the Orgs and were considered by public to be a nicer place to do services at. During this time, David Miscavige had convinced LRH that the Mission Holders were turning on him and stealing public from the Orgs, thus denying those Orgs revenue from delivering services. David had basically turned LRH’s opinion of the Missions against them. The 1982 San Francisco meeting was sanctioned by LRH and driven by a sense of revenge against those Mission Holders.
Veteran Los Angeles field auditor Trey Lotz explained in an interview to Andy Nolch that in the bigger picture, the Church’s troubles with the IRS in the 1970’s were really the major mover to taking over the Missions. The Church knew that losing a lawsuit to the IRS could wipe out them out completely. They were still fighting the loss of a major lawsuit in Portland, OR and many other lawsuits were on the horizon. It became time to shore up the bank account. Prices for public services began to increase in the 70’s and the ultimate jackpot was to be found in the Missions: that was where the real money was at. Once they were taken over by the Church however, they began to decline and many eventually dismantled.
HOW I STUMBLED INTO IT
At that time, the San Francisco Org was just a cool place to hang out for me. As it was, having just moved to S.F. in September that year, I didn’t really have much of any other place to hang out. I made friends there pretty easily. Even the ones who were trying to cop a stat out of me (use me to raise their statistics) were still my friends. This had me casually sitting in the lobby on the sofa one night in early November looking at a magazine, perhaps. It was already dark outside, but suddenly I noticed that there were a lot of people coming in the front door and walking straight to the staircase leading up to the 2nd floor Div. 2 Academy. Many of them had white uniforms on. I didn’t know what the Sea Org was at the time. I think it was the Day Staff PES, Martha Kerchen, who began to join them walking up stairs. As I watched this, she waved me over and said “Hey Dave, c’mon”. She was inviting me to go upstairs with them. Having nothing better to do, I went along. When we got to the Academy, there wasn’t any room inside that I could see from the back. It was filled with public, probably close to 100, as the Academy room there was pretty big. There was obviously some sort of event that was going to take place. I must have been somewhere else in the Org when all these public individuals poured in during the hour before. Not having a chair to sit in, I just sort of hung by the door and when the event began I found a small book shelf partition in the back corner of the Academy to lean on. There might have been a stool there I sat on but by the time it began the place had become standing room only. The front of the room had several long tables lined up end to end and the 10-15 Sea Org members conducting this event sat next to each other like the Supreme Court. Adjacent to their table was another long table set up with maybe 6-8 e-meter stations assembled across it where a mass group sec-checking session was going to take place. When the speaker, a tall guy with a mustache, began talking he just went into his monologue without much of any friendly welcome, hello, glad you’re all here tonight, etc. It was straight down to business. I kept my mouth shut and figured I was just supposed to watch whatever this thing was. It felt like there was a lot of seriousness going on.
DAVID MISCAVIGE WAS THERE, BUT SAID NOTHING
While waiting for the event to begin, as I stood in the doorway, I watched the remainder of the white uniformed Sea Org Members march past me to the second entrance at the far end of the hallway. They all had a no-nonsense look on their faces as if they were there for some real business. That is, all except for one of them. One guy, much shorter than the rest, stood out to me as I watched him walk past, and was the only one I would remember aside from the main speaker. He didn’t look serious at all. In fact, he sort of had this carefree, happy-go-lucky look on his face. Instead of staring straight ahead as the rest of them did, he was glancing up at the ceiling, turning his head side to side to look at the upper corners of the hallway. He seemed to be having fun, perhaps because he knew what another power trip the whole event was going to be for him. That guy, I’d realize years later from pictures and video, turned out to be David Miscavige. He was the Master of Ceremonies at the original Conference, laying down the law and talking tough. He had personally expelled Mission Holder Kingsley Wimbush and his wife there. At this replay however, he stayed silent and just observed.
I WAS GIVEN PERMISSION TO BE THERE
After the speaker took a few minutes to give his opening remarks, he asked the audience if there was anyone in attendance who was new to Scientology or, perhaps, not a Scientologist at all. I was the only one to raise my hand. He looked at me in the back corner and asked me how long I had been in Scientology and what services I had done up to that point. I said I had been in for about 5 weeks and had done 2 basic courses: The Ups and Downs of Life and The Personal Integrity Courses. I also said that I had received 5 hours of Book One auditing. He paused, looked down at his notes and said “Alright, you can stay”. I was in.
“THE SPEAKER” WAS CLIVE DODELL, DEP. INT. FINANCE POLICE DICTATOR
The International Finance Dictator who spoke at the original Conference was Cmdr. Wendell Reynolds. I don’t know if he was there at my event. However, I learned in 2013 from a well known OT8 from Norway that this speaker was Reynolds’ deputy within the Int. Finance Police unit. Towards the end of the event I turned to Karen Houk, a Foundation staff member who was sitting close to me. I said “Karen, what’s that guy’s name?” She didn’t even turn to look at me. She just stared straight ahead at him and dead panned to me “Clive Dodell”. In hindsight, I think Karen knew what was going on with this event and wasn’t happy about it. About 8 years later or so, during the winter of 1989 to 1990, I would see this same guy once again. I spent that winter training at Flag. The FSO Chaplain at that time was a tall, dark haired lady named Jackie Dodell. One day in a hallway within the Ft. Harrison I saw Jackie and Clive walking together side by side. They may have been holding hands. I recognized Clive right away and figured they must be married.
WHAT EVERYBODY GOT LECTURED ABOUT
Since the the attendees at this event were public Scientologists and local staff members, they didn’t get yelled at and beat-up like the Mission Holders did. It was a little less “in your face”. Still, the tone and narrative dealt to them was delivered as if their lives and all eternity depended on getting the message and following through on it. The whole thing seemed to drag on and on. I didn’t know what most of it was in reference to. Only 2, maybe 3 Sea Org members spoke in total, but Clive did the most of it. I can say that compared to the original Conference, it did not have the lawyers and legal explanations of the Church/Mission restructuring that had just taken place. They did discuss the importance of KSW though, and that was the major thrust of the meeting. The following points I can remember pretty well:
1. The Declare of Mission Holder Kingsley Wimbush and the jeopardized status of his Stevens Creek Mission was very much discussed at great length early on. He was the biggest squirrel of them all at the time. Kingsley was Declared for promoting a squirrel technology within his mission that he referred to as “De-Dinging”. I’ve linked to a description of what this tech was at the bottom of this report. Ironically though, he had one of the most upstat missions in California.
2. The Ruth Minshull book, How To Choose Your People, was ordered to be removed from all the Org book stores. That book was not LRH, therefore it must have been squirrel. I could be wrong about this, but the removal of all the Board Tech Bulletin volumes was also ordered to take place. Don’t quote me on that though.
3. A bunch of people, no more than 15 I’d say, were at one point ordered to walk over to the table at the far wall and get a metered sec-check about something which I don’t recall exactly. It probably had to do with whether they had any withholds about being a squirrelly, covert-operator somewhere along the Org/MIssion lines.
4. A good handful of senior Org staff members and/or public who were well up the Bridge at that point were ordered to fly to Flag the next week to do training. This included the KSW course and perhaps the OEC Vol 0 course also. The FEBC may have been thrown in there as well. This was to be paid for by each individual at a cost of $12,000, at least.
5. Just like in the original Conference, they Declared a guy for not taking a seat up front when asked to. I’ll have more to say about that below.
I HAD NO IDEA WHAT I WAS WITNESSING
In the days leading up to the meeting, there was no discussion, notice nor promo about it that I saw or heard around the org. It must have been promoted through call-in, because the room was already filled with 100 people, it seemed, once I got up there. After the event, no one told me what it was all about and I didn’t really think to ask anyone. I never heard anyone else talk about it either. I really just forgot about it from that point on because there was no significance assigned to it for me. It was only…”only !!” 23 years later in 2004-05 or so when I read Jon Atack’s book, A Piece of Blue Sky, that I began looking at it again. In Jon’s book, he devotes an entire chapter to the Mission Holder’s Conference. Much of it is taken directly from Bent Corydon’s book. As I was reading that chapter, I began remembering what I saw in 1982. There were things told in that chapter that were nearly identical to the things I had seen. Too many and too similar to not make any connection. Still, there were also a few things that were not congruent to my memory. I couldn’t reconcile the differences but also could not assume that the parallels were just coincidence, either. I wasn’t sure what to make of it all. In the year or two that followed after reading it, I would occasionally get on the web and do a search in various forums, ESMB type boards, blogs, etc and try to find out more about the Conference. Every deep dive came up short until I finally discovered one single forum post from someone that said the MHC was repeated, for general staff and public, several times around the Bay area in the weeks that followed Oct. 17th. So that was it. That’s what must have happened. Still, though, it was just too baffling that they would expel and Declare a guy in the original Conference for refusing to sit up front and then have a chance to do the exact same thing again in a replay. In 2021, after reading Ron Miscavige’s book Ruthless, I figured out why.
SOMEONE GOT DECLARED WITHIN 15 MINUTES
At the beginning of the event, but toward the end of the speaker’s introductory comments, there was a man in the back of the room standing with his back against the wall. He had an open chair in front of him but chose not to sit down. As the speaker looked to this guy across the room, he told him that he would like to fill the chairs in the front row and requested that he come forward and take one of the available seats up there. This guy in back just shook his head and said “No”. There was a bit of defiance in his voice as well. The speaker at that point paused, looked down at his notes, then looked back up at the guy and said the following: “Ok sir, you are hereby Declared Suppressive”. It was just like that. The guy in back didn’t react. He didn’t say anything. He just continued to stand there with his head still held high and looking forward at the speaker. No one in the room said a word. No one even looked over their shoulder at the guy. The air was thick and heavy, as it was for most of the meeting. Probably everyone in the room knew what had just happened. That is, everyone except for me. I was brand new to Scientology. I didn’t know what ethics were, let alone what being Declared meant. From the way that exchange went down with the guy in back, apparently it was something consequential. Not to me, though, at least not at that time. I distinctly remember what was going through my mind when he said that. I was thinking to myself: “declared suppressive…declared suppressive…what does that mean? Is he saying that he officially thinks this guy is a jerk?” I’m not kidding. It sounds funny in retrospect. It isn’t funny to those who want to be in Scientology and get this shot at them as a weapon, as the CoS has been doing on a regular basis since the late 1960’s. As the speaker moved on with his presentation, the guy continued to stand there for another 15 minutes or so, after which he left the room.
THIS DECLARE WAS MOST LIKELY FAKED
In the last chapter or so of Ron Miscavige’s book, he makes reference to a series of meetings held by the Church in 1982 regarding the Mission Holders. He tells how some were Declared on the spot so as to intimidate all those in attendance. This was really the first formal acknowledgement I’ve read that the Conference was several meetings and not just one. Within his book, he also tells a few stories about how his son David had seemingly engineered situations to look like something they were not. The one that stood out to me was when he described being in David’s office with him and a CMO treasury messenger walked in on them to deliver David his weekly staff pay: $30.00 cash paperclipped to a receipt. The ploy was for David to make his father Ron think that David was paid no more than the rest of the Sea Org members. Ron Miscavige tells how he wasn’t duped by this at all. Within 5 minutes of reading this narrative near the end of the book, I began cogniting on what I saw myself in 1982: The Declare of that guy standing in the back of the room was staged. He actually was sitting down at the immediate beginning of the event and then stood up within the first 5 minutes or so. I don’t remember for sure if the speaker even asked him what his name was. The guy didn’t move or say anything after he was hit. It didn’t seem to phase him. It was like he didn’t care if he was Declared. Up until 2021, I figured that guy maybe was even daring them to Declare him, thinking they wouldn’t do it again after the first time. If so then that’s why it didn’t seem to bother him. I’m not so sure now. Today I’m 90% certain it was all an act. That would be consistent with how they intended to intimidate the Mission Holders using real Declares, just weeks earlier. It would be consistent with the story in Ron Miscavige’s book, as well as Mark Headley’s book, Blown For Good, about the Musical Chairs incident at the Int. Base which was meant to scare a bunch of S.O. members into fearing they were going to be deported out of the Base. It would also be consistent with how Mark describes David Miscavige always obsessing about the next World Tour Event, trying to create over-the-top impact for the audience. That would be consistent with the pictures I’ve seen in Source Magazine of all these New Ideal Org openings where the crowd outside is obviously photoshopped in, so as to mislead the viewer about how big something is when it really isn’t.
I’m sure most of those who have worked with David Miscavige would agree that PR and imagery are paramount with him.
THE CONFERENCE WENT GLOBAL AND HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF
In 2019, I took a trip to Israel to visit The Dror Center. That is a modern day Scientology Mission-like group that delivers the entire Bridge. They’ve been around since the early 90’s and were able to deliver successfully under the Church as a regular Mission until they left in 2012. They’ve been even more successful after 2012. One of their auditors, Aviv Bershadsky, I was able to sit down and talk with. I told him at one point about my experience that I’ve described here and he said something that surprised me at the time: The Conference was also replayed at St. Hill in the U.K. In retrospect now, that made sense. It was believable to hear this coming from Aviv. With Dror being a part of Scientology’s European network, perhaps he has talked with people either in or out of session who have had ties to St. Hill at some point back then. I would think he’d be in a position to know something like this.
The Dror Center struck me as one of the closest things today resembling what the successful Scientology Missions in California were like from 45 years ago, in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. If Dror was around back then, it would definitely be on The Church’s take-down radar in 1982. It’s interesting to see that 30 years after the MHC, the Church still had no problem letting go of another successful Mission. I can only guess it’s rooted in the fact that David Miscavige didn’t directly control it. When Dror left the CoS in 2012, the story of their break was no more amicable than those of the earlier Mission Holders. My comments above about “Scientology Street Cred” come to mind. I’ve linked to their website below in which they’ve posted several articles that detail their own story and many other success stories as well. Recently, Dani and Tami Lemberger, the founders of The Dror Center, reported on their website as having their highest statistics ever in 2020, when the COVID-19 global pandemic had travel across Europe greatly restricted for much of the year.
David H. Fennick, May 2021
LINKS
https://www.xenu.net/archive/audit/missions.html
http://www.sc-i-r-s-ology.com/documents/1982-10-17missionholders.html
http://www.iscientology.org/scientology-blog/384-what-de-dinging-actually-was
How to build a successful auditing business
Have you wondered why some look so disparate and unattractive by flooding social media with advertisements but at the same time unable to gain the business needed to even sustain operating in an ethical and safe manner?
If you try to “close the deal” by bragging about your accomplishments and material possessions, you won’t get very far but just attracting the wrong crowd of losers. However, if you learn to honestly share the reasons WHY you are passionate for your work, then you can leverage from an opportunity to connect with your prospective public on a deeper spiritual level.
Successful and spiritually wealthy public is mostly attracted by what you do because of why you do it. Dangling the carrot of free service is hardly attractive to the successful crowd, rather what attracts them is your dedication to spiritual freedom or dedication to achieve the states of beingness promised by L. Ron Hubbard.
Successful and spiritually wealthy public somewhat care about your training and credentials as they build credibility and trust. What they care the most about is your ability to learn about their goals, their priorities, their expectations of value and hence coming up with a solution and a good C/S Program that aligns with their definition and expectation of value. Successful public buys your product or service because they see how it helps them either solve a problem or achieve their goals.
You need to focus on why THEY do it and what frustrates them in achieving their goals. Don’t offer your solution, just listen and don’t always agree automatically. Establish a dialog you can build on. Wealthy public are not buying a commodity, they’re choosing a partner to entrust with something critical to their business.
Pierre Ethier about his training and ability to handle potential PTS situations
I left Flag through the front door, after completing all the requirements that were asked from me (including getting sec-check by an auditor who had just been declared a suppressive). I left the Flag Land Base under amiable terms.
That auditor was declared Suppressive for allegedly doing out-tech on John Travolta. He audited me at length on Sec-checks and FPRD. Perhaps I was expected me to somehow become PTS to him, since he was still under his suppressive declare during our sessions together, since the suppressive is traditionally supposed to do in the people they audit.
I had been personally drilled and individually coached within an inch of my life on Sec-checking by IG Tech and Senior C/S Int. I was the first auditor to successfully go through this program of being a -PERFECT sec-checker-. This was a requisite for doing the New OT VIII Eligibility check on the OT VIII hopefuls for the Freewinds Maiden Voyage in 1988. They had disregarded the fact that the end product of that course was my unequalled ability to detect and recognize any and all manifestations of Overts, Withholds and Evil Purposes on everyone I dealt with. (including Senior Management, RTC and others).
I had produced in the vicinity of 25 000 Well Done auditing Hours in my career as an auditor, which was substantially more than any auditor had ever done at the time, anywhere. All my pcs (with virtually no exceptions) were rave (and still are) about their wins and were smoothly progressing up the Bridge. I have always found the experience of auditing very rewarding, when I have seen how much people can change and improve their lives for the better.
RIP – Adam Holland, 1988-2019
Scientology Diconnection iniside the Church and in the Free Field is yet anothe evil.
Adam Holland, a former Canadian Sea Org member who went public about the Sea Org’s degrading conditions after leaving the organization in 2009, took his own life in Toronto Subway on February 17. He was only 30 years old.
Adam was born on August 8, 1988, into a Scientology family. His mother’s brother, Peter Byrne, is still today Executive Director at the Vancouver, B.C., Scientology org. His mother, Denise Byrne, met Paul Holland at the Toronto church.
His mother Denise was our friend. We met Adam only once during her funeral in Toronto. It was a very sad even full of meaning. The room was full with members of the community who had very kind words to say. We wished Adam was to reach out to us for help. IHis dad had discinnected him , his mom was gone.
For various reasons, Adam himself wasn’t very involved in Scientology until he was about 18 years old, but then he soon joined the Sea Organization, signing its billion-year contract in 2007. He spent some time getting trained in Los Angeles, but spent most of his time in Toronto where, in 2008, the Anonymous protests against Scientology happened, and Adam saw Scientology’s executives panicking. Security was increased, and the already stifling life of total dedication in the Sea Org became even more claustrophobic. By Christmas 2008, when he was denied permission to visit his family but he went for a week anyway, he was having serious doubts about Scientology.
He left the Sea Org in 2009, but then laid low until he really got himself into more trouble: He helped a former church member get a message to her twin sister at the Toronto org. The church also discovered that Adam had been posting criticism of Scientology online.
He was declared a “suppressive person” in March 2010, which meant that Scientologists who wanted to stay in the good graces of the church would have to cut off all ties with him.
“You’re going to have to leave,” his father told him. (By then his mother had left Scientology, and she didn’t disconnect from her son.)
“What can they take now?” he told MacLean’s magazine in 2012. “They’ve taken my dad, my home, my identity, my religious beliefs—everything.”
In 2013, he lost his mother, Denise Byrne .
“It’s been five years since she passed away but only this year was my mind ready to process the grief,” he wrote “So I wrote about how she was there for me after the SP declare took Dad from me. This short piece about her represents the first time I have been emotionally ready to honor her role in my life after Scientology – and even still it is hard for me to read over it without crying.”
November 1, 2016:
“Dad, you’re gone, you’re really really gone. And I miss you, so so much! I just awoke from a very upsetting dream in which I was trying so hard to reach you. Calling out into abstract darkness, I shouted “dad, dad!” but you did not answer.
It has been 6 years since my father disconnected from me. Day-to-day I am able to carry on, but in dreams like the above, it all comes back to me, even with the passing of time. I am diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder that stems from the process of leaving the Scientology corporation and the enforced disconnection of my father. He might never talk to me for the rest of his life. I could have kept my mouth shut and stayed with him, but I know that would not have been the right thing to do.
I still remember the day my declare was official. It was the weekend, and my father was at the Toronto Foundation organization studying. Two HCO staff came to the house and showed me the declare, asking me to read it while holding tightly onto it to make sure I didn’t take it from them. (I think their tight grip on the paper was actually more revealing of their awareness of wrongdoing than it would have been if I had obtained it and shown it to the press). Then later that evening, my father arrived home in a really sad state. I remember how he told me that I would have to leave, he was almost crying.
I was really close to my dad. I lived with him from birth until being recruited into the Sea Organization for two years, and for a year following that – until the disconnection. I felt more than just a father-son connection. There was a sense of alliance where I wanted to help him as much as he helped me. When we were tight on money, I refused to ask him for new things or even a weekly allowance, so that he would have the best chances of paying off debt. I never imagined life without him. It happens often that I wake up from a dream about my younger years, only to realize that he isn’t there anymore.
My father really didn’t want to lose me. Even after he discovered that I was using the ex-Scientologist forums, he was still willing to be there for me, and to allow me to live under his roof. He never ratted me out to Scientology, and I was only declared after OSA found out through their own Internet monitoring activities. Despite his allegiance to Scientology, he didn’t report to them about me and that showed his true love for me. That’s what makes this disconnection such a tragedy.
I could have kept my mouth shut. I could have stopped visiting the forums and never ordered Nancy Many’s book or Marc Headley’s book, I could have pretended to be a good little Scientologist and I would have been able to maintain living with my father. He probably would have helped pay for a university education. There were a lot of ‘smart’ reasons to keep my disaffection from Scientology a secret. But, as I told the reporter for Macleans’ magazine in a coffee shop one day, I ask myself it it would have been right. The answer is always no.”
In a video he recorded just a few months ago, Adam talked about how much depression he’d been dealing with. He also talked about his father remaining in the church.
In a 2012 letter Adam wrote to Scientology leader David Miscavige and made public. It seems a fitting memorial to a young man who refused to stand by and watch abuse happening around him.
Mr. Miscavige,
My name is Adam Holland. 24 years ago I was born to Scientologist parents, raised a Scientologist, and joined the Sea Org in 2007. After two years I became aware of the use destructive mind control techniques on Sea Org members by various seniors, including Sigourney Bergeron and CMO Canada staff. This includes isolation from outside family members, interrogation and ‘scare tactics’ such as threats of disconnection from family.
Later in 2009, after I discovered on-line reports which made it clear that not only does this behavior occur in all CLOs over the world, but that this abusive treatment is most extreme at INT. My father, Paul Holland, mentioned that he would write to you to have this matter resolved. In a final meeting with Yvette Shank, CO OSACAN, she spoke to me about the reports. On the matter of your personal behavior, she told me that that you appeared “friendly and caring” after briefly meeting you some time ago. She refused to believe that the reports could be true. I don’t wish to discuss the credibility of the sources, as I am an eyewitness to the treatment of Sea Org members, including the intimidation tactics used by “Mr. Z,” your RTC representative in LA. Rather then address these concerns, anyone who has made such a report has been declared a suppressive person, including myself. The enforcement of disconnection tears families apart, and causes untold hardship for those affected.
I don’t know if my father ever wrote to you, but the declare certainly has not been ‘handled’ and I miss him very much. David, I have never written to you about this, quite honestly, because I am sure that you don’t care about me and my family, or anyone else. If you aren’t doing anything about the mind control and intimidation in the Sea Org, and if you aren’t doing anything about the torn families, then I must conclude that you approve of and support these destructive actions. You are not operating behind the scenes anymore, you are now under the watch of the general public. It is about time you took some responsibility in these matters. Taking responsibility may include turning yourself in to the Police. It will take a lot of courage, but it would be the most honorable thing you could do
Sincerely,
Adam Holland
Third Partier Trey Lotz cought in the act of attempting to create yet another conflict
WALL OF SHAME!
We wanted to make you aware that Trey Lotz has been generating conflicts in the free field and had been attacking our marriage spreading Third Party on Pierre. We find it to be extremely insulting that Trey asserts that a Class XII cannot apply the basics of Scientology and handle a PTS situation. We have been always trying to be helpful and assist to people to reach out and communicate, however Treys 3P has generated DEV-T to a proportion over the top. His PCs would come with attacks and insults forwarding Trey’s enemy line even between sessions with Trey.
Pierre’s health situation is related to the need of surgery and other treatment he did not get after a severe accident due to the Church getting his funding for medicals. The accident happened while Pierre was on staff at the Church and much before his marriage. He had no money to pay for the treatment as he did loan money to parishioners for services at the Church and the loans were never repaid. Also he had given money directly to the Church that were never returned. Pierre was also abused as a staff at the Church and almost died. His wife helped him to leave the abuse. Pierre has been very vocal about the importance of family relations. ( link)
Unfortunately some have found an opportunity generate further abuse using social media and Third Party to generate hatred and conflict. Please be aware of SMEAR and ABUSE by individuals that are up to no good and crossing the line of personal privacy!
Below are series of messages where Trey Lotz is attempting by a Third Party and destroy our family. He is even involving in his SMEAR our son.
Trey’s 3P amounts to a manipulative covert attack on Pierre. Why?
Trey spreads vicious rumors asserting for 10 years that Pierre is stupid and does not know how to do PTS handling. Moreover Trey would not even try to help, but just would go onto generate upsets in the Field instead.
THIS IS A DIRECT INSULT ON CLASS XII!
Trey was very disrespectful, arrogant and selfish when he wrote a disconnection letter to go on to blamed Karen De La Carriere as a Third Party (3P) and her backchannel messages to have resulted in his decision to disconnect with Pierre. In other words Trey Lotz admits to have lied in his disconnection letter and was aiming to create conflict between Pierre and Karen. Now out of the blue Trey blames Pierre’s wife. The real reason tho is Trey’s cover up out outech and his resistance to correction.
Moreover we wish no relation with anyone connected with Trey as it just results in DEV-T.
Why Trey does not HELP but instead had chosen to smear Pierre’s marriage?
If Trey was ever concerned about Pierre and his marriage , he could of offered marriage counceling or to help another way. Instead Trey Lotz, who in not in the business of helping people, had chosen to disconnect and spread BLACK PR. This Trey used to create yet another conflict by promoting HATRED!
What does Trey Lotz do when he feels a comrade is in trouble ? Deserts him. This is a breach of the code of Scientologist. Trey Lotz is truely no longer Scientologist , he is constantly mixing practices.
TREY LOTZ HAS BEEN GENERATING CONFLICTS IN THE FREEZONE!
Recently Trey Lotz have been called upon his training and his materials due to many PC complaints. Trey has also been using Pierre’s name in relation to his training and his materials. Trey Lotz has been using Pierre name for marketing purpose and to generate business without Pierre’s permission. This is in breach of California’s legal statues. More over saying half truths Trey Lotz has been misleading his public. Pierre has attempted to train Trey Lotz but Trey failed and did not complete the training , he disconnected to avoid cramming and correction. Pierre has given to Trey some of his own notes. The main motivator for Trey is GREED. This is a link where others seem to have been having similar experiences with Trey Lotz/ Albert.
Evidence of SMEAR by Trey Lotz ( Albert F. Lotz , III)
Aida De Thomas Published messages from Trey Lots:
I just got a private message from Trey Lotz with third party about Pierre Ethier who has trained him on the Ls.
There has been a dispute between Pierre and Trey for years that has not been resolved. I know nothing about except that Pierre was his C/S and they had disagreements about some alleged out tech from Trey and they ended up disconnecting.
There was never an ethics handling, standard Chaplain’s court, cramming or even a third party investigation.
Sending natter and third party about someone is something that is not welcomed in this group. We are available to help anyone who has disagreements in private.
Lakis Agrogiannis
...and the truth shall set us free, Trey Lotz
Aida De Thomas
Trey Lotz you never said Pierre was the best auditor you ever had. You mentioned instead he was nasty and you disconnected from him. Below are the exchanges of communication about Pierre! I still don’t know why out of the blue you sent me that vitriolic message. You and I never talked about Pierre, so out of place you nattering about him to me!
Why? Are you trying to enturbulate me? You won’t! Whatever your purposes are they’re not theta!
—————————————————————————————-
Further 3P and attacks by Trey Lotz
Trey Lotz is not a Scientologist. Instead of helping he is trashing people. Instead of believing that the ” Man is Good” , he is all worked up and negative and sees nothing good in the very people who always had tried to help him.
I find it to be extremely insulting that Trey asserts that a Class XII can not apply the basic of Scientology and handle a PTS situation. This is a direct insult on Pierre! But there is more, Trey went into animosity and targeted Catherine Ethier over single meeting over no data. Now you can undertsand how Trey delivers the Ls – with no data.
Trey Lotz fabricates conversations with Pierre that never happened and then couples this with personal insults on Catherine. He feeds on gossip and aims to fail the very person who once offered him a helping hand. Trey makes phony claims to have disconnected from Pierre but then keeps sending informants to spy on Pierre and report back to Trey.
Now that Trey Lotz is out of tricks , he puts words in Pierre’s mouth spreading blatant LIES:
Read carefully the above message by Trey Lotz. Now Trey is mixing up religious practices and instead of having the person go through a standard processing Trey Lotz is postulating and telling “he would be chronically PTS” of his wife , but also Trey admits that he is doing negative EVIL eval and inval based on no data. FLUNK on Trey Lotz . THIS IS NOT SCIENTOLOGY.! This is an INSULT on a CLASS XII! Instead of helping his comrade in need, what does Trey Lotz do? Abandons him, disconnects him. What is even more disgusting is that Trey Lotz feels proud of violating the Scientologist Code of honor and abandon people in need. Flunk !
Now one thing to tell about Trey Lotz and his lack of OT abilities. To be an OT one has to be at cause and produce an amicable effect on others. Whining and complaining that someone did not like you is one more proof that you suck as an OT solely by producing the effect of others disliking you. One more FLUNK!
This is how we see Trey’s poor excuses. Class XIIs had to overcome mountains of resistance , live in substandard conditions , work hard to become flubless auditors. This is LRH’s test of character and integrity. On other hand Trey Lotz is whining like a child: ” he wife did not want him to train me” . Trey Lotz is not at cause , he chickens out at the first minor obstacle. He does not want to train , he does not want to cramm. Trey is a person who accepts defeat and keeps whining.
Perhaps it is prudent Trey Lotz to look at his “backyard” first before trashing people for no reason. The third partier Trey Lotz is using a nickname, while his real name is Albert F. Lotz, III . Trey has been generating conflicts using 3P and spreading rumors backchannel. He is accusing others in what he is doing himself. His wife Nicci is also using a nickname . Both their names are on a public records, hence none of this is a private information. One wonders why is Trey so concerned if others are using nicks names,
Once again , Trey Lotz is incapable to apply Scientology basics and to amicably solve issues. He would rather use discinnection instead of Ethics gradients, sink into the blame game and finger pointing coupled with Covert Hostility. Instead of helping Trey will watch and find faults where none exist. Trey is TOXIC and poisons everyone around him.
- Trey Lotz There is no Kiki. Why do you tolerate a fake account? You know that is against Facebook rules. She is being a hidden instigator. I am not going to play that game and you shouldn’t either.
- Cuitlahuac Rivas GonzalezFacebook has not considered that Kiki is a fake account. The topics Kiki brings up here are valid topics.
- Trey Lotz But YOU know it is fake. Don’t you? Tell the truth.Is there any other reference to Kiki Budera anywhere else in any list of Scientology completions, anywhere? No there is not. Are the photos on her home page of her? No they are of an actress named Minka.Like LRH says in policy, if a person coming into an org won’t sign in and reveal their name, they have something to hide.
- Cuitlahuac Rivas GonzalezLRH used several pseudonims in his fiction writing. Kiki’s photos of Minka were deleted. Kiki’s Facebook profile has not been proven false.
If Trey is scamming the FreeZone using Pierre’s name and you are afraid of the Protection Racket so much that you are spooked when I speak my truths about it. That’s OK also. I am sorry that you have to live surrounded by people who operate with threats and feel the need to lie to you. I count my blessings every day that I don’t have to take my pictures with degenerates but with decent people. I am only blessed to be in a better environment where I am surrounded by a better quality of people. I also understand the challenges you experience.
The Secret of Flag Results
From Pierre Ethier
Pierre Ethier Class XIISun 2007-12-16 12:44
- ifachat@yahoogroups.com
Someone used to say he was the voice that shouted in the desert when faced with the obtuseness of Man.
I am not at all comparing myself with that philosopher, but sometimes I have such a feeling toward a segment of the FZ.
I will simply sign off on this topic for the sake of anyone who may have been confused by some of the recent posts, by stating:
Intolerance of out-ethics is not a service fac. If it is then LRH who was far more intolerant about out-ethics and out-tech than I have ever dared to, would be the person with the most Service Fac in history and if this was true, then shouldnt we all be labelled insane on this list for following his lead?
For 30 years I drilled and trained to have NO CASE ON POST to be upheld by LRH trained Class XIIs and those he had turned his hat to.
Perhaps because I have a higher awareness level, since I can view implications in statements that others appear not to see: for example attacking my state of case or condition is a direct invalidation of my auditors and C/Ses who happened to be LRH handpicked Class XIIs, therefore it is not only an attack on Class XIIs in general but on LRH as well.
When I talk to people in discussion group I exclusively talk to them either as Senior Tech Terminal or an Ethics Terminal (Senior Tech Terminals and those who wear part of LRH hat are responsible for putting ethics in in their immediate area: see Volume Zero). I never talk out of my case on any dscussion group.
Further my aim in reprimanding or exposing out-tech or out-ethics has always been one to help, even the misguided, though my having a positive impact is sometimes only a long shot. In spite of advices to the contrary, I feel that mildly roughing up idle persons on a fast sinking ship so they get jolted into action and toward safety is a more ethical course of action than “smiling and being nice to everyone” while quietly watching them all go down with the ship.
This is why I never did nor will I endorse Squirell practices, even when they are “popular” or “speaking against them makes enemies”.
I have always judged Squirrel practices as out-tech because of my technical analysis and the Data Series, not because of any alleged case response by me or others to it, just in the same way a chemist can state that products laced with LSD or Cyanide are bad without the need to try them on self or others first.
If some people see me as Service Facy or “wrong” or “out-PR” because I dare step on some toes in order to light the rocks they are heading toward, it is a price I am more than willing to pay. Not everyone will avoid the rocks, of course, but some, because of me, will avoid them.
At the end of the day, this is in my book, a more worthy reward than winning any popularity contest.
Pierre
“An auditor is most successful when he has achieved an inexorable self-confidence in himself, in his tools, in his attitude toward the pre-clear and in the results he means and determines to achieve.” LRH
GREED AND VIOLENCE – HALLMARKS OF A MORTAL WORLD
In a vast universe containing billions of galaxies, and billions upon billions of stars, can be found one pretty ordinary spiral galaxy, the Milky Way. In the outer reaches of one of the galaxy’s spiral arms there resides a singularly beautiful, but deeply-troubled world orbiting the main sequence star known as Sol.
Earth’s troubles arise from the actions of just one of its species, a decidedly self-centered life form, sick with its fixation on its own mortality. The individuals within this population generally act as if they care for their own offspring, much like their fellow species, but there the similarities end.
These creatures, men, are not the only self-aware lifeforms on planet Earth, but they generally disregard their fellow species as if they were. Collectively, they generally show little interest in the welfare of other living things–-in it’s place burns a passion for using other organisms as god-given resources, raw material for what suits man’s selfish purposes today.
And man’s purposes amount to getting what can be gotten while the getting is good–-because men (so goes their creed) will not pass this way again. And it is this concept, this accepted frailty, that underpins all of man’s culture. It is the fundamental circumstance around which all human actions, decisions, plans, and dreams are built.
Too many of these self-appointed “sentient” creatures care little or nothing even for the welfare of their brothers or sisters–-especially if they happen to reside outside the same self-assigned class, politics, race, or philosophy. Only among humans are brazen individuals driven to accumulate more than they need, to exterminate, enslave or subjugate their fellows purely for the sake of greed and power–-to ultimately corrupt a once-pristine planet into a wasteland incapable of supporting even their own living grandchildren. And all in an insane effort in denial of their own avowed mortality, as if by vast ownership (and scrawling their brash trademarks on every rock) they can negate the inevitable as they rush the world headlong into ruin.
It was the short-sighted fanaticism of those blinded to the needs of the future, by their own imminent mortality, that created the Earth we know today. An Earth where terrorism is fueled by a specious hereafter where wholesale slaughter is to be rewarded. Where greed is fed by opportunity, not necessity, in pursuit of wholly unearned wealth. Where no opportunity to extract wealth from the ground is overlooked. In the end, fundamentally altering the very climate and environment of man’s only home without a thought for others, let alone for their own generations yet to come.
In a more perfect world, what would it be like if humans knew they were immortal and acted so? Would they be undertaking truly great works, works that spanned generations in their creation? Would the concepts of hunger and poverty even exist? Would Man have long since reached the stars, not having expended countless generations of young lives and untold resources in his never-ending history of violence? Might he be behaving as the proper steward of a world whose welfare was acknowledged as being linked inextricably to his own?
Would men still be killing their fellows to silence witnesses to their crimes? Or taking responsibility for their destinies–banking for their futures, rather than greedily picking the bones of their departed? Would the dead still be taxed. Would the followers of another faith still be killed when the perpetrator’s particular Almighty would not be rewarding him in a gilded end that would never come? Would insane cowards still be drugging and otherwise manipulating the gullible, including women and children, into carrying out crimes they themselves are too timid to commit? Or might The Golden Rule one day become the usual way of life for planet Earth?
Sadly, only Man, of myriad species, behaves as if he believes in his own mortality.
A monarch butterfly knows how to begin and finish a migration that takes five generations to complete–a migration it has never personally experienced. A songbird, hand-raised from an egg by humans, still goes out and builds its characteristic nest, sings its characteristic song. An orb-weaver spider, displaying spectacular feats of engineering, spins marvelous creations often many meters across–-that it has never personally witnessed in the making.
Man’s best friend, the dog, descended from the same Pleistocene ancestor as today’s grey wolf, is at birth habituated to humans beyond all explanation. It reads Man’s gestures, expressions, and intentions without being taught. A standard poodle will go on point (raised paw and all) in the presence of prey—not a wolf behavior, but training as a pointer instilled in a former life. Dogs turn and look where humans point–while a chimpanzee, reputedly Man’s closest genetic relative, instead advances and smells the pointing finger. None of these are examples of heredity, or instinct, or evolution. No biological hereditary mechanism has yet been isolated that otherwise explains these examples of understanding without this-life training or experience.
Earth science is rigged to negate any reality beyond pure mortality. The mere suggestion of the possibility of a spiritual component in behavior, from within the scientific community, would meet with instant and utter ostracism. The scientific method itself negates anything but objective evidence, even when the act of communication between its adherents is based solely on subjective understanding, not chemistry.
All nonhuman creatures are functionally immortal. Even Ockham’s razor cuts to a truth religiously ignored in the sciences. The simplest explanation being that innate understanding in an organism’s behavior is what it appears to be–-something they’ve done before–not some convoluted chemistry born of a necessity to negate the spiritual, immortal behaviors of living things.
The fact is, non-human creatures come back. They reorient and pick up where they left off. They arrive with experience that they obviously remember. What is it about humans that we do not?
Copyright (c) 2016 Carey J. Burke
All Rights Reserved
Trey Lotz to Marty Rathbun
From: Trey Lotz
Sent: September 2, 2009 6:31 AM
To: Marty Rathbun
Subject: Ls
Hi Marty,
Someone brought to my attention that Rey Robles was quoting you regarding the Ls materials. I’m sure he twisted what you wrote, but it was to the effect that the Ls materials were hard to follow, but Rey’s interpretation was that this proved that the RTC “Fucked up” the materials.
.,,,,,,
I’ve learned a lot of important data about the Ls which I wanted to relay to you. As far as Rey Robles goes, he audits the Ls using a pack that was written from memory by Russ Meadows a good 15 years after he was declared by LRH, and it is very incomplete, especially L10.
There are 6 different Ls packs in the Freezone. Pierre has the only one with all the original data in the right sequence, and complete. The Ls materials were written in 1970-71 and were never revised by RTC. If RTC screwed it up in any was it was in executive csing and the whole FNs fiasco. But that isn’t why the materials are hard to follow. They are hard to follow because, as you know, the basic actions of the Ls are straightforward, TWCs, D/Ls, L&Ns, and O/W. The materials only give an outline of the level, but a lot of data about how the Ls are actually put together and run are in the LRH C/Sd sessions which have never been available in the Freezone. It is for that reason as well as others, that the Ls are often botched in the Freezone. Auditors try to run them as a read it drill it do it action where they actually omit the drill it part, and a lot of these guys aren’t very good auditors in the first place and so they either botch the actions or badly quicky the whole thing. “Big win=Oh that’s the EP.” They leave 90% of the gains on the table.
Pierre not only studied the CSs that the Ls auditors study, but he called for all the original folders and studied them as to follow up and results, as well as subsequent LRH comments, none of which is on the Ls course. The Ls are actually many rundowns, each of which has an EP, as well as several alternate or additional handlings that can be done under various circumstances.
….
I’ve really learned a lot, and there were several points where, if I had not had an experienced Ls CS, I would not have known what to do.
……
When PIerre has gotten in other auditor’s face, it is because they have badly messed up a case or are delivering a very substandard product when it comes to the Ls, which are Pierre’s baby.
I wondered if you have had any 3P on Pierre? I ask, because Pierre said he had emailed you 3x and hadn’t heard from you. He is
aware that you are auditing/repairing the Ls, and he is very willing to be a terminal on that as he really wants to see them done right and pcs to get the full gains available from them, gains which are considerable. Repairing them blind is particularly tricky. I know you are a good auditor and have studied the materials, so maybe you know all this, but in case you didn’t, I wanted to share this with you.
Trey
From: Trey Lotz
Sent: September 5, 2009 8:36 AM
To: Marty Rathbun
Subject: Re: Ls Marty,
I don’t really want to speak for Pierre. You could get a better answer if you ask him directly.
However, I can tell you my own experience last summer. Pierre was going to train Aida Thomas, Tommy Thompson and myself on the Ls while he was here in LA.The Goals Mini Course, a series of 32 tapes, is a prerequisite for the Ls course, and Pierre asked me to do that, which I did. The other prerequisite for studying the Ls is having done the Ls.I did that as well, so I was ready to go.
(Note:This is Trey’s view and there are other prerequisite. This statementm and sme other statements are not entirely accurate)
Aida on the other hand, never did did the course, and neither did Tommy. Aida also had no interest in doing the Ls herself, she said she didn’t need them,and Tommy just didn’t make it go right to be here to do the training.
……
A few months ago Pierre tried an experiment when he let two auditors audit L11. These were lower classed auditors with some experience, and he wanted to see if they could audit L11, which is the most straightforward and easiest L to run. Both of them botched it terribly. I know that some auditors have gotten frustrated with Pierre because they have demandedthat he turn over the Ls materials to them. But these auditors were completely unqualified, and became abusive to boot when Pierre declined to give them the materials.
If I was to venture a guess as to why Pierre doesn’t give the materials to anyone or everyone, it is because he doesn’t want to see the materials misused or pcs screwed up by havingit delivered by incompetent auditors. I think it is as simple as that. I think that if someone is a proven standard auditor and is willing to do the work, and is willing to be C/Sd, Pierre wouldn’t have a problem with training them or C/Sing them on the materials. I’m sure that someone with your experience and skill would be someone Pierre would be more than happyto work with.
One could make the argument that the material is out there in some form, even if it is incomplete or altered, so some people will just get it off the internet and audit it. That may be so, but then whatever happens is on them. But, as I said in my last email, even though Pierre has the original HCOBs, all the data from the LRH C/Ss are not in written form anywhere. One other piece of data is that Pierre has made it a point to contact all the the Class 12s that he could in order to get as much data as he could about how LRH C/Sd the Ls when he was directly on the line.Otto was a particularly good source as he was the first auditor LRH directly trained on the Ls, and Pierre did quite a bit of auditing on Otto about a year and a half ago and got to know him very well. There were two whole rundowns dropped from L12 after LRH was off the line and Flag moved to Clearwater! Amazing.
I am sure that Pierre would be glad to get into comm with you. He is in Brazil right now, but should have internet access. I would also like to hear your comments on the Ls as well.
ARC,
Trey
Meeting with Terril Park
From: basic basic / Terril Park
Date: February 7, 2009 8:59:10 PM PST
To: Trey Lotz
Great stuff. 🙂 I met Pierre about 10 days ago, and from my point of view was a lovely meeting over a long lunch. I actually felt he would be a safe terminal as an auditor which I really didn’t expect. He may have had a different view, but I think he enjoyed the comm as I did. It seemed clear getting into controversial areas could be problematical so I didn’t. Breaking news you may have seen me cross post to IFAchat, Marty Rathbun appears to now be an FZer! bb |
The efford to recreate the Ls plus refence materials
Pierre wrote:
Dear XXXXX,
unfortunately I am not acquainted with tech people in ANZO except for XXXX and XXXX. There are several CLass XIIs in NZ,
but they are literally hiding, and I doubt they could be amenable to audit
I did the NVRD course and listened to all 22 tapes. Better yet those tapes
were the “Masters” not a copy.
I still have my notes from the lectures.
Pierre
p.S thank you on the info on the 3SACC, I guess I have everything availble
to the FZ.
>From:XXXXX
>To: Pierre
>Subject: Re: 3rd SA ACC.
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:16:03 -0800
>
>Hi Pierre,
>Re: 3rd SA ACC.
>
>Glad to help anyway i can.
>I can reproduce and send you a glossary of the definitions for 3rd SA
>ACC., if this is of service to you.
>
>The source of the defintion is the master_glossay.pdf
>There are two transcript dates for 3rd South African unpublished Appr
>GLS (19.3.92) & (14.4.92) according to the master glossary. I assume
>compiled for the cassette series.
>(3SACC = Reproduced on cassette for the South African Rundown Auditor
>Course.)” I can reproduce the glossary of the definitions, if this is of service
>to you.
>
>I have enjoyed reading some posts i have found of yours over the last
>year.
>May i ask two questions of you?
>
>One, Have you heard any of the 22 tapes by LRH from 1975 called New
>Vitality Rundown?
>
>Two, i am wanting to get into session, do any setups and then go OT and
>looking for a standard auditor/cs in australia [prefer melbourne] for me
>and a friend, both clear, both have M1 and class 0 training. FANZA does
>not have australian based terminals. I am a Flag trained [1986-7] course
>supervisor. Can you refer a comm line to me if you know of any here in
>Australia? I would also like to continue my auditor training too.
>
>Regards
>XXXXX
>On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:00:44 +0000, “Pierre Ethier Class XII”
said:
> > Dear XXXXX
> >
> > From your answer you seem to have either transcripts or a glossary for
> > the
> > 3rd SA ACC.
> >
> > I have been unable to find those anywhere since I left Flag.
> >
> > The 3rd SA ACC tapes contain information crucial to the theory and
> > understanding of L-10 and I was interested in helping some of my peers
> > review them.
> >
> > Any help you could provide on the matter would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Pierre Ethier
The Ls delivered
Pierre Ethier Class XIISat 2007-10-06 7:23 PM
To:
- ifachat
Anyone can deliver the Ls.
I know several Class IVs who do.
In Milwaukee there is even a non class auditor who does.
Of course some of their suicidal pcs have repeatedly called me in the middle
of the Night begging for help since… (this is the reason for the entire
upset of my most vocal critic: his spinning pcs contacted me and he went
into a fury, which has not abated since).
If you dont mind getting “transitioned” (a concept nowhere in the Tech) onto
a New OT Rundown rather than completing cycles of action first, or if you
are one one of those who think that C/S Series 1-10 are a pile of hogwash
(and therefore think that Major actions rather than than standard repair are
the tool to use to repair case, than I am sure you wont mid getting the Ls
from anyone from anyone.
Of course, perhaps you will not mind either the auditor reading you ‘the
rights of a Being” (from technique 88) mid session as a form of Pep talk
when you fail to reach the EP of a process…
Or perhaps you think that telling yourself or part of your case using “Tone
40″ is the way to get to a higher state of awareness. (LRH and I call that
NOT-IS, but purveyors of “new ideas’ call it “Standard tech”
In Tape of 6 June 1971, which is the only tape where LRH explains the exact
details on how to audit L-10 and L-12 he makes it clear as to who can and
why.
A your L auditor if they listened to it. When and where? Until 1982 there
were only two copies of that tape plus a master. I would be fascinated to
learn where the person listened to it.
The thing to ask your L auditors is the following:
What are the setups for the Ls.
What is the Goals Mini COurse and what does it consist of? Have you done it?
HINT: The Goals Mini Course is the last course done before Class X. By
actual experiment each and every auditor who did not do it, failed as a
Class X-XII.
Every single impostor I have asked what is on the course could not correctly
mention a single item from it.
What does the Flag only HCOB “Auditing and C/Sing Flag only Rundowns say
about Ls delivery and programming sequence.
What does LRH say is the greatest High Crime for an L auditor?
What is L-11 Expanded? What does it do? When is it run Why?
On whcih L is Plus/Minus a vital step? Why?
What is the fundamental technology L-10 is based on?
Who trained you to deliver the Ls?
Where did you get the materials or do you have the Russ Meadows version
(apparently deliberately alterised with RTC blessing and leaked on the
Internet many years ago to “spin cases in” by altering procedures and
sequence (Russ was declared suppressive by LRH in 1976 for chronically false
reporting. There is a 1976 HCOB about him.)
Snake Oil merchants wont be able to answer most of the questions properly.
Tech wont go in, when Ethics is out.
Natter, personal attacks about someone’s character, carping 1.1 sarcasms,
refusal to get corrected and inability to recognize the differences between
past foes and someone who indicate out-tech as he sees it, are the primary
symptoms of Missed Witholds. Behind Missed Witholds one will always find
out-Ethics.
In my book anyone reckless anyone to be audited by someone showing those
outpoints, deserves what he gets. Since Birds of a feather floxk together,
only the out-ethics pc will seek the out-ethics auditor.
This is why I now leave out-ethics auditors alone: they are busy burying
themselves. I do not need to return their attacks any further.
Pierre Ethier
>From: “standardtechauditor”
>Reply-To: ifachat
>Subject: [ifachat] Re: The Ls delivered
>Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:05:58 -0000
>
>I approved this posting, Tim. It’s interesting that the same mesage
>was just posted by a “Virgil Tibbs”. You are not Virgil as well, are
>you? Or is Virgil a proxy for you?
>
>On another note, I didn’t know Class VIIIs could deliver the Ls. I
>was under the impression one had to train on the specific Class X,
>XI, and XII courses. Have Mary and Franklin now trained to Class XII?
>Or have I misunderstood your post?
>
>Re your wins, I know you’ve experienced quite a few, and I believe
>your wife has as well. I’m happy for that
>
>Chris
>
>
“Tim Roland” <xxmech@.
> >
> > Have you ever wonder what it would be like to be audited by Mary
>Sue
> > Hubbard or Ron the Old Man Himself? How about being on course when
>Ron
> > was lecturing personally at Saint Hill or at the first Class 8
>course?
> > I have wondered and wished for it many times.
> >
> > You can get the Ls delivered with the same intention. Have the
> > unadulterated original materials, delivered flawlessly superlative
>by
> > Mary and Franklin Freeman.
> >
> > Mary was personally trained on the Class 8 Course with Ron.
>Franklin
> > speaks of his training at Saint Hill and on the Apollo with Ron. It
>is
> > as close to source as you can get!
> >
> > Yes, it is an experience that is worth the effort to own.
> >
> > Most gratefully,
> >
> > Tim Roland
> >
The true test of an OT
Pierre Ethier
The true test of an OT is in ability to “DO” and to make it go right.
Criticism is an admission of an INABILITY to change and therefore is an INABILITY to make things go right
Seeking Revenge is a form of Inverted Effect (you cannot seek revenge without admitting having been the adverse effect of someone). Hence anyone engaged in Revenge or the dramatization of Evil Purposes, is taking a toboggan ride away from the state of OT.
LRH had it right when he said the ultimate victory against critics is to Florish and Prosper.
Legacy
> 2007 has been a banner year for me:
>
> Ls completions: 39
>
> Upper Level completions (non including Ls): 14
>
> Clear OTs: 2
>
> Rehabilitated Scientologists (people who contact me
> having either lost their purpose of being the severe
> effect of ARCX with Scn or CoS): 115
>
> New people contacting me for services, training,
> general inquiries or starting something in their
> areas: 227
>
> Number of cities visited where I delivered: 7
>
> Number of countries where people are currently on my
> lines: 17
>
> Number of New people disseminated to (never been on
> a Church lines) who showed a genuine interest in the
> Subject: 22
>
> Pierre
Intolerance of out-ethics (Reprinted)
Pierre Ethier Class XIISun 2007-12-16 12:44 PM
To:
- ifachat
Someone used to say he was the voice that shouted in the desert when faced with the obtuseness of Man.
I am not at all comparing myself with that philosopher, but sometimes I have such a feeling toward a segment of the FZ.
I will simply sign off on this topic for the sake of anyone who may have been confused by some of the recent posts, by stating:
Intolerance of out-ethics is not a service fac. If it is then LRH who was far more intolerant about out-ethics and out-tech than I have ever dared to, would be the person with the most Service Fac in history and if this was true, then shouldnt we all be labelled insane on this list for following his lead?
For 30 years I drilled and trained to have NO CASE ON POST to be upheld by LRH trained Class XIIs and those he had turned his hat to.
Perhaps because I have a higher awareness level, since I can view implications in statements that others appear not to see: for example attacking my state of case or condition is a direct invalidation of my auditors and C/Ses who happened to be LRH handpicked Class XIIs, therefore it is not only an attack on Class XIIs in general but on LRH as well.
When I talk to people in discussion group I exclusively talk to them either as Senior Tech Terminal or an Ethics Terminal (Senior Tech Terminals and those who wear part of LRH hat are responsible for putting ethics in in their immediate area: see Volume Zero). I never talk out of my case on any dscussion group.
Further my aim in reprimanding or exposing out-tech or out-ethics has always been one to help, even the misguided, though my having a positive impact is sometimes only a long shot. In spite of advices to the contrary, I feel that mildly roughing up idle persons on a fast sinking ship so they get jolted into action and toward safety is a more ethical course of action than “smiling and being nice to everyone” while quietly watching them all go down with the ship.
This is why I never did nor will I endorse Squirell practices, even when they are “popular” or “speaking against them makes enemies”.
I have always judged Squirrel practices as out-tech because of my technical analysis and the Data Series, not because of any alleged case response by me or others to it, just in the same way a chemist can state that products laced with LSD or Cyanide are bad without the need to try them on self or others first.
If some people see me as Service Facy or “wrong” or “out-PR” because I dare step on some toes in order to light the rocks they are heading toward, it is a price I am more than willing to pay. Not everyone will avoid the rocks, of course, but some, because of me, will avoid them.
At the end of the day, this is in my book, a more worthy reward than winning any popularity contest.
Pierre
“An auditor is most successful when he has achieved an inexorable self-confidence in himself, in his tools, in his attitude toward the pre-clear and in the results he means and determines to achieve.” LRH
RECENT SUCCESS STORIES
RECENT SUCCESS STORIES ( republished)
(From people that were recently Supervised or Counseled)
REVIEW COUNSELLING
I have been so busy enjoying my wins and my life after my NOTs Review, that only now am I writing this belated success.
Prior to my Review, I was concerned and introverted by some of the situations I have to face daily in my life and in my job.
Since then, the exact opposite is true. Not a week goes by, without manifesting my increased skills and ability that just makes things go right.
My heartfelt thanks go to my Case Supervisor, Class XII Pierre Ethier, and to my auditor.
I have been so busy playing bigger and bigger games that I had overlooked thanking them appropriately until now.
Through the years, I had actually become the adverse effect of a few unscrupulous business men. I had done several thousands of hours of unguided Solo NOTs auditing and was slowly going nowhere.
Prior to my Review, I had experienced some wins and even a few occasional Floating TAs, but there was no change in my chronic conditions and in my life problems.
Since then, as the months fly by, my gains each day appear completely stable. My games are each month bigger and bigger.
I derive great satisfaction from it, and from a true return of my powers. It is even fun to watch those who acted until now Suppressively getting tired of failures and shrinking, and starting to change their ways.
Needless to say there are significant material and monetary rewards as well…
My review was nothing but a complete standard application of the tech per the C/S Series. It blew any false datum I ever heard that incorrectly states that NOTs is either inflexible, robotic or does not address what someone needs and wants. A completely tailored NOTs approach cracked my case in hours. NOTs is actually the most flexible Technology in existence and can be made to very precisely tailor any case and anyone.
Not only is my case cracked but my chronic breathing disorder is gone!!!
In the hands of a true expert, NOTs, a Technology much maligned because of its obvious misapplication, actually perform miracles when done correctly by someone who is a true expert.
I will never be thankful enough
T. A.
upperbridge.org
INTRODUCTION
Definition of a Whistleblower: (from the American Heritage Dictionary) One who reveals wrongdoing within an organization to the public or to those in positions of authority in the hope of reforming it.
I have worked for and with the Church of Scientology for over two decades, assuming various posts and eventually reaching the Highest training level (Class XII) achieved by only a handfull few. During that time I was able to experience first hand the numerous paradoxes and conflicts within. The same organization has been professing the highest possible humanitarian goals and has provingly helped, at least for a time, many to achieve better lives. Yet in far too many documented cases, it has sought to enslave others through Mental and Emotional Manipulations or been guilty of Human Rights Violations..
THE SCIENTOLOGY PARADOX
To explain the Scientology paradox, it is vital to distinguish its three components:
1- Scientology, according to the very first recorded mention of it on November 28th 1951 (lecture titled: The Chart of Attitudes) “is a route: it is the study of science or the study of truth or the study of knowledge”.
The reason I undertook that study was to help myself and others achive greater abilities, develop more fully our potential and to reach higher levels of Spirituality. Many years ago, I established the firm postulate that no individual or Organization will ever ever be able to stray me away from those goals. Nearly 15 years after my departure from the Church of Scientology, those goals are more present than ever in both my life and my daily activities.
2- L.Ron Hubbard , the individual (1911-1986). An important distinction is required here between it and “L. Ron Hubbard. the Trademark”..
L. Ron Hubbard the individual is of course a Man (not deity, hence by definition prone, at least in some form, to some of the imperfections of humankind) born in 1911 and deceased in 1986.
“L. Ron Hubbard, the trademark” is that trademark owned by the “Church of Spiritual Technology (CST), a FOR PROFIT organization (and acknowledged as such by the IRS) who is led by three non-scientologists Special directors. (It main figure head being Meade Emory, a non-scientologust who was the IRS High Comissioner for many years. The Church of Scientology DOES NOT CONTROL CST, but rather the opposite. The Trademaks, L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology and Dianetics are controlled by them and the Church of Scientology has agreed to not appoint or remove any of its Senior Management structure without their approval. Note that the President of CST (a Scientologist) has no true power and that only its non-scientologist board of Directors has. Some have even argued that due to the direct links between CST’s directors and the American Government, that the Church of Scientology had actually fallen under the control of Big Brother…
L. Ron Hubbard Library is ficitious name officially registered by CST. In other words an alias. L. Ron hubbard Library is found as the final signatory and authority in all current Church of Scientology documents, revisions of LRH originals and their publication, and new directives. Therefore anything revised after 1986, no matter how contradictory to the original philosophy of Scientology and to LRH (the individual) writings and recordings can be freely stamped “L. Ron Hubbard” as its author since it is legally defensible (as absurd it may be in the mind of most people).
So this leaves us with two new paradoxes.
A) L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology may not necessarily 100% of the time be in full harmony
B) L. Ron Hubbard library has legal license to authorize the complete re-writing or editing of the works of L. Ron Hubbard (the individual), even if those were to satisfy somebody else’s pernicious agenda. It can therefore, at its whim, grant the right to appose the name L.Ron Hubbard to any perversion of the original technology or of its original intent.
3- The Organization: currently known as the Church of Scientology and including the Sea Organization and its numerous affiliates. Legally the Church of Scientology is accountable to no one but its leadership. It’s Supreme leader is accountable to one but himself. By its very design the Church of Scientology has no provisions of any kind for any “Checks and Balances” since by Policy it is assumed that it is exempt from ever doing any wrong and that its leader is by definition infallible. (This is amply covered in the Organizational Executive Course Volumes). There has not been a single instance in Human History of an Organization without Checks and Balances, not eventually sinking into complete corruption. Corruption is like Cancer, if left untreated, it will lead to the death of the organism. The Church of Scientology ‘s actions are based upon the dictate of a self-appointed clique. This is not opinion but fact. The only legal defense to justify the take over of current Management of the Church in 1986 is a Will signed by L. Ron Hubbard the hours before his death, when it is doubtful from the amount of medication found in his body at death time that he would have been conscious or been able to sign the document in a full conscious state on his last day. After 20 years the same clique is intact, in spite of wholesale lower statistics and no evidence of stable expansion. (It lists of completions as published in Advance and Source Magazines, shows it is still falling seriously short of earlier levels). That clique per its own public admission is able to rewrote policy and does not tolerate any attempt to correct it or challenge it. It has ruthlessly declared a Supressive Person anyone challenging their orders or anyone attempting to correct them, no matter how they contravened LRH own policies or how destructive their actions may be. It is almost trivial, under those circumstances to demonstrate that the philosphy of Scientology and the Church of Scientology as it is being operated today, are virtually in complete contradiction one from the other.
In Summary one cannot truly judge Scientology, or the philosophy of what stands for through the actions of the Church or even to a lesser degree to its author.
Whathever reprehensible actions the Church may be currently doing is generally the product of aberrant behaviour by its leaders, and is not necessarily due to a fault in the design of the philosophy.
Something remains workable because it is so or can be demnonstarted to be valid. The actual biographical details or shortcomings of its designer do not necessarily invalidate the workability of something, especially when supported by experience and logic.
From the 3 March 1952 lecture: “Introduction to Scientology” “Out of Scientology you could formulate, …a very fine type of “thought warfare” which you could use enslave people utterly”
My statement is therefore that the philosophy of Scientology correctly applied by someone in a benign way will routinely help people reach greater self-determinsim, awareness and spititual enlightenment. Perverted or used by people with ulterior motives and it will trap or enslave people
my email address:
ARTICLES AND ESSAYS
NEW ARTICLE: THE SUPPRESSION AND PERVERSION OF NOTs TECHNOLOGY by the CHurch of Scientology and RTC.
For the past 3 years, I have travelled across 5 continents, from Brazil to the Middle East, from California to South Africa, from England to Russia, to gather information, make contacts with people in the know and establish more accurately the truth.
The following series of articles and bulletins are the result of those meetings and interviews.
I went through great pains and personal expense to contact some of these people. Most wish to preserve their anonymity.
Because all the information was gathered at my own expense and as a result of my labours, I intend to release some or all of it, as I personally see fit, oblivious, as always to the slanderer, the denier, the extortionist or those who feel they are owed everything without the slightest exchange or contribution.
I have started to apply the unreleased technology to my pcs with astonishing results. Therefore, I feel motivated at this time to release it broadly, as I can find the time to do it.
What follows is a summary of data from handwritten, typed materials and taped recorded interviews.
Telepathy vs Mental Telegraphy : two entirely unrelated phenomena.
Auditing Pitfalls: How to Avoid
THE 8th DEADLY SIN: a revealing analysis of the Bulletin PAIN and SEX
The Black Panther Mechanism Demystified: An old Mechanism explained by more recent discoveriesRATIONALISM VS REVELATION: The natural Evolution of Scientology
What do I think about investments proposals run from Scientologists?
RECENT SUCCESS STORIES
FORTCOMING ARTICLES
A much maligned subject clarified: 10 MYTHS ABOUT STANDARD TECH DEBUNKED.
The Stable Datum Conundrum: Will it save your life… or cost your own sanity?
The Scientology Justice System: Utopian Equity or a sinister antithesis to the American Bill of Rights?
Hubbard Last Public Lectures (Daytona 1975) – The New Vitality Rundown: Hubbard’s Explanations and practical pproaches toward the “Bipolar Case”.
Principles and applications stemming from Infinite Value Logic.
Remote Viewing as a functional discipline.
Article written: Telepathy vs Mental Telegraphy : two entirely unrelated phenomena.
The secrets of telepathy and clairvoyance.
Where was I buried? a personal test of whole-track recall.
Succesfully adressing Amnesia on the Whole-Track.
The lost Art of Two Way Communication.
Fads and Fallacies in the name of Scientology.
The False Memory caper: Anatomy of bottomless abyss.
The use of synthetic identities as substitute for self or for Reason
The Unholy Legacy of Homo Novis
The renaming of Standard Technologies as an exercize in propaganda and re-education
What is Hatred?
Tips for Prevailing over OSA phony PR and tactics
Lost technologies: in each article, the author explores the theory, background, technical validity, subsequent alterations and perversions and the reasons for abandonment as well as results related to each one.
I Creative Processing
II The Lost Art of Two Way Communication
III Goal Listing and Criss Cross Technologies
IV Whole Track Implants and GPM handling
V The accurate adjudication and rehabilitation of the state of Clear
VI L-10 and its derivatives
VII Expanded Dianetics
VIII Standard Dianetics
IX Integrity Processing
X The New Vitality Rundown
XI The Introspection Rundown
XII The Humongous Rundown
XIII The Body Blue Print Rundown
XIV The Case Cracker Rundown
XV The Dynamic Assessemnt Rundown
XVI The Student Booster Rundwown
XVII The Rehabilitaion of Intention Rundown
XVIII The Hubbard “Dianetics for OTs” Rundown.
XIX The Power Processes
XX The Vital Information Rundown
XXI The true meaning of Standard tech
XXII Adverse effect (PTS) Technologies
XXIII The Culling and FESing of past and recent sessions.
XXIV The art of remote Case SupervisionFAQ
Subjects without link are under preparation
1- Who are You?
2- How did you get to leave the Church?
3- What are you doing Now?
4- In what daily activities do you apply your knowledge.
What alternate is there to the Church of Scientology?
What is Standard Tech?
Why is there all this jargon in Scientology?
What should I do if I decide I dont want to want to continue with the Church or disagree with its practices?
Does Scientology promotes Hatred?
Is Scientology the ONLY ROAD TO TOTAL FREEDOM?
Does premature exposure to confidential materials (such as the Clearing Course or OT III) makes someone goe mad, sick or even die?
Does Scientology Kills? Are the reports of numerous deatha ssociated with Scientology exaggerated or in any way true?
Does Scientology Make people go Insane?
Are the stories presented by the media of Sceintology prmoting the belief in Space Aliens (or space Invaders) true?
Official Church of Scientology FAQ errata sheet (correction about misleading information given on the Church in Society on the orfficial CoS Web site)
Does the Church still believe or apply the FAIR GAME LAW?
What is the Church of Scientology “FINAL SOLUTION” to the Opposition Problem?
Has the Tech being altered?
Why are some many good people gone from the Church?
What LRH a Con Man?
How can you explain reports of LRH harsh behaviour?
Why are there so many discrepancies between LRH offcial biography and documentary evidence.?
Is the Tech Valid?
Why are so many OTs (including OT VIIIs) dead?
Have you corrected OT VIII and IX?
Why did LRH change over the years?
Was David Mayo as bad as the Church said he was?
What do you think of the Free Zone (The Free Zone is loose term for the Scientology Underground, for those who seek to practice it safe from persecution by the Church)?
A SCIENTOLOGY WEDDING
Want to know the scoop on what a True Scientology Marriage looks like? What is said, what are the promises? Want to know the exact details of the very same ceremony used by Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes?
Click on the link above for details on the ceremony and exclusive photos of my own wedding. A complete Video with audio of the entire ceremony is available.
A stunning revelation: According to current Church management, St-Hill was composed of 97 1/2% supressives. I think anyone can figure out the rest…
INTRODUCTIONTHE UNTOLD CASE HISTORY OF LISA MCPHERSON
How a technology meant to help people can be perverted to harm or to kill
IN MEMORIAM: MARY SUE HUBBARD 1931-20021- OT VIII AND BEYOND: What awaits us?2- FOOL’S GOLD: THE TRUTH ABOUT THE GOLDEN AGE OF TECH3- ADDRESSING AUTISM WITH SCIENTOLOGY4- FREE ZONE BULLETINS:
This is a brief introduction about myself and my search and struggle for Spiritual Freedom and enlightenment.
My long term goal for this life time and for many others has been the seeking of the truth and the spiritual improvement and accomplishment that come with it.
I consider anyone who honestly and truthfully seeks the truth to be my friend.
Thanks to the correct application of a working Spiritual Technology, I have not only handled all the character and Spiritual traits that bothered me years or decades ago, but have continued to increase my awareness and understanding of both life and myself.
Through personal experiences, I have found the philosophy and Technology developed by L.Ron Hubbard (LRH) to be highly workable in thousands of people.
I am again continuing on the Spiritual journey that was laid in the “Bridge” as formulated by LRH. It is my strict intention not to deviate from the Standards set in Scientology Technology by strictly applying its Axioms and Logics and the wealth of information I have accumulated training and applying his Technology for several decades.
Hence, I have corrected the errors made by RTC who have perverted the Upper OT Levels and I have found the answer as to why so many people died, became sick or sour after completing RTC’s rendition of OT VIII. (It is not the one they believe) Better yet, I have found the answers of OT IX (a level that was never designed to be done years apart from OT VIII and is kept dangling like a carrot to cadge the loyalty of those who completed OT VIII toward RTC.
Thanks to a decade of progress and improvements, I have reached a point where I feel that my recall for this lifetime events and those I was personally involved in, for the past 2000 years to be excellent.
A few years ago, I ran, based on my recall, an experiment based on the Project “Where are You buried?” and I was quite satisfied with the results.
(The Project Where are you buried was conceived by LRH after the publication of “Have You lived before this life? and consists of locating one’s past burial’s locations and tombstones)
THE FUTURE OF THE UPPER BRIDGE
I do not believe in “Invented Technology” as a solution to improving or continuing the Bridge. These unusual solutions are merely a hodge-podge of “other practices”, case dramatizations from its instigator and reactive ideas gotten as a result of self-auditing.
The end result is clearly described in HCOB 30 June 1971 “Confused Ideas”.
However, it might be possible for someone who has sufficiently freed himself from the constraints of his case, and who possesses a conceptual and thorough understanding of the entirety of Scientology Tech to be able to continue in LRH footsteps beyond OT VIII.
However it has become amply clear to me from observing and studying the “Free Zone” that every “researcher” who claims having looked beyond OT VII, was so heavily introverted into his case, that they found nothing of value, except perhaps pointers to addressing their own private cases through Repair and Advance Programs which are entirely covered within existing and published Technology.
EARLY YEARS THIS LIFETIME
I was born and raised in Canada, majored in Pure Sciences (Physics and Mathematics) and always have had the highest Academic grades in the application of logic and deductive reasoning, which to this day I still consider to be my strongest intellectual skill.
While I did not particularly fare well at School in subjects such as History or Geography, which I regarded at the time in great part as the byproducts of irrational human activities, and a number of facts and dates to merely memorize, I absolutely excelled at Analytical Geometry. In fact, I never had less than a perfect score in all exams I ever had on the subject, and never found a new Geometry problem or theorem that I was unable to resolve and prove completely on my own. I even recall, being called more than once to the blackboard at the request of the teacher, when he had forgotten the solution or embarrassingly discovered that his book did not contain the solution after he had started to explain it . I took great pride in those accomplishments.
Later on, I was very favorably impressed, by the discovery of the Scientology Axioms and Logics, where all subsequent rules, processes and applications are merely extensions, albeit convoluted and complex of those same fundamental axioms and Logics.
During my school years, I was always much more concerned about my intellectual development and achievements, contrary to most of my peers who judged others through their athletic (and later on, romantic) performance. On that point, LRH and I are clearly very different as I recall reading in one of his Biographies that he scored Lowest in Geometry and Highest in Physical Education. I scored the exact opposite: Highest in Geometry and Lowest in Physical Education.
I skipped Grade 5, due to exceptionally high Academic Grades. I went to one of the best Schools in Canada (I like to think it is so, since two of the six prime Ministers of Canada born in my province frequented it).Unfortunately I then became the target of older bullies who were content with “repeating grades”. Many were 3 or 4 years older than I. My Academic performance never recovered, a fact I understood only later when I became acquainted with the Mechanics of Suppression and PTSness.
I pursued my undergraduate studies in Pure Sciences, keeping my options open as I had not quite decided whether I wanted to become a Mathematician or a Physicist.
EARLY INVOLVEMENT IN SCIENTOLOGY
Having discovered Scientology in Montreal in early 1973, and experienced life altering changes in my introductory services, I decided to join staff full time, and put my studies indefinitely on hold.
The organization became prosperous and expanded by leaps and bounds, thanks to an FEBC trained Executive Director and to my effective activities running Divison 6 (New Public into the org).
The organization eventually moved to the main street, a mere one block away from what was the busiest intersection in the country.
I was made in charge of Divison 1 (HCO) supervising Communication and “Ethics” and doing recruitment myself.
In just over 6 months, the organization more than doubled in size and personnel. The best staff were hired during that period. In 1992, I felt a great sense of pride when I discovered than the entire Senior Executive structure and the 6 oldest staff members in Montreal org were all people that I had either personally hired or introduced to Scientology in the 1970s.
I eventually fell out of favor with the Executives running Montreal org in 1975, and it was agreed that I would complete my 2 1/2 year contract working under the Executive Director in Quebec City (a 4 hour drive from Montreal), in exchange for one of their staff who wanted to be transferred.
The Executive Director made me his assistant, and essentially allowed me the full run of the Org, merely filling in reports and acting as the contact person with the Flag Liaison office, so that he could pursue other activities and training.
I had a “different understanding” of Ethics than my Superiors at Montreal and those at the Flag Liaison office wanted.
To them, Ethics was “Harsh”, absolutely punitive and degrading in its application, and you had to go through Hell to get through it. Ethics to them was something meant to be as unpleasant as an amputation performed without anesthetics.
I differed in that viewpoint (and still do), in that Ethics was merely a tool to get the job done and the application of Ethics should be an activity where “Everybody Wins”.
Degradation, torments and humiliation seem in my eyes to be merely relics belonging to Medieval History and are largely Whole-Track Dramatizations, not a component of a Science of Life that boasts to be on par with the man’s Highest Technological Achievements. In my Technical view someone who thinks and act like Ethics is something savage, harsh, unreasonable and even cruel, not only demonstrate a clear need to have his Evil Purposes (and Rockslams) on the subject of Help addressed, but is a serious candidate for receiving a GF40 (earlier practices assessment), as he is clearly confused between some earlier humanoid practices and that of Scientology.
Looking back at it, Quebec City of the 1970s is one of the few places in Scientology where Ethics was applied in a Benign and Benevolent Manner.
The result: High Stats and Morale. No blows, no cries, no grief. Staff so happy being there that each and everyone instinctively disseminates and recruits whenever he steps out of the org for an errand, a meal or taking the bus. Staff not fighting with each other to “get their own stat up”, but sincerely cooperating one with the other with their foremost interest being expanding the Org and the broad Dissemination of Scientology. Almost no more PTS Type A situations to handle as entire families are on lines getting Services and drilling each others. Body routers were frequently being recalled from passing hand outs on the street, because unexpected high inflows of interested public would just walk in. The Number of Well Done Auditing Hours in the Staff HGC was competing with those from the Public HGC…
MY MEETING WITH LRH
It was in the Fall of 1973. Unknown to anyone at the time, even to the entire Scientology world, but only to a selected few, LRH had resided in Queens, New York for the previous 10 Months. Some say, he was hiding, from attempts at indicting him for fiscal reasons.
Whatever the case, he deemed it best to return to the Ship (which was in Lisbon) at that point in time.
Accompanied by his two body guards (Jim Dincalci and Paul Preston), he decided, to avoid possible FBI scrutiny on American based International flights, to take the train to Canada, and to fly to Lisbon directly from there.
Upon arrival in Montreal and after booking a room as “Mr Harris” at the Queen Elizabeth Hotel in Downtown Montreal, LRH was pleased to discover that Montreal Org was within a mere 10 minute walk from the hotel. Montreal had some significance for LRH, since a personal friend and one of the first people to train as an auditor in Elizabeth, New Jersey in the Summer of 1950 had opened one of the very first Dianetics Foundation, in Montreal later that year.
In spite of the obvious, if unvoiced, misgivings his companions had on the fear that he may end up being publicly recognized, LRH decided to pay a visit to the new fledging Org…
Upon emerging from my office that was adjacent to the reception area, I was introduced by a young man calling himself “Jim” who looked just like a “Sea Org Missionaire” to “Mr Harris” who was decribed as an “Old personal friend of LRH”. Mr Harris appearance was anything but ordinary. A stout Man in his late 50s or maybe early 60s, he had bright red hair, penetrating blue eyes, muscular arms, and he literally exuded the Beingness of a “Seaman”. Upon gazing at him, the instant thought that raced to my mind was: “By Gosh, this is LRH”, but being an introverted type person at the time, I felt uneasy at the fact that nobody else’s seemed to have recognized that obvious fact. I kept glancing back and forth between the Man standing in the Lobby and the large picture of LRH on the wall and the more I looked, the more I saw similarities and the less I saw differences. Finally, I almost blurted out: “This is LRH!!!”, but some invisible force seemed to have gotten hold of my throat and I received a form of telepathic communication from the man who was friendlily staring at me straight into the eyes across the room.
I am not certain how much I understood at the time from that communication cycle. It must have lasted a mere few seconds, but it had enough bandwidth to have kept someone occupied for a whole hour. There was no denial about his true identity. there was nothing that could be construed as a lie, even in retrospect, but there was a definite and deliberate suggestion that I had “better things to do”.
A few years later, after I joined the Sea Org at Flag, three times, when I wrote to LRH about my taking constructive steps and making concrete progress toward my goal of becoming a Class XII Auditor, I had both the incredible thrill and experience of receiving my reply, not on the standard SO-1 stationery, but in LRH own handwriting on my own letter. Those letters will continue to remain amongst my most precious possessions and clearly indicate how special becoming a Class XII has always been to LRH.
I am not aware of anyone else, having received handwritten replies on the SO-1 line (letters to Ron), and certainly not from any other Class XII that I ever worked with. I have also verified with SO-1 staff during the 1980s, that my encounter with LRH was historically possible and it was their opinion that in most probability my description of the events was entirely accurate.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF MY CAREER as a Class XII
After a shaky start, I eventually rose through the ranks and became Flag Top producing auditor and held that title undisputed for many years.I spent 4 years in the Class IV HGC, auditing the world’s most difficult cases, including people who come to Flag having received over 20 intensives of “No results” in the field and looking forward to getting their first win and their first cognition in Auditing.
I became an expert at the Case Cracker Rundown and acquired the utter unshakeable conviction that “There are No Failed Cases” and that a properly trained C/S and auditor will resolve 100% of the cases when applying the Tech correctly. I delivered Clear Checks and in spite of the confusion and numerous revisions about Clear Checks, Dianetics Clear Intensive, Clear Certainty Rundowns through the years, I am satisfied that to this day, that I have neither allowed someone to attest Clear who wasn’t or failed to acknowledge someone who had made it.
I eventually went through the OT levels. Sheer determination, not luck was the reason that I made it. Unless an auditor is flubless, has continually good results and can routinely pass the continual checks made with his auditing and submit passing Videotaped sessions, he will simply not be allowed to progress up the Bridge. Not only that, but one must take arrangements to get the required auditing as absolutely nobody is going to offer you to get up the bridge and do it for you..
After completing OT III and IV, I went onto NOTS training, I was eventually transferred to the NOTs HGC and audited thousands of cases at that level. I then went onto Solo NOTS and with the formation an HGC for Solo NOTS only, was transferred there.
In the mean time, I was made to do a plethora of specialist courses along with their Internships. The only way, someone could move on up the bridge was by doing all the Tech Course and all the Internships.
Among the more Interesting courses I did: the very lengthy and extensive AO review Auditor Course, seldom done by anyone, which deals with the entirety of the Clearing Materials ( a great deal more than any Clearing Course student would be required to go through), OT III, the Upper OT levels and contains data by LRH that are not part of any other course even the Class VIII materials.
It is a sad fact that a few untrained individuals, who have not even read the materials in that course have elected themselves as “Supreme Authorities” on the Subject of Clear and OT III in the FZ. When I tried to inform them they did not have all the data, I was invariably told that they preferred to deny the existence of any LRH materials that had not been leaked to the FZ, calling what I knew, even if written or spoken by LRH, to be a “Hidden Data Line”
Another fascinating course I did was the “New Vitality Rundown”.
Contrarily to statements made by uninformed people in Ron’s org, the last set of Public Technical Lectures made by LRH was made in November 1975 in Daytona Beach, Florida to all Flag Auditors on what was called at the Time “The Special Rundown”.
The course, which I did directly under the Supervision of the Snr C/S Flag Land base has the 22 LRH lectures Series from late 1975 for its core. I was pleasantly surprised when I listened in their Introduction that I was listening to a Master, not a Copy and therefore no editing of any kind had been made, including a number of passages, where LRH suddenly paused, after having made a statement with political or other unsavory ramifications, would say loudly to a messenger :”You will have to cut that off, boy!”.
I spent several years in the Solo NOTS review HGC. Once there, I started doing the Solo NOTS EP Checks, as I could do them in all required languages but one and they wanted to strictly limit the exposure to the confidential EP of Solo NOTs (which is not shown to Solo NOTS pre-OTs). I did 95% of the Solo NOTS EP checks for the following 3 years.
Since Solo NOTs completions count for a huge amount of the FSO Statistics and that traditionally in Scientology there is an incredible push to get sthe stats as High as possible before 2PM on Thursday, I would have seldom something else to do but Solo NOTS EP checks on Thursdays between 11AM and 2PM. I had the entire FSO and Flag Land Base Senior Executive structure flocking around me like a bunch of groupies for the last hour, as my actions would frequently dictate whether they were upstat or downstat for that week.
This further cemented my repute as Flag Top auditor as in 3 years, contrairily to all others who had done them, I never flubbed one of those checks (flubbing would have been a virtual garantee to fail to attest the person before 2PM). and that I became utterly impervious to the Huge amount of expectation and demands that were put on my shoulders.
I even managed to do high hours on my own Solo NOTS, being the only full time Sea Org Auditor to earn a special pin for doing 25 hours Solo in a week (This was on top of doing 45-50 hours on public and other Staff member duties).
I managed to complete Solo NOTS to its true EP and became Solo NOTS completion #801. I would have been Number #800, but I was bumped so they could give that Number to a Celebrity.
As the release of OT VIII neared, a new HGC was formed for OT VII completions only and I was transferred there, auditing now Solo NOTs completions exclusively.
Then a new project came to get 5 Solo NOTS Review Auditors to become 100% flubless sec-checkers.
Flubless sec-checkers are not merely people who are good at doing Confessionals. Confessional Technology encompasses the all fundamental auditing technique and all five styles of auditing. A flubless Sec Checker is a Flubless auditor Period. The standard and ante were raised to unimaginable levels, as Senior management expected only chronic perfection as the only acceptable standard.
I was the first auditor to pass. The Snr C/S FSO was a distant second. Then one by one the remaining four. Even RTC had not managed to get any of their personel to pass before the first two people in our group. Part of the unique materials provided for the course was the ONLY VIDEO session of LRH auditing with both TRS and Metering being observable. I saw the video over 100 times until the time my auditing skill became undistinguishable.
In 1989 I finally completed the Saint Hill Special briefing Course. This is no small feat, as I had never been on full time study. The course is so long. In fact, I have never heard of anyone else completing the course on a part time basis and still working in the Sea Org. I spent so many days off, meal breaks, listening to tapes or going through the checksheet that only Tone 40 determination made me successfully go through.
Shortly after, I found myself, doing full time training, for the first time in my life, on the Class VIII course.
Then the Class X, XI, XII course and Internships, which I completed in short order.
Alain Kartuzinski, a Class XII C/S who was for a long time one of the Snr C/Ses at the Flag Service Org, used to call me �The King� when referring to me as an auditor, perhaps because I had in a way become to Scientology auditing what Elvis became for Rock and Roll.
I am not complaining about “mistreatment” while in the Sea Org. Though I would have more than enough legitimate reasons to complain, I view my experiences, both good and bad as important experiences. I have fully outgrown any desire or need at complaining, retribution or any type of hate mongering.
MY LAST DAYS IN THE SEA ORG
I reluctantly left the Sea Org in December 1992, after conditions became simply impossible to live under, and after Senior management failure to brainwash me with their non-sense. I had never anticipated to leave the Sea Org before.
When I heard with my own ears David Miscavige (Chairman of the Board of RTC) gloating with Marc Yager (IG Admin) and Marc Ingber (CO CMO Int) about his latest new invented unusual and cruel punishment of a staff member, (a completely off-beat Ethics handling) and later heard him voicing evil purposes that he had toward my organization (the FSO), I decided that I did not wish to continue to support such a degenerate any longer. This was the final straw, having witnessed in a single week, more injustices and cruelty than any level of human decency should be allowed to tolerate. What I personally witnessed coming out of the mouths of David Miscavige, Mark Ingber and Marc Yager was far closer to Joseph Stalin’s ideals than even a corrupted version of Scientology could have been. While I would have undoubtedly tolerated someone dramatizing LRH Valence, even if it was one of his darker sides, I drew the line at following a trio who could only remind me of Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler and Hermann Goering.
So I left.
I left Flag through the front door, after completing all the requirements that were asked from me (including getting sec-check by an auditor who had just been declared a suppressive). I left the Flag Land Base under amiable terms.
That auditor was declared Suppressive for allegedly doing out-tech on John Travolta. He audited me at length on Sec-checks and FPRD. Perhaps I was expected me to somehow become PTS to him, since he was still under his suppressive declare during our sessions together, since the suppressive is traditionally supposed to do in the people they audit.
I had been personally drilled and individually coached within an inch of my life on Sec-checking by IG Tech and Senior C/S Int. I was the first auditor to successfully go through this program of being a �PERFECT sec-checker�. This was a requisite for doing the New OT VIII Eligibility check on the OT VIII hopefuls for the Freewinds Maiden Voyage in 1988. They had disregarded the fact that the end product of that course was my unequalled ability to detect and recognize any and all manifestations of Overts, Withholds and Evil Purposes on everyone I dealt with. (including Senior Management, RTC and others).
I had produced in the vicinity of 25 000 Well Done auditing Hours in my career as an auditor, which was substantially more than any auditor had ever done at the time, anywhere. All my pcs (with virtually no exceptions) were rave (and still are) about their wins and were smoothly progressing up the Bridge. I have always found the experience of auditing very rewarding, when I have seen how much people can change and improve their lives for the better.
Becoming a Class XII is extremely difficult, due to the thoroughness of the training, where everything one does is put under a microscope, and because �unreasonable� standards of perfection are expected in every single thing. If anyone thinks that a Class XII is merely an auditor trained to deliver the L-10,11,12 procedures, they have no concept of it whatsoever.
I do not hide it that I find it annoying that an “auditor” with less than 1% of my technical baggage, picks up an altered version of the Ls on the Internet and satisfied that he has a list of commands and processes he can now robotically repeat with no understanding whatsoever of the underlying theory, labels himself a Class XII or claims to be my “Technical Peer”.
FAKE L Rundowns delivered in the Free Zone
One for one each and every individual that I have examined that received the “Ls” (or whatever you call their alter-ised rendition) from someone who did not train correctly on the full theory with all the approprate drills done with an experienced Class XII had the following three symptoms months and years after “completing them”:
1- General case state seriously deteriorated
2- Doing significantly worse in life after the auditing. (many compared their life as little better than being flotsam)
3- Noticeable worsening of physical condition.
I know it well, I have done some reviews of those botched cases and people were in truly miserable condition.
The reasons are obvious: Cases are not being setup, the “Auditor” doesn’t have a clue what he is auditing. Botched L&Ns, Unblown case, Unflat Evil Intentions and partially run Succumb Postulates.
Also since these auditors have obviously the quickie impulse (they do not even try to train completely on the materials), they invariably quickie those rundowns in one quarter to one tenth of the time they should be spending on them. The full phenomeon is described in C/S Series 77.
The following should be read by anyone considering delivering without adequate training or receiving the Ls from same:
It is rumoured that the Ls Materials that were leaked on the Internet and are in use by various FZ auditors today were purposely leaked by the Church with the unavowed intention to “spin the squirrels”. Their “release” contained major steps out of sequence, carefully misworded commands meant to cave in the entire case on the recipient and core steps meant to blow Succumb Postulates were carefully omitted.
Whether this is true or not I lack concrete evidence to state with certainty, but having read the versions of the Ls in use by FZ auditors, I can state unequivocably that the version they use is completely consistent with that theory. It certainly aligns with the Church philosophy about applying “FAIR GAME” to those they regard as “Squirrels”.
Thank to a remarquable memory and years of practice auditing and translating the Ls Rundowns in 5 languages, I have been able to reconstruct the entirety of the Ls Rundowns and their remedies. My write up is well over 500 pages long and contains the totality of all 3 rundowns as well as their entire history, background, theory and remedies. (Compare this to the paltry 50 pages released on the Internet).
COMPLETE LIST OF ALL CLASS XII AUDITORS EVER MADE
In 1990, I became the 41st Class XII to be made.
Following this, is the entire list of Class XII auditors ever made. The list is complete and absolute. I have checked it and cross-referenced it with many individuals. The list reflects information as of 1998. Only the few (if any) Class XIIs made after 1998, would not be on the list. If someone’s name is not on the list, they are not, nor ever were a Class XII, PERIOD. In other words they are a fake, if they claim to be one.
| List of ALL Class XII ever produced, in sequence: The 8 original Class XIIs (trained by LRH) The ship trained Class XII (trained by the original XIIs) The FLag Land Base Class XIIs. Total: 54 Class XIIs. Does not include anyone trained AFTER 1998, but does include everybody else. It does not include people who enrolled onto the Class X course, but never completed training to Class XII (such as Greg Wilhere, Kerry Gleason, Christine Marquardt) |
In RED are name of people who are still on Tech lines either at Flag or with International Management.
All others are no longer in the Sea Org, due to departure. Current status is witten under the name. Those without mention are either Auditing or C/Sing.
| OJ Roos (Declared) | Liese Klingvall (Declared) | Tommy Klingsvall (Declared) | Mike Mauerer (Departed the Sea Org) | ||
| Leon Steinberg (Declared) | Quentin Hubbard (Deceased) | Alex Sibersky (Declared) | Brian Livingston (Declared) | ||
| – | – | – | – | ||
| John Ausley (Declared) (Deceased) | Ron Shaffran (Declared) | Merril Mayo (Declared) | David Mayo (Declared) | ||
| Jeff Walker (Declared) | Murray Chopping (Declared) | Russ Meadows (Declared) | Alex Gerber (Declared) | ||
| John Eastment | Robin Lindsell (Declared) | Paulette Ausley (Declared) | Karen DelaCarriere (Departed the Sea Org) | ||
| – | – | – | – | ||
| Gwen North (Declared) | Ray Mithoff | Carolyn Webb | Alain Kartuzinski (Off tech Lines) | ||
| Minty Alexander | Alan Stave | Myriam Stave (OT VIII) (Deceased) | Ted Cormier (Deceased) | ||
| David Gellie (Permanently ORDERED Off tech Lines by RTC) | Rick Sheehy (Permanently ORDERED Off tech Lines by RTC) | Peter Buttery (OT VIII) (Permanently ORDERED Off tech Lines by RTC) | Claire Reppen (OT VIII) (Deceased) | ||
| Bodil Tucker | Tony Rogers | Linda Sydejko | Malin Gelfan | ||
| Richard Reiss, Snr C/S FSO | Lisa Rentschler | Carole Schwartz | Rick Alexander (Off Tech Lines) | ||
| Jo Struthers(Departed the Sea Org) | Pierre Ethier (Departed the Sea Org) | Jim Sydejko (Off Tech Lines) | Ingrid Keller (Departed the Sea Org) | ||
| Peggy Eastment | Ann Glushakow | Edie Lundeen (Off Tech Lines) | Bruce Glushakow (Departed the Sea Org) | ||
| Jerome Bloom | Nina Paull | Sheryl Weigand | Hank Bourland | ||
| Norman Herring | Sheri Rabey |
LINKS AND ARTICLES
What it means to become a Class XII
What nobody has been told about Lisa MacPherson
The Truth about OT VIII and OT IX
What Standard Tech Truly Means
My Personal Test of Whole Track Recall
(Under preparation)
PARTIAL LIST OF PEOPLE I HAVE AUDITEDThe following is a partial list of pcs I have audited. It is not in any way exhaustive and consists of roughly 3500 people out of about 5000. It may include a very few cases I FESed when I could count the hours. Anyone on this list (or not) is welcome to contact me at the email shown at the top of the page. With virtually no exception, I enjoyed auditing each of those people and going over the list and recalling the gains and life changing improvements I saw in those people provided me with hours of happy memories.
My ultimate desire is for each of these people to reach happiness and spiritual Freedom, whether they achive it in the Church of Scientology or in another.
A lot of those names have not been on Flag completion list for a very long time. Each and everyone should be told that “NO CHURCH HOLDS A MONOPOLY ON SPIRITUAL FREEDOM OR THE STATES OF BEINGNESS PROMISED BY L. RON HUBBARD”. Anyone can move forward from whatever point they have been stopped, betrayed or given arbitrary actions that were not designed to help them.
Alberto Abate, Mario Abbiati, Stefania Abbiati, Tom Abrams, Delia Acheson, Doug Acheson, Hans-Ruedi Ackle, Suzette Ackle, Angela Acosta, Mary Acosta, Ramon Acosta, Robin Adair, GianFranco Adami, Bob Adams, Gene Adams, June Adams, Mary Adams, Chris Adler, Fernando Adler, Lloyd Adler, Lottie Adler, David Agami, Elias Agami, Roberto Agami, Theresa Agami, Vicky Agami, Viviane Agami, Frank Aggio, Eliana Aguilar, Patricia Aguilar, Elaine Aguirre, Peter Aguirre, Juan Aguirrebeitia, Robert Ahoua, Margaret Ainsworth, Aldo Airoldi, Debra Aitken, Lena Akesson, Linda Aldrete, Angela Alemania, Alex Alemis, Cathy Alessandrini, Maurizio Alessi, Peter Alevizos, Lee Alexander, Minty Alexander, Peter Alexander, Rick Alexander, Dixon Allen, Gabrielle Allen, Jane Allen, Terry Allen, Lynda Allender, Patricia Almeida, Robert Almqvist, Richard Almstead, Stephen Alpert, Felix Altorfer, Heidi Altorfer, Marianna Altorfer, Diana Alvarado, Enrique Alvarado, Lucio Alverez, Maria-Fernanda Amaya, Konrad Ambach, Amanda Ambrose, Roland Ambuhl, Carol Anahu, Clare Anahu, Bob Anderson, Candy Anderson, Carol Anderson, Cindy Anderson, Doug Anderson, Michael Anderson, Rick Anderson, Sherry Anderson, Roland Andersson, Joe Andruscavage, Greg Angus, Pamela Angus, Dee Ann Rule, Lisa Ann Malmquist, Mary Ann Durham, Jo Anne Beachy, Jo Anne Christensen, Dodley Anson, Elizabeth Anstrin, Peter Anstrin, Luis Antoni Perez, Tiziano Antonini, Peter Antonio, Philip Antonio, Luis Antonios Vasquez, Stefano Antonucci, Luciano Apperti, Mariano Apperti, Mauro Apperti, Juan Arambula, Edurne Aranguren, Michel Archambault, Carlos Arena, Cherie Arend, Tony Arend, Ruth Arguelles, Miguel Arguello, Alejandro Aristi, Michael Armentrout, Janice Armstrong, Raoul Arnal, Gerry Arnett, Ramon Arnold, Vicky Arnold, Rafael Arredo, Philippe Arsac, John Arvanitakis, Tomas Arvidsson, Peter Asberg, Sandro Asnaghi, Harout Assadourian, Bob Asselin, Robert Asselin, Doug Atcheson, Douglas Atcheson, Bruce Atkinson, Peter Atkinson, Bertha Aubert Llorens, Armando Aubert, Bertha Aubert, Helen Audrey Stewart, Pierre Auget, Peter August, Carol Austin, David Austin, Jeff Avrin, Karen Aylor, Rebecca Azares, Inma Azpitarte, Irma Azpitarte, George Baca, Mariella Baccari, Adelio Bacchi, Ornella Bacchi, Frederick Badger, Edwin Baer, Susan Baez, Gianfranco Baggio, Robert Bagnall, Paul Baikie, Roland Baikley, Brigitte Bailke, Wolfgang Baitz, Joanne Baker, Sally Baker, Yiva Balazs, Mike Ball, Mike Ballard, Otis Ballard, Frederick Balmaele, Fulvio Balmelli, Edgar Bammatter, Fulvio Bandera, Giovanni Bandieri, Giuseppe Bandierini, Henvelle Bandroin, Ken Banfield, Britta Bang, Alison Banks, David Banks, Hanna Baram, Michael Baram, Paul Barbaro, Steve Barbera, Alain Barbier, Jean-Luc Barbier, Antonella Barbieri, Giorgio Barbieri, Sandra Barbieri, carlos Barcena, Vivian Bardavid, Gavin Bargate, Dee Barker, Mary Barne Mann, Debra Barnes, Cathy Barnett, Gabriela Baroni, Michael Barram, Kay Barres, Chuck Barron, Elizabeth Barron, Olivia Barron, Bob Bartell, Donna Barton, Geoffrey Barton, Pamela Barton, Ray Barton, Win Barton, Steve Basin, Chere Bauman, Molly Baxter, Randy Baxter, Liz Bayback, Robin Beaman, Sarah Bean, Joan Beats, Shane Beats, Anne Beatty, Karin Beatty, Richard Beatty, Karen Beaty, Joanne Beaubien, Phil Beaubien, Jocelyne Beauregard Jocelyne Beauregard, Pierre Beauregard, Pierre Beauregards, Donna Beaven, Carlos Becerra, Gabi Beck, Peter Beck, Emily Becker, Stephanie Becquet, Susanne Beeh, Suzanne Beeh, Carol Beeny, carol Beeny, Hannelore Behdig, Ray Behm, Jean Beigantz, Robert Beilhart, Robert Bein, Susana Bejarano, Enzo Beletti, Enzo Belletti, John Bellmaine, Vanessa Bellmaine, Gale Belsel, John Belue, Javier Benet, Martha Benilles, Gracia Bennish, Gisele Benoit, Rolly Berdna, Jacqueline Bergantz, Bobbie Berger, David Berger, Yogi Berger, Linda Bergman, Mitzi Bergman, Albie Berk, Anthony Berka, candy Berman, Ray Bernard, Sergio Bernardini, Roberto Bernazzoli, Eva Berryman, John Berryman, Sylvie Berson, Marino Bertoli, Luigi Bertoni, Sylvie Bertrand, Alain Berube, Franco Beschi, Sharon Besio, Steve Besio, Jean Besre, Richard Best, Leni Betes, Sue Bettinger, Florence Bezazian, Paul Bezazian, Hennie Bezuidenhout, Fabbian Biagio, Loredana Biancolini, Cathy Bible, Monica Biddle, Gaby Bilodeau, Dario Binda, Donato Biondi, Rick Birkenshaw, Donatella Birolo, Laurie Bittner, Karen Black, Michael Black, Stephanie Black, Tina Black, Doris Blair, Eva Blake, Corinne Blanc, Yves Blanc, Sandrine Blanchet, Alain Blanchette, Tony Blanco, Charles Blankenship, Ellie Blankenship, Lise Blankertz, Angelika Blaskovich, Carol Blaut, Jay Blaut, Alexander Blechinger, Dean Blehert, Pamela Blehert, Henry Blumenthal, Frank Blumer, Dieter Blumler, Lorentz Blumler, Paolo Boarato, Dan Boardsen, Silvano Bobadilla, Remo Boden, Arlene Boeger, William Boeger, Serd Boehm, Ginny Boehme, Patrice Boesinger, Donald Bohn, Donna Bohn, Pierre Bolduc, Ellie Bolger, Maureen Bolisczak, Michael Bollen, Michel Bollen, Michael Bolln, Giorgi Bonardi, Giorgio Bonardi, Sonia Bonfiglioli, Simone Bongiovanni, Caroline Bonifas, Rosa Bonisoli, Donald Bonn, Massimo Bonoldi, Paolo Boratao, Christa Bordewieck, Gianluca Bordoni, Jorg Borgmann, Al Born, Kai Bornemann, Susanne Bornemann, Carl Borowski, Carlos Borrero, Giuseppe Borsarini, Jane Bosan, Christian Bosiger, Patrice Bosiger, Patrice Bosinger, Jane Boson, Glen Bostrom, Wendy Bostrom, Nick Bot, Carol Bottle, Claude Boublil, Julian Bouchard, Calisre-Marie Boujon, Francois Boulbil, Francoise Boulbil, Hank Bourland, Denise Boutin, Richard Bovey, Bill Bowen, David Bowers, Janet Bowes, Theo Box, Stephen Boyko, Steven Boyko, Alejandro Bozzone, Bernard Brackenshaw, Ulrich Bracunig, George Bradley, Gregory Bradley, Hugh Bradley, Jeff Bradley, Jeff Bradshaw, Lisa Bragato, Lucia Bragg, Ted Braggin, Antonio Braggion, Antinio Braggione, Antonio Braggione, Brigitte Brandle, Christian Brandle, Karl Braun Steiner, Morgans Bredsdorf, Gabi Brendel, Peter Brendel, Giovanna Brenicci, Pino Brenicci, Annette Brennan, Rob Brennan, Sandra Brennan, Naomi Bresaham, Dee-Dee Bressert, Jim Brewer, Carleen Bridgetown, David Brier, Maureen Brigatti, Rita Bright, Anne Briscoe, Naomi Brisnehan, Bill Broderick, Christa Broderick, Ed Broderick, Cammie Brodie, Patrick Broeker, Louis-Michel Brolles, Madeline Broman, Harry Bronsoiler, Lilis Bronsoiler, Gaetan Brouilette, Christine Brovcenko, Cathy Brown, Charles Brown, Judy Brown, Hans Brugemann, Gro Brugermann, Greg Brumley, Marie-Therese Brunet, Alain Brunette, Larry Bruning, Ruth Brunner, Ed Bryan, Daniel Bryenton, Giacomo Bucchi, Heimo Bucerius, Anna Buch-Hansen, Doris Buchel, Annabel Bueno, Beth Bueno, Sue Bueno, Kathy Bulawa, Hamish Bulger, Lorraine Bulger, Martine Bullot, Claudio Burchi, Irene Burgener, Ray Burgess, Don Burgett, Donald Burgett, Jane Burgett, Arnell Burghorn, Florence Burghorn, Jim Burghorn, Shannon Burke, Lynn Burkhart, Monika Burkli, Roberto Burlone, James Burnham, Jeffrey Burr Johnson, Nancy Burton, Jim Bush, Rex Bush, Ray Butera, Laura Butki, Debbie Butler, William Butler, Tony Butzlaff, Jarrett Buys, Peter Buzzelli, Karen Bydlo, Dan Byl, Peter Byrne, Char Byrnes, Jessica Byrnes, Larry Byrnes, Lawrence Byrnes, Alejandro Cabrera, Elvis Cabrera, Idea Cabrera, Patrizio Cabrini, Elena Cabrino, Lisa Cabrino, Warren Caggiano, Cinzia Cagnoni, Alessia Cairoli, Giorgio Cairoli, Juliette Calame, Sergio Calcinai, Ida Calder, Antionetta Calderon, Guillermo Calderon, Letitia Calderon, Maria-Antonieta Calderon, Sarah Calderon, Barbara Caldwell, Elaine Caldwell, Eric Caldwell, Giovanni Calicchio, Giuseppe Calicchio, Haracio Caligiuri, Fausto Callegarini, Rosette Calliauw, George Calpin, Lisetta Calzolari, Lisette Callarata, Lee Cambigue (Mr), Lee Cambique (Mrs), Nancy Cameron, Antonio Cammarata, Gaetano Cammarata, Salvatore Cammarata, Mark Campbell, Baby Campos, Dolores Campos, Jose-Luis Campos, Susana Campos, Frank Camuso, Gilbert Canali, Paolo Canali, Bruno Cantalupi, Gianni Canuti, Hector Cardenas, Barbara Cardona, Juan Cardona, Maria-Terese Cardona, Chuck Carel, Pat Carel, Pat Carey, Ruth Carey, Jerry Caril, Dixie Carlisle, Hank Carlson, Marti Carlson, Mike Carlson, Scott Carmichael, Ida Carrera, Gina Carrerra, Joanne Carrier, Steve Carrier, Julie Carrol, Gail Carroll, Noel Carroll, Ann Carter, Marylin Carvin, Vickie Case, Doug Casey, Carlos Casillas, Juan Casillas, Claudia Caspary, Raymond Cassano, Sheryle Cassano, Alfonso Castaneira, Jorge Castaneira, Lisa Castellani, Jacinto Castellano, Virgilio Castellano, Carlos Casteneira, Virginia Casteneira, Antonella Castignoli, Carlos Castillo, Lucinda Castillo, Rosana Castillo, Eugenio Castillo,, Betty Castleman, Elizabeth Castleman, Ken Castleman, Rosita Castro, Massimo Cavadenti, Stephanie Cayouette, Nadia Cedro, Julian Cerati, Denise Ceresnak, Berenice Cervantes, Jean Chacon, John Chadder, Mary Chadder, Andrew Chalmers, Alan Chamberlain, Allen Chamberlin, Don Chamberlin, James Chamberlin, John Chambers, Rebecca Chambers, Luis Chamorro, Julie Champness, Mick Champness, Michael, Chandler, Tom Chandler, Karin Chapman, Peter Charbonneau, Jean Charbonnier, Jeanie Charles, John Charlesworth, Louise Charnonneau, Mike Chatelain, Julio Chavez, Martha Chavez, Jeff Chee, Brigitte Chelin, Hellen Chen, Nancy Chepey, Murie Cheshire, Alain Chevrot, Henriette Chevrot, Felipe Child, Filipe Child, Maria-Teresa Child, Roberto Child, Rosario Child, Pam Chipman, Pamela Chipman, Corine Chiquet, Francoise Chiquet, Gerard Chiquet, Josette Chiquet, Luisa Chiricho, Jay Chitteroe, Mireille Chouraki, Lorna Chrichton, Monica Christen, Carl Christensen, James Christensen, Jamie Christensen, Joanne Christensen, Kurt Christensen, Mie Christensen, Malcolm Christiansen, Gillian Christie-Cullen, Gerd Christoffel, Gerry Chromoy, Jeanie Chromoy, Michael Church, Mauro Cinquepalmi, David Cintron, Bruce Cladwell, Bruce Clark, Evelyne Clark, Fran Clark, Jane Clark, Jeanne Clark, Jenny Clark, Michael Clark, Mike Clark, Shirley Clark, Garrison Clarke, Peter Clarke, Jean Claude Smadja, Karl Clausen, Nancy Clay, Peter Clay, Robert Clay, Tom Clay, Emily Clayton, John Clegg, Charles Clements, Dale Clerk, Maria Clovet Bridget Cobb, Maxine Cocain, Giuliano Cocchetti, Guigliana Cocchetti, Jan Cockerill, Judith Code, Keith Code, Joaquim Coelho, Art Colaianni, Lucy Cole, Ross Cole, Allen Collins, Jim Collins, Regina Collins, Sally Colloden, Franco Comi, Carlo Comincini, Maria-Luisa Como, Kathy Conable, kathy Conable, Maria Conceicao, Kathy Condon, Maggie Condon, Margaret Condon, Robert Condon, Ron Condron, Robert Conn, June Connelly, Lynn Connor, Bernd Conradi, Elke Conradi, fabian Conti, Richard Cook, Giancarla Coppi, Ernest Corbett, Gaye Corbett, Arlette Corbi, Paolo Corbi, Jose Cordero, Andre Cordet, Maria Cordova, Shirley Coriveau, Rebecca Cormier, Skip Cormier, Daphne Cornelius, Vernon Cornelius, Ewald Cornelsen, Marc Coromina Hector Cortes, Patty Cortes, Noemi Cortinovis, Luisa Cossini, Giuliano Cossu, Robasto Costanzo, Jennifer Costello, Denis Cote, Ghislan Cote, Paul Cote, Marie-Louise Courvoisier, Marianne Couvoisier, Helen Covary Fritsch, Michael Covin, Maria Covini, John Cowden, Brian Coyle, Bryan Coyle, Ed Cramb, Larry Cramer, Susan Crausaz, Bill Crawford, Ginger Crawler, Michele Crescetino, Bruno Crestino, Adelio Crippa, mario Crippa, Miriam Crippa, Ralph Criscione, Rick Crites, Ron Crites, Gabrielle Crittendon, Barry Critzer, Beppe Crivella, Malcolm Croft, Jim Crosser, Bill Crossley, Roddie Crouch, Emil Crough Allan Crouse, Lisa Crundall, Peter Crundall, Virgilio Cruzado, Gerardo Cucciniello, Mariana Cuenca, Gwen Culbert, Chris Cullen, Sally Culloden, Patrick Cultiera, Peter Cunningham, Elizabeth Currier, Glenn Currier, Jaye Curry, Mike Curry, David Curtis, Patricia Curtis, Yolande Curty, Matteo D’Agnelli, Louis Da Re, Susan Da Re, Alicia Dabbah, Lucy Dabbah, Salomon Dabbah, Bob Dahlquist, Robert Dahlquist, Jacinthe Daigle, Barbara Dakin, Sonja Dal Borgo, Luciano Daldosso, Raoul Dallaire, Antonella Dallari, kathy Dalziel, Karin Damian, Marisa Damiani, Marcos Dana, Cindy Dangberg, Gunther Dangela, Dana Danhoff, Nazmy Daniel, Dick Danilobb, Peter Daniloff, Alycia Danilovich, Harold Danko, Roberto Danne, Francesco DaPasquale, Silvia Dare Susan Daugherty, Jose-Luis Davila, Cathy Davis, Chris Davis, Kennny Davis, Les Davis, Leslie Davis, Lonnie Davis, Nancy Davis, Naomi Davis, Paul Davis, Vicki Davis, Peggy Day Westerman, Brian Day, Doreen Day, Andree De Thiersant, Beatriz De Aguilar, Bernard De La Cour, Celia De Mello, Gisele De Benoit, Hennie De Ridder, Henri De Bruyn, Iria De La Vaccarra, Javier De Aguinaga, Jill De Hochepied, Jim De Grosa, Justa De Villiers, Maria De Landez Ferreira, Marie De Thiersant, Peter De La Cour, Pierre De Thiersant, Tom De Grandpre, Ursula De Leon, Galee Dean, Gaylee Dean, Richard Dean, Alicia Debbah, Henri DeBryun, Thiery DeChaunac, Madeleine DeFreitas, John Dekiewitt, Antonio Del Francia, Bernard Delacour, Jacqueline Delafraye, Odile Delafraye, Patrick Delafraye, Pierre Delance, Jean-Pierre Deleze, Antonio Della Giovanna, Marc Delomez, Odile Delomez, Giovanna Delzanno, Henry DeMarco, Jutta Demeler, Dan Deming, Jane Deming, Thomas Demogines, Paul Denev, Peter Denev, Camille Denholme, Eugenia DeNieto, Francesco DePasquale, Bertrand DePetigny, Marie-Therese DePetigny, Carole DeRoo, Charles Deschambury, Daniel Descombaz, Andree DeThiersant, Andre Dettieri, Justa DeVilliers, Pino Devitini, Candace Devoe, Chuck Devoe, Eloy Dewey, Albert Dewisme, David DeZelle, Anna Di Lorenzo, Anna Di Meo, Antonio Di Gioia Bob Di Diego, Antonio Diaz, Barbara Diaz, Pat Didear, Rosemary Didear, Carlo DiFrancesco, Sergio DiFrancesco, Antonio DiGoia, Tina Dillard, Julia Dimmock, Dana Dineen, Anita Dingler, Raul Dingler, Thomas DiPaola, Loren Dirks, Claes Ditleusen, Else-Marie Ditleusen, Claes Ditlevsen, Bruno Divitini, Dan DiVito, Janet Dixon, Dusan Djukich, Michael Dlack, Bruce Dobin, Forrest Dockery, Eddie Dodd, Linda Doering, Willy Doestschman, Sass Doetschmann, Willy Doetschmann, David Dolan, Mary Dolan, Paul Dolan, Mike Dolbaczuk, Karin Don Braber, Graham Donavan, Angelo Donghia, Christa Donker, Graham Donovan, Cecile Donze, Therese Donze, Karen Doobi, Mercedes Dorelia, Anna Dorigo, Elen Dorset, Ellen Dorsett, Eugenio Dos-Santos, Denyse Doudan, Alan Douglas, Jim Douglas, Joan Douglas, Richard Douglas, Robert Drake, Chris Dresser, Robin Drimmer, Ronnie Drimmer, Mitchell Drobbin, Jeff Drumm, Veronique DuBellay, Horst Dubiel, Dennis Dubin, Stan Dubin, Martin Dubow, Bob Duggan, Tom Duggan, Bob Duggin, Helene Dugmore, Georgette Dumas, Scott Duncan, Joe Duncanson, Joseph Duncanson, Lindy Duncanson, Ann Dunev, Camille Dunholme, Jean-Jacques Dunki, James Dunn, Brigitte Duquesne, Francoise Durand, Dave Durnan, Jurgen Durnberger, Peter Durnil, Corrie Dutko, Brenda Dyer, Trevor Eade, Dick Eastin, John Eastment, Edna Eaton, Lolita Echavarria, Fred Eckfeld, Lilliane Eckharter, Margaret Eckold, Tina Eckstein, Anders Eckwell, Eve Eden, Donna Edison, Steve Edison, Ellen Edmondson, Eloise Edmonson, Louise Edmunson, Luis Eduardo Cuello, Carlton Edwards, Deborah Edwards, Harold Edwards, Darlene Eggen, Dean Eggen, Jerry Ehrlich, Debbie Ehst, Ilse Eich, Alexander Einkhour, Jay Eisenbach, Else-Brith Ekstrom, Roland Ekstrom, Maria Elana Nunez, Maria Elena Martini, Amy Elliot, Hugh Elliot, Kay Elsner, Catherine Emard, Philip Embick, Susan Embick, Pat Emery, Tucker Emmett, Susan Emory, Shahab Emran, Shahab Emrani, David Ender, Edi Ender, Sabine Ender, Christine Engler, Thomas Engler, Walter Erb, Lothar Erdtmann, Nena Erdtmann, Ramses Erdtmann, Gert Eriksson, Gunilla Eriksson, Enrique Espinosa, Juan Espinoza, Christopher Estey, Tina Estey, Carol Estrada, Julio Estrada, Beverley Ettinger, Wendy Ettricks, Gus Evans, Noel Evans, Suzanne Evans, Virginia Fair, Andre Fakir, Tony Falcaro, Steve Falcy, Caroline Falone, David Farca Lorna Farca, Raquel Farca, Franco Farina, Jana Farr, Valerie Fasnakis, Floriana Fassi, Gianfranco Fassi, Marina Favilla, Marino Fazi, Marisa Fazi, Stephen Fedele, Dennis Feeney, Eloisa Feeney, Axel Fehling, Liv Fehn, Maria-Luisa Feirrara, Leon Feldbrill, Maria Feldman, Sikica Feldman, Caroline Felons, John Fenton, Enrico Fermi, Slvador Fernanderz, Salvador Fernandez Herrero, Juan Fernandez, Salvator Fernandez, Jose Ferrano, Juan Ferrara, Vivian Ferrara, Bruno Ferrari, Mario Ferrari, Rosaria Ferrario, Robert Ferrarro, Lourdes Ferreira, Maria Ferreira, Alberto Ferrerro, Linda Ferry, Lynn Ferry, Richard Ferry, Steven Ferry, Cindy Feshbach, Kathy Feshbach, Lynn Feshbach, Matthew Feshbach, Sheryle Festa, Ron Fiandaca, James Fiducia, Margrit Fierz, Angel Figueroa, Fred Filios, Robin Filios, Giusy Filippini, Renata Filippini, Betty Filisky, robert Filisky, Beatrice Findlay, David Findlay, Lena Findlay, Bill Findley, Bob Fine, Elena Fine, Mike Fine, Robert Fine, Mary Finley, Hans-Peter Fischer, Dianne Fisher, Joan Fisher, Leslie Fisher, Gary Fishman, Patrice Fishman, Jonny Fjall, Jim Flahive, Bob Flanagan, Dave Fleershoff, Debby Flemming, John Flemming, Mary Float, Irma Flores, Walter Flosser, Willi Flosser, Luigi Fogazzi, Leslie Foglesong, John Foglio, Ed Fomby, Astrid Fontana, Gerald Foos, Bob Forrest, Nancy Forrest, David Forsman, Suzanne Fortin, Fabio Fortunat, Sarina Foster, Christian Fouche, Rex Fowler, Jonathan Fox, Marsha Fox, Russell Fox, Marie France Carpentier, Albert Franceschetti, Clara Franceschetti, Maria Franceschinelli, Alessandra Franchi, Maria Franchini, Carlo Francisco, Fabrizio Francomano, Veronica Francomano, vincente Francomano, Jim Frankel, Massimo Franzoni, Neil Fraser, Susana Frederick, Judy Freedman, Rosy Freihoff, Bertha Frias, Roxanne Friend, Hanne Fries, Fabio Frigerio, Thomas Frigge, Harry Frisch, Nancy Frisch, Helen Fritsch, Arda Froese, Diane Froese, Linda Frommer, Greg Frost, Claude Froute, Mary Fry, Rafael Fuentes, Valerie Fuetris, Hamida Fuiatti, Debra Fuller, Terry Fuller, Wayne Fuller, Graziano Fumari, Dudo Func, Richard Furbish, Geoff Fushi, Geoffrey Fushi, Jim Futris, John Futris, Gunther Gafton, Phillipe Gaille, Sheila Gaiman, Linda Galardo, Bianca Galbiati, Giancarlo Galbiati, David Gale, Marie Gale, Jose-Luis Galicia Jr, Gisela Galicia, Guillermo Galicia, Jose Galicia, Jose-Luis Galicia, Ernesto Galli, Eugenio Galli, Marilena Galli, Mauricio Galli, Margaret Gallivan, Ursula Gambert, Carmen Gamboa, Alessandro Gangidino, Pino Gangidino, Pino Gangislino, Steve Ganns, Marianne Garatti, Alfred Garbutt, Manuel Garces, Maria Garces, Cecilia Garcia, Ernesto Garcia, Evangelina Garcia, Gisela Garcia, Gladis Garcia, Ignacio Garcia, Jesus Garcia, Martha Garcia, Maria-Pia Gardini, Claire Gardner, Eva Gardner, Lilia Garduno, Benjamin Garner, Trisa Garner, Marc Garnier, Alicia Garrido, Gloria Garrido, Dolores Garriga, Manuel Gartces Linda Garver, Celia Garza, Laura Garza, Nadina Garza, Nadine Garza, Jane Gatliff, Gary Gatliffe, Eduardo Gatti, Fabrizio Gatti, Luciana Gatti, Chantal Gauthier, Harvey Gauthier, Luisa Gavazzi, Adelio Gaviraghi, Elena Gaviraghi, Fabrizio Gaviraghi, Paul Gawrello, Larry Geis, Malcom Gellatly, Barb Gendusa, Barbara Gendusa, Angelo Gentile, Martino Gentile, Marianne Genton, Antoine Geoffre, Kitty Georgius, Ken Gerbino, Victoria Gerbino, Peter Gerhards, Chris Gerson, Jan Gerson, Stan Gerson, Theresa Gerson, Reto Gfeller, Benjamin Ghiora, Benny Ghiora, Wendy Ghiora, Giovanni Giambarini, Mauro Gianfranco, Sergio Giannini, Dave Gibbons, Anne Giblin, Ingrid Gibson, Cathy Giesecke, Ellen Giffin, Irma Giger, Felipe Gil, Sandra Gil, Linda Gilbert, Louise Gilbert, Richard Gilbert, Steve Gilbert, William Gillette, Per Ginge-Nielsen, Giovanni Giocamezzi, Angelia Gioffre Angela Gioffre, Massimo Giordanengo, Luisa Giovanna Bellagamba, Fabio Giovannelli, Linda Giovanni, Phil Giovinco, Giorgio Girardi, Ernst Girnus, Allan Giroler, Alfredo Gironella, Antonio Gironella, Luisa Gissi, Luisa Gissy, Lorenzo Gizzarelli, Michelle Gizzi, Kurt Glassel, Anne Glenski, Bernadette Glenski, Alba Gloor, Greg Gloor, Lois Gloor, Albert Glow, Franziska Glur, Giorgio Gobbi, Sandra Godding, Tom Godfrey, Vivian Godfrey, Peter Godwin, Georgio Goffe, Alberto Goffy, Giorgio Goffy, Gerri Golashesky, Calla Gold, Marshall Goldblatt, Eden Golden, Emily Goldfield, Steve Goldfield, Lynne Goldstein, Allan Gomery, Mercedes Gomez, Roberto Goncalves, Kay Gonsolin, Ed Gonsoulin, Leona Gonsoulin, Carlos Gonzales, Leon Gonzales, Lillian Gonzales, Lou Gonzales, Maria Gonzales, Monica Gonzales, Penny Gonzales, Pilar Gonzales, Raoul Gonzales, Rom Gonzales, Silvana Gonzales, Susana Gonzales, Alvaro Gonzalez, Luis Gonzalez, Oscar Gonzalez, Pilar Gonzalez, John Good, Kevin Good, Marianne Good, Sherry Good, Randy Goode, Ann Gordin, Anne Gordin, Dawn Gordon, Gerald Gordon, Jerry Gordon, Gabriele Gordt, Emilia Gorini, Edward Goss, Rose Goss, Liane Gottwald, Hank Gould, Mark Gould, Sylvain Goulet, Christian Gounord, Daniele Gounord, Ignacio Gracia, Robert Graf, Jill Graham, Eva Gramm, Alba Grande, Alfonso Grande, Maurizio Grande, Carlo Granito, Theo Grant, Thoe Grant, Alicia Gray, Bob Gray, Maria Grazia Rocco, Linda Graziano, Anita Grechi, Betty Green, Jane Greenberg, Martin Greenberg, Marty Greenberg, John Greene, Maurice Greene, Peter Greene, Jayne Greenwalt, Anita Gregory, Kathy Gregory, Scott Gregory, Anne Greig, Mark Greisen, Simon Grenier, Anne Grieg, Nancy Griffith, Cristina Groenewold, Ricardo Groenewold, Cristina Groenwold, Jaime Groesbeck Michael Grope, Dominique Gropper, Carla Grossbohlin, Harry Grossbohlin, Larry Grout, Cathy Grown, Wilmie Gruber, Bertha Guadalajara, Mariani Gualtiero, Marianne Gubeli, Pierre Guenette, Lauri Guerin, Antonieta Guerrero, Francisca Guerrero, Irma Guerrero, Maria Guerrero, Virginia Guerrero, Anne-Marie Guertin, Duncan Guertin, Diana Guillen, Javier Guillen, jaime Guillertin, Brigitta Gustafsson, Brigitte Gutermann, Rolf Gutermann, Giuliana Gutierrez, Javier Gutierrez, Veronica Gutierrez, Peter Guy, Victor Guzman, Steve Guzzetta, Enza Guzzo, Helga Habiger, Gisela Hackenjos, Holger Hackenjos, Marie Hadjian, Jill Hagen, Diane Hahn, Helgard Hahn, Ernst Haible, Gali Halamish, Dave Haldy, Bob Hall, Cindy Hall, Betty Halliday, Lisa Halverson, Susan Hamady, Bob Hamilton, Edward Hamlyn, Ted Hamlyn, Michael Hancock, Lynne Haney, Michael Haney, Wally Hanks, Bill Hanley, Stina Hans, Henning Hansen, Wiebke Hansen, Eve Hanson, Janet Hanson, Larry Hanson, Lawrence Hanson, Randy Hanson, Margaret Hardy, Charlotte Harness, Connie Harris, Oliver Harris, Roger Harrison, Sioux Hart, Gunter Hass, Wenche Haugen, Lynn Hauptman, Bob Hay, Steven Hayes, Steve Head, Tom Head, Gary Hedge, Janet Hedge, Elisabeth Hedinger, Robert Hedinger, Peter Heer, Betsy Heess, Barbara Hegetschweiler, Helmut Heinzel, Mary Heldt, Katie Heller, Nina Helms, Jean Helpert, Monika Helpert, Berenice Hemsani, Moises Hemsani, Bev Henderson, Diane Henderson, Michael Henderson, Craig Hendrick, Jack Henessey, Bill Henley, Tim Henley, Robin Hennessy, Hans Henriksen, Cyril Henry Holman, Keren Hepner, Randy Hepner, Enrique Hernandez, Isabel Hernandez, Madalena Hernandez, Maria Hernandez, Martha Hernandez, Robert Hernandez, Mario Herold, Janet Herring, Norman Herring, Nan Herst, Pam Hertz, Axel Hesse, Anette Hevillon, Martha Higareda, Jim Highsmith, Saul Hildebrand, Jonathan Hill, Patricia Hillard, Sonia Hines, Robert Hinson, Peggy Hitchman, Tony Hitchman, Eva Hitz, Andy Hoare, Joe Hochman, Edith Hodgskinson, Edith Hodgson, Margaret Hodkin, Terry Hodosi, Hans Hodosy, Terry Hodosy, Otmar Hofer, Lucie Hoffmann, Rose Hogg, Doug Hoisington, Paula Hoisington, Debby Holder, Alan Hollander, Janet Hollander, Karen Hollander, Mimi Holm, Steven Holmes, Fred Holtby, Frederick Holtby, Ursula Holub, Gilles Homier, Francoise Hooks, Vera Hopkins, Joel Hord, Cynthia Horton, Dale Horton, Bill Horwich, Fred Houck, Guy Houston, Karen Howard, Bill Howey, David Howson, Faith Hudon, Faith Hudson, Ana Huelva, Debbie Hughes, Greg Hughes, Harriette Hughes, Peter Hughes, Rick Hull, Sherene Hull, Paul Hulme, Debbie Hulthen, Deborah Hulthen, Leena Hungerbuhler, Fred Hunt, Midge Hunt, Peter Hunt, Beatrice Hunziger, Peter Hunziker, Elena Hurtado, Nicolas Hurtado, Jane Hutchins, June Hutchins, Fawn Hutton, Marilyn Hydie, Jeff Hyland, Ellen Hyrne, Seija Hytonen, Sharon Imburgia, Mavis Imra, Barbara Inbody, Bob Inbody, Werner Indermuhle Deborah Indursky, Michael Ingbar, Renato Ingenito, Judith Irons, Judy Irons, Lynn Irons, Anne Isabelle, Anna Iverson, Jim Jackson, Brigitte Jacobi, Michael Jacobi, Dan Jacobs, Myrna Jacobs, Paul Jaconello, Albert Jacquier, Ariane Jacquier, Hamida Jafferji, Elias Jafif, Sandra Jager, Henry Jaggers, Mary Jane Luniewski, Bernt Janssen, Carmen Jaramillo, Keith Jarrett, Luisa Javier, Sally Jeans, Georg Jecel, David Jelley, Molly Jelley, Dane Jenkins, John Jennings, Barbara Jensen, Britta Jensen, Craig Jensen, Mary Jensen, Sally Jensen, Karen Jepson, Alexandra Jimenez, Claudia Jimenez, Javier Jimenez, Manuel Jimenez, Ramon Jimenez, Raoul Jimenez, Gust Johanesson, Wendel Johanesson, Hakan Johansson, Peter John, Berenice Johnson, Brent Johnson, Bruce Johnson, Jay Johnson, Jervis Johnson, Judy Johnson, Larry Johnson, Mark Johnson, Richard Johnson, Stacia Johnson, steve Johnson, Tyrone Johnson, Andrew Johnston, DeDe Johnston, Drew Johnston, Terry Johnston, Evelyn Johnstone, Lisa Johonnsesson, Lisa Johonnsson, Mark Jonathan Kloss, Debbie Jones, Iain Jones, Mark Jones, Robin Jones, Henning Jorck, Peter Jorck, Andrea Jordan, Paul Joseph, Claudia Joss, Danielle Jossi, Carol Joyal, Carolyn Judd, Karen Judkin, Hans Juel, Claudia Jugo, Diane Jullian, Abby Juneau, Michael Juneau, Mike Juneau, Unice Juneau, Andre Jurt, James Justice, Suzanne Justus, Alan Juvonen, Allan Juvonen, Susan Juvonen, Magda Kahanu, David Kahn, Mary Kahn, Barbara Kalergis, Bob Kalergis, James Kalergis, Carla Kammer, Gloria Kamph, Magda Kanahu, Rory Kaplan, Cheryl Kapuler, Mauri Karger, Michael Karger, Susan Karnovsky, Lamia Kashoghi, Carlo Katchi, Eurlich Katschzmann, Ulrich Katzschmann, Emil Kauer, Emile Kauer, Hugo Kaufmann, Mary Kaufmann, David Kaup, Bob Kaye, Robert Kaye, David Keat, Jamie Keavic, Dietmar Kecht, Goerge Keck, Gary Keenan, Guy Keenan, Jeanne Keenan, Richard Keeney, Grace Kefover, Patrick Kegel, John Keldami, Ingrid Keller, Alan Kellman, Kathy Kemmerer, Steve Kemp, Klaus Kempe, Marieta Kempe, Bonnie Kempner, Rudi Kempner, Robert Kenny, Carla Kent Grossbohlin, James Keppler, Kifumi Keppler, Stefan Kerber, John Kerr, Kitty Kerr, Naomi Kerr, Vivien Kerslake, Marianne Kessler, Denis Keyes, Ike Kezsbom, Peter Khaled, Christopher Kight, Bruno Kihm, Bill Kilpatrick, Kyung Kim, Scott Kimball, Sharon Kimball, Ivy Kimmich, Michael King Hancock, Eddie King, Fred King, Frederick King, Isabel King, Liz King, Susi Kinglefuss, Carol Kingsley, Siegfried Kiontke, Carmine Kischke, Christine Kischke, helen Kitchen, Helen Kitchin, Andrew Kitt, Andy Kitt, Any Kitt, Tara Kitt, John Kitzinger, Jens Kjeldsen, Niels Kjeldsen, Ken Klaebe, Monroe Kleiderman, Andreas Klein, Barry Klein, Jan Klein, Janet Klein, Naomo Klein, Martha Kleinbaum Lolita Kleinbaum, Ricardo Kleinbaum, Rosita Kleinbaum, Ruben Kleinbaum, Salvador Kleinbaum, Richard Kleinberg, Naomi Kleyn, Sandra Kleyn, Heidi Klinger, Michael Klinger, Gad Klopstock, Yaffa Klopstock, yaffa Klopstock, Sharon Kloss, Andrea Kluge, Dave Kluge, Housi Knecht, Nancy Kneighten, Angie Knewitz, Elsa Knewitz, Elvira Knewitz, Nancy Knighten, Ruth Knudsen, Emilio Kobeh, Andi Koch, Andres Koch, Christa Koch, Elizabeth Kochsiek, Walter Koenig, Walter Kolabruski, Felix Kolla, Klaus Koller, Emilie Kong, Martha Korringa, Wouter Korringa, Juliane Kostinger, Hans-Peter Kotzli, Dick Kraman, Jayne Kraman, Roswitha Kratz, Rolf Krause, Susan Krause, James Krebsbach, Nancy Kredel, Pam Kresse, Randy Kretchmar, Rene Kristal, Karl Kroeger, Sandy Kroeger, Elizabeth Kroll, Herwig Kroll, Greg Krueger, Daniel Kuhn, Maina Kuhn, Roland Kuhn, Ron Kule, Josef Kunz, Steve Kurth, Tuula Kuusisto, Sandy Kuypers, Iria La Vaccara, Phil La Claire, Michele Labarile, Elena Labarrure, Andre Laberge, Johnny Laboriel, Bob Labre, Nick Labuschagne, Rocky Lackey, Steven Lackey, Richard Lacy, Andy Ladd, Nicole Lafreniere, Connie Lahmann, Simone Laine, Bert Laing, Joachim Laiss, Stevie Lake, Josette Lambert, Giovanni Lamberti Frederica Lambertini, Enzo Lamorgese, Federica Lampronti, Bernardo Lan, Carlos Lan, Jeannie Lan, Miguel Lan, Morris Lan, Sarah Lan, Victorina Landra, Janet Langdon, Gennaro Langella, Andree Langevin, Michael Lanza, Serge Lapointe, Thierry Laprevote, Angela Laramea, Charla Larch, Donna LaRock, Elena Larrabure, Miguel Larrabure, Allen Larsen, Alan Larson, Arwen Larson, Janet Larson, Sherry Larson, Christina Larsson, Urban Larsson, Albert Lasala, Finn Lassen, Connie Latch, Lloyd Latch, Brenda Latchman, Pat Lathrom, Marjorie Laughlin, Tom Laughran, Joe Lauricella, Marie-Margrethe Lauritzen, John Laursen, Iria Lavacarra, Angelo Lavazza, Peggy Laverdiere, Andre Lavergnat, Charles Lavin, Joseph Lavin, Janet Lawrence, Greg Layton, Philippe Le Bourveau, Marc leach, Bruce Leavitt, Luis Leceta, Didier LeClercq, Steve Lederman, Carol Lee Womble, James Lee Antoinette Lee, Barbara Lee, Michael Lee, Mike Lee, Sydney Lee, Alain Lefebre, Eva Lefevre, Sam Lefkowitz, Pierre LeFrancois, Alain Lefrancois, Monique Lefrancois, Giuliana Legnani, Merriad Lehman, Monica Lehman, Yves Lehman, Hannes Lehmann, Klaus Lehmann, Meinrad Lehmann, Vivian Leifield, Al Leighton, Carol Leipsic, Ruth Lennie, Bente Lenz, Maurizio Lenzi, Ingrid Lenzke, Luis Leon, Ricardo Leon, Marsha Leone, Fabrizio Leonelli, Ben Leong, Gunter Leonhardt, Sergio Leoni, Gary Lerner, Diane Leroux, Vanella Lesevre, Andrea Lettieri, Tobias Leutenegger, Joe Levin, Johnny Levin, Alvah Levine, Barbara Levine, Daniel Levine, Doris Levine, Caspar Levman, Jan Levy, Sam Levy, Stew Levy, Barbara Lewis, Carita Lewis, Donna Lewis, James Lewis, Laura Lewis, Michael Lewis, Myron Lewis, Norman Lewis, Ronald Lewis, Victor Lidchi, Maria Lienert, Janet Light, Mari-Ann Lind, Per Lindberg, Ole Lindell, Christina Lindroth, Artur Lindskog, Virginia Lindskog, Michael Lindstr�m, Lenny Lindstrom, Michael Lindstrom, Lil Linson, David Lipchitz, Elizabeth Lippert, Lee Lippert, Heidi Lipscher, Juraj Lipscher, Albert Lipschutz, Mireille Lipschutz, Ken Lipton, Francesco Locilento, Frnaco Locilento, Jurg Locker, Rachel Lockwood, Maria Lodovici, Mario Lodovici, Leona Logan, Beatrix Lohman, Claus Lohmann, Leonardo Loi, Robert Lolln, Salvatore Lombardo, Desiree Long, Steve Longbotham, Joan Lonstein, Joan Loosli, Angel Lopez, Juan-Baptista Lopez, Leticia Lopez, Charla Lorch, Pier-Angelo Loreggia, Bill Lorentzen, Vikki Lorentzen, Carlos Lores, Michel Loron, Christi Losh, Mary Losty, Albert Lotz, Bjorn Lotz, Trey Lotz, Marlys Lotzer, Jan Loup Gilliot, Krystyna Louw, Anita Lowe, Jill Lowe, Madeline Lowe, Susan Lowe, Bernie Lowenstein, Grace Lowrance, Maria Lozano, Borghild Lozio, Nicola Lozio, Henry Lubbe, Harry Lucas, Nick Lucchesi, Hannelore Luck, Beth Ludwig Beth Ludwig, Patrick Lue Fan, Carlo Lugli, Claudio Lugli, Maria Lugli, Renata Lugli, Jerry Lull, Steve Lund, Conny Lundberg, Betty Lunde, Borje Lundgren, Anita Lundstedt, Mary-Jane Luniewski, Ron Luniewski, Ronald Luniewski, Paolo Luoni, Tarcisio Luoni, David Luscombe, Christian Lussi, Ernie Lutz, Hania Lux, Sally Lyn Zwan, June Lynch, Mary Lynne Wolfe, Bobby Lyons, Bruno Maca, Lenny Macaluso, Deanne Macdonald, Debbi Mace, Debbie Mace, Rick MacFarlane Sylvia Machado, Marco Macias, Phyllis Mack, Daniel MacKenzie, Bernadette Macullo, James Madia, Jim Madia, Stephen Mage, Maurizio Maggione, Janine Magnan, Janine Magnan, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Mario Majorski, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, David Magnano, Vincent Magni, Maria Mahoney, Alex Maier, Lina Majorsky Marc Majorsky, Mario Majorsky, Ray Malecki, Karen Mallenson, Anita Malley, Evan Malm, Janice Malm, Lisa Malm, Sally Malm, Anders Malmberg, Lisa Malmquist, Arturo Malnati, George Malnati, Giovanna Malnati, Beverly Manasse, Marco Mancusi, Antonietta Mancuso, Luigi Mandelli, Maria Mandelli, Bob Mangiamele, Karen Mangiamiele, Sandro Mangiapane, Carter Manierre, Carla Mann, Brigitte Manning, Christian Manning, Wendell Manning, Michael Manoogian, Juan Manuel Cardona Jr, Juan Manuel Cardona Sr, Maria Manzoli, Marina Manzoli, George Mapston, George Mapstone, Joni Marchese, Stephen Marchese, Toni Marchese, Nicola Marchetti, Mary Mardsen, Elizabeth Marelli, Ana Maria Santiago, Eva Maria Teilmar, Jose Maria Cordero, Rosa Maria Hernandez, Salvatore Maria Martini, Karen Marie Juel, Kathy Marier, Peter Marier, Anna-Maria Marino, Dan Marino, Daniel Marino, Gennaro Marino, Christie Marion, Jessica Marks, Susan Marple, Ray Marquardt, Pura Marquez, carlo Martelli, Carlos Martelli, Diana Martelli, Michele Martelli, Pedro Martin-Moreno, Christina Martinez, Francisco Martinez, Jose Martinez, Lucinda Martinez, Pedro Martinez, Pilar Martinez, Sergio Martinez, Veronica Martinez, Luisella Martini, Marc Marty, Robert Marx, Laura Mason, Mary Mason, Mary-Clare Mason, Dedo Maspero, Giusy Maspero, Patrizio Maspero, Valerio Maspero, Denise Masse, Alessandro Massolo, Donato Masucci, Antonelo Matar, Angela Matarazzo, Antonello Matarazzo, Luis Mateos, Dwight Matheny, Konrad Matt, Leon Matthews, Sue Mattinson, Giorgio Mattioli, Maria Mattioli, Maria-Teresa Mattioli, Pietro Mauro, GianFranco Mauro, Mary Mauser, Thomas Maxwell, Jeanette May, Elena Maya, James Mayer, Jim Mayer, Ulrich Mayer, Ursi Mayer, Regula Mayor, Kate Mays, Todd Mays, Christine Mazarand, Riccardo Mazza, Tito Mazza, Scott Mazzanarella, Elisabetta Mazzorato, Evangelina Mazzorato, Loris Mazzorato, Vincenzo Mazzoratto, Rose McAffee, Pam McCall, Mary McCarran, Mike McCaudles, Peter McCord, Carlynn McCormick, John McCormick, Margee McCormick, Rod McCormick, Gwen McCoy, Michael McCoy, Mick McCoy, Joseph McCusker, Janice McDaniels, Janice McDannel, Carolann McDonald, Michael McDonald, Shannon McDougall, Gill McEnery, Robert McFarlane, Jeff McGee, Lee McGee, Tom McIntyre, David McKee, Thomas McKee, Dennis McKenna, Mark McKenna, Breck McKinley, Jean McKinnon, Terry McKnee, Beth McLeod, Kenny McLeod, Debbie McNeely, Gerald McNeely, Jerry McNeely, Mario McQuade, Simon Meadmore, Gisela Medina, Lee Meekcoms, Karen Megan, Giovanna Megna, Jeannette Meier, Ursi Meier, Paolo Meini, Bob Meinsma, Betsy Melchior, Tim Melchior, Claire Melgren, david Melis, Alexia Melocchi, Al Melone, Penny Melrose Fernando Mena, Brigitte Meneau, Raquel Menoa, Guy Mercier, May Meriwether, Stefania Merlino, Clarisse Meschoulam, Tom Messick, Helen Meuley Ract, Alex Meyer, Christine Meyer, Otto Meyer, Ursi Meyer, jackie Meyers, Jacquellyn Meyers, Francoise Michaillet, Ron Michalski, Louis Michel Brolles, Lana Micheletti, Lina Micheletti, Tony Milan, Renato Milani, Uwe Millan, Gil Miller, Tina Miller, Karen Milligan, Rick Milner, Terry Milner, Gisella Minacci, Tudy Ming, Jacqueline Mingard, Peter Miranda, Loretta Miscavige, Ron Miscavige, Joe Miskowiecz, Paul Missonis, Tess Mobilia, Lucio Modegna, Joe Modica, Gunter Mohl, Rudi Mohl, Antonello Moi, Vera Moklowya, Paolo Molini, Don Moll, Fritz Mollman, Brigitta Mollmann, Kurt Molman, Jacky Molnar, Theo Molten, Charles Momsen, Greg Montangero, Susanne Montangero, Luisa Montero, Vicky Montesinos, Vito Montini, Vittorio Montini, Ed Mooney, Pat Mooney, Art Moore, Brigid Moore, Bruce Moore, David Moore, Peter Moore, Wendy Moose, Jose-Luis Morales, Paul Morel, Pablo Moreno, Tas Morfopoulos, Jeaninne Morissette, Angela Moro, Livia Morone, Loreno Moroni, Magda Morra, Brian Morrell, Silvana Morri, Kathy Morrill, Patricia Morrill, Terry Morrill, Bob Morris, Deborah Morris, Faye Morris, Gloria Morris, Mavis Morrison, Karen Morrissett, Carol Morse, David Morse, Joan Mort, Cecilia Mortano, Mina Moschini, Mildred Moscona, Lauren Moseley, Cathy Moss, Kathy Moss, Ron Moss, Lena Moufarej, Linan Moufarres, Art Mould, Richard Moulton, David Mowbray, david Mowbray, Roger Mueller, Walter Mueller, Elly Muller, fred Muller, Josef Muller, Peter Muller, Robert Muller, Roger Muller, Walter Muller, Jean-Christophe Mulliez, Javier Munoz Carmen Munoz, Hector Munoz, Javier Munoz, Alejandra Munro, Klaus Munz, Evelyn Murdock, Dan Murillo, Peter Murphy, Jerry Murray, Marvin Murray, Pat Murray, Barbara Musach, Bob Musack, Janice Myerberg, Paul Myerberg, Beth Nabors, Betyh Nabors, Lorena Nacif, Linda Nadir, Bill Nagengast, Judy Nagengast, Douglas Nagy, Mike Napier, Ed Naranjo, Antonio Narcisco, Cecilia Nascimento, Silvia Nascimento, Anne Nash, Bob Nastas, Claudio Natale, Marco Natale, Silvia Natale, Silvio Natale, Orlando Navarro, Patricia Navarro, Ann Naylor, Darrel Naylor, Astrid Neal, James Neal, Ron Nedd, Dennis Negley, Wendy Negley, Linda Neilson, Robert Neilson, Pamela Nelson, Donna Nemier, Art Nermiah, John Ness, Douglas Neuman, Rebecca Neuman, Gloria Neumeyer, Walter Neuschitzer, Herman Newkirk, Josh Newkirk, Alex Newman, Anita Newman, Arnold Newman, Becky Newman, Buzz Newman, John Newman, Mark Newman, Mary Newman, Phil Newman, Steve Newman, Willie Newman, Edith Nichols, Carol Nickols, John Nickols, Anne Nielsen, Bob Nielson, Celia Niemerow, Guillermo Nietes, Norma Nieto, Oscar Nieves, Ruth Nighswonger, Franco Nigro, Meryl Nilsson, Betty Nimger, Christian Nissen, Christian Nitart, Claude Nitart, Brodie Noeske, Rodie Noeske, Robert Nordlund, Thomas Nordlund, Robert Nordstrom, nadine Normal, Michael Norris, Mike Norris, Nadia North, Derrick Northcross, Gianfranco Notari , John Novello, Norm Novitsky, Mark Noyes, Bruna Nucci, Richard Nuccio, Jeff Nuckols, John Nuckols, Steve Nuckols, Judy Nugent, Antonio Nunes, Ann Nunez, Carlos Nunez, Jose Nunez, Maria-Elena Nunez, Mario Nunez, Jose-Luis Nuno, Manfred Nussle, Maria Nutgeren, David Nutter, Sally Nutter, Tom Nyerges, Elaine O’Connell, Kevin O’Donnell, Maryann O’Donnell, Melissa O’Hara, Steve O’Hara, Maureen O’Keefe, Kieran O’Leary, Peter Obolensky, Hugo Ocalo, Steven Ogmon, Therese Oliva, Barbara Oliver, Joy Ollemans, Dolores Olmos, Geri Olson, Giuseppe Onesti, Michel Oneyron, Churlya Ong Wurfel, Enrico Opipari, Luisa Opipari, Giuseppe Oresti, Luisa Orlandini, Umberto Orlandini, Pilar Orozco, Dolores Ortiz, Jesus Ortiz, Veronica Orvananos, Hazel Osborne, Mario Osborne, Mike Osborne, Rick Osborne, Carol Osinaga, Inger Ostlund, Vega Ostlund, Peter Otanjac, Patrick Ouellette, Bill Owen, Brooke Owen, Dan Owen, James Owen, Jim Owen, Michael Owen, Nancy Owen, Robert Pace, Adrian Padilla, Ariel Padva, Robert Page, Mary-Jo Pagel, Per Pagh, Rebecca Pagovich, Paula Paiewonsky, Mauricio Palacios, Chris Palmer, Garnet Palmer, Margie Palmer, Dario Pandolfi, Alessandra Panigalli, Roberto Panigalli, Jennifer Pantermuehl, Daniela Paolini, Paolo Paolini, Pietro Paolini, Daniele Paoloni, George Papaheraklis, Juan Paredes, Louise Parent, Serge Parent, Floriana Paris, Anna Parise, Beverly Park, Margaret Parke, Phillip Parke, Debbie Parker, James Parker, Francois Parmentier, Nancy Parodi, Pat Parodi, Stephen Parodi, Bennett Parrish, Helen Parselle, Jeanine Pasche, Ron Patella, Jo Patti, Bonnie Paull, Cindy Payer, Beatrice Payne, Graham Payne, Chip Payson, Sheri Payson, Jose-Luis Paz, Colleen Peabody, Dee Pearson, Dee-Dee Pearson, Delores Pearson, Rosie Peck, Sally Peck, Ernie Pecoraro, Nydia Pecoraro, Robert Pedersen, Karen Pedre, Patrizia Pedroza, Heidi Peens, Louis Peens, Antonella Peghin, Patrizia Pelizzari , Sylvie Pelletier, Andree Peloquin, Anne Peloquin, Diane Peloquin, Guy Peloquin, Michel Peloquin, Hector Pena, Fred Penna, Jeanette Penwell, David Percival, Antonio Perez, Arturo Perez, Elisa Perez, Jose Perez, Samuel Perez, Dennis Pero, Giugliana Peroni, Eliana Perotti, Silvio Perotti, Genevieve Perrin, Steven Perrin, Alessandra Pesce, Gisella Pesce, Silvia Pestiddo, Lynn Peters, Kifumi Peterson, Bradford Petit, Pino Petrotto, Angelo Petruolo, Marzia Pezzali, Don Pfendler, Linda Phillip, Christine Phillips, Diane Phillips, Michael Phillips, Maria Pia Gardini, Pier Piaceri, Laura Piazza, Lucio Piazza, Enzo Piccone, Isella Piccone, Patricia Piccone, George Pick Geoffrey Pick, Jean Pierre Deleze, Jean Pierre Lehman, Luciano Pietrobuoni, Giuseppe Pietrobuono, George Pilat, Irit Pillo, Bernard Pimont, Giovanni Pinchietti, Claire Pinelli, Gustavo Pinto, Katharina Piotrowski, Colleen Piper, Collen Piper, Claire Pirelli, Alain Pitre, Letizia Pizzi, Dominic Pizzinat, Veronique Pizzinat, Ariel Podva, Daniel Podva, Marie-Louise Podva, Beatrice Pogouch Armando Pogoush, Dieter Pohlmann, Manuel Poiatti, Jean Poitras, Carl Polk, Dan Polk, Mireille Pollack, Fay Pollard, Ina Pollins, Mario Polverini, Maurizio Polverini, Bruce Pomaville, Martha Pomroy, martha Pomroy, Angelo Ponchetti, Maria-antonieta Ponchetti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchetti, Giovanni Ponchietti, Maria-Giovanna Ponchietti, Dick Pool, Cal Poole, Calvin Poole, Mark Poole, Fred Pope, Hermann Poppinga, Hans-Jorge Porner Claude Portais, Joanne Porter, Carlos Portillo, Paula Portmann, Joanne Portner, Graham Potter, Jack Potter, Christian Pouliot, Maria Pozzebon, Priscilla Presley, Leonie Price, Paul Price, Rosa Prieto, Clay Primrose, Earl Prince, Marty Prince, Nicolas Prince, Bruce Pringle, Carlyn Pringle, Carolyn Pringle, Daniela Prior, Tommy Pritzkau, Antonella Prosali, Massimo Prosperi, Peter Przybylla, Pia Pskowski, Hamida Puatti, Susana Puente, Marco Pugelli, Luisella Pugliatti, Hamida Puiatti, Wayne Pullen, Lee Purcell, Betsy Putterman, Larry Putterman, Michel Puzzolante, Sigrun Quetes, Rod Quinn, Bolivar Quinones, Francisco Quiroz, Ken Rabey, Nornie Rabey, Pat Rabey, Sheri Rabey, Janice Racheff, Jerry Racheff, Norma Rachel Brian Rackham, Helene Ract, Orelio Radaelle, Oreste Radaelli, Silvio Radaelli, Jerald Radroblo, Ron Radstrom, Leon Raffoul, Erika Rail, Rob Rainer, Aino Raisanen, Mauno Raisanen, Jaakko Raita, Pirjo Ramberg, Graciela Ramirez, Jaimes Ramirez, Lidia Ramirez, Norma Ramirez, Jose Ramon Amondarain, Eduardo Ramos, Giovanni Rampazzo, Mauro Rangeloni, Michel Raoust, Farhad Raschidi, Heidi Raschidi, Victoria Rashidi, Bruce Raston, Keith Raymond, Sandy Raymond, Joe Reaiche, Serge Rebeillard, Nelia Redondo, Nena Redtmann, Jan Regan, Sissy Reginato, Gayle Rego, Jim Rego, Marian Reguera, Sherwood Reichard, Brian Reichenberg, Helmut Reichert, Jean Reid, Gerhard Reile, Kathy Reilly, Eric Reinertaen, Felix Reinhard, Liliane Reinhard, Felix Reinhardt, Maggie Reinhart, David Reinken, Bruno Reisch, Richard Reiss, Manfred Renker, Gerard Renna, Karen Renna, Ian Rennie, Ann Rentachler, Lisa Rentschler, Brian Reso, Joan Reso, Michel Reveillere, Odile Reveillere, Virginia Rex, Edelia Reyes, Gino Reyes, Olivia Reyyes, Emil Rhodes, Mary Ribero, Gay Ribisi, Giuseppina Riccardi, Duane Rice, Mischa Rice, Arlene Rich, Frances Rich, Gary Rich, gary Rich, John Rich, Jean Richardson, Dan Richier, Harry Rickard, Dee-Dee Riechel, Frank Riemer, Paul-Unko Rieter, Nicola Rinaldi, Barbara Rinder, Ian Rinder, Jan Rinder, Crister Ringkvist, Fernando Rios, Gian-Luigi Ripamonti, Patricia Ripetta, Michael Rischer, Giancarlo Rivolta, Giovanna Rizetti, Giovanni Rizza, Carol Rizzardini, Giovanna Rizzetti, Costanzo Robasto, Francisco Robasto, Silvano Robasto, Don Roberts, Donald Roberts, Gracia Roberts, Lynn Roberts, Suzanne Roberts, Hunter Robertson, James Robertson, Maggie Robertson, Marguerite Robin, Allison Robinson, Mary Robinson, Myron Robinson, Patrick Robinson, Robbie Robinson, Dan Robison, Jose Robles, Ricardo Robotton, Francisco Rocha, Rene Rochat, Kathleen Roche, Kathy Roche, Craig Rocheau, Norma Rochelle, Michael Rock Mike Rock, Bonnie Rockwell, Jean Rockwell, Ginger Rodeghero, Linda Rodgers, Tony Rodgers, Jose RodriGuez, Susan RodriGuez, Antonia Rodriguez, Juan-Salas Rodriguez, Martin Rodriguez, Noemi Rodriguez, Gina Rogers, Mimi Rogers, Rick Rogers, Pablo Rohrig, Sabine Rohrig, Helena Rojo, Dennis Roland, Doc Roland, Kay Roland, Kaye Roland, Len Roland, Riccardo Romanini, Romano Romanini, Tiziana Romanini, Claudio Romano, Laura Romano, Patrizia Romano, Jose Romeo, Jose-Manuel Romero, Rocio Romero, Jorge Roncal, Bruno Ronchi, Ricardo Rosales, Louise Rose, Sandi Rosen, Sandy Rosen, Alain Rosenberg, Alain-Frank Rosenberg, Sarit Rosenberg, Charles Rosenkranz, Allyne Rosenthal, Jean Rosko, Gwen Ross, Ron Ross, Rino Rossetti, Alessandro Rossi, Giorgio Rossi, Christian Rossini, Marianne Rossini, Riccardo Rosso, Harry Rostig, Sandra Rostig, Marco Rota, Alon Roth, Bernard Roundhill, Karen Rounds, Cristina Roveyaz, Elaine Rowles-Poole, Susan Royal, Kristina Royce, Richard Royce, Jaime Ruane, Pat Rubey, Michael Rubin, Sy Rubin, Bet Ruddell, Steven Ruddell, Alfons Ruegg, Alfonse Ruegg, Gery Ruegg, Sleven Ruggiero, Guido Ruiu Hector Ruiz, Roberto Ruiz, Linda Rule, Giovanni Rusconi, Sara Russo, Margaret Rutherford, Susan Ryan Eastin, Gerard Ryan, Howard Ryan, Joan Ryan, Corry Ryke, Tony Ryke, Bernardo Sacchi, Bianca Sacchi, Vittorio Sacchi, Doug Sadwick, Douglas Sadwick, Nancy Sadwick, Fernando Sakuray, Marco Salame, Russell Salamon, Kenneth Salazar, Oscar Saldarriaga, Andres Saldivar, Tom Saliga, Mauricio Salinas, Ritva Salmela, Leon Salsberg, Matty Salsberg, Adriana Saltamerenda, Michael Saltz, Landru Salvo, Tony Sampson, Paolo San Agostino, Robert San Filippo, Roberto San Filippo, Alejandar Sanchez, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrea Sanchez, Benites Sanchez, Firmin Sanchez, Gisela Sanchez, Pilar Sanchez, Eileen Sanders, Sunny Sanders, Claude Sandoz, Diana Sandrin, Michel Sansfacon, Paolo Santagostino, Luis Santiago, Pablo Santiago, Alberto Santinato, Mavi Santinato, Graziella Santo, Massimo Santoro, Frances Santos, Hernan Santos, Laura Santos, Roberto Santos, Bonifacio Saponaro, Alberto Sarrocco, Ennio Sarrocco, Mike Savales, Andy Savas, Kathy Savas, Martha Savelo, Saveria Savocchia, Iris Sawtelle, Fabio Scarabelli, Alex Schabes, Volker Schalthoff, Denise Scherer, Guido Scherer, Theo Scherer, Olga Shermayer, Ursula Scherwinzer, Catherine Scherzinger, Denise Scherzinger, Rolf Scherzinger, Clarisse Schmid, Heinz Schmid, Dieter Schmitt, Heide Schnabl, Hermann Schnabl, Susan Schnabli, Anita Schneider, Ingeborg Schneider, Joanne Schnitzer, Ingeborg Schnitzler, Hilda Schoemaker, Paul Scholten, Martin Schonenberger, Jeanne Schrodinger, Hermann Schubotz, Claudia Schuhbock, Inge Schuhbock, Ruth Schuler, Peter Schultz, Dieter Schulz, Joseph Schumacher, Vreni Schurtenberger, Cheryl Schwalbe, Gerhard Schwandt, Carole Schwartz, Joe Schwartz, Pam Schwartz, Robert Schwartz, Judith Schwyter, Giorgio Scialuga, Flavio Sciotti, Jeannie Scoglio, Jeff Scott Jeffrey Scott, Karen Scott, Sonya Scott, Susan Seagal, Jon Sears, Bernadette Segal, Frank Seibert, Rob Seibert, Andy Seidler, George Seidler, Philip Seifleir, Marie Selosse, Jacques Senior, Maria Serato, Vincenzo Servidio, Vincenzo Servilio, Vincenzo Servodio, Jacob Sevilya, John Sexsmith, Mario Sgamarella, Pietro Sgaramelli, Peter Sgroi, Mike Shadowski, Anita Shain Reichenberg, Avishai Shalev, Bill Shannon, Pat Shannon, Hyam Shaull, Wendy Shaw, Rick Sheey, Hanna Shefi, Joanne Shelby, Larry Shelton, Kathy Shepard, Kathy Sheperd, Eric Sherman, Manon Sherman, Martin Sherman, Renee Sherman, Ron Sherwood, Bill Shields, Megan Shields, Chris Shipman, Ilana Shippony, Donald Showalter, Susan Shugart, Gloria Sierra, Joan Sigal, Jan Silber, Marc Silber, Penny Silber, Bruce Silton, Larry Silver, Dennis Simmons, Karen Simons, Tony Simpson, David Singer, Martine Sitbon, Gro Skov, Tina Slack, Benetta Slaughter, David Slaughter, Larry Sliver, David Sloane, Pascal Smakdji, Margaret Smidt Van Gelder, Brian Smith, Dieter Smith, Greg Smith, John Smith, Lena Smith, Louise Smith, Peter Smith, Steven Smith, Jessie Snow, Kathy Snow, Scott Snow, Peter Snyder, Deborah Sobocinski, Lawrence Sobocinski, Flavio Sofia, Tom Solari, Elena Soldati, Liesel Soley, Linda Solomon, Lee Some, Donna Sommer, Ann Sophie Wago, Beatrice Sopprarono, Ronit Soracco, Bengt Sorensen, Daniel Sorensen, Eric Sorensen, Scott Sorensen, Dick Sorenson, Josse-Luis Sosa, Jose-Maria Sousa, Vicki Southard, Maurizio Sozzi, Joe Spencer, John Spencer, Torrey Spencer, Michal Spencer-Smith, Paul Spencer-Smith, Massimiliano Speri, Ann Spielberg, Rick Spies, Jim Spina, Michael Spinelli, Jean Spinner, Fritz Spohn, Maggie Spohn, Bruno Spolenak, Jenny Sprecher, Stephen Spreecher, Luisa Sprefilio Richard Springsteed, Robert Sprungli, David St-Lawrence, Herbert Stahl, Maike-B Stahl, Hansueli Stahli, Darrell Staley, Aldo Stanzani, Roberto Stanzani, Chiara stanzani, Christina Staples, Peter Staples, Velli Stefneki, Rolf Steimer, Art Stein, Paul Stein, Cathy Steiner, George Steiner, Thomas Steiner, Lewis Steinman, Charles Stephens, George Stermer, Jennifer Stermer, Cheryl Stewart, Donna Stewart, Tony Stewart, Egon Stiebel, Edith Stockli, Ilse Storfer, Paul Storfer, Dan Stover, Joe Stover, Peter Stowes Travis Stracener, Betty Stradford, Dan Stradford, Gene Streett, Anne Strickland, Peter Strickler, Bengt Strom, Jeanine Struchen, Dominique Struder, Jo Struthers, Kathrin Stuckenbrock, Marilyn Stuckli, Brian Sturgeon, David Sturgiss, Gloria Suarez de Romero, Alberto Suarez, Denise Suarez, Maria Suarez, Leo Suchor, Bob Sudalnik, Susanne Sudalnik, Bonnie Sue Krumpe, Michael Suggs, Jon Supak, Margaret Supak, Jurgen Suplit, Libia Susana Calvete, Angela Sushko, Lana Susman, Marie Suter, Max Suter, Betty Sutphin, Herb Sutphin, Christian Svensson, Staffan Svensson, Sherry Swanson, Ralph Swarens, Paul Sweeny, Renee Swisko, Jim Sydejko, Linda Sydejko, Francois Sylvestre, Debbie Taffe, Joseph Taffe, Veikko Taivainen, Peter Talbot, Mitch Talevi, Pierre Tamboise, Harry Taplin, Roberto Tarabini, Serge Tardif, Tania Tarpico, Elena Tarqui, Jaime Tauchi, Berndt Taylor, Bruce Taylor, Claire Taylor, John Taylor, Sue Taylor, Pierre Tedeschi, Sylvie Tedeschi, Jaime Tello, Ralph Temps, Grace Ten Oever, Sax Ten Oever, Carmine Terra, Meri Tertelman, Aline Testa, Gerd Teutsch, Peter Thalmann, Laurent Theberge, Len Their, Marie Therese Meili, Yves Thibodeau, Marc Thies, Ann Thomas, Bob Thomas, David Thomas, Dina Thomas, Laurie Thomas, Meredith Thomas, Miguelle Thomas, Pat Thomas, Serge Thomas, Bruce Thompson, Frank Thompson, Raymond Thompson, Anne Thurston, Fatima Thut, Dottie Tillberg, Tomas Tillberg, Tina Tinbri, Chris Tingley, Alain Tizzioli, Don Tolan, Maureen Tolan, Ildiko Tombolini, Kristin Tomczak, Jacqueline Tomlinson, Stefano Tonellotto, Claudio Toppi, Ernesto Toro, Ricardo Toro, Graciela Torres Graciela Torres, Maria Torres, Miguel Torres, Ricardo Torres, Sergio Torres, Silvia Torres, Giullio Toso, Kader Toumi, Larry Trainor, larry Trainor, John Travolta, Nicole Tremblay, Pierre Tremblay, Daniel Tremblay, Anne-Marie Tremday, Angie Trent, Gian-Paolo Trivella, Gigi Troglio, Dave Tropf, Irv Trudell, Irving Trudell, Gunter Tschauder, Hans-Peter Tschudin, Susi Tschupp, Bill Tucker, Bodil Tucker, Stefan Tunedal, Philip Tunison, Paul Turnbull, Bruce Turner, Nancy Turner, George Turney, Andrea Turroni, Rudiger Tuschen, Catherine Tweed, Rusty Tweed, Vera Tweed, Enrique Ugarte, Maggie Uitz, Francesca Ulivieri, Anette Ungerman, Marian Upton, Alessandro Urbini, Mikel Urizarbarrena, Dario Usai, Franco Useri, Charlie Uslander, Ornella Vaccari, Marco Vaccarone, Mario Vaccarone, Marie-France Vachon, Nola Vains, Antonio Valentini, Hector Valenzuena, Jane Van Pelt, Jone Van Hoecke, Marc Van den Lynde, Michael Van Masters, Timothy Van De Pelt, Victoria Van Harasz, Eden Vanning, Manuel Vargas, Anita Vasquez, Cesar Vasquez, Sergio Vavalle, Jean Vavrus, Anita Vazquez, Frank Vedder, Judy Vedder, Enrique Vega, Manuel Vega, Maria Vega, Fredrich Veit, Manuel Velasco, Maria Velasco, Ricardo Velazquez, Jose Veloz, Diana Venegas, Sam Venti, Velia Vera, Yolanda Vergara, Susan Verger, Angela Vescovi, Norman Vespi, Marc Vianna, Anne Vicino, Elaine Vidal, Tania Vilchez, Tom Villaire, Val Villaluz, Jose Villareal Acosta, Antonieta Villareal, Antono Villareal, Jose Villareal, Maria Villareal, Rodrigo Villareal, Rudolfo Villareal, Jose Villarreal, Charni Vilnar, Angelina Vincent, Sylvie Vincent, Margarita Vinyallonga, Mireya Vinyallonga, Vera Vitale, Lore Vlemmings, Bob Voight, Christie Voight, Jon Voight, Steve Vollum, Giuseppe Volpari, Connie Von Adelung, Edith Von Thungen, Erik Vos, Marijke Vos, Sally Voss, Larry Voyer, Beatrice Vuille, beatrice Vuille, Erik Wagel Sorensen, Ann Wagle, Helga Wagner, Tom Waite, Peter Wakley, Marc Walby, Andrea Walker, David Walker, Doff Walker, Estelle Walker, Jack Walker, Jill Walker, Nancy Walker, Peter Walker, Rene Walker, Roger Walker, Rohn Walker, Margot Wall, Janie Wallace, Jim Wallace, Tony Walpert, Siegfried Walser, Marc Walter, Therese Wanner, George Ward, Lana Ward, Laura Ward, Bruce Warren, Jerry Watson, Susan Watson, Susie Watson-Taylor, Barey Wayne Critzer, Art Webb, Alice Webber, Bennet Webber, Carolyn Weber, Gerd Weber, Harriet Weber, Joan Weber, Maria Weber, Patricia Weber, Regula Weber, Winfred Weber, Paula Webster, Edouard Weesely, Doug Weigand, Judith Weigand, Judy Weigand, Scott Weigand, Nancy Weilgart, Peter Weis, Odile Weisgerber, Rebecca Weiss, Kathy Welch, kathy Welch, Brad Wells, Martha Wells, Ted Wells, Heidi Wendel, Janine Wenger, Marcel Wenger, Chris Wertin, Julien Wessenberger, Dorothy West, Kathy West, Kirk Westerman, Peggy Westerman, Jeanne Weston, Anette Westphal, Kjell Westphal, Joanne Wheaton, Bob Wheeler, Ellyn Wheeler, Janice Wheeler, Larry Wheeler, Lydia Wheeler, William Wherry, Tom Whipple, Betsy White, George White, Judy White, Rosalind White, Kurt Wicki, Monika Wieneke, Sherri Wiktor, Ruth Wilette, Peggy Wiley, Virgil Wilhite, Ernie Wilkens, Janet Wilkens, Cary Wilkins, Janet Wilkins, John Wilkins, Bob Wilkinson, James Wilkinson, John Wilkinson, Fran Willardson, Judith Willardson, Judy Willardson, Ruth Willett, Christine Williams, Dick Williams, Elizabeth Williams, Jack Williams, Karla Williams, Peter Williams, Eve Willner, Neil Willner, Barbara Wilson, Curt Wilson, David Wilson, Duke Wilson, Phil Wilson, Rosa Wilson, Ted Winegar, Dennis WInfrey, Gil Winter, Marge Wirick, Barbara Wiseman, Nikki Wiseman, Adele Witkin, Joan Witt, Judy Witt, Else-Margarete Wojan, Meggie Wojan, Nancy Wold, Barbara Wolf, Shirley Wolf, Mary Wolfe, Benjamin Wolff, Tova Wolff, Leslie Wolleinstein, Gus Wollitzer, Aurora Wong, Bill Wong, Harry Wong, Percy Wong, Roberto Wong, Claire Woodruff, John Woodruff, Diane Woods, Michael Woods, Neil Woods, Steven Woodworth, Diane Workman, Heinz Wrege, Sara Wright Lister, Bonnie Wright, Cyndy Wright, Chris Wrightsman, Pam Wrightsman, Bonnie Wubben, Bia Wunderer, Churlya Wurfel, Hubert Wurfel, Kathy Wydler, Verena Wyss, Alexandra Yacoulef, David Yanrenko, Richard Yared, Brenda Yates, Marie Yates, Bill Yaude, Kathy Yaude, Beat Yogel, Jeff Youmans, Ofelia Yunes, Wolfgang Zabel, Alberet Zack, Anders Zacks, Ed Zacks, Marjorie Zacks, Larry Zagler, Bill Zahn, Bill Zalin, Lorenzo Zambelli, Giovanni Zamboni, Arturo Zamora, Maria Zanaboni, Gianni Zanetti, Lucia Zangrandi, Jack Zani, Laura Zani, Pauline Zani, Peter Zani, Gisela Zapata, Rita Zarahn, Helga Zaun, Robert Zchwartz, Susan Zea, Irina Zecchina, Ivan Zecchina, Bob Zeltzer, Jose Zenas, Heinz Zepernick, Alfredo Zetune, Martha Zetune, Andrea Zhinaghi, Ros Ziebart, Edda Ziehe, Helmut Ziehe, Deborah Zimmatore, Peter Zimmatorre, Michael Zimmer, Oreste Zinaghi, Massimo Zocche, Waki Zollner, Diana Zottola, Glenn Zottola, Antonio Zucchelli, Beatrice Zulauf, Kaija Zulker, Paula Zulli, Harry Zunicky, Elena Zurloni, Giovanna Zurloni, Bryan Zwan, Robert Zwan, Kaspar Zwicky, Robert Zwiegers
UNSECURED LOANS run by scientologists
an OPEN LETTER to anyone who asks about
THE MERIT of “HIGH RETURN INVESTMENTS”
(OR UNSECURED LOANS)
run by scientologists
Promises of untold riches arising from small to medium investments abound amongst Scientologists
Blinded by the lure of lavish returns and the problems resulting from the need to raise the hundreds of thousands (sometimes millions) of dollars demanded by the Church, every year more people fall prey to schemes that would make any banker or professional investor hair stand on end.
In fact a large number of “ex-scientologists” became so as the direct result of their disenchantment when they realized that their gullibility had purposely been nurtured for years in order to encourage them to make large investments or loans when these actually were nothing but elaborate plans to funnel millions into the Church coffers.
Anyone honest and with verifiable experience in Investing will tell people that the greater the theoretical potential for return the greater the risk and the odds that one will loose everything rather than make a small fortune. It if were not true, the numbers of millionaires in America would not be in the thousands, but rather in the millions.
Individual schemes come and go, so I do not know for a fact that the promises of any specific individual someone is now referring me to actually fall under that category, but based on my experience in life and an extensive one with investing, I would advise anyone to use extreme caution before embarking on any schemes promising extremely high returns, especially when no verifiable track of success can be provided.
When returns or promises to pay back fail to materialize, it is typical to see a series of stalling messages given to investors or lenders. Taking taking legal action by a Scientologist against another, (even when fraud or crimes are involved) is subject to the most extreme and heavy punishment by the Church of Scientology. (The one thing the Church of Scientology hates is to be publicly maligned or exposed)
Long time Church policies state that it is supreme in adjudicating disagreements among its members. Yet it has a proven track to exclusively rule with the individual who most closely align with it short term financial gain, no matter how amoral its diregard for those who have been wronged.
The penalty for any Scientologist seeking legal relief agaisnt another is
1- The automatic shunning of wife, children, parents, any associates and friends (lest they wish to share the same fate)
2- Public expulsion and humiliation, typically with slanderous generalities and fabrications, often disseminated where it will cause the maximum amount of embarassment.
3- Being branded as as a psychopath
4- Persecution by becoming the target of Hatred by zealot members who take all currently Church pronouncements as if they were divinely inspired.
5- Becoming an open target to the practice of the infamous FAIR GAME (policy cancelled only for PR purposes, but very much applied to high profile targets in current practice)
6- Official condemnation by curses of eternal damnation (Scientologese jargon actual means the same)
Authors of scams are typically given free rein to operate within the Church as long as they contribute to the filling of Church coffers (War chest in the Church lingo) until the day when they eventually lead to the creation a legal problem of the type of magnitude that induces legislation seeking to get Scientology banned in that country. Once this occurs, the Church will inevitably plead its innocence and vigorously place itself on the long list of their victim, quietly disregarding the fact that it profited obscene amounts of money from them.
I have personally met thousands of individuals on both sides of the fence in and out of the Church of Scientology.
As long as Scientology’s name was kept out of the newspapers or absent from legislators agendas, the Church would turn the cold shoulder to the hundreds of desperate pleas by those who claimed they had been fleeced by con men and had now become destitute. Being now useless to them, (downstat in Scientology jargon), the Church would discard them just like a worn out doll, should the victims of schemes and defaulting loans ever revolt against the Church sanctiomonious rulings or vocalize disparaging statements agaisnt against their agressors because they were “Scientologists in Good standing”. Hundreds, possibly thousands of members have been expelled that way since in the last 25 years.
Over my two decades at Flag (the highest center in Scientology, located in Clearwater, Florida), I was called to obtain the written (and therefore entirely actionable) confessions of the perpetrators (and more sadly, provide counselling to address the upset and despondency from its victims) for dozens upon dozens of scams, swindles, pyramid or ponzi schemes and other empty promises and fraudulent loans.
For years I wrote reports on the perpetrators of such scams, appalled that they would be granted immunity by a Church I came to see every day as more corrupt. Nothing came out of it, except for my being listed as a “trouble maker” and eventually marked for “orderly disposal”.
Some of the victims of those schemes became dangerously despondent and found themselves destitute. In extreme cases, suicides or murderous rages were the final result.
One of the most touching stories documenting such abuses to be posted on the Internet is “Albert Jaquier, Diary of a dying scientologist”. I personally knew Albert quite well. Based on my first hand experience with Albert, I can state that his story as compelling as it was is merely the tip of a monstruous and most pernicious iceberg. I know first hand dozens of stories equally devastating (see the link for a more detailed account)
I feel no compunction to withold any of this data, because in each case prior to the the travesty of a confessional that I was ordered to give on behalf of the Church of Scientology each parishioner was told at the beginning that “This is not auditing (Scientology word for counselling) and that everything revealed would be written up in triplicate and forwarded to a number of lay people and to the Church Intelligence agency, where privacy concerns are officially acknowledged as entirely irrelevant by long standing policy.
In every case, I was under the obligation to write a full and detailed report of the transgressions revealed to me by the parishioners, as well as any hearsay involving others, so that the Church could use it for its own lay purposes. When I eventually objected that covertly using Confession as a double standard to extort blackmail materials from its parishioners and publicly revealing their details for personal gain was morally objectionable, I found myself threatened by expulsion and blackmail. I eventually felt utter contempt for a Church acting that way, especially in the light that it has always insisted in the court and legal system that all such confessions are “priest-penitent
privileged” and has the folders containing such “confessions” so stamped. A number of disenchanted Scientology celebrities are currently being kept at bay through the “intelligence” so gathered through such chicanery. Without doubt the same fate awaits any current Church celebrity should they one day decide to defect.
It is my view that the amount of money that was lost by well meaning individuals through questionable schemes between 1980 and 1992 (the years I was the foremost and most succesful counsellor within the Church) to be well in excess of 100 millions American dollars.
In most cases the sole beneficiaries were the Church of Scientology and International Association of Scientologists, who blissfully received the millions of dollars funelled through the amoral schemes.
In the worst cases suicides were even directly linked when such schemes failed. In 1996 Scientology was almost banned in France as a result.The story of people I personally know who found themselves facing shattered lives, financial ruin and who left Scientology as a result could fill up a very large book. I also know equally well the unholy story and details of those who defrauded them.
Best Regards
Pierre Ethier
In memory of Bill Franks
“They prey on the goodness of people and use that to get into their heads.”
Bill Franks shared his views:
Dear Catherine,
Firstly, I regret deeply any harm I might have caused your husband. I was and am far from perfection. I obviously had Pierre mixed up with someone else but I fucked up as well as trying to right the church. I see now how hollow and plagiarized the “tech” really was and what a true thief hubbard was. If my apologies mean anything please accept them.
Me and my family were harassed for 15 years after I was removed from the board of directors. So, I have an idea of how mean spirited they are. It must be very very difficult with your child to have to hear or see the garbage they can say and do. My children had a taste of it but I was able to shield them. I can’t imagine what it must have been like with a disabled child. But fuck them. I believe when this HBO thing gets digested it will be the gateway to their destruction. I have my hopes the government- US will take their assets over ad try to right some of the wrongs. I have good reason to hope for this.I’m sorry about it all, but there is light at the end of this arduous tunnel.
Also, I thank you for taking the time to write to me.I assume Pierre is so angry that is why you are writing.
Catherine, I hear you. As ED int’l and Chairman of the Board I never made more tha $50 dollars. In the boat yrs I made as low as 2 dollars per week. Though not a Class 12 I was a Class nine with over4-5000 hours. I was not aware of Rathburn’s pay of $50,000 annually but I, I left before he came aboard, I am very aware thru friends like Mayo of his many many misdeed. I had to laugh whenthe other day he fessed up to tapping Nicole Kidman’s phone. That is such very small potatoe’s that it is really just laughable.No need to get into what they did to me but it went on for no less than 15 years.
As someone who knew hubbard personally and saw things from the top down I can say that even so I saw the shit I stayed in denial for a very long time after having left. I was all in so to speak during my 14 years. I got married a few years afterwards and got busy with earning a living and raising my kids. But, I was still stuck. I find this still today a source of humiliation. A part of me still wanted to “make scientology work”. Fucking nuts, right.
Well I was Chairman of the Board and fired by Hubbard himself for things such as lowering prices. I know a lot about failed purposes.
My wife is a psychologist by training and it is only now that we are both beginning to confront this. Actually about 4 years ago.
The fact is there is definitely brainwashing that occurs within the church from the first tr’s course to your continual sec checks. I did the rpf 3 times while on the apollo andthe whole process is meant to introvert you. L.hubbard actually admitted this to me and dave mayo in 1974. He did it to gain controll over individuals and it is successful in doing that to varying degrees.
I know Pierre I believe from Clearwater but we were not even acquaintances. As a Class 9 auditor I audited over 4000 hours. That means I unknowingly collaborated with hubbards goal of control. I believe this weighs very heavily on auditors though most stay in denial.
A suggestion is if you haven’t read True Believer published in 1951 you should. That will tell you what has happened to Emile and it sounds like he is very much still wrestling with it. The mental state that you find yourself in is very hard to shake but the book really nails the lure of the cult which Hoffer calls “mass movements”. That insight might be of help to you.
Having seen things about myself finally through my non Scn wife’s eyes I can feel compassion for your frustration. Emile sounds like the kind of people the church loves to get their hands on. They prey on the goodness of people and use that to get into their heads.Good Luck. I hope this is helpful.
Bill
sent 2015
Bill Franks, 1946-2018, appointed by Hubbard to ‘reform’ Scientology after Snow White scandal
By Tony Ortega | December 20, 2018
https://tonyortega.org/2018/12/20/bill-franks-1946-2018-appointed-by-hubbard-to-reform-scientology-after-snow-white-scandal/
[Bill Franks, left, with former mission holder Bent Corydon last year]
We spoke with Bill Franks a few weeks ago on the phone after we heard he had entered hospice care. We wanted him to know how much we appreciated the help we got from him on our book about Paulette Cooper. He was characteristically humble about it, saying that he hadn’t done much.
In fact, Bill Franks was one of the longest tenured whistleblowers of Scientology, a top former executive who tried time and again to help get the word out about what he’d seen during his meteoric rise in the organization.
He joined Scientology in 1968 and met L. Ron Hubbard aboard the yacht Apollo two years later. Hubbard vanished early in 1980 in the turmoil after the disastrous “Snow White Program” that had church operatives infiltrating US and foreign government agencies, resulting in eleven top Scientologists being prosecuted and eventually going to prison. As Jon Atack explained in his book A Piece of Blue Sky, major reorganizing after the Snow White debacle was needed, and a young Bill Franks suddenly found himself elevated to the organization’s highest spot…
In December 1980, the long-dormant post of Executive Director International was resurrected. It had remained vacant since Hubbard’s supposed resignation in 1966. Scientologists the world over were aware that Hubbard, the Founder, Commodore and Source, was the real head of their Church, but under the new corporate strategy, it was necessary to conceal Hubbard’s control. The new Executive Director International was Bill Franks, and he was to be “ED Int for life.” It turned out to be a very short life. Scientologists the world over assumed that Franks was Hubbard’s immediate junior, and was being groomed to succeed the Commodore.
Bill was 34 years old at the time. He was also the Chairman of the Board of the Church of Scientology International, and he had an enormous task — to purge the “Guardian’s Office” that had been responsible for the Snow White disaster, and calm things down so that eventually, Hubbard could return from wherever he was hiding.
But just a year later, at the end of 1981, Bill was ousted as Hubbard became convinced that Bill was part of a “mutiny” with some mission holders, Atack writes…
Hubbard was given the CMO account of events, and started to send dispatches to senior executives at Gilman describing the Mission Holders’ “mutiny,” and an infiltration by enemy agents. Hubbard raged about Don Purcell and the early days, when “vested interests” had tried to prise Dianetics from his control. Swift action was taken to counter the “mutiny.” On December 23, 1981, a Policy Letter was issued entitled “International Watchdog Committee”…Four days later, Executive Director International “for life” Bill Franks was replaced. The coup was very nearly complete.
Bill was declared “suppressive” in 1982. But rather than stay quiet, just a year after he was declared Bill was talking publicly about what he’d seen, telling Time magazine in 1983 about the new young cohort taking over Scientology, which included an upstart named David Miscavige…
“It’s just a power grab,” he says of the new leader’s acts. Their motive, he charges, is “totally money, absolute greed.
Eight years later, Time quoted Bill again in its epic 1991 cover story that called Scientology a “thriving cult of greed and power”…
“[John Travolta] felt pretty intimidated about this getting out and told me so,” recalls William Franks, the church’s former chairman of the board. “There were no outright threats made, but it was implicit. If you leave, they immediately start digging up everything.” Franks was driven out in 1981 after attempting to reform the church.
Bill’s tenure running Scientology may have been relatively brief, but we found his stories fascinating. In particular, it was Bill who told us that when he was dismantling the Guardian’s Office, he went through its files on Paulette Cooper and was astonished to find just how obsessive Hubbard was with her. There was no doubt, he told us, that it was Hubbard who personally directed the years of efforts to try and destroy her.
We were grateful for Bill’s help, and over the years he was an invaluable resource for journalists who wanted to understand a crucial period in Scientology history. He was only disappointed, he told us, that after all that effort, the church was still abusing people and hadn’t been stopped by a government investigation or some other intervention.
We assured him that his contribution won’t be forgotten.
[Bill Franks, right, with Janis Gillham Grady and Kerry Gleeson at a reunion last year]
We’re grateful to Janis Gillham Grady, who has written up this more complete account of Bill’s life in Scientology…
It is time to say good bye to a great friend – Bill Franks. I have had the pleasure of knowing Bill for over 48 years.
Bill graduated from college in June 1968, and joined the U.S. Marine Corp. However, while he was in boot camp, he broke his back in a car accident, bringing a fast end to his Marine Corp career. While recovering from the broken back, Bill got into Scientology in Los Angeles and over the years trained to Class VI Auditor.
In November of 1970, Bill arrived on the ship Apollo, which was my home at that time. This was the point when I first met Bill. After Bill had bumped into L. Ron Hubbard on the deck, Bill decided to join the Sea Org.
After completing his executive training on board the ship, Bill was sent to the Los Angeles Organization as the Commanding Officer with instructions to get the LA Org delivering Scientology and to expand it. However, though Bill did indeed greatly expand the LA Org on an immediate basis, I remember reports that arrived from the Guardian’s Office (to LRH) about Bill along with several other executives in the LA area, who were supposedly involved in “crush regging,” “postulate checks,” going to Samurai movies and having too much fun with pretend sword fights instead of working. Nothing really unusual for a group of young men in their early twenties who had dedicated their lives to “Clearing the planet.”
In December 1971, Bill was sent as part of a Command Team to Boston org to make it boom. After doing well in Boston, Bill returned to LA org and again began to greatly expand the org. Later, Bill returned to the ship Apollo where he ended up working directly with LRH as one of the administrative executives for the ship organization. It was during this time that I got to know Bill a little better through my message runs to him from LRH.
In 1974, he returned to the Apollo to join his wife at that time. Based upon some Guardian’s Office reports, Bill was briefly posted to the Rehabilitation Project Force (RPF) until he ran into LRH on deck. LRH was very surprised to see Bill on the ship and in the RPF, so LRH reprieved him at once (cancelled his RPF assignment).
While on the ship, Bill courageously helped fend off some very upset locals who were rioting against us and throwing large rocks and stones at us and our ship while we were in Madeira. Bill even risked his own life to help get another crew member safely back aboard amid the riots.
In 1975, while I was on a troubleshooting mission to Washington DC Org, my mission in charge and I requested a new Executive Director (ED) to head up the DC org as we felt the existing ED was not making it. Bill was selected and he was sent to DC for us to put him on the job of Executive Director DC Org. Bill remained in DC for several years where he built one of the largest Scientology organizations internationally in his usual style. Bill was a very strong and determined executive; even later, Bill admits that there were some people who did not appreciate his determination and how he went about getting things done. For this, he has apologized to those he realized that he had offended. But as a Commodore’s Messenger and also as a Missionaire, I always knew I could depend on Bill to get any job done.
After the Apollo was closed down and everyone moved to the Flag Land Base in Clearwater, Bill was called to Flag for “clean up,” where he was security checked by David Mayo for six weeks, until it was said he was a List One R/Ser (having evil purposes against things or people like LRH, Mary Sue, Scientology, etc). For this reason, he was sent to the RPF where he lived in a room with about 60 other men, sleeping on a mattress on the floor and working very long hours at hard labor for the next seven months. Still having the purpose and dedication to “clearing the planet” Bill pushed forward despite thoughts of wanting to leave the Sea Org and believing the general scene would improve and he would get back on top again.
Upon completion of the RPF, Bill did work his way back up the executive ladder again and was posted as the Commanding Officer of International Training Org (ITO). The work Bill did to build the ITO and train the outer orgs’ executives resulted in LRH eventually appointing Bill to the highest administrative job in Scientology management: Executive Director International for life. As Executive Director International, he had become senior to the Guardian’s Office and he participated in the dismantling of the Guardian’s Office because of criminal actions of the GO which had been exposed by the FBI raid in June 1977.
As the Executive Director International, Bill saw many issues he did not support such as the monthly increase of Scientology service fees and rampant mismanagement of the Scientology Franchises (Missions). Bravely, Bill took it upon himself to try and correct these problems, but the reports which were sent to LRH about Bill’s activities were greatly misconstrued, which made Bill a target to be taken down. Not going quietly, Bill had the Missions Holders support but that didn’t hold up well when it came to standing up to David Miscavige (DM) and his thugs during DMs early steps to grabbing control and usurping the Church of Scientology. Attempts to reach LRH were, of course, stopped by DM who was monitoring the communication lines. So Bill was taken down…… but not without a huge and defiant fight! This was all some 36 years ago.
Bill moved on, and left Scientology. He left to build a business empire of his own.
He returned to his roots to marry his college sweetheart. Anne Preston and Bill were married 34 years and they raised two beautiful and successful daughters together.
Over the years since Bill left Scientology, he still felt a strong connection to many friends he made in Scientology, and he made it a point to visit and still hang out with them when possible. To his last day, it was the friends that Bill had made while in the Sea Org and whom he talked about and contacted to say his good byes. He said that he had never felt that same camaraderie with any other group of people in his life and that he will miss them all.
Bill’s last request to me was for me in coordination with his wife and daughters, to host an Ex- Sea Org/Scientologist reunion on his behalf. He had planned to write the invitation himself but was not able to do so in the end. He was very excited when I told him my plan to host it in the Los Angeles area, since that is the area where he made his close friends and his original camaraderie and strong connections with those good folks, who to this day remained his good friends.
Please stay tuned as the Memorial Ex Sea Org/Scientology Reunion evolves in the honor of Bill Franks in Southern California. The exact time and place will be announced as the event is organized.
— Janis Gillham Grady
And Jeffrey Augustine sent over this final podcast he did with Bill which has not previously been released…
Clear the Planet
FSO
Highest Producing Auditor
Graduation
L. Rop Hubbard Office of Public Relations Ethics file PIERRE ETHIER
Some basic meditations
These are some meditation practices to get you going
A Basic Meditation for Beginners
The first thing to clarify: What we’re doing here is aiming for mindfulness, not some process that magically wipes your mind clear of the countless and endless thoughts that erupt and ping constantly in our brains. We’re just practicing bringing our attention to our breath, and then back to the breath when we notice our attention has wandered.
- Get comfortable and prepare to sit still for a few minutes. After you stop reading this, you’re going to simply focus on your own natural inhaling and exhaling of breath.
- Focus on your breath. Where do you feel your breath most? In your belly? In your nose? Try to keep your attention on your inhale and exhale.
- Follow your breath for two minutes. Take a deep inhale, expanding your belly, and then exhale slowly, elongating the out-breath as your belly contracts.
Welcome back. What happened? How long was it before your mind wandered away from your breath? Did notice how busy your mind was even without your consciously directing it to think about anything in particular? Did you notice yourself getting caught up in thoughts before you came back to reading this? We often have little narratives running in our minds that we didn’t choose to put there, like: “Why DOES my boss want to meet with me tomorrow?” “I should have gone to the gym yesterday.” “I’ve got to pay some bills” or (the classic) “I don’t have time to sit still, I’ve got stuff to do.”
If you experienced these sorts of distractions (and we all do), you’ve made an important discovery: simply put, that’s the opposite of mindfulness. It’s when we live in our heads, on automatic pilot, letting our thoughts go here and there, exploring, say, the future or the past, and essentially, not being present in the moment. But that’s where most of us live most of the time—and pretty uncomfortably, if we’re being honest, right? But it doesn’t have to be that way.
We “practice” mindfulness so we can learn how to recognize when our minds are doing their normal everyday acrobatics, and maybe take a pause from that for just a little while so we can choose what we’d like to focus on. In a nutshell, meditation helps us have a much healthier relationship with ourselves (and, by extension, with others).
3 Guided Meditations for Beginners
Guided meditations are an excellent tool for beginners, as they provide a focal point and gentle instruction to help you connect and let go of self-judgment.
Try this 3-part guided audio series from Mindful Editor-in-Chief Barry Boyce:
How long would you like to meditate? Sometimes we only have time for a quick check-in, sometimes we can dip in a little longer. Meditating every helps build awareness, fosters resilience, and lower stress. Try to make meditation a habit by practicing with these short meditations from our Editor-in-Chief Barry Boyce. Find time to site once a day for one month and see what you notice.
1-Minute Meditation
- 2:36
A short practice for settling the mind, intended for doing in the middle of the day, wherever you are out in the world.
10-Minute Meditation
- 10:28
A longer practice that explores meditation posture, breathing techniques, and working with thoughts and emotions as they surface during mindfulness practice.
15-Minute Meditation
- 15:54
A practice that explores sitting in formal meditation for longer periods of time.
More Styles of Mindfulness Meditation
Once you have explored a basic seated meditation practice, you might want to consider other forms of meditation including walking and lying down. Whereas the previous meditations used the breath as a focal point for practice, these meditations below focus on different parts of the body.
Introduction to the Body Scan Meditation
Try this: feel your feet on the ground right now. In your shoes or without, it doesn’t matter. Then track or scan over your whole body, bit by bit—slowly—all the way up to the crown of your head. The point of this practice is to check in with your whole body: Fingertips to shoulders, butt to big toe. Only rules are: No judging, no wondering, no worrying (all activities your mind may want to do); just check in with the physical feeling of being in your body. Aches and pains are fine. You don’t have to do anything about anything here. You’re just noticing.
Body Scan Meditation
- 25:41
A brief body awareness practice for tuning in to sensations, head-to-toe.
Begin to focus your attention on different parts of your body. You can spotlight one particular area or go through a sequence like this: toes, feet (sole, heel, top of foot), through the legs, pelvis, abdomen, lower back, upper back, chest shoulders, arms down to the fingers, shoulders, neck, different parts of the face, and head. For each part of the body, linger for a few moments and notice the different sensations as you focus.
The moment you notice that your mind has wandered, return your attention to the part of the body you last remember.
If you fall asleep during this body-scan practice, that’s okay. When you realize you’ve been nodding off, take a deep breath to help you reawaken and perhaps reposition your body (which will also help wake it up). When you’re ready, return your attention to the part of the body you last remember focusing on.
Introduction to the Walking Meditation
Fact: Most of us live pretty sedentary lives, leaving us to build extra-curricular physical activity into our days to counteract all that. Point is: Mindfulness doesn’t have to feel like another thing on your to-do list. It can be injected into some of the activities you’re already doing. Here’s how to integrate a mindful walking practice into your day.
Walking Meditation
- 01:25
A mindful movement practice for bringing awareness to what we feel with each step.
As you begin, walk at a natural pace. Place your hands wherever comfortable: on your belly, behind your back, or at your sides.
- If you find it useful, you can count steps up to 10, and then start back at one again. If you’re in a small space, as you reach ten, pause, and with intention, choose a moment to turn around.
- With each step, pay attention to the lifting and falling of your foot. Notice movement in your legs and the rest of your body. Notice any shifting of your body from side to side.
- Whatever else captures your attention, come back to the sensation of walking. Your mind will wander, so without frustration, guide it back again as many times as you need.
- Particularly outdoors, maintain a larger sense of the environment around you, taking it all in, staying safe and aware.
Introduction to Loving-Kindness Meditation
You cannot will yourself into particular feelings toward yourself or anyone else. Rather, you can practice reminding yourself that you deserve happiness and ease and that the same goes for your child, your family, your friends, your neighbors, and everyone else in the world.
A Loving-Kindness Meditation
- 17:49
Explore this practice to extend compassion to yourself, those around you, and the larger world.
This loving-kindness practice involves silently repeating phrases that offer good qualities to oneself and to others.
- You can start by taking delight in your own goodness—calling to mind things you have done out of good-heartedness, and rejoicing in those memories to celebrate the potential for goodness we all share.
- Silently recite phrases that reflect what we wish most deeply for ourselves in an enduring way. Traditional phrases are:
• May I live in safety.
• May I have mental happiness (peace, joy).
• May I have physical happiness (health, freedom from pain).
• May I live with ease. - Repeat the phrases with enough space and silence between so they fall into a rhythm that is pleasing to you. Direct your attention to one phrase at a time.
- Each time you notice your attention has wandered, be kind to yourself and let go of the distraction. Come back to repeating the phrases without judging or disparaging yourself.
- After some time, visualize yourself in the center of a circle composed of those who have been kind to you, or have inspired you because of their love. Perhaps you’ve met them, or read about them; perhaps they live now, or have existed historically or even mythically. That is the circle. As you visualize yourself in the center of it, experience yourself as the recipient of their love and attention. Keep gently repeating the phrases of loving-kindness for yourself.
- To close the session, let go of the visualization, and simply keep repeating the phrases for a few more minutes. Each time you do so, you are transforming your old, hurtful relationship to yourself, and are moving forward, sustained by the force of kindness.
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Get mindfulness meditation practices, research, and special offers from our Mindful community delivered to you.
Beyond the beginning
What to know and where to go when you’ve started
Frequently Asked Questions About Mindfulness Meditation, Answered
When you’re new to meditation, it’s natural for questions to pop up often. These answers may ease your mind.
1) If I have an itch, can I scratch it?
Yes—however, first try scratching it with your mind before using your fingers.
2) Should I breathe fast or slow or in between?
Only worry if you’ve stopped breathing. Otherwise, you’re doing fine. Breath in whatever way feels comfortable to you.
3) Should my eyes be open or closed?
No hard-and-fast rules. Try both. If open, not too wide, and with a soft, slightly downward gaze, not focusing on anything in particular. If closed, not too hard, and not imagining anything in particular in your mind’s eye.
4) Is it possible I’m someone who just CANNOT meditate?
When you find yourself asking that question, your meditation has officially begun. Everyone wonders that. Notice it. Escort your attention back to your object of focus (the breath). When you’re lost and questioning again, come back to the breathe again. That’s the practice. There’s no limit to the number of times you can be distracted and come back to the breath. Meditating is not a race to perfection—It’s returning again and again to the breath.
5) Is it better to practice in a group or by myself?
Both are great! It’s enormously supportive to meditate with others. And, practicing on your own builds discipline.
6) What’s the best time of day to meditate? Whatever works. Consider your circumstances: children, pets, work. Experiment. But watch out. If you always choose the most convenient time, it will usually be tomorrow.
7) What if I get sexually (and physically) aroused by thoughts in my head?
No big deal. Meditation stokes the imagination. In time, every thought and sensation will pop up (so to speak). And come back. Same old story. Release the thought, bring awareness and receptivity to body sensations, bring attention back to your chosen object (the breath, in this case). Repeat.
8) Do you have any tips on integrating pets into meditation practice?
While meditating, we don’t have to fight off distractions like a knight slaying dragons. If your dog or cat comes into the room and barks and meows and brushes up against you or settles down on a part of your cushion, no big deal. Let it be. What works less well is to interrupt your session to relate to them. If that’s what’s going to happen, try to find a way to avoid their interrupting your practice.
More Guided Meditation Practices
The RAIN Meditation with Tara Brach
- 11:42
A practice for difficult emotions, RAIN is an acronym for Recognition of what is going on; Acceptance of the experience, just as it is; Interest in what is happening; and Nurture with loving presence.
A Mindfulness Practice to Foster Forgiveness
- 11:13
Explore this practice to let go of the tendency to add to our suffering during challenging situations.
A. L. Kitselman introducing E-Therapy and The Institute of Integration
THE 1950’s
The official publications of the Church of Scientology give very little information about the early 1950’s.
The publication of ‘Dianetics – Modern Science and Mental Health’ in 1950 caused a wave of interest around the United States, At the same time the Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation was set-up in Elizabeth, New Jersey. This was close to Bay Head, New Jersey where Hubbard was living at the time. The Board of Directors of the Foundation included Hubbard’s main two supporters at the time, John W. Campbell, editor of ‘Astounding Science Fiction’, and Joseph Winter, a medical doctor.
During 1950 demand grew for auditing facilities. Branches of the Foundation were established in Los Angeles, New York, Washington, Chicago and Honolulu. The main auditor training centres were in New Jersey and Los Angeles. Graduates of the four week course were certified as professional auditors.
In parallel with this, ‘grass-roots’ groups emerged who began training themselves and co-auditing. Some publicised their activities in the papers, some wrote to booksellers or the Foundation to make contact with others in their area interested in Dianetics. Extensive written communication took place between the groups and with the Foundation. This correspondence discussed case histories, new ideas on therapy and practice, and ideas on development of the movement. Groups started to produce their own newsletters and the Foundation produced its own journal. This included articles by Hubbard and other Foundation staff plus details of courses and books available,
There was no attempt however by the Foundation to control or structure the field groups. Auditors trained by the Foundation were left to apply their new skill how and where they wished. Some joined or led local groups, others set up as solo-practitioners.
None of the Board members of the Foundation were obviously good administrators and the central organisation was not well managed. Hubbard himself was primarily concerned with research and lecturing at this time and was commuting between Los Angeles and New York. When he did get involved in administration, his authoritarian style antagonised other Board members.
Staff were recruited in large numbers and money was spent in the belief that the booming interest in Dianetics would continue. However by early 1951 income started to drop as the difficulties of getting predictable and reliable results from Dianetics started to become evident There had also been hostile criticism by doctors and psychiatrists who pigeon-holed Dianetics with psychoanalysis and hypnotism. In addition there was a lot of publicity given to Hubbard’s divorce from his second wife, a supposed ‘Clear’. The biggest disappointment for many however was that the attractive state of Clear was not achieved as easily or quickly as the book had promised.
Gradually Hubbard’s colleagues resigned from the Board and the Foundation moved towards bankruptcy. Another supporter of Dianetics Don Purcell, stepped in to provide a financial injection to the Foundation He closed down the branches and relocated the Foundation in Wichita Kansas. Purcell became President of the Foundation with Hubbard as Chairman of the Board and Vice-President.
In early 1952 Purcell and Hubbard split up. It was agreed that Hubbard would resign, sell his stock for a nominal figure to Purcell and set up an independent Hubbard College in Wichita.
In April 1952 the Foundation finally went bankrupt. Its assets were bought by Purcell. These included the sole right to the name ‘Hubbard Dianetic Foundation’ and the publishing rights and copyrights on all the Foundation’s publications, including ‘Dianetics-Modern Science and Mental Health’.
Hubbard had meanwhile transplanted the Hubbard College to Phoenix Arizona, where he established Scientology. This seems to have been a conscious decision to abandon the Dianetics field for the moment.
The conflicts that had led to Hubbard’s isolation, or isolation of himself, were fundamental. It was as if an isolated community living in an area surrounded by impenetrable mountains had built a flying machine which would let them contact surrounding valleys. The main inventor however now wanted to use this machine to go to the moon whereas his colleagues still wanted to fulfil the original objectives.
Most particularly Dr Winter wanted to get Dianetics accepted by the scientific and medical community. Hubbard’s moves towards the spiritual and the apparently occult were felt to be making this goal unachievable. Purcell wanted a sound commercial operation which could provide the backing and support that the popular movement needed. Hubbards impetuous and grandiose money raising schemes, such as ‘Allied Scientists of the World’, were out of keeping with the respectable image he wanted Hubbard s first major supporter, John Campbell, withdrew in reaction to Hubbard s authoritarian style and his unwillingness to accept the intellectual contributions of others.
Meanwhile the field groups were also in a state of discord. These groups were jealous of their independence They did not all agree that Hubbard needed to be the head of the movement. While acknowledging his initial breakthrough, some felt that further refinement and development could equally well be done by others. Some felt that other techniques could be incorporated into Dianetics and others felt that several different therapy methods could emerge An indication of the vigour of the controversy was the evolution of a whole range of magazines, including The Dianews. Dianotes, and Dianetics Today.
In addition to mainstream Dianetics, other breakaway methodologies appeared led by individuals who hoped to pick up the mantle that Hubbard had droPped as leader of Dianetics Among these were Ron Howes and the Institute of Humanics, A. L. Kitselman with the E-Therapy, and Art Coulter with Synergetics.
In the UK the development of Dianetics followed a similar pattern to the early days in the United States. The loose coordinating body was the British Dianetic Association which was succeeded by the Dianetic Association Ltd. Their main function was to get hold of American material and distribute it in the UK. In 1952 the Dianetic Association Ltd was absorbed by the Dianetic Federation of Great Britain. Like its American counterpart it exercised virtually no control over the multitude of field groups and auditors. Very few of these auditors had been to the United States to be trained at the Foundation.
From his new base in Phoenix, Hubbard started to establish the new subject of Scientology. As explained earlier this grew out of the further development work he did on Dianetics with more advanced auditing procedures.
By 1952 he had moved beyond the exclusive area of the human mind to dealing with its ‘animator’. This animator is the concept of a spiritual being that determines the action of the mind and body. In our normal experience our spiritual awareness becomes largely obscured by the physical and mental inefficiencies that we pick up during our growth to adulthood. With the development of techniques for increasing our awareness of existing as a spiritual being, separate from our body and mind, Scientology was born.
Hubbard established the Hubbard’s orbit as the HAS, in Phoenix. He began Scientology auditing and training of interested members of the Dianetics community there. He also started a periodical called the Journal of Scientology.
From this new platform he began to attack Purcell’s Dianetic Foundation in Wichita, claiming that it was profiteering from Dianetics. He made a strong appeal to Dianetics followers which produced many converts to Scientology.
As the HAS grew it changed its name to Hubbard Association of Scientologists International (HASI) and became tougher in the control it exerted over its members using Scientology techniques. Hubbard was obviously determined to avoid a repeat of the uncontrolled evolution of field auditors and groups that had happened with Dianetics. Only organisations affiliated to the HAS were permitted to have and use Scientology materials. To qualify as an affiliated group all members had to be individual members of the HASI and monthly reports of activities were required. Groups that did not toe the line had their certificates withdrawn and became ineligible for new Scientology materials. Independent practitioners were similarly controlled and these now included quite a few former Dianetics practitioners who were drawn back into to be individual members of the HASI and monthly reports of activities were required. Groups that did not toe the line had their certificates withdrawn and became ineligible for new Scientology materials. Independent practitioners were similarly controlled and these now included quite a few former Dianetics practitioners who were drawn back into
The Wichita Foundation had not thrived since Hubbard’s departure and was having to contend with law suits from Hubbard. In late 1954 Purcell decided he would give up Dianetics and he would switch his support to the breakaway group, Synergetics. He agreed to return the Dianetic copyrights and publishing rights to Hubbard.
The HASI now had full control of both Scientology and Dianetics materials and could set about ending fringe practices that used Dianetics in combination with other therapies. Those groups and magazines which did not come back to Hubbard and HASI gradually joined the breakaway groups, Humanics and Synergetics, or extended their interests into other practices such as Yoga, Hypnotism and Numerology.
In Britain the Dianetic Federation was apprehensive of the effect of a subsidiary HAS being founded as it would reduce the autonomy of the Dianetic Groups. Hubbard made it clear that he regarded the failure of the earlier Dianetic Foundations as due to him not having complete control. In the end he by-passed the leadership of the Federation and set-up a HAS in London, It made a broad appeal to the field groups and support moved quickly over to it once Hubbard started to visit the UK. As a resultvirtually all the independent Dianetics groups in the UK had disappeared by 1955.
Despite the turmoil and problems of these times, Hubbard continued researching and lecturing on a massive scale. There are several hundred taped lectures from the period. The three most famous of these are available in book form as Notes on the Lectures (1951). The Philadelphia Doctorate Course delivered in Philadelphia in 1952 and the Phoenix lectures delivered in that City in 1954. There are in addition tapes of introductory lectures and radio broadcasts that he did all over the US during the early 50’s.
The other thread in Hubbard’s work was the production of material to introduce new people to the subject. In 1953 the following books were published: ‘This is Scientology The Science of Certainty’; ‘Introduction to Scientology’ and ‘Self Analysis in Scientology’. Among the books published in 1954 were: ‘Group Auditors Handbook’ (Vols I & II) and ‘Dianetics 55’. In 1955 there followed nine books including ‘Scientology- Its contribution to knowledge: The Elementary Scientology Series’ and ‘The Creation of Human Ability’. In 1956 there were again many advanced technical publications, usually presented in the form of ‘Professional Auditors Bulletins and also Scientology The Fundamentals of Thought’; ‘Creative Learning – A Scientological Experiment in Schools’ and ‘The Problems of Work’. By the late 50’s the flow of books reduced to three or four a year and these were mostly more technically specialised for professional auditors.
The flow of lectures continued unabated until 1960. Prior to 1953 Ron Hubbard had moved around the country to deliver them. Now the large numbers of people wanting to learn the techniques of Dianetics an. Scientology were more ready to come to him. At first this was to Phoenix Arizona, but after the setting up of the Church in Washington DC in 1955 he centred his activities there. In February 1954 the first religious flavour appeared with founding of the first Church of Scientology, in Los Angeles n 1955 Churches were founded in New York and Washington DC interestingly a Church was also founded in Auckland, New Zealand in 1954
In the later 50’s Hubbard made more visits to Britain and in the Spring of 1959 purchased Saint Hill Manor, in Sussex. This was to become h home and the centre of Scientology operations for the next few years.
The most obvious question that springs from this period is why did the Scientology movement take on the title of a church and thus a religion? Also why did Ron Hubbard move from the United States to the UK in 1959?
A significant paragraph appears in the section on Ron Hubbard’s life history in the Church’s book ‘What is Scientology’. This says that in the early 50’s the US government tried to monopolise his researches to use them for mind control of people. It then says that after the government failed to get Hubbard’s agreement to this, it embarked on a campaign of covert attacks on his work. This is the earliest reference In the Church’s published history to deliberate discrimination and attacks by government- backed agencies. Most frequently referred to are the efforts of the American Psychiatry Association to discredit the movement. This belief in a campaign of covert attacks has grown into massive paranoia within the Church over the years.
It could be that these real or imagined pressures were more important in deciding to become a Church rather than a belief that Scientology needed to be a Church to be effective in doing its job of Improving the mental and spiritual health of people.
In the United States, and all English-speaking countries, the liberty and tolerance extended to religions is obviously much greater than to para- medical practices. There were many practical advantages therefOre in repackaging Scientology and Dianetics as a religion and therefore a Church. The individual Churches in each State applied for and got exemption from Federal Taxes, as they were entitled to do as religious and educational bodies
In 1958 the Federal Tax agency started to change its view and began to withdraw the tax exempt status from some of the Churches. This led to a series of extended legal battles with the US Inland Revenue Service. It was not until 1975 that the Church of Washington regained full tax exempt status. During that year most of the other Churches also regained tax exemption. It would appear however that not all of the Churches within the United States did regain exemption.
This was the first of many aggravating governmental actions against Scientology in the United States, and later in other countries of the world. Whether the actions were justifiable for the public good then or now is difficult for us to pass judgement on. What we can see is that the legacy of these governmental actions is considerable paranoia within the Church, and also on the part of Ron Hubbard himself.
Whatever views we may have on the right of government and its agencies to make life difficult for fringe groups, the actions of the US Internal Revenue Service and later the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not halt the growth of Scientology They can be seen now as no more than irritating side issues in relation to the continuing expansion of the movement during the fifties. Getting into the subject of Scientology requires some intelligence and a fair level of education In addition the promise to the individual of the benefits of increased awareness and abilities is quite specific. If these promises were being fulfilled to some degree, then the Church’s nationwide continuing growth during this period could not have happened.
By the end of the fifties Scientology had established a network Churches throughout the United States. Churches had also been set u in New Zealand and South Africa. There were in addition groups active in many other places and Scientology was already well on the way t becoming a world movement-
With the official attitude to Scientology in the United States being somewhat hostile, it seems probable that Hubbard considered it better to set up his Worldwide headquarters somewhere with a freer and more benign climate in which to operate. The peace of the Sussex countryside and the strong following Scientology had already gained in Britain probably accounts for his choice of Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead.
RAISING STANDARDS IN THE FREE ZONE (Reprint)
RAISING STANDARDS IN THE FREE ZONE
Sometimes I talk about unprofessionalism in the Free Zone.
I am not talking about auditors who leaned from the seats of their pant or the best they could with few or no course room available, provided they try to the best they can and apply a modicum of intelligence in their practice.
I am not talking either about auditors who make errors, mistakes, because they got confused, didnt know any better or somhow misduplicated some minor technical point.
What I am talking is at a completely different level.
What I am talking about unprofessionalism is field trained Class IVs, VIs or lower who have no notion of what a Flag Only Rundown is and claim there is no difference between a provisional Class IV with 500 hours experience and a Flag Interned Clas XII auditor with 30,000 WDAH.
Or a Field auditor which in explicit contradiction of LRH (in Welcome to the Flag Internship) who feels he fully meets all Flag Standards, even though he never did a Flag Intenship, nor his mentors. Such auditors will rationalize why a grossly incomplete L pack without a checksheet nor any of the standard LRH C/Ses sessions taught by a Class VIII is “fine enough for them and their pcs” and sees nothing wrong with Quickying the Rundowns “because he gets such remarkable results” (In other words they do not believe in C/S 43 for audidtors and think that auditors have cases.
Or the self-trained NOTs auditor who has purposefully avoided being checked by anyone with experience with auditing the Rundown. and zip pcs through the program in les than 1/10th of what the well trained auditor will do.
Or the auditor who has not studied more than 2% of the Clearing materials and gleefuly attest people to Clear who have simply not made it.
Whenever I speak against such abuses, always attacking the out-tech, NEVER the personality nor past of the individual, the response tend to be Ad Hominem attacks, deliberate attempts to enturbulate as many people as possible, and spread false and misleading data and trying to impugn my technical integrity by inferring I was mistrained.
(The latest flagrant example is someone largely ignorant of the Ls technology making false assertion that David Mayo and others altered the Ls technology, not knowing that NO L Rundowns Bulletin or issue was published NOR REVISED after 1972, the Class X-XII checksheets I did are dated 1971 or 1972 and that 90% of the course packs are made from LRH C/S sessions with his instructions in hand and all those sessions were done in 1971 and 1972.
David Mayo had nothing to do with the Ls write-ups and did not revise any L bulletin nor issue.
NOBODY REVISED ANY L BULLETIN AFTER 1972!!!! There are no exception.
The Ls bulletins were not even revised to tell to omit the running of R3R on Clears, because per LRH “ONLY A FULL CLASS X can read L-10 issues and nobody got to revise them.
Anyone truly trained on the Ls would know that. Only someone who has accepted verbal tech and rumours and lies as part of his training would spread such blatantly false propaganda. The Course packs that I used were made and stapled on the Apollo, yet the auditor that I labelled Incompletely trained franctically try to fit a round peg in a square hole by inventing false data or spread lies he has heard.
It is a true fact that someone who was declared supressive by LRH himself for false reports in 1976 (se the 1976 HCOB Auditors who falsify worksheets) gave assurances it was “complete”. The same auditor has sold over a dozen L pack to any FZ auditor willing to pay the $6000 for it, no matter how bad, flubby or unethical, or even if he wass trained at all as a Class IV. Of course people get mad at me when I tell them they have been ripped off. But they by atacking me they are shooting the Messenger.
Serious Out-Tech consist of the following:
Auditors mixing every conceivable rundowns,
Mixing techniques of Upper OT levels with lower ones,
Using upper techniques on lower level cases,
C/Sing for Solo Actions which could not possibly done Solo,
C/Sing Solo without having even read the Solo C/S Series,
C/Sing NOTs without having read half of the NOTs bulletins,
Zipping people on Rundowns (Ls, Power, Grades, Solo NOTS ) at dizzying quickie speed, and attesting people without the auditor nor pc even knowing what the EP is.
Putting people onto OT levels without any setups or doing any checklist and with many unhandled Bad Indicators,
Allowing pc to natter their head off intensives after intensives without once pulling a withold,
or the auditor who indicate to his pcs that some OT levels were “unnecessary”.
This of course does not mention
the auditor who audited his pcs on various processes while they were both sipping beer at a pub,
or the one who encouraged his pc to drink so she would be more amenable to spend the night with him.
nor the one who was secretly having an affair with the wife of the pc he was currently auditing!!!
OR HOW ABOUT THE 60 YEAR PC (too old for past lfe auditing) who has a chronic history of Drug abuse WHO WAS RACED ON THE BRIDGE FROM WOG TO “NOTS COMPLETION” IN LESS THAN 2 INTENSIVES????
These are not invented cases, but only a mere glimpse at the kind of stuff that has come up on my lines…
There is plenty of out-tech in the FZ, outside of IFA.
As one of the FZ top trained people I get often pulled into what I call the FZ “Skid Row”.
The very worse of IFA appears quite tame when compared to the whole FZ.
It is unavoidable to make mistakes when one audits. I never said otherwise. especially among beginner auditor.
But what can be surmised about the twenty year old veteran who still without any shame still does a more shabby job that most beginners. Is he truly trying to help.. If he were trying to help he would raise at least a finger to raise above the level of bare mediocrity. What can you say about his respect for the pc`, when the obvious viewpoint is that `sloppiness is good enough for for him (as long as he can pay)`.
I have worked with more beginner auditors than you have and can even imagine and encouraged them tremendously. I am currently working with over a dozen neophyte auditors and I am encouraging them a lot. So you appear to have build a lot of prejudiced ideas about me, either based on someone`s natter, black PR, Church INDOC or other ideas NOT BASED ON ACTUAL EXAMINATION OF MY PRODUCTS AS A TRAINER OF AUDITORS, to the point you say that I am in a bad need of being salvaged through a session from you., and that I must now follow your guidance…What is your training level, since You claim that you can teach me so much..
But what of the auditor who quickies his training, or after years of ample opportunity never raise a finger to maintain a minimum of quality. This is where YOU WORDS and LRH frankly depart. LRH never endorsed LAZYNESS IN AUDITORS.
Would you tolerate a fireman coming to save your house who has not read the ABC about fires, and slept through most of his training. This is different than your next door neighbour trying to help. You would definitely have every right to expect a PROFESSIONAL to have a minimum of skills and not to pour water over a grease fire and destroy the totality of your belongings in the name of help.
In the Amazon there are many Bush pilot who do not have a pilot license, and have no clue about plane maintenance. A good number have their clients never coming back after crashing in the Jungle. `They were trying to help`, though they were too lazy and sloppy to follow any kind of safety standards. Would you honestly fly with them….
It is wonderful thing to try to help. But are you truly helping people by giving them out-lists THAT YOU WONT CORRECT or if your auditing makes him suicidal or if the pc abandons forever auditing (especially in the FZ where some auditors tend to be so defensive about their auditing they sometimes seek to ACTIVELY PREVENT THE CORRECTION OF THEIR FAILED CASES BY ANYONE even if it means the pc abandoning Scn).
For someone who is trained at Flag as a Class 12 to willfully violate the auditor code by evaluating, overrunning FNs and remaining out of comm as one can see in Jason Beghe testimony is not something LRH would be proud of. Neither would I. I am frankly appalled at your open validation of out-tech in an audidtor who should know better. We are not talking about a neophyte making the errors that anyone at his level is expected to make, but an auditor labelled by Flag as `the best of the best` who is certain to repeat the same errors on his next pcs and yet you come to RTC`s rescue as their apologist.
Validation of auditors who recklessly give out-lists to pcs, leave them with unflat Evil Purposes, do not pull their Missed witholds is what produces cases like Lisa MacPherson and Jason Beghe.
Open encouragement of such out-tech is tantamount to saying you would like to see such cases multiply.
There is a FZ faction who feels that “one should never another to adjust his personal truth to others nor society and one must always respect each individual’s self-determination to disagree Standards and redefine them as he sees fit.. In other words, Out-Tech cannot truly exist and there are as many Stnadards as there are individuals.
When I confronted the author of that delirious theory that applying those principles means one would never sent anyone to Ethics, even a known child molester and killer or an anti-semitic individual advocating violence and mayhem. Even when I added that they wold see nothing wrong with processing Charles Manson who in a TV interview admitted a desired to see the whole of Mankind exterminated, they simply ignored my answers.
Another group feels that everything on a case is simply explained by events that tok place in the last Universe and that our entire life and behavious is actually pre-destined as dictated in a series of previous or paralell universes.
There is yet another group who considers UFOs not only real but occupied by Evil Markabians whose prime operating target is the Church of Scientology and its infiltration. They claim having technology to “telepathicaly defeat” these agressors.
Another says he audited for 4 years Suppressives in a remote Galaxy because they were the reason for al troubles on this planet. Having completed that task he has evolved a “superior form of auditing” and claims to achieve on raw public the same results as Ful OT 7 faster and easier than the average person can brew a cup of coffee.
Finally there is a group who Promotes that QUALITY does no count. Oblivious that most of their stats are actualy false (they produce false Clears and quickie rundowns) they feel that “the end justifies the means”.
THe main justification or rationalization for sloppy auditing in the Free Zone is the incorrectly applied datum that “ANY AUDITING IS BETTER THAN NO AUDITING”.
Those who use it, always ensure it is taken out of the context of the bulletin or taped lecture it is coming from.
Anyone who has done the SHSBC, would have found over 20 places where LRH amended that datum that “Any auditing is better than no auditing”.
Just like those validating untrained people doing the Ls:
In Lecture 7 Jun 1971 LRH said:`Any auditing is better than no Auditing: This applies to Normal auditing. L10 IS NOT NORMAL AUDITING. YOU CAN KILL A PC BY MISRUNNING L10`.
In HCOB 13 Aug 1971 L10 Training Prerequisites LRH states: “Auditors who do not meet all the above requirements and are flubless have NO BUSINESS RUNNING L10… It is a HIGH CRIME to do otherwise …you can kill a pc by flubs on L10.
And yet you chant ad nauseam “Any auditing is better than no auditing”. Using the words of a Man to contradict him when it so pleases you.
I am starting to wonder if the COMPUTATION: AUDITING IS BETTER THAN NO AUDITING as an eternal apology for recklessness is not the FZ MAJOR SERVICE fac!!!
It certainly makes out-tech auditors and those too lazy to train or improve COMPLETELY RIGHT.
It makes those who work hard like me to ensure the best possible jb and high standards are kept and try to raise standards completely wrong…
It certainly makes them help escape domination (IN fact most natterers agaisnt me after I tried to correct them and they refused claim that I try to dominate them!) … It makes them seek to dominate anyone who contradicts them.
They certainly see it as aiding their survival because it becomes utterly OK and no longer an overt to do any form of out-tech, no matter how gruesome and they view it as impeding those of people they decide to opperm like me…
In the First Class VIII TAPE LRH states`AUDITING IS NOT WHAT YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH`.
Perhaps anyone who advocate out-tech as a laudable goal ought to demonstrate that in clay.
WHY GIVE SLOPPY AND LAZY AUDITORS SO MUCH ADMIRATION… Nobody outside of the FZ seems to admire sloppiness and lazyness.
WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH BEING A PROFESSIONAL…
I know which LRH choose.
Pierre EThier
Class XII
Pierre Ethier
True Class XII
Sometimes I talk about unprofessionalism in the Free Zone.
I am not talking about auditors who leaned from teh seats of their pant or the best they could with few or no course room available, provided they try to the best they can and apply a modicum of intelligence in their practice.
I am not talking either about auditors who make errors, mistakes, because they got confused, didnt know any better or somhow misduplicated some minor technical point.
What I am talking is at a completely different level.
What I am talking about unprofessionalism is field trained Class IVs, VIs or lower who have no notion of what a Flag Only Rundown is and claim there is no difference between a provisional Class IV with 500 hours experience and a Flag Interned Clas XII auditor with 30,000 WDAH.
Or a Field auditor which in explicit contradiction of LRH (in Welcome to the Flag Internship) who feels he fully meets all Flag Standards, even though he never did a Flag Intenship, nor his mentors. Such auditors will rationalize why a grossly incomplete L pack without a checksheet nor any of the standard LRH C/Ses sessions taught by a Class VIII is “fine enough for them and their pcs” and sees nothing wrong with Quickying the Rundowns “because he gets such remarkable results” (In other words they do not believe in C/S 43 for audidtors and think that auditors have cases.
Or the self-trained NOTs auditor who has purposefully avoided being checked by anyone with experience with auditing the Rundown. and zip pcs through the program in les than 1/10th of what the well trained auditor will do.
Or the auditor who has not studied more than 2% of the Clearing materials and gleefuly attest people to Clear who have simply not made it.
Whenever I speak against such abuses, always attacking the out-tech, NEVER the personality nor past of the individual, the response tend to be Ad Hominem attacks, deliberate attempts to enturbulate as many people as possible, and spread false and misleading data and trying to impugn my technical integrity by inferring I was mistrained.
(The latest flagrant example is someone largely ignorant of the Ls technology making false assertion that David Mayo and others altered the Ls technology, not knowing that NO L Rundowns Bulletin or issue was published NOR REVISED after 1972, the Class X-XII checksheets I did are dated 1971 or 1972 and that 90% of the course packs are made from LRH C/S sessions with his instructions in hand and all those sessions were done in 1971 and 1972.
David Mayo had nothing to do with the Ls write-ups and did not revise any L bulletin nor issue.
NOBODY REVISED ANY L BULLETIN AFTER 1972!!!! There are no exception.
The Ls bulletins were not even revised to tell to omit the running of R3R on Clears, because per LRH “ONLY A FULL CLASS X can read L-10 issues and nobody got to revise them.
Anyone truly trained on the Ls would know that. Only someone who has accepted verbal tech and rumours and lies as part of his training would spread such blatantly false propaganda. The Course packs that I used were made and stapled on the Apollo, yet the auditor that I labelled Incompletely trained franctically try to fit a round peg in a square hole by inventing false data or spread lies he has heard.
It is a true fact that someone who was declared supressive by LRH himself for false reports in 1976 (se the 1976 HCOB Auditors who falsify worksheets) gave assurances it was “complete”. The same auditor has sold over a dozen L pack to any FZ auditor willing to pay the $6000 for it, no matter how bad, flubby or unethical, or even if he wass trained at all as a Class IV. Of course people get mad at me when I tell them they have been ripped off. But they by atacking me they are shooting the Messenger.
Serious Out-Tech consist of the following:
Auditors mixing every conceivable rundowns,
Mixing techniques of Upper OT levels with lower ones,
Using upper techniques on lower level cases,
C/Sing for Solo Actions which could not possibly done Solo,
C/Sing Solo without having even read the Solo C/S Series,
C/Sing NOTs without having read half of the NOTs bulletins,
Zipping people on Rundowns (Ls, Power, Grades, Solo NOTS ) at dizzying quickie speed, and attesting people without the auditor nor pc even knowing what the EP is.
Putting people onto OT levels without any setups or doing any checklist and with many unhandled Bad Indicators,
Allowing pc to natter their head off intensives after intensives without once pulling a withold,
or the auditor who indicate to his pcs that some OT levels were “unnecessary”.
This of course does not mention
the auditor who audited his pcs on various processes while they were both sipping beer at a pub,
or the one who encouraged his pc to drink so she would be more amenable to spend the night with him.
nor the one who was secretly having an affair with the wife of the pc he was currently auditing!!!
OR HOW ABOUT THE 60 YEAR PC (too old for past lfe auditing) who has a chronic history of Drug abuse WHO WAS RACED ON THE BRIDGE FROM WOG TO “NOTS COMPLETION” IN LESS THAN 2 INTENSIVES????
These are not invented cases, but only a mere glimpse at the kind of stuff that has come up on my lines…
There is plenty of out-tech in the FZ, outside of IFA.
As one of the FZ top trained people I get often pulled into what I call the FZ “Skid Row”.
The very worse of IFA appears quite tame when compared to the whole FZ.
It is unavoidable to make mistakes when one audits. I never said otherwise. especially among beginner auditor.
But what can be surmised about the twenty year old veteran who still without any shame still does a more shabby job that most beginners. Is he truly trying to help.. If he were trying to help he would raise at least a finger to raise above the level of bare mediocrity. What can you say about his respect for the pc`, when the obvious viewpoint is that `sloppiness is good enough for for him (as long as he can pay)`.
I have worked with more beginner auditors than you have and can even imagine and encouraged them tremendously. I am currently working with over a dozen neophyte auditors and I am encouraging them a lot. So you appear to have build a lot of prejudiced ideas about me, either based on someone`s natter, black PR, Church INDOC or other ideas NOT BASED ON ACTUAL EXAMINATION OF MY PRODUCTS AS A TRAINER OF AUDITORS, to the point you say that I am in a bad need of being salvaged through a session from you., and that I must now follow your guidance…What is your training level, since You claim that you can teach me so much..
But what of the auditor who quickies his training, or after years of ample opportunity never raise a finger to maintain a minimum of quality. This is where YOU WORDS and LRH frankly depart. LRH never endorsed LAZYNESS IN AUDITORS.
Would you tolerate a fireman coming to save your house who has not read the ABC about fires, and slept through most of his training. This is different than your next door neighbour trying to help. You would definitely have every right to expect a PROFESSIONAL to have a minimum of skills and not to pour water over a grease fire and destroy the totality of your belongings in the name of help.
In the Amazon there are many Bush pilot who do not have a pilot license, and have no clue about plane maintenance. A good number have their clients never coming back after crashing in the Jungle. `They were trying to help`, though they were too lazy and sloppy to follow any kind of safety standards. Would you honestly fly with them….
It is wonderful thing to try to help. But are you truly helping people by giving them out-lists THAT YOU WONT CORRECT or if your auditing makes him suicidal or if the pc abandons forever auditing (especially in the FZ where some auditors tend to be so defensive about their auditing they sometimes seek to ACTIVELY PREVENT THE CORRECTION OF THEIR FAILED CASES BY ANYONE even if it means the pc abandoning Scn).
For someone who is trained at Flag as a Class 12 to willfully violate the auditor code by evaluating, overrunning FNs and remaining out of comm as one can see in Jason Beghe testimony is not something LRH would be proud of. Neither would I. I am frankly appalled at your open validation of out-tech in an audidtor who should know better. We are not talking about a neophyte making the errors that anyone at his level is expected to make, but an auditor labelled by Flag as `the best of the best` who is certain to repeat the same errors on his next pcs and yet you come to RTC`s rescue as their apologist.
Validation of auditors who recklessly give out-lists to pcs, leave them with unflat Evil Purposes, do not pull their Missed witholds is what produces cases like Lisa MacPherson and Jason Beghe.
Open encouragement of such out-tech is tantamount to saying you would like to see such cases multiply.
There is a FZ faction who feels that “one should never another to adjust his personal truth to others nor society and one must always respect each individual’s self-determination to disagree Standards and redefine them as he sees fit.. In other words, Out-Tech cannot truly exist and there are as many Stnadards as there are individuals.
When I confronted the author of that delirious theory that applying those principles means one would never sent anyone to Ethics, even a known child molester and killer or an anti-semitic individual advocating violence and mayhem. Even when I added that they wold see nothing wrong with processing Charles Manson who in a TV interview admitted a desired to see the whole of Mankind exterminated, they simply ignored my answers.
Another group feels that everything on a case is simply explained by events that tok place in the last Universe and that our entire life and behavious is actually pre-destined as dictated in a series of previous or paralell universes.
There is yet another group who considers UFOs not only real but occupied by Evil Markabians whose prime operating target is the Church of Scientology and its infiltration. They claim having technology to “telepathicaly defeat” these agressors.
Another says he audited for 4 years Suppressives in a remote Galaxy because they were the reason for al troubles on this planet. Having completed that task he has evolved a “superior form of auditing” and claims to achieve on raw public the same results as Ful OT 7 faster and easier than the average person can brew a cup of coffee.
Finally there is a group who Promotes that QUALITY does no count. Oblivious that most of their stats are actualy false (they produce false Clears and quickie rundowns) they feel that “the end justifies the means”.
THe main justification or rationalization for sloppy auditing in the Free Zone is the incorrectly applied datum that “ANY AUDITING IS BETTER THAN NO AUDITING”.
Those who use it, always ensure it is taken out of the context of the bulletin or taped lecture it is coming from.
Anyone who has done the SHSBC, would have found over 20 places where LRH amended that datum that “Any auditing is better than no auditing”.
Just like those validating untrained people doing the Ls:
In Lecture 7 Jun 1971 LRH said:`Any auditing is better than no Auditing: This applies to Normal auditing. L10 IS NOT NORMAL AUDITING. YOU CAN KILL A PC BY MISRUNNING L10`.
In HCOB 13 Aug 1971 L10 Training Prerequisites LRH states: “Auditors who do not meet all the above requirements and are flubless have NO BUSINESS RUNNING L10… It is a HIGH CRIME to do otherwise …you can kill a pc by flubs on L10.
And yet you chant ad nauseam “Any auditing is better than no auditing”. Using the words of a Man to contradict him when it so pleases you.
I am starting to wonder if the COMPUTATION: AUDITING IS BETTER THAN NO AUDITING as an eternal apology for recklessness is not the FZ MAJOR SERVICE fac!!!
It certainly makes out-tech auditors and those too lazy to train or improve COMPLETELY RIGHT.
It makes those who work hard like me to ensure the best possible jb and high standards are kept and try to raise standards completely wrong…
It certainly makes them help escape domination (IN fact most natterers agaisnt me after I tried to correct them and they refused claim that I try to dominate them!) … It makes them seek to dominate anyone who contradicts them.
They certainly see it as aiding their survival because it becomes utterly OK and no longer an overt to do any form of out-tech, no matter how gruesome and they view it as impeding those of people they decide to opperm like me…
In the First Class VIII TAPE LRH states`AUDITING IS NOT WHAT YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH`.
Perhaps anyone who advocate out-tech as a laudable goal ought to demonstrate that in clay.
WHY GIVE SLOPPY AND LAZY AUDITORS SO MUCH ADMIRATION… Nobody outside of the FZ seems to admire sloppiness and lazyness.
WHAT IS SO WRONG WITH BEING A PROFESSIONAL…
I know which LRH choose.
Pierre EThier
Class XII
Pierre Ethier
True Class XII
Advanced NOTs Graduation
RIP Gail Michelson
Dear Gail,
You touched our souls in so many ways. Rest in Peace.
Catherine and Pierre
Obituary of Gail Michelson
Gail Michelson passed away May 22, 2020. Her wishes were for no formal funeral services.
Arrangements entrusted to McDermott-Crockett and Associates Mortuary (805) 569-2424.
I want to thank you, Gail
For always being there
And even in your blues
You always seemed to care
You meant so much to us
You had that special strength and kindness
You brightened our days
and brought so much light in our blindness
Eternally we will remember you
And what you used to say
How made each of us smile
And gifted us with every passing day
We miss your presence sadly into tears
We think this can’t be right
Because even after all this time and fears
We sense your kindness in the night
You are always in our hearts
——-
Jennifer Heath-Bendle uploaded photo(s)
Friday, June 5, 2020
Gail we miss you so much! It is hard to understand and comprehend that you are no longer here. I believe that you will live on in all of us and that your music will continue through your students who will pass it on share all that you taught them throughout their lives. Please keep a watchful eye on our kids. We love you and will remember you always!
Mary McMaster posted a condolence
Wednesday, June 3, 2020
Gail was a truly amazing person who made everyone around her feel special and loved. I have never known anyone else with her sensitivity to the feelings of others. She was a gifted teacher but was much more than that in terms of her connection to her students and their families. We will miss her forever. Mary McMaster
The family of Gail Michelson uploaded a photo
Wednesday, June 3, 2020
RIP Dimitar Bakardjiev
Rest in Peace Blackie
Blackie was a real happy cat. RIP my dear angel.
I wanted to write a short note about how you came into our lives. Pierre has been auditing and running a drill with his PCs, as a part of the drill PIerre drove us to the SPCA (the local Humane Society). This fluffy friendly back cat did catch my eye right aways, however I was concerned that we had already a senior white cat and I was wondering if they would get alone. A month later the black cat was still there in the shelter, I picked him up and he started purring in my lap and I just could not leave him there. It was this instant bond. We took him home the very same day. The shelter staff had named him Sir Fluffington The Third. Shortly we changed his name to Blackie.
He was extremely friendly to our senior cat. He was loving and kind. Kindness you have never seen.
He parted with me yesterday on February 1st , 2020 very unexpectedly. All happened in minutes and my heart told me something is wrong. By the time I reached the ER Vet he was no longer responding . It was only 10 minutes ride. The ER Vet did attempt to revive him with CPR but was unsuccessful. It is a really bad time for me to lose my fluffy friend. My heart is so broken and beaten up. Everything is falling apart around me. I am trying to be strong but the sadness overwhelms me.
I love you so much. Thank you for being there for me. Rest in Peace.
Happy New Year 2020
Dear Friends,
As the year comes to a close, I am more committed than ever to fostering understanding, compassion and powerful achievement in the world.
I have also come to realize that I can’t do it without you. If you are looking for a reason to help me spread the true application of Scientology technology: the science of a meaningful life and personal improvement? Here is a great one:
Because the World Needs More Kindness and Connection!
I share your hopes for more peace and empathy in the world. Kindness is a universal language that blind men see and deaf men hear. If I have to talk about the amazing human abilities I would talk first about human kindness. It separates us from the rest of living things. It exposes our spirit and gives us the means to prevail. If people around us base every action on a conscious kindness our world will be beautiful and our lives will be fulfilled with meaning. If the mankind wasn’t so busy being greedy or power hungry or ego-driven, they would have more time to devote to being more kind.
The end of the year marks the time for clearing the slower energies of the past and preparing for a new cycle of growth. It is a time of awakening and recommitting to life as spiritual beings full of new energy and warmth. It is time again to celebrate of being spiritually rejuvenated and resurrected in a new spiritual realm allowing ourselves the reckoning of better deeds.
The completion of one cycle and going into the next is a sign representing energy, drive, initiative and motivation. I feel rejuvenated with a restlessness and an openness to change and new experiences. Now’s a perfect time to reflect on relationship to life and I invite everyone to revisit what brings your personal and spiritual fulfillment.
No matter what are your challenges, you can look at your life in new ways and this will support you to grow closer to your higher self. Empower yourself with the postulates of spiritual growth and change by learning from adversity.
I wish you an inspiring, productive and meaningful new chapter in your life’s journey.
Pierre Ethier
Why Does Compassion Feel So Good?
At the lowest points in our lives, the presence and care of one supportive person can be life-changing. Our pain or loss may be just as real, but we suffer less knowing we’re not alone.
Coming together in this way works in transforming one person’s pain into a shared feeling of uplift. Indeed, compassion is the opposite of a zero-sum game in which there are winners and losers. Both giver and receiver benefit.
One wonders about compassion: What is it? What are the benefits? How can we foster it? Here is why compassion is a good thing:
- Our suffering is recognized and acknowledged. Compassion starts with a willingness to see someone else’s pain. Rather than looking away, denying the pain, or choosing to ignore it, we acknowledge the person’s experience. This acknowledgment makes us feel less alone in our suffering.
- We understand the universality of human suffering. Part of compassion is knowing that at some point, everyone hurts. In this way the pain is relatable. While pain is a personal experience, it is also a common and unavoidable part of what it means to be human. Thus we feel a further joining with others in the shared recognition that pain is part of existence.
- There is an emotional response to our suffering. Compassion is not simply knowing that another person is in pain; there is an emotional component, a “feeling with,” as the etymology of compassion suggests. It’s comforting to feel another person’s heart go out to us.
- Compassion requires tolerating uncomfortable feelings. While there are benefits to being compassionate, it’s also not easy. Connecting emotionally with another’s pain activates our stress response (fight-or-flight, or freeze). It takes emotional work to stay with a person’s pain rather than fleeing or trying to deny it in some way (e.g., by blaming the person for their distress). When we see that a person isn’t running from our pain, we’re better able to withstand our own discomfort.
- There is a motivation to alleviate our suffering. Compassion involves feelings but not just feelings. We would probably not feel much compassion from someone who acted sad for us but was unwilling to help. When we respond with compassion we’re moved to act. As a result another person’s compassion can improve our situation, and we feel better just knowing someone is trying to help us.
Increasing Compassion
You can probably think of people you know who seem to have a lot of compassion, and others who have little. Recent studies suggest that compassion is not a fixed trait; it can improve with treatment, which in turn leads to other benefits.
Practice What You Preach?
“I found a the following post from Michelle Sterling ( Emma ) where she admits to have benefited from Life Repair:Life Repair Auditing -I did life repair auditing both as a PC and auditor.Done properly it can produce really good changes in the PC. Getting through the word clearing on the Scn C/S1 was the worst thing :(”
No more comments on my side.Just a reminder about inconsistencies in her practices. How do you want me to believe that Michelle Butcher Sterling is opposing Scientology?
Catherine Ethier
Here Michelle’s admission that Pierre’s articles helped her leave the abuse at the Church of Scientology. She has not been very kind and thankful for the help.
In recent admissions Michelle Sterling states to have been paid to control the distribution of unflattering and harrassing propaganda about targeted individuals. Pierre seems to have been unfairly victimised by some of her paid sponsors.
ERRAND OF MERCY
How the Church of Scientology abandons in the hour of need, to die alone and penniless, those who are the most vulnerable and desperate.
Call it for what it is: Complete callousness toward the dying and depraved Indifference toward those who have “outlived their usefulness”.
Sometimes around the advent of its “Golden Age”, the Church of Scientology has implemented a policy of Denying Help and/or assistance to the dying.
In the 1980s terminally ill parishioners who had paid vast fortunes into the Church Coffers were still being given counseling (auditing), though they were made to sign waivers and releases. This is how I came to audit the late Betty Filisky (Solo NOTs Completion #1) in 1987. At age 57, she was dying of Cancer. I am authorized to state at this point that she was entirely disaffected with the Senior Management of the Church after she had seen how they had behaved like bullies and thugs toward many good meaning people, including many personal friends of L. Ron Hubbard.
The Snr C/S FSO, the late Richard Reiss, blamed her illness on her disaffection, though there are no LRH references explaining how disaffection can makes someone deadly ill. But that was the politically acceptable comment to make.
The truth is that Oppression (Suppression toward people who are denied the right to defend themselves or speak out against abuses) is one of the key things that makes people ill. There are dozens of LRH references pointing to that fact. Even common sense, when one describes the Oppression by its key attribute: Stress, agrees with this as well.
Last year three times, I was asked to come to the bed of a dying person that I had last audited between 20 and 30 years earlier, because the Church they still officially belonged to (The Church of Scientology) had callously denied them the right to receive their last rites for no better reason that they now viewed them as a potential liability and a burden. Simply stated, the Church of Scientology has the peculiar view, unique among any religious organization, I have ever heard of, that it primarily exists for its own benefit and to satisfy its private interests (and those of its leaders) well ahead of those of any of its faithfuls. In that respect, the Church of Scientology acts entirely and solely like a FOR PROFIT ORGANIZATION while using loopholes within the law to parade as a Church. The reasons for Scientology being a Church have nothing to do with its daily actions and entirely with financial and monetary gain.
Listening to nothing but my Heart, I made arrangements to fly to Europe at my own expense, as all three of the dying resided there and were broke. At least, my actions allowed three good people to die with dignity and I was able to provide some comfort for their family and survivors.
I had audited the first one of them for the last time 25 years earlier and because I had left the Church shortly after, we had never spoken since. That person had remained entirely faithful to the Church until the moment she had been ditched by the Church as a potential liability for having an inoperable tumor and “having outlived her usefulness”.
Now on her death bed and unwilling to be abandoned to her fate by the Church of Scientology who viewed her as nothing more than a useless rotting piece of meat: a carcass to be, she asked for her relatives to find the person who had always been there for her when we both were at Flag and been vastly more successful than anyone else in helping her through auditing. That person was me.
She was extremely glad to see me. Her first words were:”Pierre! you came! I am so glad! You have helped me so much…” I provided her with the help that she needed and her well deserved last rites. Within 48 hours she departed peacefully from her body after an agony that had lasted too long already.
In another country I met an elderly individual who had once been a truly brilliant executive and many decades ago a close confidante of L. Ron Hubbard, someone whose name can be heard on many LRH conferences from the 1950s. Sadly a degenerative disease had ravaged their life and body. I was able to provide effective counselling and assistance to that individual to the point that the care providers told me I had made a difference for the better.
The third one lived in a country where Scientology is unknown.
That person was now deadly ill and no cure could be found. Years earlier, under David Miscavige guidance, teenage CMO Messengers had treated that person with wanton disrespect for his dignity as a Human being. That prompted the individual to leave.
The Church of Scientology viewed that extremely able and ethical individual as “useless” and an ENEMY, merely for the fact that he had departed the Sea Org while still following all of their rules on leaving. I was invited to deliver an Assist as the family knew I did not apply KSW (Keep Scientology Working Policies) destructively like the Church of Scientology now specializes itself in. His influential family and the Head of State of that country both arranged for the most competent doctor they could find to help that “Enemy of the Church”. It is little wonder after the leaders of that country had been appraised of the Violation of Human rights on their own citizens by the Church of Scientology, that all Scientology books have now been officially banned from both bookstores and Libraries in that country, because they are viewed as the product of “an Extremist Organization”. I was successful in helping that individual as well.
I had very little sympathy when someone called me direct from the latest Freezone convention and boasted about awards and trophies they had just handed out to people who are top PR artists but horrible auditors when one is actually allowed to examine their session reports. Coincidentally one of the awards recipients had just abandoned a suicidal pc behind and left another go to a psychiatrist mid-intensive and put on anti-psychotics. Neither that auditor nor the Freezone Convention organizers felt the slightest guilt feeling.
I told them that I was on an errand of Mercy at my own expense because it was the right to do: to help those who gave several decades of their lives to help others and LRH develop the technology so that we can all use it, nor merely financially benefit from it, as too many people both in the Church and the Independent field seem to do. The reason I went to help those people was largely because they were too broke to pay my expenses because nobody else in the Church or the Freezone/Independent Field was willing to do it. I had spent many hours cramped in Economy Airplane seats, slept on uncomfortable couches, ate processed food because it was the only thing available, while some of those “award winners” basked in luxurious accommodations and quietly swept their overt products under the carpet.
That person I told this to, went on repeating what I had just said. I was assigned subsequently lower conditions and told I was a “LIABILITY TO THE FREEZONE” by the self-appointed FREEZONE PR, when I declined to cover up for the auditor whose pcs became suicidal or defected to psychiatry mid intensive and for refusing to stay silent about another one who keeps being invited as guest of honor to events, but is documented to be a child molester. The self-appointed Freezone PR has declared me FAIR GAME since and encouraged both his auditor and those who finance him and pay for his own auditing to do the same.
Judging on the resulting natter, it seems that I missed a lot of withholds that day.
This is why no matter how much natter, lies, rumors and sordid tales the tormented souls whose withholds were missed that night, or other nights, I stand tall whenever I look at my actual actions and motives.
Pierre Ethier
(c) 2013
——
The voice of the victim of a Class VIII speaks louder than just words.
Somehow the voice of the victim has been ignored by PR artists promoting the abuser.
Brushing off moments of success
You probably don’t have to think too far back to recall the last time you diminished yourself and your work, brushing off moments of success as simply “good luck”.
Have you ever had a day when it seems like the stars are perfectly aligned for you? When someone has reached out and hit the easy button on your behalf? I had one of those days this past Friday and it was brilliant, everything managed to fall into place and several people offered some much-needed support to make the day successful.
My initial reaction to the day falling into place was “what a stroke of luck, thank goodness things happened that way.” But when thinking about things again I realized that there really was no luck involved. Friends stepped up to help out because I had done the same for them many times before. I was offered a project for my business because I had established a track record and proven my worth. My initial reaction of “wow, what luck” diminished the work and my own capabilities that had led to a brilliant day.
How many of us do this on a regular basis? Diminish ourselves and our work and brush it off as luck? As it turns out, a whole bunch of us do.
The person who is brusshing off moments of success can be summarized as an individual who attributes the success in their life to external factors and internalizes the failures within their life, and they experience some degree of fear at being discovered as an intellectual fraud. They may tend to discount their success if it’s not a match to the ideal standard that they’ve envisioned for themselves. They may discount the success that comes with hard work and perceive it as not being due to their innate ability, or they may just attribute their success to luck.
Some have asserted that there is a correlation between the deminishing your acomplishments and success, as it drives a cycle of ambition. Anxiety over failure leads to hard work and preparation, leading to success, leading to positive feedback which is discounted, leading to the next task that will prove capability and debunk fraudulent feelings and so on. However, a cycle of ambition based on fraudulent feelings doesn’t feel like an ideal long-term approach to managing a career or life.
Here few helpful tips:
-
Acknowledge Success: accept that you’ve had some part in your own success and that hard work counts just as much as innate skills.
-
Reinforce and Reward: create a reminder for yourself of your positive accomplishments, such as a journal, tweet, text, or celebratory token – the point is recognizing it in yourself.
-
Learn from Failure: the point of this post is about owning both your successes and failures, so ensure that in your process of acknowledging, you identify what can be learned from the failures along the way
Selfish people come across our lives all the time. There is a difference between self-loving and being selfish. This type of person only thinks about themselves while bulldozing their way on others to get what they want. Selfishness is “1. Being concerned excessively or exclusively with oneself; 2. Having no regard for the needs or feelings of others. If someone is both totally self-involved and uncaring about anyone else, they are not likely to be very responsive to you in any way other than evaluating how you meet their needs.”
BEHAVIORS THAT CREATE SELFISH PEOPLE (AND HOW TO AVOID THEM):
1. MANIPULATION.
The person who will utilize behavior for their benefit without regard to you is a master manipulator. Selfishness is not a genetic physical disposition in our psyche. It is a learned behavior from childhood. Children are suppose to be selfish up to a point since they are learning from their environments. It’s important to distinguished from the behaviors of self love and self care. However, the manipulator feeds on another person’s self-esteem. Stand back and realize that you are not getting anywhere by arguing with this person. This type of selfishness has little or no regard to your needs. If you are feeling like you are being used then most likely you are.
2. UNCARING.
Selfish individuals are emotional tyrants. They are uncaring and have no sympathy for your needs. The more love and reward you show them the easier it is for them to feed from your kindness. They might appear charming and caring at first but their behavior goes astray the moment you don’t submit to their desires. The best way to deal with an uncaring and unselfish behavior is to put yourself first and let them know it. They don’t tolerate that. They are all about them. Explaining to them things like this is redundant since they can’t see past their own issues.
3. PLOTTING AND SCHEMING.
This specific trait or action arises from the fear of losing control. The moment you step into the picture you are disrupting their goal. The selfish person will continue doing things behind your back and plotting a different angle to suit themselves. The lack of control scares them. They have to manipulate everything. The best way to deal with this type of behavior is to show them who is really in charged through kindness. And when that doesn’t work it’s important to let them go. You cannot be responsible for how they feel since they cannot see your point of view.
4. SELF-CENTERED AND CONCEITED.
Narcissism and selfishness arrive from a lack of self-worth and an attention seeking behavior. In order to feel better this type of personality will brag and make everything about them seem relevant. Stay true to yourself. The moment they put you down remember not to take it personally. Anyone who goes around hurting another is truthfully a hurt individual. They must put themselves up by putting another down.
5. GIVING AND SHARING DO NOT COME EASILY.
Selfish people pretend they care. They might say the right things but their actions speak loudly. They only do things for others when they will receive great benefit from them. It’s not in their nature to go out and give. If they do it is because they want the attention back to them for giving. They will make sure they let the world know how wonderful they’ve been. The easiest way to readjust their behavior is to take away their focus. Do not praise the behavior. It’s best to just allow the act itself to go unnoticed.
6. EXPECTATIONS OF OTHERS TO DO THINGS FOR THEM.
A selfish person has high expectations of what they need. They live based on what others think of them and what they can do for them. What can they get out of this? They expect the world to revolve around their needs and desires. They ask for lots of favors, so stop doing them. Don’t give into their demands. Limit the time you spend around this type of person because if they don’t have you available to their demands they will not need to be with you.
To some extent, we are all considered selfish when we give to ourselves first and foremost. But there is a line between narcissism and self-care. Being selfish is self-absorbing of others. This type of personality is arrogant and self-indulging. There are ways to deal with selfishness and remove those who bathe only in their glory. End all relationships that don’t support you because you deserve better.
Spoiling People
“Spoiling doesn’t prepare your children for anything but heartache later in life.” –
A spoiled child normally grows to become a spoiled adult. This will affect them in maintaining a steady job, keeping friendships, having a spouse, and experiencing a healthy life. Spoiled people are selfish and self-centered. But, how do you know if they are spoiled? How can you help them see how destructive their behaviors are to others?
BEHAVIORS THAT CREATE SPOILED PEOPLE (AND HOW TO AVOID THEM):
1. GIVING INTO EVERYTHING.
Spoiled people have never known boundaries. Parents and friends cater to their every whim. These are the children who, with every tantrum, get exactly what they want. As adults, they have louder and more volatile tempers that implement the same behavior. “I want what I want when I want it.” Because they are used to getting what they want, they will torment anyone who doesn’t give into their demands. They border on mental illness because they can’t see reality from the delusional state of desires.
You can’t return to their childhood. You can, however, establish boundaries of what you will tolerate. The word “No” can anger these individuals. But, being consistent in your pursuit to help them recognize their behavior is important (and vital for their mental health). They might not stick around. If they do, know you have accomplished a beautiful task!
2. REINFORCING NEGATIVE BEHAVIOR.
Spoiled people trampled on anyone who gets in their way. They take what they want. They have zero concept that the world doesn’t revolve around them. They will make their way into an office and step on anything that prevents them from moving up the ladder of success. They will also use people and relationships quickly and then dump them without a single ounce of regret.
In order to disarm their behavior, you must use positive forces. For every negative action, you will need to establish several positive ones. So if you have witnessed the selfish behavior of someone who has been nasty to another to get what they want, you may want to let them know that the behavior can (and will be) returned in the same manner. Nothing upsets the spoiled person more than believing they will get punished. They don’t know what it is like to set limitations.
3. PICKING FIGHTS.
A spoiled person will create drama to get attention. They will pick fights to deviate from what they want and then stab you from behind. It’s manipulation at its finest. They will devalue your opinion and turn around and utilize it for themselves. They truly don’t care how they get what they are after. They are determined to get it to all cost.
Pick your fights wisely. Not every argument needs to become a battle of wits to feed the ego. You stand your ground. Keep your boundaries. The spoiled person will soon forget what you were trying to accomplish. They are off on their next tantrum.
4. DESTROYING OUR IMAGE THROUGH MANIPULATION.
People who are spoiled are narcissistic. They will manipulate through abuse, degrading, and control. They will make you feel horrible for not participating in the things that they want. They feed off your weaknesses or insecurities to get you to do things for them. These people don’t care how they hurt you as long as they get what they are after.
A spoiled person doesn’t accept that they have any weaknesses. It’s not about pinpointing those insecurities to them, but about turning the tables so they can see that things hurt when you are vicious. They have their weaknesses. Stay humble and use humility as your armor when dealing with these master manipulators. Stand your ground. Show them forgiveness but also discipline. Do not let them abuse you with their anger.
5. REWARDING POOR ACTIONS.
Spoiled people brag about how they got that new job or the new girlfriend. They will create these stories with Oscar-winning talent. They want the attention even though it’s toxic. Rewarding poor actions and behavior encourages the self-centered and spoiled person to continue doing these things. It’s giving them permission to get what they want regardless of the consequences.
Create incentives for good behavior. Just like a parent does with a child, you must reward positive actions. Become a positive role model in this person’s life. You don’t need to brag about the things you do, but allow them to witness compassion, goodwill, and empathy through your examples. Let them know that the act of receiving is just as beautiful as giving.
6. LACK OF CONSIDERATION.
Spoiled people have no consideration for the feelings of others. They are aggressive in behavior. They will bulldoze over anything to get attention. Their actions are sneaky and premeditated. These folks plot and scheme to con anyone into doing anything. The famous Cuban poet Jose Marti said, “A selfish man is a thief.” He will steal your heart, your money and your livelihood if you let them.
We have been taught to satisfy our needs however we can. The spoiled person takes it on a completely different level. You do not have to satisfy their needs. You don’t have to participate in everything they want. Once again, boundaries are important. Show this person love. Most spoiled people are missing structure in their lives. They didn’t have set rules growing up. Everything was supplied to them. Now as adults, they don’t understand why the world has to be so structured.
Spoiled, selfish people are everywhere. You can deal with them in a healthy manner that won’t suck you into their drama. You don’t have to entertain them and give into everything. You can use your awareness and knowing to teach them little by little what it is to be a functional adult with healthy behaviors.
People Who Lack Grattitude Are Toxic
We have all had ungrateful people in our lives. Those folks that seem to think we were put on this earth to serve them or fix the messes they get themselves into. They expect people to pick up after them or help them with things but never seem to get to the “thank you very much for your help.” portion of the interaction. They also never seem to be happy or content with the way their life is or the people who are in it.
So identify their behaviors and avoid dealing with ungreatful people because this kind of people are toxic and will poison your life.
HERE ARE 6 BEHAVIORS OF PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL AND HOW TO AVOID THEM:
1. PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL ARE ALWAYS IN NEED
People who aren’t thankful are always in need of some kind of assistance. Whether it is help with bills, watching the kids or giving them a ride. They always need something from you. They are in a perpetual state of emergency and it is usually one they create themselves either through poor judgment or on purpose in order to create the drama they feed on.
Do you have a recurring emergency in a relationship or with finances? Identify what the issue is and work to change it. Instead of asking for someone to help with a temporary solution work on a permanent one. Instead of asking for help with a bill ask your friends and family to help you find a better job.
The important thing is that when someone does take time to help then tell them “thank you.” People will rescue you from hellish situations and all that is required on your part are two words that won’t cost you a dime.
2. PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL DON’T HAVE TIME FOR YOU UNLESS THEY NEED SOMETHING
The thing is that unless they need something from you, then you never hear from them. They only turn to you for friendship when they are in a jam. You will never hear them say “Hey let me take you out to lunch” or “let me help you with that.” If everything is going fine then you don’t exist in their world anymore.
Don’t just call friends or family only when you need something. Reach out to people. Ask them if they need help with anything or just go out and get a coffee with them and talk. Relationships built on mutual assistance are strong and last a lifetime.
3. PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL EXPECT YOU TO HELP THEM
They may feel entitled to your help either because you are family or they feel that you owe them something for being their friend. They aren’t grateful because they feel they have earned your help and you are just paying them back. They may have done a single nice thing for you only so that they could hold it over your head for as long as they can and squeeze every last ounce of guilt fueled work they could. Family, rather than friends, usually expect you to help them.
Don’t expect people to save you. You are a strong independent and resilient person who is more than capable of helping themselves get up after a tumble. It is great when people help or come to the rescue and be very thankful when they do because those people are rare indeed, but don’t sit in your tower and expect someone to save you. Save yourself.
4. THE WORLD REVOLVES AROUND THEM AND THEIR SCHEDULE
Oh and you have to drop everything you are doing right now to come and help them. If it was an unexpected emergency that would be one thing but the ungrateful person’s emergencies are usually do to poor planning, poor time management or irresponsibility on their part. They screwed up (again) and they expect you to come running to save them right this second.
If someone is willing to volunteer their time to help you with something then the least you can do is to work your schedule around theirs if you can or come up with a time when you both are free. Being grateful for their assistance means understanding that their time is just as precious to them as yours is to you.
5. PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL OFTEN BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS THEM
Despite all of your help ungrateful people will turn on you. They will talk behind your back. They will say that you never help them. That they do all of the work and you are the ungrateful sponge. Despite all you have done for them they will tell their friends or other family members what a horrible person you are in order to get more sympathy from people who can’t help them.
If someone helps you or does something nice for your with no expectation of recompense then sing their praises whenever you have a chance. Sometimes being recognized is reward enough.
6. PEOPLE WHO AREN’T THANKFUL WILL ALWAYS REMEMBER THE ONE TIME YOU DIDN’T HELP THEM
Ungrateful people will never let you forget that one time you weren’t able to help them. Whether it was because of time constraints or lack of funds it doesn’t matter. They will hold that guilt over you until the end of time.
If someone can’t help you either because of a lack of resources, knowledge or time then be understanding. Tell them you are thankful that they were willing to help even if they weren’t able.
Everybody needs help now and then and no one should be ashamed to ask for, or receive, help. When you are able to return the favor at a later date then that shows thankfulness. If you have truly special people in your life who give selflessly and ask for no reward then you should let them know how very grateful you are to have them in your life.
All you need is love
While some have been spreading rumors about Pierre for a long time, this has been proven to be non- constructive and very destructive to him and others. It is true that Pierre had been a subject to viscous attacks where out ethics individuals have been fabricating lies and attacking Pierre out of GREED. Their fabrications and manipulations had been very TOXIC and targeted to bring Pierre down.
Pierre has been very sick in a Hospital, however he has the firm intention to recover and complete his research. Pierre wanted me to post out the message that he had some difficult times but this is in the past and he intends to recover from the TOXIC effect of EVIL individuals. All he needs is LOVE and your postulates for complete recovery. I will print all your good and meaningful messages and will bring them to Pierre.
Please donate for his research at
Beliefs and Practices of Scientologists Concerning Death
Scientologists believe that the defining part of every human is his soul, or thetan. The physical body is a very transitory and limiting part of existence. Indeed, the purpose of auditing in Scientology is to eliminate harmful spiritual influences that restrict the thetan, and higher levels of this process allow the thetan to interact with the world without needing to use the body as an intermediary. The higher levels also prepare the thetan to be able to choose another body in a better and timely transfer. Some levels of processing allow the thetan to recollect past lives.
Life After Death
Each thetan is billions of years old, passing from one human life to the next through reincarnation. There is no judgment of the soul involved, and the process is automatic, without any necessary intervention through ritual, prayer or other means. However ethics , morals and clearing deal determine how , when and where the thetan would be able to transfer into a new body , tree or other. The next life may be or may not be in a huma body.
Scientology funerals are relatively simple ceremonies asit is believe that one has simply dropped the current body.
Treatment And Disposal of The Body
Scientology doctrine does not dictate any required or forbidden treatment of the body after death. Scientologists may have the body either buried or cremated. Ceremonies may or may not involve a viewing of the body, and grave markers may or may not be used.
L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology, was cremated. He requested that no memorial be created in remembrance and no ceremony was performed other than the depositing of his ashes at sea.
Organ Donation
Scientologists are allowed to make their own decisions about organ donation. However, they also believe that all traumatic experiences form harmful engrams, which limit the expression of the thetan until expelled through auditing, and that this process may occur even when unconscious or suffering “brain death”. Therefore, there may be spiritual repercussions to organ donation requiring additional auditing in the next life
Funeral Ceremony
If the family of the deceased opts for a funeral ceremony, a church official will address the deceased, bidding farewell and encouraging his thetan to take up a new body and a new life through reincarnation. The ceremony also generally involves a celebration of the deceased’s accomplishments in life and thanking him for the time spent with those attending. Readings from Hubbard’s works on Scientology are also generally included.
Non-Scientologists are welcome to attend any portion of the funeral services.
Services Available For Family
Counseling through auditing is encouraged by the Church of Scientology for survivors of the deceased. The grief associated with the loss of a loved one is understood to form engrams, which need to be worked through and released.
Wall of shame – trashing other victims of abuse has a toxic effect
For many years an anonymous poster on ESMB who goes by the handle of Veda has been trashing Pierre with toxic personal attacks which showed so much hatred that I honestly was scared for my personal physical safety and the safety of my family. I have been told that Gerry Armstrong posts under Veda. I have no idea who this is.
I do not know what an ex-Sea Org slave had done to Veda, Gerry Armstrong or whoever this is , to anger him/ her to this extend. Trashing the victims of abuse is not looking good. It is toxic to his/hers own quality of life.
I met Gerry Armstrong couple of years ago during at an anti-scientology conference in Toronto. Small build with wondering eyes, Gerry was sitting across the hotel lobby. Gerry remained distant and did not approach us and why would he? I am thinking that if he had something to say he could of done so in person. One should take the opportunities as they present to actually speak to people and embrace differences with compassion and understanding.
I wish you well, Gerry Armstrong.
Catherine
Greg Wilhere about the Ls
Hank Bourland about the L rundowns
Past Life Therapy Sessions
Explore Your Past Lives
Your thetan’s journey is like a colorful storybook with many, many chapters.
Your thetan takes you where you to need to go.
We all hold memories of our past lives deep within our unconscious minds. These memories may surface from time to time in dreams or in sudden flashes of insight. Or, they may wait tantalizingly below the surface.
Let us help you access these memories when you are in a couscous state of control so you will embark upon an amazing odyssey into your own soul history:
Uncover the root causes of present issues:
- Release stuck emotions and energy
- Understand and heal relationships
- Connect with past talents and interests
- Know your path & purpose in this lifetime
Past life therapy sessions may help heal and improve you current life.
- Prejudice
- Obsessions
- Phobias
- Eating disorders
- Chronic Medical Problems
- Repeating Patterns
- Unworthiness
- Feelings of Loneliness
- Having Affairs
- Marriage problem
What you may experience in a session:
- A journey back through time to uncover lessons from previous lives
- Clear and heal emotional abuse
- Receive wisdom & knowledge to apply to your current lifetime and situation
- Healing the connections that you have with others
- Forgive those who hurt you in the past
- Meet past friends and lovers
- Find out what your soul purpose is in this lifetime
- Meet and connect with your Spirit Guide(s)
- Receive Clarity and Gifts from your previous lives
and much more
In your Past Life journey, you explore important soul information with your own mind, your own voice, your own unique personal experience. You may choose to have your Past Life therapy session directed towards a specific issue or concern; or, you may choose to be open to receive the spiritual guidance that is most valuable to you now, at this moment in your present life.
A Past Life therapy is a journey of self-discovery of hidden knowledge contained within the unconscious mind and unlocking sacred information. Revelations from past incarnations and the afterlife can positively affect your conscious mind, providing keys of understanding and wisdom to a variety of problems. We will guide you through your journey to help you obtain information that you may bring forward into your present life.
This sacred experience – a vision quest is very personal and different for everyone. You are the one in control and do not have to answer or explain yourself to anyone- you can evaluate your results for yourself, then accept the validity of your own experience.
Past life memories come to us is in many forms such as dreams, deja-vu experiences, when visiting a new country (feels familiar). Some people may fear water, fires, public speaking and fear of heights. These are just a few common phobias. While visiting your past, you may discover that you drowned at death, hanged or burned at the stake, plane crash or falling from a high place. As you explore these past life traumas, the therapy begins and the phobias cease to exist afterwards. Emotional and physical challenges carried over from past incarnations into the present life can be quickly and effectively resolved through past life therapy in few sessions .
It can also be healing to discover why we have certain relationships with certain people in our lives? Why do we repeat the same patterns over and over? This process will allow you to experience healing or wisdom and gives us the opportunity for a new clean start, another chance to learn and grow towards our goal and spiritual betterment.
Many people believe that soul mates are the love of their life. Soul mate may be a soul that has been incarnated at the same approximate time as yours to help you uncover and discover parts of yourself in order to learn and heal in this lifetime. A soul mate can be a friend, a parent, a wife or husband or child. And the relationship may or may not be a kind or loving one.
The Sanctuary of Standard Scientology Technology is dedicated to Pierre Ethier: a Flag trained Class XII Auditor honored as The Best Auditor on the Planet for over a decade. 
You must be logged in to post a comment.