About L11

 A non Flag-and non interned Class IV  has broadly claimed he had “the Only original L11 Rundown from LRH himself including a step long deleted by bad people”. He had distributed yet another squirrel write up of L11 and will sure get in deep  trouble when someone is smart enough to ask for “evidence” about his fraudulent claims. Altered or improperly run rundowns, lack of set ups can make the PC sink or spin or simply can bring the PC in the La-La -Land of insanity . Lisa McPherson’s case comes to mind as one example of the devastating results. (  background update – Lisa died at Flag in 1995 right after completing L11 – this is 3 years after Pierre has left Flag)
L-11 has NEVER BEEN REVISED since 1971. In 1975 L11 Expanded was compiled based on cases and research done on L11 in 1971 and 1972, because public paying $25,000 started to object to the price when they had had less than 6 hours of auditing before attesting.  A few additional steps can be done in case of unresolving “Hidden standards” or case conditions, but a properly setup PC is unlikely to need anything beyond the basic steps.
ls-promo-what-are-ls-ot-max
2ls001 

Wall of shame

Ralph Hilton (with whom Pierre did not have any exchanges for over 10 years) yet still keeps stalking Pierre and originating EVIL attacks.
One example below:

I just came across this. It seems pertinent. While I have little respect for Pierre, what he says makes sense.

 

About this website

PIERREETHIER.WORDPRESS.COM
A non Flag-and non interned Class IV has broadly claimed he had “the Only original L11 Rundown from LRH himself including a step long deleted by bad people”. He had distributed yet an…
Comments
Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton It would be appreciated if Pierre would openly state whom he is attacking. This appears to be directed against Jonathan Burke .If it isn’t then perhaps he can clarify.
Jonathan Burke
Jonathan Burke Nah, I was trained at Flag, and I’m not a Class IV. Nor did I proclaim to have something deleted by the church.
Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton What Class did you train to?

Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton You claimed to have original L’s but have not shared them. If you do not make the materials publicly available then you will not have support.

Jonathan Burke
Jonathan Burke Not worried about that. They aren’t my find to share. I got lucky to have them shared. It isn’t my call.

Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton I think that you are lying. You do not have any original L’s.
Jonathan Burke
Jonathan Burke That’s your prerogative Ralph. You’ve been far too unkind with me of late to care.

Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton I was not kind when I saw your emeter film which was a technical degrade. I offered help to make it better but you refused it. Experienced auditors criticized it but you failed to correct it.

Jonathan Burke
Jonathan Burke Prime example, right there. Peace out old chap.

Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton Send a copy of your L’s to a few respected auditors.
Ralph Hilton
Ralph Hilton Frankie – I am not sure how that fits in this thread. I did read Pierre’s statements about meeting LRH in DC. I was in DC at that time and was quite certain that LRH was there.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon I wonder how any of you guys justify keeping *any* of the tech “secret” given the shades of night closing in and especially ever since the 1981 take-down of the Original OT Levels by Miscavige with support of government agents working for the Nazi CIA.See More
Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch Luckily, the original OT levels are available from many sources.
While I believe rundowns should be readily available, it would be nice to restrict access to those auditors with the appropriate training-level to deliver them.
In years past I have had to clean up several people who were put through rundowns by people who didn’t really know what they were doing.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon That’s… one of the justifications, unfortunately.

There is nothing you can do about bad auditors than to try to straighten them out. And the truly bad ones will invent a rundown if they do not have it.

(Witness the “SuperPower” compilation in the FreeZone Tech Vol. – and many thanks to Dan Koon for finally setting the record straight as to what was supposed to be SuperPower and how much of it we now have, which is most of it.)

There are solutions for that problem, but I’m afraid secrecy can’t be one of them.

References – Opening Essay to Dianetics 55, PDC #20 (on making Scientology a monopoly), LRH Essay “My Philosophy”

And the failures of religions past who imagined their top practitioners to be a priesthood with secrets…

Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch We have MOST of Super Power? I was not aware of that.
I was not aware that others are delivering the Consequences RD and the Perceptics RD. I would love to talk to those delivering those RD’s to compare notes.
Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch Because of all the bogus Super Power rundowns being delivered, several years ago I put together a Super Power interview for people who claim to have been run on Super Power in order to help them sort out the fact from fiction.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon Here is the entire write-up done by RTRC compiler Dan Koon.

I have my own notes on those two rundowns you mention and I would be delighted to compare notes.See More

Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch I too have these notes but as you can see, there are no ACTUAL rundowns in those notes, only some ideas of how they MIGHT be run. That is why I would like to compare notes with people ACTUALLY delivering these Rundowns.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon x Ron Fitch

here is a set of processes I am working on:

Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch That is a useful process, but is not what is done on the Tone Scale Consequences RD.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon Ah yes – I see that. What Dan Koon has written there is pretty straightforward…

WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF _YOU _GOT_ANGRY_?

Looks workable – using the main tone levels.

But I thing Consequences is generally a fruitful area and should be expanded beyond that.

Ron Fitch
Ron Fitch “What would be the consequences of Being Angry [all the time]”. There is a more detailed handling on each item, but this is the opening question.
Scott Gordon
Scott Gordon Part II (see above)

a) WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO -HAVE-? (DO, BE)
b) WHAT MIGHT BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THAT?